Plant Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilmartin, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilmartin, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilmartin, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.

THE PLANT CELL, Vol 2, Issue 5 447-455, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Plant Biologists


RESEARCH ARTICLES

Spacing between GT-1 Binding Sites within a Light-Responsive Element Is Critical for Transcriptional Activity

P. M. Gilmartin and N. H. Chua
Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021-6399

Dissection of the light-responsive element (LRE) located between -166 and -50 of rbcS-3A from pea has revealed critical spacing requirements between the two GT-1 binding sites for light-responsive transcription. An increase in spacing between the two sites by as little as 2 bp reduces dramatically the rbcS-3A transcript levels in vivo. Mutation of the 10 bp between the binding sites leads to slightly lower transcript levels, as do deletions of either 3 bp or 8 bp. Deletions of 5 bp or 7 bp from between the GT-1 binding sites do not affect rbcS-3A transcript levels; however, a deletion of 10 bp virtually abolishes the activity of this element. These spacing changes within the light-responsive element similarly affect transcription of a divergently oriented and truncated nopaline synthase promoter. Most spacing changes between the two GT-1 binding sites, however, do not impair the binding of GT-1 to this element in vitro. Together with previous observations, these results suggest that the nuclear factor GT-1 may interact with the binding sites in either a productive or nonproductive manner and that GT-1 binding is necessary but not sufficient for light-responsive transcription. We also discuss our results in relation to the observed spacing of similar sequence elements present within other light-responsive promoters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. A. Manavella, C. A. Dezar, F. D. Ariel, M. F. Drincovich, and R. L. Chan
The sunflower HD-Zip transcription factor HAHB4 is up-regulated in darkness, reducing the transcription of photosynthesis-related genes
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3143 - 3155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Sampedro, C. Sieiro, G. Revilla, T. Gonzalez-Villa, and I. Zarra
Cloning and Expression Pattern of a Gene Encoding an {alpha}-Xylosidase Active against Xyloglucan Oligosaccharides from Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2001; 126(2): 910 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists