Plant Cell Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online September 19, 2008; 10.1105/tpc.107.057521

The Plant Cell 20:2293-2306 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/9/2293    most recent
tpc.107.057521v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Efroni, I.
Right arrow Articles by Eshed, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Efroni, I.
Right arrow Articles by Eshed, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Efroni, I.
Right arrow Articles by Eshed, Y.

A Protracted and Dynamic Maturation Schedule Underlies Arabidopsis Leaf Development[W]

Idan Efroni1, Eyal Blum1, Alexander Goldshmidt and Yuval Eshed2

Department of Plant Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

2 Address correspondence to yuval.eshed{at}weizmann.ac.il.

Leaf development has been monitored chiefly by following anatomical markers. Analysis of transcriptome dynamics during leaf maturation revealed multiple expression patterns that rise or fall with age or that display age-specific peaks. These were used to formulate a digital differentiation index (DDI) based on a set of selected markers with informative expression during leaf ontogeny. The leaf-based DDI reliably predicted the developmental state of leaf samples from diverse sources and was independent of mitotic cell division transcripts or propensity of specific cell types. When calibrated by informative root markers, the same algorithm accurately diagnosed dissected root samples. We used the DDI to characterize plants with reduced activities of multiple CINCINNATA (CIN)-TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF) growth regulators. These plants had giant curled leaves made up of small cells with abnormal shape, low DDI scores, and low expression of mitosis markers, depicting the primary role of CIN-TCPs as promoters of differentiation. Delayed activity of several CIN-TCPs resulted in abnormally large but flat leaves with regular cells. The application of DDI has therefore portrayed the CIN-TCPs as heterochronic regulators that permit the development of a flexible and robust leaf form through an ordered and protracted maturation schedule.


Related articles in Plant Cell:

A Bioinformatics Approach to Investigating Leaf Development
Nancy A. Eckardt
Plant Cell 2008 20: 2283. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y. Berger, S. Harpaz-Saad, A. Brand, H. Melnik, N. Sirding, J. P. Alvarez, M. Zinder, A. Samach, Y. Eshed, and N. Ori
The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves
Development, March 1, 2009; 136(5): 823 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. A. Eckardt
A Bioinformatics Approach to Investigating Leaf Development
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2008; 20(9): 2283 - 2283.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists