Plant Cell SoftGenetics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salinas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salinas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salinas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.

THE PLANT CELL, Vol 4, Issue 12 1485-1493, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Plant Biologists


RESEARCH ARTICLES

Two G-Box-Related Sequences Confer Different Expression Patterns in Transgenic Tobacco

J. Salinas, K. Oeda and N. H. Chua
Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021-6399

We have analyzed the expression patterns conferred by two G-box-related motifs, a perfect palindromic sequence (PA, 5[prime]-GCCACGTGGC-3[prime]) and motif I (Iwt, 5[prime]-GTACGTGGCG-3[prime]), in transgenic tobacco plants. A mutant version of motif I, Imu, was used as a negative control. PA is present in the promoters of several different genes, whereas Iwt is a conserved sequence found in abscisic acid-inducible promoters. Previously we have demonstrated that PA and Iwt, but not Imu, can bind to the tobacco transcription activator TAF-1 in vitro, with the PA sequence showing a 70-fold higher affinity as compared to Iwt. We found that tetramers of PA and Iwt, which differ by only 2 bp per 10-bp repeat, confer very different tissue-specific and expression patterns in transgenic tobacco plants. PA confers preferential expression in root tissues with a low level of activity in leaves, whereas Iwt directs developmentally regulated expression in seeds beginning 15 days after petals have fully expanded until seed maturation. Imu appears to be inactive because it gives the same expression pattern as the -90 cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter control. RNA gel blot analysis showed that the expression pattern of TAF-1 mRNA is similar to that directed by PA, suggesting that TAF-1 may be involved in the transcriptional regulation of PA.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. E. Hudson and P. H. Quail
Identification of Promoter Motifs Involved in the Network of Phytochrome A-Regulated Gene Expression by Combined Analysis of Genomic Sequence and Microarray Data
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1605 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
T.-L. Jinn, J. M. Stone, and J. C. Walker
HAESA, an Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase, controls floral organ abscission
Genes & Dev., January 1, 2000; 14(1): 108 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
P. J. Rushton, A. Reinstadler, V. Lipka, B. Lippok, and I. E. Somssich
Synthetic Plant Promoters Containing Defined Regulatory Elements Provide Novel Insights into Pathogen- and Wound-Induced Signaling
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2002; 14(4): 749 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists