This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 19/5/1441    most recent tpc.107.050419v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in Plant Cell Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freeling, M. Articles by Thomas, B. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freeling, M. Articles by Thomas, B. C. Agricola Articles by Freeling, M. Articles by Thomas, B. C.

G-Boxes, Bigfoot Genes, and Environmental Response: Characterization of Intragenomic Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Arabidopsis^[W]

^a Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
^b College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail freeling{at}nature.berkeley.edu; fax 510-642-4995.

A tetraploidy left Arabidopsis thaliana with 6358 pairs of homoeologs that, when aligned, generated 14,944 intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs). Our previous work assembled these phylogenetic footprints into a database. We show that known transcription factor (TF) binding motifs, including the G-box, are overrepresented in these CNSs. A total of 254 genes spanning long lengths of CNS-rich chromosomes (Bigfoot) dominate this database. Therefore, we made subdatabases: one containing Bigfoot genes and the other containing genes with three to five CNSs (Smallfoot). Bigfoot genes are generally TFs that respond to signals, with their modal CNS positioned 3.1 kb 5' from the ATG. Smallfoot genes encode components of signal transduction machinery, the cytoskeleton, or involve transcription. We queried each subdatabase with each possible 7-nucleotide sequence. Among hundreds of hits, most were purified from CNSs, and almost all of those significantly enriched in CNSs had no experimental history. The 7-mers in CNSs are not 5'- to 3'-oriented in Bigfoot genes but are often oriented in Smallfoot genes. CNSs with one G-box tend to have two G-boxes. CNSs were shared with the homoeolog only and with no other gene, suggesting that binding site turnover impedes detection. Bigfoot genes may function in adaptation to environmental change.

Related articles in Plant Cell:

Bigfoot Genes and Plant Response to Environmental Change

Nancy A. Eckardt
Plant Cell 2007 19: 1439. [Full Text]