This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 20/8/2009    most recent tpc.108.060194v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by van der Hoorn, R. A.L. Articles by Kamoun, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van der Hoorn, R. A.L. Articles by Kamoun, S. Agricola Articles by van der Hoorn, R. A.L. Articles by Kamoun, S.

PERSPECTIVE

From Guard to Decoy: A New Model for Perception of Plant Pathogen Effectors

^a Plant Chemetics Lab, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany
^b Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom

¹ Address correspondence to hoorn{at}mpiz-koeln.mpg.de.

ABSTRACT

The Guard Model for disease resistance postulates that plant resistance proteins act by monitoring (guarding) the target of their corresponding pathogen effector. We posit, however, that guarded effector targets are evolutionarily unstable in plant populations polymorphic for resistance (R) genes. Depending on the absence or presence of the R gene, guarded effector targets are subject to opposing selection forces (1) to evade manipulation by effectors (weaker interaction) and (2) to improve perception of effectors (stronger interaction). Duplication of the effector target gene or independent evolution of a target mimic could relax evolutionary constraints and result in a decoy that would be solely involved in effector perception. There is growing support for this Decoy Model from four diverse cases of effector perception involving Pto, Bs3, RCR3, and RIN4. We discuss the differences between the Guard and Decoy Models and their variants, hypothesize how decoys might have evolved, and suggest ways to challenge the Decoy Model.