The Plant Cell, Vol. 14, 133-147,
January 2002, Copyright © 2002,
American Society of Plant Biologists
The early phase change Gene in Maize
Shifra H. Vega,
Matt Sauer1,
Joseph A. J. Orkwiszewski2 and
R. Scott Poethig3
Plant Science Institute, Biology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6018
3 To whom correspondences should be addressed. E-mail spoethig{at}sas.upenn.edu; fax 215-898-8780
Recessive mutations of the early phase change (epc) gene in maize affect several aspects of plant development. These mutations were identified initially because of their striking effect on vegetative phase change. In certain genetic backgrounds, epc mutations reduce the duration of the juvenile vegetative phase of development and cause early flowering, but they have little or no effect on the number of adult leaves. Except for a transient delay in leaf production during germination, mutant plants initiate leaves at a normal rate both during and after embryogenesis. Thus, the early flowering phenotype of epc mutations is explained completely by their effect on the expression of the juvenile phase. The observation that epc mutations block the rejuvenation of leaf primordia in excised shoot apices supports the conclusion that epc is required for the expression of juvenile traits. This phenotype suggests that epc functions normally to promote the expression of the juvenile phase of shoot development and to suppress the expression of the adult phase and that floral induction is initiated by the transition to the adult phase. epc mutations are epistatic to the gibberellin-deficient mutation dwarf1 and interact additively with the dominant gain-of-function mutations Teopod1, Teopod2, and Teopod3. Genetic backgrounds that enhance the mutant phenotype of epc demonstrate that, in addition to its role in phase change, epc is required for the maintenance of the shoot apical meristem, leaf initiation, and root initiation.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Sekhon and S. Chopra
Progressive Loss of DNA Methylation Releases Epigenetic Gene Silencing From a Tandemly Repeated Maize Myb Gene
Genetics,
January 1, 2009;
181(1):
81 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Casler and D. J. Undersander
Selection for Establishment Capacity in Reed Canarygrass
Crop Sci.,
April 25, 2006;
46(3):
1277 - 1285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Lauter, A. Kampani, S. Carlson, M. Goebel, and S. P. Moose
microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize
PNAS,
June 28, 2005;
102(26):
9412 - 9417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Chardon, B. Virlon, L. Moreau, M. Falque, J. Joets, L. Decousset, A. Murigneux, and A. Charcosset
Genetic Architecture of Flowering Time in Maize As Inferred From Quantitative Trait Loci Meta-analysis and Synteny Conservation With the Rice Genome
Genetics,
December 1, 2004;
168(4):
2169 - 2185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. HOCHHOLDINGER, K. WOLL, M. SAUER, and D. DEMBINSKY
Genetic Dissection of Root Formation in Maize (Zea mays) Reveals Root-type Specific Developmental Programmes
Ann. Bot.,
April 1, 2004;
93(4):
359 - 368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|