|
|
||||||||
|
Light Regulation of Fed-1 mRNA Requires an Element in the 5' Untranslated Region and Correlates with Differential Polyribosome AssociationLynn F. Dickey1,a, Marie E. Petracek1,a, Tuyen T. Nguyena, Eric R. Hansena, and William F. Thompsonaa Department of Botany, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7612 Correspondence to: Lynn F. Dickey, lfd{at}unity.ncsu.edu (E-mail), 919-515-3436 (fax).
Light regulation of Fed-1 mRNA abundance in the leaves of green plants is primarily a post-transcriptional process. Previously, we have shown that the Fed-1 mRNA light response requires an open reading frame, indicating that the light regulation of the mRNA depends on its concurrent translation. We now show that light-induced increases in Fed-1 mRNA abundance are associated with increases in polyribosome association that require both a functional AUG and a normal Fed-1 translational start context. We also present evidence that light regulation of Fed-1 mRNA levels requires more than efficient translation per se. Substitution of the efficiently translated tobacco mosaic virus
Fed-1 is a single-copy, intronless gene from pea that encodes the photosynthetic electron transport protein ferredoxin I. Like other nuclear genes that encode chloroplast proteins, Fed-1 produces an mRNA that is translated in the cytoplasm. The resulting protein is transported into the chloroplast, where it functions to transfer electrons from photosystem I to NADP+. In both pea and transgenic tobacco plants, Fed-1 mRNA and protein levels are higher in the light than they are in darkness. Interestingly, however, the light-induced increase in mRNA abundance that occurs in green leaves (as opposed to etiolated seedlings) is mediated mainly by an internal light-regulatory element rather than by the promoter (
Fed-1 mRNA abundance in the leaves of green plants is regulated by a post-transcriptional process. In dark-adapted transgenic leaves, mRNA from cauliflower mosaic virus 35S::Fed-1 constructs increases when reilluminated, but there is no accompanying increase in run-on transcription (
The Minimal Fed-1 iLRE
The 35S::CAT gene alone showed only a slight light response (L /D = 1.8 ± 0.3), and no further effect was seen when the CAT 5' UTR was replaced by the Fed-1 5' UTR alone (L /D = 1.6 ± 0.3). However, Figure 1 shows that increasingly strong light responses were seen when increasing amounts of the Fed-1 coding sequence were included along with the Fed-1 5' UTR. The Fed-1 5' UTR together with the first 13 Fed-1 codons conferred a significant light response in F136::CAT mRNA (2.7 ± 0.3), whereas the addition of more coding sequence in F158::CAT and F199::CAT (containing 21 and 34 codons, respectively) resulted in a gradual increase in light responsiveness. A response similar to that of wild-type Fed-1 mRNA was observed with the F236::CAT transgene, which contains 47 codons.
Translation Must Initiate at the Fed-1 AUG Codon
We next asked whether the chimeric mRNAs with a mutated (missense) Fed-1 start codon were translated as well as their unmutated counterparts. As shown in Figure 2, however, these missense mRNAs were not efficiently loaded onto polyribosomes. The control mRNAs (F158::CAT and F199::CAT) were found primarily in polyribosomal fractions in extracts from illuminated plants but not in extracts from dark-treated plants. This pattern is very similar to that of unmodified Fed-1 mRNA (
The Fed-1 5' UTR Is Not Simply a Translational Enhancer
We previously observed that light regulation was lost when the Fed-1 5' UTR was replaced by the bacterial GusA 5' UTR (
To assess the translational status of
Mutational Analysis
Between positions +16 and +31 of the 5' UTR (64 nucleotides from the start of translation), the tetranucleotide sequence CAT T is repeated four times, creating a 16-nucleotide element that we refer to as the CAT T repeat. We mutated this region in two different ways. The 14.1 mutation substituted 20 bp of an 85% GC sequence for the CAT T repeat, whereas the 16.1 mutation substituted 16 bp of a 37% GC sequence. In both cases, Fed-1 mRNA levels were no longer light regulated (Figure 4, constructs 14.1 and 16.1). Thus, the CAT T repeat region of the Fed-1 5' UTR is necessary for light regulation.
We next asked whether these CAT T repeat mutations also block the light effect on polyribosome loading. Figure 5 shows that the GC-rich mutation (14.1) largely prevented loading of the Fed-1 mRNA onto ribosomes. The majority of this mRNA was found in the nonpolyribosomal fractions of both light- and dark-treated plants, perhaps because the relatively GC-rich sequence of this substitution forms secondary structures that block ribosome binding (
In sharp contrast, mRNA from plants transformed with transgenes containing the 16.1 mutation was found mostly in polyribosomes in light-treated plants. Much less was in the polyribosomes of dark-treated plants, as is the case for wild-type Fed-1 mRNA (Figure 5). Thus, the 16.1 mutation (in which the substituted sequence has a GC content of 37%) prevented the light effect on mRNA abundance without affecting ribosomal loading patterns. We conclude that differential polyribosome loading per se is not sufficient to cause changes in mRNA abundance. In addition, because alterations in the CAT T repeat can block light effects on mRNA abundance without altering its polyribosome association, we suggest the CAT T region has an independent function distinct from any effects it might have on polyribosome formation. We asked whether the mutations of the CAT T repeat changed the absolute levels of Fed-1 mRNA from wild-type levels in the light or dark. Seedlings from independent transformants containing the wild-type Fed-1, 14.1, and 16.1 constructs were dark adapted for 40 hr and either illuminated or kept in the dark for an additional 6 hr. Because the absolute expression of Fed-1 mRNA varies among independent transformants, we pooled RNA from at least four independent transformants per construct. Figure 5 shows that the relative levels of Fed-1 mRNA in the light are constant in the wild-type and CAT T mutant constructs (14.1 and 16.1). In contrast, the relative levels of CAT T mutant Fed-1 mRNA in the dark are significantly elevated by at least twofold, suggesting that the CAT T repeat is important for reduction of Fed-1 mRNA levels in the dark.
The rest of the Fed-1 5' UTR was examined for discrete light-regulatory elements by using linker scanning mutagenesis, as shown in Figure 4. In construct 32, a 14-bp PstI linker was substituted for the Fed-1 sequence starting at position +32, a region that is homologous to a sequence in the Arabidopsis FedA 5' UTR (
Mutations of the Fed-1 start codon are known to abolish light regulation of Fed-1 mRNA levels (
The Fed-1 system is the only example to date of a plant nuclear gene in which a regulated change in mRNA abundance requires translation of the affected mRNA. Our data are consistent with a model in which Fed-1 mRNA is relatively stable when it is associated with polyribosomes, as is normal in illuminated plants, but rapidly degraded once it loses its association with polyribosomes, as it normally does in darkness. Recent data suggest a significantly longer half-life of Fed-1 mRNA in light- versus dark-treated plants (M.E. Petracek, unpublished data). We propose that increased turnover in the dark is facilitated by the primary sequence or unstructured character of the CAT T repeat near the terminus of the 5' UTR. Decreased translation initiation in the dark could expose the CAT T repeat region to nucleases, resulting in more rapid degradation of Fed-1 mRNA. Increased polyribosome association in the light might provide direct protection for translated mRNA or sequester it from the machinery that degrades nonpolyribosomal-associated Fed-1 mRNA. Replacement of the Fed-1 5' UTR with
The Role of Translation
Evidence that light-induced translation may be required for light effects on mRNA abundance comes from previous work in our laboratory as well as several findings presented here (
Second, we found that changes in the translational initiation context, as in the linker scanning mutation LS86, also affected light regulation (Figure 4). Altering this context, but not the AUG itself, would be expected to reduce translational efficiency. This hypothesis might also explain the fact that light regulation is abolished when the Fed-1 5' UTR was fused directly to the CAT reporter gene (Figure 1) or to the GusA gene ( In addition to showing that reducing translational initiation efficiency abolishes light regulation of the Fed-1 mRNA, our data suggest that a reduction in translational elongation rates can also abolish light regulation of Fed-1 mRNA. Constructs carrying decreasing amounts of Fed-1 coding sequence show decreasing amounts of light responsiveness (Figure 1). We speculate that constructs with more Fed-1 codons are translated more efficiently in plants as a result of more optimal codon usage by Fed-1 than by the bacterial CAT gene. In addition, our data suggest that Fed-1 coding sequences are more important close to the start of translation, where ribosome stalling might have more of an effect on the rate of initiation.
Consistent with the idea that disruption of translational elongation could affect the light response, we found that introduction of rare codons in linker scanning mutation 106 also had an effect on light regulation of Fed-1. Both codon 5 (CCA, encoding Pro) and codon 7 (UUG, encoding Leu) were replaced with CUG (Leu), which is a rare codon in tobacco (see
Although little is known about the effect of rare codons on mRNA stability in plants, it is known that codon usage must be optimized to obtain high-level expression of foreign proteins, such as the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (
Importance of the CAT T Region One feature of the Fed-1 5' UTR that may be involved in light regulation is the CAT T repeat element located between nucleotides 16 and 31. Two different substitution mutations in this region each blocked the normal light effect on mRNA abundance. Only one of these two substitutions, however, blocked the normal light effect on polyribosome formation. Therefore, we conclude that the CAT T element does not merely facilitate polyribosome loading in the light or unloading in the dark but that it may be a direct stability determinant.
Many studies have indicated that mRNA translation and turnover are intimately connected (reviewed in
Although most recent studies have focused on elements that destabilize unstable mRNAs, there is also precedent for translational stabilization. An example is the yeast PGK1 mRNA, for which it has been shown that inserting a strong secondary structure upstream of the AUG codon reduces both translational initiation efficiency and mRNA half-life (
Our data are consistent with just such a positive relationship between translation and Fed-1 mRNA stability. Light-induced increases in Fed-1 mRNA abundance are associated with increases in translational activity (measured by polyribosome association) in illuminated tissues, and both a functional AUG and a normal Fed-1 translational start context are required for the Fed-1 iLRE to regulate Fed::CAT transcripts. It is formally possible that the CAT T element could act to stabilize Fed-1 mRNA in the light, for example, by inhibiting a polyribosome-based degradation mechanism in a light-dependent manner. However, we prefer the hypothesis that the CAT T element somehow acts to increase turnover of the mRNA in darkness. This preference is based on the lack of precedent for small, discrete mRNA stabilizing elements in other mRNAs. In addition, translationally defective Fed-1 constructs (missense mutation of the AUG start codon, as shown in Finally, plants containing constructs with mutated CAT T elements tend to show relatively high levels of mRNA in both light and darkness (Figure 5). Comparing mRNA levels is potentially confounded by "position effect" variability among transformants with respect to rates of transgene transcription in various transformants; therefore, our conclusion must be regarded as tentative. However, we are currently working on direct, in vivo measurements of half-lives for mutated and normal mRNAs. These measurements should clearly distinguish between stabilization and destabilization effects.
Gene Constructions
Similarly, the F136::CAT, F158::CAT, and F199::CAT constructs were made by amplifying Fed-1 fragments from the 5' end of the message construct using the antisense Fed-1 primers 5'-AGA-TCTGTGCTGACAGCAGT T-3', 5'-AGATCTGGCTGAGTCCTGAGG-3', and 5'-AGATCTCCAT TGGAAAATGCT-3', respectively. F236::CAT was made by ligating the XbaI-BglII fragment from the message construct to the XbaI site of pBI121 and the BamHI site of the CAT gene. The CAT gene was followed by the nopaline synthase terminator. F158MS1::CAT and F199MS1::CAT were made as F158::CAT and F199::CAT, except that Fed-1 fragments were amplified from the Fed-1 template that had a missense mutation, ATA, at the start codon (
All of the constructs shown in Figure 4, except for wild-type Fed-1, were made by PCR-based overlap extension (
Transgenic Plant Growth
Clonally duplicated transgenic plants described above and used for mRNA accumulation experiments shown in Figure 1 and Figure 4 were transferred to soil and grown to midmaturity (height of 15 to 25 cm with approximately six leaves of 4 to 8 cm long). At this stage, plant pairs were dark adapted in total darkness at 22°C for 3 days, at which time one plant from each pair was returned to light for 6 hr (light intensity of ~240 µmol m-2 sec-1 between 380 and 780 nm). Developmentally similar leaves (the top two unfolded leaves) were harvested into liquid nitrogen, total RNA was prepared, and 5 µg of total RNA (as determined by absorbance at 260 nm) was analyzed by RNA blot analysis, as described by
Fed-1 or Fed::CAT mRNA was detected by using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) or radioanalytic imaging (AMBIS Systems, Inc., San Diego, CA) of the radioactive signals resulting from RNA blot hybridization using antisense RNA probes, as described by The plants used for polyribosome analysis shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 5 were grown from T1 seed that were germinated and selected on 100-mm plates containing Murashige and Skoog medium (Gibco), kanamycin (50 µg/mL), and 1.25% Phytagar (Gibco). After selection (~1 to 2 weeks), seedlings were transferred to the same medium without kanamycin and grown for 3 weeks in a growth chamber set on a 12-hr-light and 12-hr-dark cycle with a mixture of fluorescent and incandescent lights (light intensity of ~120 µmol m-2 sec-1 between 380 and 780 nm). At this time, the plants were dark adapted for 48 hr, and half of the plates were reilluminated for 2 hr. Leaves from at least 10 seedlings for each sample were harvested, and RNA was extracted and analyzed as described below.
Polyribosome Analysis
Fractions (1 mL) were collected by dripping directly into an equal volume of phenolchloroformisoamyl alcohol supplemented with 25 µL of 10% SDS, 20 µL of 0.5 M EDTA, and 5 µL of 100 mM aurin tricarboxylic acid. The resulting mixtures were immediately vortexed and placed on ice before centrifugation for 10 min at 15,000g at 4°C. Five hundred microliters of the supernatant was precipitated with 2 volumes of 95% ethanol and 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate at -20°C overnight. Precipitated RNAs were resuspended in 22 µL of 100 µM aurin tricarboxylic acid and glyoxylated (
1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of David Robinette. We are also grateful to Dr. George Allen for construction of the CaMV35S::CAT and F236::CAT transgenes and to the Southeastern Plant Environmental Laboratory for controlled environment plant growth space. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. MCB-9507396 to L.F.D. and W.F.T., National Institutes of Health Grant No. GM43108 to L.F.D. and W.F.T., National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship Grant No. 1F32GM15510-01 to M.E.P., and funds from the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Received November 3, 1997; accepted January 15, 1998.
Abler, M., and Green, P.J. (1996) Control of mRNA stability in higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 32:63-78[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Adang, M.J., Brody, M.S., Cardineau, G., Eagan, N., Roush, R.T., Shewmaker, C.K., Jones, A., Oakes, J.V., and McBride, K.E. (1993) The reconstruction and expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis cryIIIA gene in protoplasts and potato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 21:1131-1145[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].
Bevin, M. (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:8711-8721
Caponigro, G., and Parker, R. (1996) mRNA turnover in yeast promoted by the MAT
Caponigro, G., Muhlrad, D., and Parker, R. (1993) A small segment of the MAT Caspar, T., and Quail, P.H. (1993) Promoter and leader regions involved in the expression of the Arabidopsis ferredoxin A gene. Plant J. 3:161-174[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Davies, E., and Abe, S. (1995). Methods for isolation and analysis of polyribosomes. In Methods in Cell Biology, D.W. Galbraith, D.P. Bourque, and H.J. Bohnert, eds (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), pp. 209222. Dickey, L.F., Gallo-Meagher, M., and Thompson, W.F. (1992a). Ferredoxin gene expression and its regulation by light. In Control of Gene Expression, D.P.S. Verma, ed (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), pp. 221232. Dickey, L.F., Gallo-Meagher, M., and Thompson, W.F. (1992b) Light regulatory sequences are located within the 5' portion of the Fed-1 message sequence. EMBO J. 11:2311-2317[Web of Science][Medline]. Dickey, L.F., Nguyen, T.-T., Allen, G.C., and Thompson, W.F. (1994) Light modulation of ferredoxin mRNA abundance requires an open reading frame. Plant Cell 6:1171-1176[Abstract]. Diehn, S.H., De Rocher, E.J., and Green, P.J. (1996). Problems that can limit the expression of foreign genes in plants: Lessons to be learned from B.t. toxin genes. In Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, Vol. 18, J.K. Setlow, ed (New York: Plenum Press), pp. 8399.
Elliott, R.C., Dickey, L.F., White, M.J., and Thompson, W.F. (1989a) cis-Acting elements for light regulation of pea ferredoxin I gene expression are located within transcribed sequences. Plant Cell 1:691-698
Elliott, R.C., Pedersen, T.J., Fristensky, B.A., White, M.J., Dickey, L.F., and Thompson, W.F. (1989b) Characterization of a single copy gene encoding ferredoxin I from pea. Plant Cell 1:681-690 Gallie, D.R. (1993) Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:77-105[CrossRef][Web of Science].
Gallie, D.R., and Walbot, V. (1992) Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5'-leader responsible for enhancing translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:4631-4638
Gallie, D.R., Sleat, D.E., Watts, J.W., Turner, P.C., and Wilson, T.M.A. (1987) The 5'-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:8693-8711
Gallie, D.R., Lucas, W.J., and Walbot, V. (1989) Visualizing mRNA expression in plant protoplasts: Factors influencing efficient mRNA uptake and translation. Plant Cell 1:301-311
Gallo-Meagher, M., Sowinski, D.A., Elliott, R.C., and Thompson, W.F. (1992) Both internal and external regulatory elements control expression of the pea Fed-1 gene in transgenic tobacco seedlings. Plant Cell 4:389-395 Helliwell, C.A., and Gray, J.C. (1995) The sequence surrounding the translation initiation codon of the pea plastocyanin gene increases translational efficiency of a reporter gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 29:621-626[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Ho, S.N., Hunt, H.D., Horton, R.M., Pullen, J.K., and Pease, L.R. (1989) Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51-59[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].
Horsch, R.B., Fry, F.E., Hoffman, N.L., Eicholtz, D., Rogers, S.G., and Fraley, R.T. (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229-1231 Jacobson, A., and Peltz, S.W. (1996) Interrelationships of the pathways of mRNA decay and translation in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:693-739[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Jefferson, R.A. (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5:387-405[CrossRef]. Jefferson, R.A., Kavanagh, T.A., and Bevan, M.W. (1987) GUS fusions: ß-Glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6:3901-3907[Web of Science][Medline].
Kozak, M. (1988) Leader length and secondary structure modulate mRNA function under conditions of stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2737-2744
Kozak, M. (1994) Features in the 5' non-coding sequences of rabbit
Laso, M.R.V., Zhu, D., Sagliocco, F., Brown, A.J.P., Tuite, M.F., and McCarthy, J.E.G. (1993) Inhibition of translational initiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of the stability and position of hairpin structures in the mRNA leader. J. Biol. Chem. 268:6453-6462
Linz, B., Koloteva, N., Vasilescu, S., and McCarthy, E.G. (1997) Disruption of ribosomal scanning on the 5'-untranslated region, and not restriction of translational initiation per se, modulates the stability of nonaberrant mRNAs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. J. Biol. Chem. 272:9131-9140
Marcotte, W.R., Jr., Russell, S.H., and Quatrano, R.S. (1989) Abscisic acidresponsive sequences from the Em gene of wheat. Plant Cell 1:969-976
Muhlrad, D., Decker, C.J., and Parker, R. (1995) Turnover mechanisms of the stable yeast PGK1 mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2145-2156
Parker, R., and Jacobson, A. (1990) Translation and a 42-nucleotide segment within the coding region of the mRNA encoded by the MAT Peltz, S.W., Brewer, G., Bernstein, P., Hart, P.A., and Ross, J. (1991) Regulation of mRNA turnover in eukaryotic cells. Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression 1:99-126[Medline]. Petracek, M.E., Dickey, L.F., Huber, S.C., and Thompson, W.F. (1997) Light-regulated changes in abundance and polysome association of ferredoxin mRNA are dependent on photosynthesis. Plant Cell 9:2291-2300[Abstract].
Ross, J. (1995) mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Microbiol. Rev. 59:423-450 Rouwendal, G.J.A., Mendes, O., Wolbert, E.J.H., and de Boer, A.D. (1997) Enhanced expression in tobacco of the gene encoding green fluorescent protein by modification of its codon usage. Plant Mol. Biol. 33:989-999[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Sachs, A.B. (1993) Messenger RNA degradation in eukaryotes. Cell 74:413-421[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).
Savant-Bhonsale, S., and Cleveland, D.W. (1992) Evidence for instability of mRNAs containing AUUUA motifs mediated through translation-dependent assembly of a >20S degradation complex. Genes Dev. 6:1927-1939 Stewart, C.N., Adang, M.J., All, J.N., Boerma, H.R., Cardineau, G., Tucker, D., and Parrott, W.A. (1996) Genetic transformation, recovery, and characterization of fertile soybean transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cryIAc gene. Plant Physiol. 112:121-129[Abstract]. Sullivan, M.L., and Green, P.J. (1993) Post-transcriptional regulation of nuclear-encoded genes in higher plantsThe roles of messenger RNA stability and translation. Plant Mol. Biol. 23:1091-1104[CrossRef][Medline]. Thompson, W.F., Everett, M., Polans, N.O., Jorgensen, R.A., and Palmer, J.D. (1983) Phytochrome control of RNA levels in developing pea and mung bean leaves. Planta 158:487-500[CrossRef][Web of Science]. Van Hoof, A., and Green, P.J. (1997) Rare codons are not sufficient to destabilize a reporter gene transcript in tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 35:383-387[Medline]. Wada, K., Aota, S., Tsuchiya, R., Ishibashi, F., Gojobori, T., and Ikemura, T. (1990) Codon usage tabulated from the GenBank genetic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:2367-2368.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | THE PLANT CELL | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | |
|---|---|---|---|