This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 20/9/2286    most recent tpc.108.060327v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Newbigin, E. Articles by Kohn, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Newbigin, E. Articles by Kohn, J. R. Agricola Articles by Newbigin, E. Articles by Kohn, J. R.

PERSPECTIVE

RNase-Based Self-Incompatibility: Puzzled by Pollen S^[W]

^a School of Botany, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
^b Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

¹ Address correspondence to edwardjn{at}unimelb.edu.au and jkohn{at}ucsd.edu.

ABSTRACT

Many plants have a genetically determined self-incompatibility system in which the rejection of self pollen grains is controlled by alleles of an S locus. A common feature of these S loci is that separate pollen- and style-expressed genes (pollen S and style S, respectively) determine S allele identity. The long-held view has been that pollen S and style S must be a coevolving gene pair in order for allelic recognition to be maintained as new S alleles arise. In at least three plant families, the Solanaceae, Rosaceae, and Plantaginaceae, the style S gene has long been known to encode an extracellular ribonuclease called the S-RNase. Pollen S in these families has more recently been identified and encodes an F-box protein known as either SLF or SFB. In this perspective, we describe the puzzling evolutionary relationship that exists between the SLF/SFB and S-RNase genes and show that in most cases cognate pairs of genes are not coevolving in the expected manner. Because some pollen S genes appear to have arisen much more recently than their style S cognates, we conclude that either some pollen S genes have been falsely identified or that there is a major problem with our understanding of how the S locus evolves.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. K. You, H. Y. Shin, Y. J. Kim, S. H. Ok, S. K. Cho, J. U. Jeung, S. D. Yoo, J. K. Kim, and J. S. Shin Novel Bifunctional Nucleases, OmBBD and AtBBD1, Are Involved in Abscisic Acid-Mediated Callose Deposition in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, February 1, 2010; 152(2): 1015 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Wheeler, S. Vatovec, and V. E. Franklin-Tong The pollen S-determinant in Papaver: comparisons with known plant receptors and protein ligand partners J. Exp. Bot., January 22, 2010; (2010): erp383v1 - erp383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Chen, B. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Sui, H. Zhang, and Y. Xue 'A life or death decision' for pollen tubes in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility J. Exp. Bot., December 30, 2009; (2009) erp381v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Suzuki Recent Progress in Plant Reproduction Research: The Story of the Male Gametophyte through to Successful Fertilization Plant Cell Physiol., November 1, 2009; 50(11): 1857 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. McClure Darwin's foundation for investigating self-incompatibility and the progress toward a physiological model for S-RNase-based SI J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1069 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]