Plant Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (181)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chua, N. H.

THE PLANT CELL, Vol 4, Issue 4 485-496, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Plant Biologists


RESEARCH ARTICLES

Sequences Flanking the Hexameric G-Box Core CACGTG Affect the Specificity of Protein Binding

M. E. Williams, R. Foster and N. H. Chua
Laboratory for Plant Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021-6399

The CACGTG G-box motif is a highly conserved DNA sequence that has been identified in the 5[prime] upstream region of plant genes exhibiting regulation by a variety of environmental signals and physiological cues. Gel mobility shift assays using a panel of G-box oligonucleotides differing in their flanking sequences identified two types of binding activity (A and B) in a cauliflower nuclear extract. Competition gel retardation assays demonstrated that the two types of binding activity were distinct. Type A binding activity interacted with oligonucleotides designated as class I elements, whereas type B binding activity interacted strongly with class II elements and weakly with class I elements. A third class of elements, null elements, did not exhibit any detectable binding under our assay conditions. Gel retardation analysis of nonpalindromic hybrid G-box oligonucleotides indicated that hybrid elements of the same class exhibited binding affinity commensurate with the affinity of the weaker element, hybrid class I/II elements exhibited only type B binding, and hybrid class I/null and class II/null elements did not show any detectable binding activity. These binding activities can be explained by the affinity of bZip G-box binding homo- or heterodimer subunits for G-box half sites. These experiments led to a set of classification rules that can predict the binding activity of all reported plant G-box motifs containing the consensus hexameric core. Tissue- and/or development-specific expression of genes containing G-box motifs may be regulated by the affinity of G-box proteins for the different classes of G-box elements.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y. H. Song, C. M. Yoo, A. P. Hong, S. H. Kim, H. J. Jeong, S. Y. Shin, H. J. Kim, D.-J. Yun, C. O. Lim, J. D. Bahk, et al.
DNA-Binding Study Identifies C-Box and Hybrid C/G-Box or C/A-Box Motifs as High-Affinity Binding Sites for STF1 and LONG HYPOCOTYL5 Proteins
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1862 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. Freeling, L. Rapaka, E. Lyons, B. Pedersen, and B. C. Thomas
G-Boxes, Bigfoot Genes, and Environmental Response: Characterization of Intragenomic Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2007; 19(5): 1441 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. B. Maxwell, C. R. Andersson, D. S. Poole, S. A. Kay, and J. Chory
HY5, Circadian Clock-Associated 1, and a cis-Element, DET1 Dark Response Element, Mediate DET1 Regulation of Chlorophyll a/b-Binding Protein 2 Expression
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1565 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. Guerineau, M. Benjdia, and D. X. Zhou
A jasmonate-responsive element within the A. thaliana vsp1 promoter
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2003; 54(385): 1153 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Yamagata, K. Yonesu, A. Hirata, and Y. Aizono
TGTCACA Motif Is a Novel cis-Regulatory Enhancer Element Involved in Fruit-specific Expression of the cucumisin Gene
J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 2002; 277(13): 11582 - 11590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Medina, R. Catalá, and J. Salinas
Developmental and Stress Regulation of RCI2A and RCI2B, Two Cold-Inducible Genes of Arabidopsis Encoding Highly Conserved Hydrophobic Proteins
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 1655 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. F. Martínez-García, E. Huq, and P. H. Quail
Direct Targeting of Light Signals to a Promoter Element-Bound Transcription Factor
Science, May 5, 2000; 288(5467): 859 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. Nishiuchi, H. Kodama, S. Yanagisawa, and K. Iba
Wound-Induced Expression of the FAD7 Gene Is Mediated by Different Regulatory Domains of Its Promoter in Leaves/Stems and Roots
Plant Physiology, December 1, 1999; 121(4): 1239 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y. Lee, A. M. Lloyd, and S. J. Roux
Antisense Expression of the CK2 alpha -Subunit Gene in Arabidopsis. Effects on Light-Regulated Gene Expression and Plant Growth
Plant Physiology, March 1, 1999; 119(3): 989 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Medina, M. Bargues, J. Terol, M. Pérez-Alonso, and J. Salinas
The Arabidopsis CBF Gene Family Is Composed of Three Genes Encoding AP2 Domain-Containing Proteins Whose Expression Is Regulated by Low Temperature but Not by Abscisic Acid or Dehydration
Plant Physiology, February 1, 1999; 119(2): 463 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. Xiang and D. J. Oliver
Glutathione Metabolic Genes Coordinately Respond to Heavy Metals and Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, September 1, 1998; 10(9): 1539 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Frandsen, F. Müller-Uri, M. Nielsen, J. Mundy, and K. Skriver
Novel Plant Ca[IMAGE]-binding Protein Expressed in Response to Abscisic Acid and Osmotic Stress
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 1996; 271(1): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Logemann and K. Hahlbrock
Crosstalk among stress responses in plants: Pathogen defense overrides UV protection through an inversely regulated ACE/ACE type of light-responsive gene promoter unit
PNAS, February 19, 2002; 99(4): 2428 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists