Plant Cell
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scofield, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, JDG.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scofield, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, JDG.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scofield, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, JDG.

THE PLANT CELL, Vol 4, Issue 5 573-582, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Plant Biologists


RESEARCH ARTICLES

Promoter Fusions to the Activator Transposase Gene Cause Distinct Patterns of Dissociation Excision in Tobacco Cotyledons

S. R. Scofield, K. Harrison, S. J. Nurrish and JDG. Jones
Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom

To explore the effects of altering the level of Activator (Ac) transposase (TPase) expression, a series of plasmids was constructed in which heterologous promoters were fused to the TPase gene. Promoters for the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S transcript and the octopine synthase (ocs) and nopaline synthase (nos) genes were tested. These fusions, and constructs expressing TPase from the wild-type Ac promoter, were introduced into tobacco, and their activity was monitored by crossing to a line carrying Dissociation (Ds) in a streptomycin phosphotransferase gene (Ds::SPT). The SPT marker provides a record of somatic excisions of Ds that occur during embryo development. The patterns of somatic variegation that resulted from transactivation by each fusion were distinct and strikingly different from the pattern triggered by the wild-type Ac constructs. Unlike wild-type Ac, which caused transposition throughout embryo development, each fusion gave rise to sectors of discrete size. Sectors triggered by the CaMV 35S fusion were largest, ocs sectors were intermediate, and nos were smallest. These patterns appear to indicate differential timing of the activation of these promoters during embryogeny. Measurement of transcript abundance for each transformant indicated that the CaMV 35S-transformed plants accumulated approximately 1000-fold more TPase mRNA than plants containing wild-type Ac, whereas ocs- and nos-transformed lines accumulated about 100-fold and 20-fold higher levels, respectively. Measurements of germinal excision frequencies driven by the chimeric TPase fusions, however, indicated that increasing transcription does not necessarily result in an increase in germinal excision. These measurements showed that the ocs and nos fusions have very low rates of germinal excision. Only the CaMV 35S fusion transformants were found to have higher rates than the Ac constructs, although significant pod-to-pod variation was observed. Gel blot analysis of DNA from progeny carrying germinal excision events resulting from the CaMV 35S fusion showed that excision is associated with reinsertion and that siblings sometimes carry the same transposition events. These findings suggest that in tobacco there is no direct proportionality between TPase expression and Ac-Ds transposition activity. This possibility has important implications for understanding the regulation of Ac transposition and for designing efficient gene tagging systems.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Yan and C. M. Rommens
Transposition-Based Plant Transformation
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 570 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
I. Szeverenyi, R. Ramamoorthy, Z. W. Teo, H. F. Luan, Z. G. Ma, and S. Ramachandran
Large-scale Systematic Study on Stability of the Ds Element and Timing of Transposition in Rice
Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 84 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. J. Conrad and T. P. Brutnell
Ac-Immobilized, a Stable Source of Activator Transposase That Mediates Sporophytic and Gametophytic Excision of Dissociation Elements in Maize
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1999 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
R. Morita, Y. Hattori, S. Yokoi, H. Takase, M. Minami, K. Hiratsuka, and K. Toriyama
Assessment of Utility of Meiosis-Associated Promoters of Lily for Induction of Germinal Ds Transposition in Transgenic Rice
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2003; 44(6): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. R. Muskett, L. Clissold, A. Marocco, P. S. Springer, R. Martienssen, and C. Dean
A Resource of Mapped Dissociation Launch Pads for Targeted Insertional Mutagenesis in the Arabidopsis Genome
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 506 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. Liu, R. Wang, M. Galli, and N. M. Crawford
Somatic and Germinal Excision Activities of the Arabidopsis Transposon Tag1 Are Controlled by Distinct Regulatory Sequences within Tag1
PLANT CELL, August 1, 2001; 13(8): 1851 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Liu and N. M. Crawford
Characterization of the Putative Transposase mRNA of Tag1, Which Is Ubiquitously Expressed in Arabidopsis and Can Be Induced by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation With dTag1 DNA
Genetics, June 1, 1998; 149(2): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Jones, C. Thomas, K. Hammond-Kosack, P. Balint-Kurti, and J. Jones
Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging
Science, November 4, 1994; 266(5186): 789 - 793.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Plant Biologists