First published online May 11, 2007; 10.1105/tpc.106.049676
The Plant Cell 19:1458-1472 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists
The Two AGPase Subunits Evolve at Different Rates in Angiosperms, yet They Are Equally Sensitive to Activity-Altering Amino Acid Changes When Expressed in Bacteria[W]
Nikolaos Georgelisa,
Edward L. Braunb,
Janine R. Shawa and
L. Curtis Hannaha,1
a Program in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology and Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0245
b Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8525
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail hannah{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu; fax 352-392-6957.
The rate of protein evolution is generally thought to reflect, at least in part, the proportion of amino acids within the protein that are needed for proper function. In the case of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), this premise led to the hypothesis that, because the AGPase small subunit is more conserved compared with the large subunit, a higher proportion of the amino acids of the small subunit are required for enzyme activity compared with the large subunit. Evolutionary analysis indicates that the AGPase small subunit has been subject to more intense purifying selection than the large subunit in the angiosperms. However, random mutagenesis and expression of the maize (Zea mays) endosperm AGPase in bacteria show that the two AGPase subunits are equally predisposed to enzyme activity-altering amino acid changes when expressed in one environment with a single complementary subunit. As an alternative hypothesis, we suggest that the small subunit exhibits more evolutionary constraints in planta than does the large subunit because it is less tissue specific and thus must form functional enzyme complexes with different large subunits. Independent approaches provide data consistent with this alternative hypothesis.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Boehlein, J. R. Shaw, L. C. Hannah, and J. D. Stewart
Probing Allosteric Binding Sites of the Maize Endosperm ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2010;
152(1):
85 - 95.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Feiz, B. S. Beecher, J. M. Martin, and M. J. Giroux
In Planta Mutagenesis Determines the Functional Regions of the Wheat Puroindoline Proteins
Genetics,
November 1, 2009;
183(3):
853 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Georgelis, J. R. Shaw, and L. C. Hannah
Phylogenetic Analysis of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Subunits Reveals a Role of Subunit Interfaces in the Allosteric Properties of the Enzyme
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2009;
151(1):
67 - 77.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Boehlein, J. R. Shaw, J. D. Stewart, and L. C. Hannah
Characterization of an Autonomously Activated Plant ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2009;
149(1):
318 - 326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Slewinski, Y. Ma, R. F. Baker, M. Huang, R. Meeley, and D. M. Braun
Determining the Role of Tie-dyed1 in Starch Metabolism: Epistasis Analysis with a Maize ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Mutant Lacking Leaf Starch
J. Hered.,
November 1, 2008;
99(6):
661 - 666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ventriglia, M. L. Kuhn, M. T. Ruiz, M. Ribeiro-Pedro, F. Valverde, M. A. Ballicora, J. Preiss, and J. M. Romero
Two Arabidopsis ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Large Subunits (APL1 and APL2) Are Catalytic
Plant Physiology,
September 1, 2008;
148(1):
65 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-K. Hwang, Y. Nagai, D. Kim, and T. W. Okita
Direct Appraisal of the Potato Tuber ADP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase Large Subunit in Enzyme Function by Study of a Novel Mutant Form
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 14, 2008;
283(11):
6640 - 6647.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Boehlein, J. R. Shaw, J. D. Stewart, and L. C. Hannah
Heat Stability and Allosteric Properties of the Maize Endosperm ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Are Intimately Intertwined
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2008;
146(1):
289 - 299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|