Plant Cell Hybrigenics The Protein Interactions Experts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.
Plant Cell, Vol. 10, 539-556, April 1998, Copyright © 1998, American Society of Plant Physiologists

The Organization and Evolution of the Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Gene Family

Charles L. Guya and Qin-Bao Lia
a Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, Department of Environmental Horticulture, 1545 W.M. Fifield Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0670

Correspondence to: Charles L. Guy, clg{at}gnv.ifas.ufl.edu (E-mail), 352-392-3870 (fax).


* ABSTRACT
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

The stress 70 molecular chaperones of plants are localized and function in all of the major subcellular compartments of the cell. Collectively, all of the various forms are encoded by a multigene family in the nucleus. At least 12 members of this family have been found, and sequence and DNA blot analyses provide an emerging description of the diversity of gene structure organization for this family of evolutionarily conserved proteins in spinach. They exhibit not only structural diversity in the organization of coding and noncoding regions but also distinct expression patterns for different tissues and abiotic conditions. The results of phylogenetic analyses are concordant with at least four major evolutionary events that gave rise to stress 70 molecular chaperones in each of four major subcellular compartments of plant cells: the plastid, mitochondrion, cytoplasm, and endoplasmic reticulum. The varied expression patterns also illustrate the complexity of effectively interpreting the role of any one of these stress-related proteins in response to abiotic stress in the absence of context to the other members of the family.


* INTRODUCTION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

A diverse group of at least 11 different classes of proteins that show transient increased expression in response to a rapid increase in temperature comprises the heat shock proteins (Nover and Scharf 1997 Down). The heat shock response is common to bacteria, animals, and plants and is considered to be an adaptive mechanism to help a cell, organ, or organism cope with an unfavorable temperature condition (see Morimoto et al. 1994 Down). Many of the different classes of heat shock proteins function in protein metabolism as molecular chaperones (Ellis 1993 Down). Some function in biogenesis by assisting in folding processes and translocation into organelles; others are involved in assembly and disassembly of oligomers or proteolysis of damaged or misfolded proteins (see Morimoto et al. 1994 Down).

The Hsp70 (proteins of ~70 kD) class of heat shock proteins has been found to serve a variety of functions. Because Hsp70 is a major protein induced by heat shock, it has often been linked to the characteristic of acquired thermotolerance (Lee and Schoffl 1996 Down). An organism subjected to a short (1 or 2 hr) nonlethal heat treatment will subsequently be able to withstand a higher temperature and survive, whereas it would not be able to without the pretreatment. This survival at higher temperatures is the result of acquired thermotolerance. One way that Hsp70 might function in acquired thermotolerance would be to stabilize heat-labile proteins and supermolecular structures (Minton et al. 1982 Down) and prevent them from becoming irreversibly denatured or damaged.

Hsp70 can prevent irreversible aggregation of nonnative proteins by binding to determinants not normally solvent accessible in native conformations. The binding and release of nonnative peptides containing residues with nonpolar side chains are nucleotide dependent (Flynn et al. 1989 Down). Thus, Hsp70 proteins are composed of separate nucleotide binding and peptide binding domains. Binding nonpolar regions in nonnative peptides can prevent coalescence into an insoluble aggregate, thereby maintaining the peptide in a form that may be subsequently refolded to a native conformation. Peptide release from Hsp70 is associated with a cycle of ATP hydrolysis and release of ADP, which can be facilitated by cochaperones (Pierpaoli et al. 1997 Down).

The peptide binding and release of heat denatured proteins and prevention of aggregation during heat shock by Hsp70 have a more general application in cells. Proteins are initially synthesized as nascent linear chains without higher order structure. To prevent irreversible aggregation before folding and assembly can be completed for a newly synthesized protein, there is a requirement for constitutive Hsp70 peptide binding and release functions. Indeed, constitutively expressed cognates of the heat shock–induced Hsp70 (HSC70s) are now known for many organisms, including plants (Ingolia and Craig 1982 Down; Craig et al. 1983 Down; Duck et al. 1989 Down; Marshall et al. 1990 Down; DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down). Their role as chaperones of nonnative nascent polypeptides has many facets, including assisting at several steps or stages along the protein biogenesis pathway, stabilizing folded proteins, and participating in degradative processes of abnormally folded polypeptides.

Heat shock–inducible Hsp70 and the constitutively expressed cognates are encoded by gene families in most organisms. The yeast HSP70 family, also known as the stress 70 family, has been the most thoroughly characterized of all higher organisms (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down). The yeast stress 70 family has 14 known members, and most were discovered before the complete sequencing of the yeast genome (James et al. 1997 Down; Rassow et al. 1997 Down). The stress 70 family of Escherichia coli includes two members, dnaK and hscA (Bardwell and Craig 1984 Down; Kawula and Lelivelt 1994 Down; Seaton and Vickery 1994 Down), that encode proteins of ~70 kD and four additional genes that have stress 70 motifs and encode proteins ranging from 278 to 556 amino acids (Tatusov et al. 1997 Down). At least nine distinct members of the stress 70 family are known for Caenorhabditis spp (Heschl and Baillie 1990 Down), nine for Drosophila (Rubin et al. 1993 Down; Gunther and Walter 1994 Down), and 10 for humans (Mues et al. 1986 Down; Gunther and Walter 1994 Down). Many stress 70 genes have been characterized from a variety of plants, including both the heat-inducible (Roberts and Key 1991 Down) and cognate forms for all of the major subcellular compartments (Duck et al. 1989 Down; Denecke et al. 1991 Down; Lin et al. 1991 Down; Watts et al. 1992 Down; Wang et al. 1993 Down; DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down), but little is known about the family in any plant. However, without an understanding of all of the members in even one plant species, it is difficult to know fully how they contribute to cell function or recognize whether a new member in a second species is orthologous or paralogous with other known stress 70 genes. Similarly, it remains difficult to understand adequately the evolution of this important family of essential proteins in plants or higher order aspects of their developmental and environmental specialization and stress regulation.

Several classes of heat shock proteins have become important tools in our understanding of the molecular evolution of organisms, especially when it concerns the origin of mitochondria, because of their near-universal occurrence and the relative degree of conservation that facilitates sequence data comparisons (Bui et al. 1996 Down). However, only the evolutionary relationships of the small heat shock proteins (sHsp) of plants have been explored to date. The plant sHsp superfamily is composed of five (Waters 1995 Down) or six (Waters et al. 1996 Down) families that are hypothesized to form monophyletic groups (Waters 1995 Down). The different families are considered to have arisen by duplications that occurred before the diversification of flowering plants. The diversification that characterizes this heat shock protein family is thought to reflect a molecular adaptation to the unique environmental and developmental conditions that plants must withstand during their life cycle (Waters 1995 Down). When different sHsp families are compared, it appears that they exhibit unequal rates of molecular evolution (Waters et al. 1996 Down), as has been suggested for some of the subclasses of the stress 70 family (Ohta 1994 Down).

Here, we present the results of a comprehensive characterization of the stress 70 multigene family of spinach. We show that spinach has a minimum of 12 stress 70 genes, with most having one or more introns. The genes show differential expression patterns in a variety of tissues and in response to different environmental conditions. Using sequence and gene structural organization data, we show that members of the four major subcellular compartments of plants arose in four separate, independent evolutionary events. Furthermore, the family appears to have arisen from a series of duplications and divergences, of which some are considered to have occurred relatively recently.


* RESULTS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

Isolation of Clones
The stress 70 molecular chaperones of spinach are encoded by a gene family, and Table 1 summarizes all of the different members of the family currently known and their corresponding molecular clones. The coding sequences vary in length from 1941 bp for the cytosolic hsc70-1 to 2145 bp for the stromal form (hsc70-9). The number of amino acids encoded ranges from 647 for the cytosolic forms to 715 for the stromal form, which includes a long transit peptide.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Spinach Stress 70 Multigene Family

Protein Alignments
The complete deduced protein sequences for three new spinach stress 70 members (HSC70-3, HSC70-9, and HSC70-10) for three separate compartments are shown in Figure 1. These include the cytosolic, plastid stromal, and mitochondrial matrix. The first conserved motif ([V/A][I/V] GIDLGTT[Y/N]S[C/A]V) of these and many stress 70 proteins begins eight residues from the N terminus of the cytosolic members (HSC70-1 and HSC-3) but farther downstream in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal (HSC70-2), mitochondrial (HSC70-10), and plastid stromal (HSC70-9) forms because of their targeting presequences. We prepared a primer, CG24, that is positioned at the center of this motif. A second area of conservation begins at residue 145 in the cytosolic members and extends to residue 183. A short, highly conserved region of FDLGGGTFDVS begins at residue 204. This is the location for primers CG14 and CG144. From residues 240 to 339, there is a region of sequence diversity. Another region of diversity among the members was found beginning at residue 526 and continuing to the C terminus. The C terminus, depending on subcellular localization, tends to be conserved across evolutionarily distant organisms (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down), but it is clearly unique to each of the major subcellular localization sites in plants. For the cytosolic forms, the conserved sequence is GPKIEEVD; for the ER luminal member, it is HDEL; for the mitochondrial matrix member, it is PEAEYEEAKK; and for the stromal member, it is PEGDVIDADFTDSK. The C-terminal motif is known to be a subcellular localization factor for the ER luminal form (Munro and Pelham 1987 Down) and may function as an ATPase domain interaction/recognition site for the cytosolic forms (Hightower et al. 1994 Down). Whether the C terminus of the plant organelle forms have functional significance is not known; however, given their conservation, it seems likely.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Alignment of the Deduced Amino Acid Sequences for Five Members of the Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family Localized to Four Different Subcellular Compartments.

Figure 1. (continued).

Numbers at right indicate the residue position, and dashes indicate gaps that were introduced to optimize alignments. No attempt was made to align the targeting sequences for the three members localized to the ER (HSC70-2), mitochondrion (HSC70-10), and plastid (HSC70-9). Two members localized to the cytosol (HSC70-1 and HSC70-3) are also shown. The underlining indicates known or predicted targeting sequences (Gavel and von Heijne 1990 Down; Marshall and Keegstra 1992 Down; Anderson et al. 1994 Down). The reverse type indicates residues that match the consensus. The asterisks above the sequences indicate invariant residues. The italicized and bold and double-underlined residues represent points in the sequence where the N and C termini were truncated for phylogenetic analysis (see residues 2 and 618 of HSC70-1 for reference). The positions for primers CG24 and CG14/144 used for PCR are shown.

To date, we have sequenced nearly full-length cDNAs for six members of the spinach stress 70 family. hsc70-1 is 99.2% identical to a cDNA sequence designated as sce70 (Ko et al. 1992 Down), and hsc70-9 is 99.6% identical to a previously described partial cDNA sequence (chsp70) (Wang et al. 1993 Down).

DNA and protein sequence analyses limited to the coding regions for the six members revealed the degree of relatedness for the members representing four different subcellular compartments: cytosol, ER lumen, mitochondrial matrix, and chloroplast stroma. The two mitochondrial members are most similar to each other, as are two of the cytosolic forms (Table 2). The two mitochondrial members have 97.1% nucleotide sequence identity, whereas the cytosolic members (hsc70-1 and hsc70-3) are 84.3% identical. The protein sequences for the two pairs have an identity of 98.8 and 92.9%, respectively. The chloroplast stromal member (hsc70-9) had the least nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology with the cytosolic members. The ER luminal member was more homologous to the cytosolic members than to either the mitochondrial matrix or the chloroplast stromal members. In contrast, the chloroplast and mitochondrial members were not significantly more homologous to each other than to any members localized to other subcellular compartments.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of Spinach hsc70 DNA and Protein Sequences

Limiting the sequence comparisons to the portion of the ATP binding domain that is flanked by the highly conserved ATP interaction motifs (Flaherty et al. 1990 Down; McKay et al. 1994 Down), we were able to assess the relatedness of 11 members of the spinach stress 70 family (Table 1 and Table 3). This part of the DNA and protein sequences is highly conserved, showing minimum identities of 60.4 and 44.5%, respectively. Again, the chloroplast stromal member was found to be the most divergent of the family. A group of related members (hsc70-5, hsc70-6, hsc70-7, and hsc70-8) were most similar to the major cytosolic forms (hsc70-1 and hsc70-3) and most divergent from the chloroplast stromal member. At this time, we have not resolved their subcellular localization, but we suspect that they might be another complement of cytosolic stress 70 proteins based on their sequence and intron structure similarity to the major cytosolic members. Another cytosolic member (hsc70-12) originally designated as HSE is known by its partial cDNA (Ko et al. 1992 Down), and it belongs to the hsc70-1 and hsc70-3 subgroup.

 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Comparison of Spinach hsc70 DNA and Protein Sequences from the ATP Binding Region Encompassed by Primers CG24-CG14/144

Gene Structure and Polymerase Chain Reaction
Genomic clones for two of the major cytosolic forms have been characterized. Both genes have a single large intron that interrupts the coding sequence at the position where residue 72 downstream of the N terminus is encoded (Figure 2A). The intron for both lies squarely in the highly conserved ATP binding domain. The intron for hsc70-1 is 1034 bp, whereas the intron for hsc70-3 is 941 bp. The genomic structure for the ER luminal form had been characterized previously in our laboratory (Anderson et al. 1994 Down) and shown to have seven introns. Two of these reside in the same vicinity of the coding region, but neither of them is positioned in exactly the same spot as the introns in the cytosolic forms. Also in striking contrast, the two introns of the ER luminal member are small (103 and 111 bp) compared with the ~1-kb introns in the two major cytosolic forms. The ER luminal form does possess a large intron, but it resides in the targeting sequence for translocation into the ER (Anderson et al. 1994 Down).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Structural Organization and Intron Diversity of Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Genes.

(A) The structural organization of the cytosolic stress 70 genes is compared with that of the ER luminal form (Anderson et al. 1994 Down), a mitochondrial matrix form, and a plastidal stromal form. The coding regions (open boxes) are delimited by the translation start (ATG) and stop codons. Introns are indicated by gray boxes. Hatched boxes before and after the coding region denote noncoding upstream and downstream sequences. The vertically hatched boxes of the hsc70-3 {alpha} and ß genes represent a region of extreme sequence dissimilarity. The 3' end of hsc70-1 (undulating pattern) was not sequenced. Numbers above and below the boxes indicate the base position of the feature starting from the 5' end. The positions of two ATP interacting motifs and the products amplified by the two corresponding primers CG24 and CG14 are shown, as are all EcoRI sites. (B) Primers corresponding to two conserved ATP interacting motifs were used to amplify genomic DNA from a variety of members of the gene family. Individual fragments were cloned and sequenced, and the positions and lengths of the intron were determined.

Two genomic clones from the EMBL4 library, {alpha} and ß, were obtained for hsc70-3. They differed in length by a >500-bp extension at the 5' end of the hsc70-3ß clone (Figure 2A). Sequencing revealed that the two are 99.9% identical over the 5000 bp that include the entire coding sequence, the intron, and the 3' noncoding region. At position -877 (805 and 1340 of the {alpha} and ß clones), the sequences abruptly and completely diverge. We isolated two independent ß clones and many {alpha} clones, making it unlikely that the different sequences arose from a cloning artifact.

Using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach, we have also established the structural organization for a plastid and mitochondrial member. The mitochondrial member has four introns. Two intersperse the targeting peptide sequence, one is in the ATP binding domain, and the last is in the C-terminal domain (Figure 2). In contrast, the plastid stromal member has seven introns. None of these interrupts the targeting sequence. The spinach plastid stress 70 gene structure is relatively conserved compared with that for the pea plastid member, which also has seven introns in approximately the same positions (Casey et al. 1994 Down).

It occurred to us that with two exceptions (Roberts and Key 1991 Down; Dhankher et al. 1997 Down), almost all of the plant stress 70 members in which the genomic sequence had been obtained possessed one or more introns in the ATP binding domain that is flanked by two highly conserved motifs associated with the interaction of ATP at the binding site. The high conservation of these motifs has been maintained across kingdoms and provides a basis for designing primers that will amplify sequences from a variety of the members of this family. We used two sets of primers to amplify, from genomic DNA, fragments corresponding to a 190 to 200+ amino acid region of the ATP binding domain that encompassed the site(s) of insertion of the intron(s). Our initial primers were based on a limited set of plant stress 70 sequences. As more sequences became available for both the spinach family and other plant members, we redesigned the 3' primer to be more universally homologous. Figure 2B shows the diversity of fragments that were obtained with the first- and second-generation primers. As we had hoped, different members of the family possessed different numbers and sizes of introns and therefore yielded different-sized fragments. Six fragments representing eight different members of the stress 70 family were verified (Figure 2B).

We cloned and sequenced all of these fragments and used them to screen the cDNA library for representative clones. Suprisingly, a PCR product for hsc70-1 was not obtained. We have no reasonable explanation, because the second-generation primer is a perfect match for this gene class. This means that there are at least six different subclasses of stress 70 genes present in spinach. Also, we fully expected to amplify a fragment of ~600 bp representing a gene possessing no introns in this part of the coding sequence. After many attempts, no such product was produced, so it remains an open question whether spinach possesses a heat shock–inducible member of the stress 70 family completely lacking an intron(s), as do other organisms, including some plants.

At least five patterns of intron arrangement are evident for the various family members (Figure 2B). The mitochondrial forms have a single small intron of 81 to 84 bp in the ATP binding domain. In contrast, the ER luminal member has two small introns located at different sites. The stromal form has a single large intron in the region flanked by the ATP interaction motifs that is positioned more toward the C terminus than it is in any of the other members. The fourth pattern is represented in four members (hsc70-5, hsc70-6, hsc70-7, and hsc70-8). The large intron in this group is positioned more toward the N terminus than that of the ER luminal and plastid members and 6 bp downstream of where the intron in the major cytosolic forms is found (hsc70-1 and hsc70-3). The intron arrangement of this group is most similar in placement and size to that of the two major cytosolic members. The intron inventory of the plastid and mitochondrial members is not limited to the single intron described above. The plastid member has other introns 3' of the CG14/144 site, and the mitochondrial member has one intron in the C-terminal half of the coding region and two other introns in the targeting peptide region (Figure 2A).

Gene Family Complexity
The genomic complexity for the two closely related major cytosolic forms and the stromal and matrix forms was examined by DNA gel blot hybridization using full-length cDNA probes. Stringency was increased during washing until the radiolabel remaining on the blots was reduced to the minimum detectable (Figure 3). Based on the known EcoRI sites for the two cytosolic forms (Figure 2A) and genomic clone restriction fragments (data not shown), a total of five hybridization bands were expected. Fragments for the predicted {alpha} and ß genomic clones for hsc70-3 were found and confirmed the veracity of the clones. However, at least 12 restriction fragments were detected. Some were very strong, suggesting the existence of additional hybridizing members. hsc70-12 is a cytosolic member most related to hsc70-1 and hsc70-3, and it is probable that some of the additional strong hybridizing fragments belong to its gene(s) or possibly to other yet unidentified members. Alternatively, some of the weaker bands may belong to the other subgroup of members (hsc70-5, hsc70-6, hsc70-7, and hsc70-8), with more limited relatedness to the two major cytosolic forms.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. DNA Gel Blot Hybridization Analysis of Four Members of the Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family.

Genomic DNA was digested with four different restriction enzymes as indicated, and 3 µg was separated in an agarose gel and transferred to a Hybond-N nylon membrane. Hybridization and washing were accomplished at high stringency. The membranes used for hsc70-1 and hsc70-3 were stripped and reprobed for hsc70-9 and hsc70-10, respectively. The lengths in kilobases of all detected EcoRI fragments are indicated at left. Symbols indicate whether a fragment corresponds to the mitochondrial (vertical ovals), plastid (horizontal ovals), or one of the two cytosolic (open hexagon and filled box) forms or to a yet unidentified member (filled arrowhead).

The same membranes were stripped and reprobed for the chloroplast and mitochondrial forms (Figure 3). By reprobing the blots, it was possible to visualize potentially cross-hybridizing fragments as well as to resolve fragments that differed little in length. The patterns for these two organelle forms shared some differences as well as some similarities with the cytosolic forms, despite the high conservation of this family. What was most evident from these blots is that far fewer bands were detected for the two organelle members compared with the cytosolic members, which is a pattern that is similar to that found previously for the ER luminal form (Anderson et al. 1994 Down).

A strong signal at 2.2 kb was observed for the stromal form as well as for the two cytosolic forms. We know from PCR studies and sequence analyses that a 2.2-kb fragment is present in both forms of hsc70-3 but not in hsc70-1. Therefore, this fragment in the hsc70-1 blot is a probable cross-hybridization event. This fragment covers the last 300 residues of the coding region in hsc70-3. However, for the stromal member, the 2.2-kb fragment covers a coding region with an intron that begins at residue 86 and ends at residue 390, which is ~20 residues before the hsc70-3 fragment begins. Therefore, the 2.2-kb bands are unique, nonoverlapping fragments of the same size that are not cross-hybridizing.

Expression Patterns
The pattern of expression in different tissues at the RNA level for five of the stress 70 family members was examined. All five members were expressed to varying levels in leaf and cotyledon tissues, with hsc70-12, a cytosolic form, showing the lowest level of expression (Figure 4A). The expression of both the chloroplast stromal (hsc70-9) and the ER luminal (hsc70-2) members was lower in fully expanded cotyledons than it was in young true leaves, perhaps reflecting the declining importance of the photosynthetic and secretory functions of cotyledons as young seedlings shift from heterotrophic to autotrophic functioning. We did not anticipate that all five members would be highly expressed in roots, especially the stromal member (hsc70-9). In contrast, the ER luminal member was not detectably expressed in unimbibed seed. This finding is consistent with previous protein gel blot results showing that dry seed contained no detectable ER luminal stress 70 protein either (Anderson et al. 1994 Down). hsc70-12 was most highly expressed in dry seed, whereas the expression of the other cytosolic members was at their lowest. The patterns of the three cytosolic members in leaf and dry seed showed an obvious reversal of expression, indicating that they must function in a tissue-specific manner.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The Expression Patterns of the Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family Members Are Differentially Influenced by Tissue Type and Environmental Stresses.

(A) Total RNA was isolated from the indicated tissues of 3-week-old plants (three or four true-leaf stage), and 25 µg was fractionated in a 1.2% formaldehyde–agarose gel, photographed, transferred to a Hybond-N nylon membrane, and hybridized with 32P-labeled DNA corresponding to the indicated member. RNA was extracted from dry seed after the seed coat had been removed and from root tissue after all soil debris had been washed away. Ethidium bromide staining the 26S rRNA before pressure blotting verified approximate loading of the individual lanes. Film exposure was for 24 hr for all blots, except for hsc70-9, which was for 48 hr. (B) Total RNA was isolated from 4-week-old plants at the five or six true-leaf stage. Mature leaf tissue was obtained from fully expanded first or second true leaves and young leaf tissue from developing fifth or sixth true leaves. Plants were shifted from a growth temperature of 20°C by transfer to 37°C and incubated for 1 hr in the dark. Film exposure was for 24 hr for hsc70-1, hsc70-2, and hsc70-3; 48 hr for hsc70-9 and hsc70-10; and 72 hr for hsc70-6. (C) Plants were grown at 20°C for 3 weeks, and RNA was extracted from leaf tissue only. Water stress was imposed by withholding water until the plants became moderately wilted (~3 days) at 20°C. Plants grown at 20°C were transferred to another growth cabinet at 5°C with the same photoperiod (12 hr) and irradiance (~480 µmol m-2 sec-1) and held for 7 days. The heat shock treatment was the same as given in (B), except that the duration was for 2 hr. Wounding was accomplished by using a pair of forceps to systematically pinch the leaf lamina once every ~0.25 cm2 at 20°C. Samples were prepared at 1 and 4 hr after the completion of wounding. Film exposure was for 24 hr, except for hsc70-9, which was 48 hr. (D) Plants grown at 20°C for 3 weeks as given in (C) were transferred to a growth cabinet at 15°C for 1 day. The temperature was lowered to 10°C for 1 day and then lowered again to 5°C and held for 7 days. After 5°C exposure for 7 days, the temperature was increased to 10°C for 1 day, to 15°C for 1 day, and then back to 20°C for another day. Film exposure was the same as given in (C).

The RNA levels of all six members increased in response to a heat shock treatment that consisted of transferring plants from 20 to 37°C and maintaining that temperature for 1 hr (Figure 4B). The majority of the six members were most responsive to heat shock in older, fully expanded leaf tissue and generally the least responsive in hypocotyl tissue. This pattern was most evident with hsc70-6 and almost the opposite for the mitochondrial matrix member (hsc70-10). hsc70-10 showed stronger induction in the hypocotyl than in the other aerial tissues.

Distinct expression patterns for specific members were observed for three aerial vegetative tissues. Generally, young expanding leaves had higher steady state RNA levels than did fully expanded leaves. The lone exception was the stromal member, with highest RNA levels being in the older leaf tissue. Four of the six members had the highest levels of expression in hypocotyl tissue. Only with the matrix form was the expression level most balanced among all three tissues. hsc70-6 expression was very low in all three tissues compared with the other stress 70 family members; however, when heat shocked, it showed the strongest induction in older leaf tissue.

The effect of different abiotic or stress treatments on expression patterns in leaf tissue for five members of the family was evaluated by RNA gel blot analysis (Figure 4C). Water stress to the point of wilting invoked a unique pattern of expression that was most dramatically represented by the ER luminal (hsc70-2) member and for one of the cytosolic forms (hsc70-12). In the absence of stress, the ER luminal member expression level was high, but it became virtually undetected in water-stressed tissue. Its response was mirrored by the opposite trend with hsc70-12, in which expres-sion was strongly induced. Similar to water stress, heat shock (37°C for 2 hr) caused the mRNA level for the ER luminal form to become basically undetectable. One hour after systemic wounding, mRNA levels for the ER luminal form as well as for hsc70-12 and the stromal (hsc70-9) form were also almost undetectable. At 4 hr after wounding, the mRNA levels for the stromal member remained low, whereas those of all of the other members were again strongly expressed. Consistent with other experiments, low temperature stimulated the expression of most stress 70 members examined. The member most responsive to low temperature was hsc70-12, which was strongly induced, whereas the least responsive was the ER luminal member. Consistent with the step-down experiment, expression at 5°C appeared to increase for many of these stress 70 members.

The influence of reduced temperature on the expression of the five members in leaf tissue was plainly demonstrated (Figure 4D). Plants grown at 20°C were subjected to decreasing ambient temperatures to 5°C, followed by increasing temperatures back to 20°C. Lowering the temperature to 15 and 10°C caused an increase in the expression of the stromal member but had little or no effect on the expression of the other members. Holding plants at 5°C for 1 week caused a strong induction of one of the cytosolic forms (hsc70-12) and modest increases in all of the others. The sustained strong expression of all of these chaperones at low temperatures strongly suggests a need for chaperone functioning at reduced temperatures. Increasing the temperature from 5 to 10 and 15°C resulted in a slight decrease in the steady state levels for all of the members. However, returning from 15 to 20°C caused an increase in the steady state levels of all five members, with especially strong induction of hsc70-12 and the ER luminal and stromal forms. These RNA level increases at 20°C were unlikely to be a stress response. Because active growth resumes in plants returned from low temperature to an optimal temperature, the observed increases in stress 70 expression are most likely linked with accelerated anabolic processes, including increased protein synthesis.

Evolution of the Stress 70 Gene Family
E. coli has several genes related to the stress 70 molecular chaperones. One, dnaK, has long been considered the archetype for all stress 70 molecular chaperones (Bardwell and Craig 1984 Down; Liberek et al. 1991 Down). A second stress 70 member, hscA, was more recently characterized by accident as an open reading frame upstream of a ferredoxin (fdx) gene (Seaton and Vickery 1994 Down; Lelivelt and Kawula 1995 Down). We have used these two E. coli members in phylogenetic analyses of the spinach stress 70 family. Using the coding and protein sequences for six members representing four subcellular localization sites, we found that the neighbor-joining trees are rooted with hscA (Hsc66) for both the DNA and protein data sets (Figure 5A and Figure 5B). The first major branching splits the cytosolic and ER luminal members from the organelle members. dnaK appears to be a derivative of the ancestral form that later led to the organellar stress 70s. Not unexpectedly, the two pairs of mitochondrial (hsc70-10 and hsc70-11) and cytosolic (hsc70-1 and hsc70-3) members are most similar to each other. The amino acid sequence of DnaK is more closely allied with the mitochondrial forms (Figure 5B), as has been recognized previously (Neumann et al. 1993 Down), than to other forms.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Rooted Neighbor-Joining and Parsimony Analyses Using the CLUSTAL Program in DNASTAR and PAUP for the DNA and Protein Sequences of the Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family.

(A) and (B) The neighbor-joining method was used to analyze the truncated coding (DNA) and deduced amino acid (protein) sequences, as noted in Figure 1. Included in the analysis were the two members of the family from E. coli, DnaK and hscA (Hsc66). The scale at the bottom represents the branch distance as the number of changes in character states between neighbors. The number indicates the maximum distance. (C) and (D) The neighbor-joining method was used to analyze the coding (DNA and deduced amino acids) sequences for the region encompassed by two highly conserved ATP interaction motifs. Eleven of the 12 spinach family members were used in these analyses along with the corresponding sequences for the two E. coli members. The scale at the bottom represents branch distance as the number of changes in character states between neighbors. The number indicates the maximum distance. (E) and (F) The parsimony method was used to analyze the coding (DNA and deduced amino acids) sequences encompassed by the two highly conserved ATP interaction motifs. Ten of the 12 available spinach family members were used in these analyses, along with the corresponding sequences for the two E. coli members. The values on the branches indicate the number of bootstrap replicas supporting the branch. Only bootstrap replication values >50 are shown.

When these analyses were repeated to encompass only the conserved ATP binding domain region for all of the available spinach sequences, a similar relationship was observed most notably with respect to E. coli dnaK (Figure 5C and Figure 5D). Again, the trees are rooted by hscA (Hsc66). When comparing nucleotide sequences, dnaK appears to branch from an early derived form basal to all of the spinach stress 70 family members known to date. The chloroplast form occupies a branch all to itself, as do the mitochondrial and ER luminal forms. The major cytosolic forms are most closely allied with a group of sequences (hsc70-5, hsc70-6, hsc70-7, and hsc70-8) whose subcellular localization is not known. Based on sequence relationships, we considered that this other group may be a novel subclass of cytosolic members. In contrast to the DNA-based relationships, the picture obtained using the corresponding protein sequences follows that of the more limited comparison with the nearly full-length coding sequences. Again, a major branching divides the organellar forms from the cytosolic and ER luminal forms. DnaK appears to segregate with the organelle members, and this is consistent with the proposed prokaryotic origin of chloroplasts and mitochondria, even though both organelle proteins are now nuclear encoded. Another branching divides the ER luminal form from the remaining members, which includes the major cytosolic forms (HSC70-1 and HSC70-3). Should all of the other members that are closely allied with the major cytosolic forms function in the cytoplasm, then spinach will possess at least three distinct subclasses of stress 70 chaperones for this compartment.

Parsimony analysis produced similar tree topologies, but these were not identical to the neighbor-joining results. The branching patterns for the six nearly full-length sequences were almost identical to those shown by using the neighbor-joining method (data not shown). When the DNA sequences for a region of the ATP binding domain were analyzed, the tree that was rooted by hscA and dnaK formed a branch separate from the spinach sequences. However, the branching topology within the family shows the same overall pattern as that produced by the neighbor-joining method (Figure 5E). For the ATP binding region, parsimony analysis using the protein sequences yielded two equally possible trees. We selected the tree in which DnaK allied closely with the mitochondrial forms because of the correspondence to the neighbor-joining results (Figure 5F).


* DISCUSSION
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

Stress 70 Multigene Family
This study represents one of the most comprehensive analyses of the stress 70 gene family in plants. Previous work with this family in plants has concentrated on only one form or members localized to a single subcellular compartment (Wu et al. 1988 Down; Denecke et al. 1991 Down; Bates et al. 1994 Down; Joshi et al. 1996 Down). In most cases, no more than a few members for any given plant species have been characterized (Wu et al. 1988 Down; Bates et al. 1994 Down; DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down; Joshi et al. 1996 Down). Even for Arabidopsis, no more than five distinct members have even been identified (C.H. Wu et al. 1988 Down; S.H. Wu et al. 1994 Down; Koizumi and Sano 1997 Down), and one of these (Storozhenko et al. 1996 Down) belongs to the distantly related SSE group of yeast (Rassow et al. 1997 Down).

Here, we describe the full-length coding sequences for and the genomic organization of six members of the stress 70 family of spinach, which has members localized in the cytosol, plastid, ER lumen, and mitochondrion. In addition, we present sequence data and genomic organizational information on a total of 12 members of the family. That the stress 70 family of spinach has at minimum 12 members is not surprising. Yeast has 14 members, and 10 or more members are known or indicated for other higher organisms (Gunther and Walter 1994 Down; James et al. 1997 Down; Rassow et al. 1997 Down). Actually, we expected spinach to have more than the 12 identified in this study, because there are indications from genomic DNA gel blot hybridization data that uncharacterized members have not been isolated and therefore are not included in this work. This includes, in addition, any members of the SSE type that spinach might possess.

At the very least, plants should have more stress 70 members because of the presence of an additional organelle compartment that yeast and other eukaryotes do not have. However, this may not be true because there is recent evidence to suggest that a plastid stromal stress 70 member of watermelon can be dually targeted to the interior of the glyoxysome (Wimmer et al. 1997 Down). If multiple targeting of stress 70s in plants were common, this might explain the high degree of sequence identity between one of the major cytosolic forms (HSC70-1) (Li et al. 1994 Down) and the plastid outer envelope–localized Com70 (Ko et al. 1992 Down; Kourtz and Ko 1997 Down). In addition, multiple targeting would reduce the number of different genes needed to meet the chaperoning needs of the plant cell. The complete sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome in the near future will help to determine how many stress 70 genes are present in plants and to what degree multiple targeting may occur.

Spinach has three cytosolic members (HSC70-1, HSC70-3, and HSC70-12) and two mitochondrial members (HSC70-10 and HSC70-11). Plants are known to possess at least three cytosolic members (Wu et al. 1988 Down; Bates et al. 1994 Down; DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down; Joshi et al. 1996 Down), and the three cytosolic forms of spinach are homologous to those known from other plants. This work, however, has identified two other groups consisting of five sequences that are closely related to the major cytosolic forms in sequence and intron organization. The subcellular localization of these members remains unknown, but their close similarity to the major cytosolic forms suggests that they might be additional members that localize to the cytosol. Alternatively, the members of these two groups may have specialized functions at the membrane boundary of the cytosol and other subcellular compartments (Ko et al. 1992 Down; Mooney and Harmey 1996 Down; Corpas and Trelease 1997 Down; Kourtz and Ko 1997 Down).

None of the spinach genes characterized here corresponds to the SSB subclass of yeast (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down). In fact, a recent search of the GenBank database did not identify any plant stress 70 sequence that corresponded to the SSB subclass. If spinach does not contain the SSB homolog, then perhaps the function provided by the SSB proteins in yeast has been subsumed by one of the three cytosolic forms currently known in plants. In spinach, only one member localized to the ER lumen is known (Anderson et al. 1994 Down). This is in contrast to other species in which the ER luminal form appears to be encoded by a small multigene family (Denecke et al. 1991 Down; Kalinski et al. 1995 Down; Koizumi and Sano 1997 Down; Wrobel et al. 1997 Down).

Highly conserved signature motifs are present in all of the spinach stress 70 sequences. The sequence centered around residues GIDLGTT is a signature motif near the N terminus that is conserved across evolutionarily distant organisms. This sequence represents one of the ATP interaction sites of the ATP binding domain and has been recognized as a hallmark of this family (Bates et al. 1994 Down). The targeting sequence cleavage site of the ER luminal form is between residues 28 and 29, which is only 12 residues before the GIDLGT T motif. This places the N terminus of this form about the same distance from the GIDLGT T sequence as in the cytosolic forms that lack cleavable targeting sequences. Based on a proposed cleavage site (Marshall and Keegstra 1992 Down) for the plastid form from pea, the analogous site in the spinach plastid form is between residues 72 and 73, which would leave six residues preceding the GIDLGT T sequence. For the mitochondrial form, using the proposed pattern RX{downarrow}FS (Gavel and von Heijne 1990 Down), the predicted cleavage would be between residues 46 and 47. This would leave 11 residues before the GIDLGT T sequence. Therefore, although the targeting sequences for the noncytosolic forms are all of different lengths, the expected cleavage sites would result in N termini that are of similar lengths before the ATP interaction site (Flaherty et al. 1990 Down).

The C termini of the members are different depending on their subcellular localization, and the sequences are highly conserved and diagnostic for each subcellular site. The conservation of the C terminus of the cytosolic forms became apparent as numerous sequences for the cytosolic form from a variety of organisms were determined (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down; Joshi et al. 1996 Down), and it is considered to be important as an ATPase domain interaction or recognition site (Hightower et al. 1994 Down). The ER luminal forms all end with HDEL or a conservative variation of that sequence, and it is well known as the retention signal for ER luminal resident proteins (Munro and Pelham 1987 Down). Although only a few sequences for each of the plastid and mitochondrial stress 70s have been determined for higher plants, it is clear that the C termini of these forms are very conserved and diagnostic for plants (C.L. Guy, unpublished observations). The conserved sequences are PEAEYEEVKK for the mitochondrial matrix form and PEGDVIDADFTDSK for the plastid stromal form. The two spinach mitochondrial forms show a single conservative substitution of an alanine for valine in the C terminus, PEAEYEEAKK. Neither the matrix form nor the stromal C termini show high identity with the absolute C termini of bacterial DnaKs, cyanobacterial DnaKs, or other eukaryotic forms, but there is significant homology of the matrix form to a penultimate sequence of the DnaK (Bardwell and Craig 1984 Down): PEAEYEEAKK versus vdAdYEEiKd (where uppercase letters represent conserved residues and lowercase letters indicate conservative and nonconservative substitutions).

Stress 70 Gene Structure
All of the genomic clones of spinach stress 70 genes have at least one intron, and several have more than one intron. The two major cytosolic forms have a single large intron at the same position as that for a maize cytosolic heat shock–inducible Hsp70, indicating that this structural arrangement is conserved across distantly related plants (Rochester et al. 1986 Down). A closely related subclass that includes hsc70-5, hsc70-6, hsc70-7, and hsc70-8 also possesses an intron that is positioned six bases 3' of where the major cytosolic form's intron resides. In contrast, the positioning, size, and number of introns for the ER luminal, mitochondrial matrix, and the plastid stromal forms are distinctly different and characteristic for each form. The ER luminal form has seven introns dispersed throughout the coding region from the targeting peptide and in both ATP binding and peptide binding domains (Anderson et al. 1994 Down). The matrix form has four: two in the targeting sequence region and one each in the ATP and peptide binding domains. The stromal form has seven introns, with one being in the ATP binding domain. This overall arrangement of introns in the various members is striking in that they do not correspond with each other in placement or size, and their placement does not seem to define domain boundaries. So, it appears that as the gene family evolved, the exon–intron structure became set for the particular subcellular localization site for the encoded protein. However, the exon–intron structure is not conserved for all plants, as indicated by the fact that a pea stromal form (Casey et al. 1994 Down) has seven introns, as does spinach, whereas a Chlamydomonas homolog has only five introns (Drzymalla et al. 1996 Down).

Stress 70 Gene Family Complexity
Genomic DNA gel blot analyses for four members of the family provide additional information on the complexity of the family. Previous studies with the ER luminal form (Anderson et al. 1994 Down) did not uncover any evidence that it is encoded by a multigene family, as appears to be the case in a number of species (Denecke et al. 1991 Down; Kalinski et al. 1995 Down; Koizumi and Sano 1997 Down; Wrobel et al. 1997 Down). Similar to the ER luminal member of spinach, genomic gel blot analyses for the matrix and the stromal forms suggest that these forms are not encoded by large multigene families. In contrast, the complexity of the cytosolic forms is much greater and suggests that the members that localize to the cytosol are encoded by a multigene family. Many of the restriction fragments can be accounted for, but there remain at least five fragments (0.8, 0.9, 2.6, 7.0, and 10.5 kb) that must belong to hsc70-12 or the hsc70-4 to hsc70-8 group or some as yet unidentified member. Yeast has six members belonging to two different subclasses that localize to the cytosol (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down; Rassow et al. 1997 Down), if the SSE types are excluded. If the spinach subclasses of hsc70-4 and hsc70-5 to hsc70-8 function in the cytosol, then spinach will have at least eight members that function in this compartment. However, we expect that there are additional members as yet to be identified.

Expression Patterns
Comprehensive studies that include many family members can better reveal the functional diversification that now exists within the stress 70 multigene family. Numerous studies using a variety of stress 70 members localized to different compartments in different species have consistently demonstrated differential expression patterns with respect to specific tissues, developmental stage, and environmental parameters (Rochester et al. 1986 Down; Duck et al. 1989 Down; Denecke et al. 1991 Down; Roberts and Key 1991 Down; Anderson et al. 1994 Down; DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down; Kalinski et al. 1995 Down; Dhankher et al. 1997 Down). Almost always, such analyses have been conducted with one member or at best three members. Therefore, although there is much information about the individual expression patterns, there is little information regarding the response of multiple members of the family to any environmental or developmental parameter. Although we have not completed an analysis with all members of the family, we show results for as many as six members localized to four different subcellular compartments. What is evident from the results is that the members of the family show specificity or differential expression in response to developmental or environmental parameters, as expected (DeRocher and Vierling 1995 Down). However, there appears to be substantial coordinate regulation of many members that is dependent on the particular developmental or environmental parameter that could not be predicted easily from the fragmentary analyses with individual members from different plants.

The six members included in these analyses were expressed to varying levels in leaf and hypocotyl tissue at a nonstressful temperature as well as in response to heat shock. In addition, five of the members were highly expressed at low temperatures; in the case of hsc70-1, hsc70-9, and hsc70-12, the RNA levels were significantly increased. This suggests that the functions of the stress 70 molecular chaperones are required at low temperatures in spinach and in particular may require a degree of enhanced expression for some members in a fashion analogous to that required during heat shock. The finding of continued or increased expression of the stress 70 molecular chaperones at low temperatures is consistent with the identification of a cold shock–regulated homolog of DnaK in E. coli (Lelivelt and Kawula 1995 Down) and mutations in yeast stress 70 members that result in cold-sensitive phenotypes (Craig and Jacobsen 1985 Down; Schilke et al. 1996 Down).

Evolution of Spinach Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family
Several studies using stress 70 family sequences have been conducted. Gupta and Golding 1993 Down used 57 full-length sequences from a wide variety of organisms. Their analyses indicated that the E. coli protein MreB is a truncated variant of Hsp70 and is most likely derived from the same ancestral gene that gave rise to Hsp70 before the addition of the C-terminal peptide binding domain. They proposed a model to explain the evolution of the Hsp70 gene family, concluding that it occurred in six steps, of which the first four took place in the ancestor of all present-day life forms. Two subsequent studies used 36 (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down) and 33 (Rensing and Maier 1994 Down) sequences, respectively. Boorstein et al. 1994 Down found that the Hsp70 family in eukaryotes consists of four monophyletic groups, each corresponding to a particular subcellular localization. They concluded that the major eukaryotic stress 70 groups arose before divergence of eukaryotes 2 billion years ago. In contrast, Rensing and Maier 1994 Down found that the tree divided into three major clusters: chlorobionts, protozoans, and animal cognates. The mitochondrial Hsp70 was concluded to be a monophyletic group of prokaryotic origin (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down) in one study, whereas in the other, the mitochondrial and chloroplast stress 70s split into two groups, with DnaK types in each.

Taking a narrower view by using only the spinach sequences and two members from E. coli, our results are consistent with a model that the plastid and mitochondrial forms arose from two independent endosymbionic events in which the mitochondrial form was contributed by a lineage that had diverged from the line that gave rise to the plastid endosymbiont. Interestingly, the cyanobacterial DnaK proteins cluster with the higher plant chloroplast stress 70 proteins, which is consistent with the belief that they are the progenitors of chloroplasts (Wang et al. 1993 Down; Rensing and Maier 1994 Down). More recent studies in our laboratory with 37 plant and cyanobacterial sequences support the linkage of the plastid stromal form with cyanobacterial DnaKs, whereas the mitochondrial matrix form is more closely allied with eubacterial DnaK of E. coli. This result was further supported by an analysis using >150 stress 70 sequences from bacteria, fungi, animals, and plants (C.L. Guy, unpublished data). However, with the spinach stress 70 family, intron–exon structure and arrangement also support the evolution of the family because the members localized to each of four subcellular compartments exhibit distinct organizational patterns. It may be that the diversity in the structural organization of the stress 70 genes in spinach has a functional significance in gene regulation processes or that it is simply the consequence of sequence divergence over evolutionary time.

We see a remarkable concordance of the phylogenetic relationships of the stress 70 family and that of the sHsp superfamily (Waters 1995 Down; Waters et al. 1996 Down). The similarity seen in the general branching patterns for these two classes of heat shock protein gene families representing protein members localized to four different subcellular compartments could be merely coincidental but more likely reflects the evolution of the functional specialization of the different subcellular compartments. If the two classes of heat shock proteins are necessary for the proper operation of a subcellular compartment in plants (and most would agree that this is true), then it seems that the two classes of proteins could reflect the more general evolution of the plant cell structure and function. Already, heat shock proteins have been used by others to address questions of mitochondrial origins (Bui et al. 1996 Down). Therefore, the evolution of different classes of heat shock proteins, and any set of proteins necessary for the proper functioning of multiple subcellular compartments in plants, could hold important clues to help unravel eukaryotic evolution leading to present-day plant cells.

Domain analysis has shown that the N terminus domain is more conserved than the C terminus domain (Boorstein et al. 1994 Down), and the nonlinear rate of divergence between the ATPase and the peptide binding domains indicates a functional divergence between two or more groups of related genes (Hughes 1993 Down). In a study of the Hsp70 genes of Giardia, Gupta et al. 1994 Down found that the cytosolic and ER homologs form distinct groups, indicating that the two groupings arose as a result of a gene duplication very early in the evolution of eukaryotic cells and presumably accompanied the evolution of the ER or the nucleus. Giardia is a protozoan that lacks mitochondria. Based on other evidence, it is considered to be the earliest diverging lineage of eukaryotes; hence, the assertion that duplication and divergence of the Hsp70s was an early event in eukaryotic evolution. Our results also support this conclusion, but the ER luminal stress 70 form appears to have arisen well after the endosymbiosis events that contributed the plastid and the mitochondrial members (Figure 6).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Model for the Evolution of the Stress 70 Molecular Chaperone Family in Spinach.

Closed boxes represent known genes, and hatched boxes represent theoretical progenitors. Uncolored boxes have not become a specific form or lineage; color indicates a progenitor to a specific group.

That gene duplication was central to the multiplicity of the Hsp70 sequences in eukaryotes was further supported by the analyses of Ohta 1994 Down. In that study, the sequences of three inducible, three cognate, and two testis-specific orthologous forms from mammals were analyzed along with other types of genes. The Hsp70 cognates showed very low nonsynonymous substitutions, whereas the inducible and testis-specific forms showed higher rates of nonsynonymous substitutions, indicating divergence and the acquisition of new function.

Sequence analyses and intron–exon organization provide evidence for at least three distinct subclasses that have evolved since the divergence of the ER luminal form from the cytosolic forms. One subclass contains three distinct cytosolic members, but the subcellular localization of the other two subclasses remains to be determined. Given the high degree of sequence relatedness with the cytosolic forms, we suspect that these two subclasses may also localize to the cytosol. These two subclasses contain members that are expressed at low levels under nonstressed conditions (Figure 4B, hsc70-6) but appear to be responsive to stressful conditions (Q.-B. Li and C.L. Guy, unpublished data). If they indeed do function in the cytosol, they may have completed some degree of divergence and may have specialized functions that are different from that of the major cytosolic forms. Several reports have identified stress 70 members tightly associated with the outer membranes of chloroplasts (Schnell et al. 1994 Down; Kourtz and Ko 1997 Down) and mitochondria (Mooney and Harmey 1996 Down) and more recently with peroxisomes (Corpas and Trelease 1997 Down). To date, these membrane-bound stress 70 forms are thought to function in protein translocation into the organelles. Perhaps this function can be performed by the major cytosolic forms or may require a separate and distinct subclass of the stress 70 chaperones. Frequently, individual members of a gene family with a high degree of identity are found tightly linked (Koes et al. 1987 Down). The chromosomal positions of the spinach stress 70 members are not known.

In a larger analysis with all available plant stress 70 sequences, the cytosolic grouping is complex and the branching pattern does not necessarily follow established taxonomic relationships. This appears to be caused by the fact that the cytosolic stress 70 proteins in plants are encoded by genes that probably belong to two or more subclasses. Quite likely, not all of the sequences represented in this larger analysis are orthologous. In fact, the cytosolic grouping appears to include several paralogous sequences.

Sequences from the same species are not always the most closely related to each other, as was observed with some of the ER forms. Examples of this were seen with sequences from pea and tomato. This suggests that the duplication events that gave rise to the various cytosolic forms occurred much earlier, and divergence to some degree has taken place. However, within the spinach family, we find discrete members that show almost no sequence variation even in noncoding and intron sequences. One example includes the two mitochondrial members hsc70-10 and hsc70-11. This lack of variation indicates to us that duplication events occurred recently. Another example would be the finding of the hsc70-3{alpha} and hsc70-3ß sequences. These two members show eight differences over 5100 bp (99.8% identity), including coding and noncoding regions, but abruptly diverge and show no sequence identity for >800 bp. The divergence occurs at position -877, and we think this is the insertion site of a duplication event. If this is correct, then using the number of substitution events in the homologous region and an average substitution rate of 3.65 x 10-9 substitutions per site per year estimated from a number of angiosperm genes (Curtis and Clegg 1984 Down; Gaut et al. 1996 Down; Moniz de Sa and Drouin 1996 Down; Zhou and Kleinhofs 1996 Down), it is estimated that this duplication event could have occurred ~4.3 x 105 years ago. In contrast, the GS3A and GS3B genes of pea are almost as conserved but probably are not a recent duplication, based on their presence in ancient relatives of Pisum spp (Walker et al. 1995 Down).


* METHODS
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

Plant Material
Spinach (Spinacia oleracea cv Bloomsdale) seedlings were grown from seeds under controlled environmental conditions previously described by Guy and Haskell 1987 Down. Low-temperature treatment was conducted with a 12-hr photoperiod, as described previously (Guy and Haskell 1987 Down).

cDNA Library Construction and Screening
Preparation of total RNA and isolation of poly(A)+ RNA from 2-day cold-acclimated leaf tissue and the construction of a cDNA library were described previously (Neven et al. 1993 Down). The cDNA library was screened by in situ plaque hybridization using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products as hybridization probes. These probes were prepared from total cDNA by PCR using primers to highly conserved regions in the N-terminal ATPase domain (Flaherty et al. 1990 Down). The 5' (CG24) and 3' (CG14 or CG144) oligonucleotides were GGTAT TGA(CT)CTCGGTACCAC(CT)TAC and TCCACCACCAAGGTC- GAAGAC or AA(AG)AGT TCC(AC)CCTCCAAG(AG)TCAAA, respectively. Positive plaques were excised in vivo.

Genomic Library Construction and Screening
DNA was extracted from 20 g of leaf tissue, as described by Ausubel et al. 1989 Down. A genomic library was constructed by ligating partial EcoRI-digested genomic DNA (>2 kb) into the EMBL4 phagemid vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Approximately 500,000 plaques were screened using randomly primed {alpha}-32P-dCTP–labeled hsc70-1, hsc70-2, and hsc70-3 full-length cDNAs.

PCR Amplification of Genomic DNA and Library cDNA
Synthetic primers were constructed to conserved regions of hsp70 genes. Genomic DNA and library cDNA were amplified using Taq polymerase, according to the directions of the manufacturer (Perkin-Elmer Cetus). The 5' and 3' primers were CG24 and CG14 or CG144, respectively. PCR included an initial denaturation of 3 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55 to 60°C, 2 to 4 min at 72°C (according the PCR product length), and a final 10-min extension at 72°C. The fragments were purified and cloned into the pGEM-T (Promega) vector (Li and Guy 1996 Down).

DNA Sequencing and Comparative Analysis
DNA sequencing was accomplished by using the Taq dideoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) on an automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). DNA sequences were further analyzed using DNASTAR (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI). Homology searches were done with BLAST (Altschul et al. 1990 Down).

DNA and RNA Gel Blotting
Total DNA and RNA were extracted from leaf tissue, as described by Sambrook et al. 1989 Down. DNA gel blotting was performed using total DNA digested with a 10-fold excess of restriction endonuclease. Digested DNA was electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gel in Tris–acetate–EDTA buffer. The gels were then pressure blotted onto Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and UV cross-linked (1.2 x 105 µJ/cm2). RNA gel blotting was performed as described by Sambrook et al. 1989 Down. Total RNA was electrophoresed in 1.2% formaldehyde agarose gels in Mops–sodium acetate–EDTA buffer. Denatured RNA gels were then pressure blotted onto Hybond-N nylon membranes and UV cross-linked. Prehybridization of DNA and RNA blots was accomplished using 50% formamide, 5 x sodium chloride–sodium phosphate–EDTA, 5 x Denhardt's solution (1 x Denhardt's solution is 5 g of Ficoll, 5 g of PVP, and 5 g of BSA in 500 mL of water), 0.2% SDS, and 10 µg/mL salmon sperm DNA at 42°C for 4 hr. An {alpha}-32P-dCTP randomly labeled DNA probe (the entire cDNA as designated or cloned PCR DNA for hsc70-6; see Table 1) was added to the prehybridization buffer and allowed to hybridize with the filter for ~16 hr at 42°C. After hybridization, the DNA gel blots were each washed once in 2 x, 1 x, and 0.5 x sodium chloride–sodium citrate (SSC) plus 0.2% SDS for 15 min at 42°C. RNA gel blots were each washed once in 6 x, 2 x, 1 x, and 0.5 x SSC plus 0.2% SDS for 15 min at 42°C, followed by a 10-min wash in 0.1 x SSC plus 0.2% SDS at 50 to 65°C, according to the amount of radioisotope remaining on the blot.

DNA and Protein Sequence Analysis
Initial DNA or amino acid sequence alignments were performed using CLUSTAL in the DNASTAR sequence analysis software. Alignments were further refined manually. All sequences were truncated to include only that portion that could be aligned unambiguously. The aligned sequences were analyzed by the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987 Down) and parsimony using PAUP 3.1.1 (Swofford 1993 Down). The PAUP parameters were set for multistate, unordered, and unweighted analyses, keeping all characters with branch and bound. Bootstrapping was done with 100 replicates.


* ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Kenton Ko and Tom Leustek for providing cDNA clones HSE and Chsp70 for spinach stress 70 genes and Wesley Higgins for assistance with phylogenetic analyses. We also thank Dale Haskell, Chun Zhang, and Dong-Yul Sung for their constructive comments and discussion during preparation of the manuscript. We especially appreciate the efforts of three anonymous reviewers whose reviews helped us substantially improve this work. Facilities and assistance for DNA sequencing and computer services were provided by the core laboratories of the Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research. This research was supported by Grant No. IBN 93-17540 from the National Science Foundation. This is Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. R-06139.

Received December 1, 1997; accepted February 6, 1998.


* REFERENCES
*TOP
*ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*RESULTS
*DISCUSSION
*METHODS
*REFERENCES

Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Anderson, J.A., Li, Q.-B., Haskell, D.W., and Guy, C.L. (1994) Structural organization of the spinach endoplasmic reticulum–luminal 70-kilodalton heat-shock cognate gene and expression of 70-kilodalton heat-shock gene during cold acclimation. Plant Physiol. 104:1359-1370[Abstract].

Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A., and Struhl, K., eds (1989). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. (New York: Wiley Interscience).

Bardwell, J.C., and Craig, E.A. (1984) Major heat shock gene of Drosophila and Escherichia coli heat-inducible dnaK gene are homologous. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:848-852[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Bates, E.E., Vergne, P., and Dumas, C. (1994) Analysis of the cytosolic hsp70 gene family in Zea mays.. Plant Mol. Biol. 25:909-916[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Boorstein, W.R., Ziegelhoffer, T., and Craig, E.A. (1994) Molecular evolution of the HSP70 multigene family. J. Mol. Evol. 38:1-17[Web of Science][Medline].

Bui, E.T., Bradley, P.J., and Johnson, P.J. (1996) A common evolutionary origin for mitochondria and hydrogenosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9651-9656[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Casey, R., Creissen, G., Domoney, C., Forster, C., and Matta, N. (1994) An intron-containing nuclear stress-70 gene from Pisum sativum.. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:325-326.

Corpas, F.J., and Trelease, R.N. (1997) The plant 73-kDa peroxisomal membrane protein (PMP73) is immunorelated to molecular chaperones. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 73:49-57[Medline].

Craig, E.A., and Jacobsen, K. (1985) Mutations in cognate genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae hsp70 result in reduced growth rates at low temperature. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:3517-3524[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Craig, E.A., Ingolia, T.D., and Manseau, L.J. (1983) Expression of Drosophila heat-shock cognate genes during heat shock and development. Dev. Biol. 99:418-426[CrossRef][Medline].

Curtis, S.E., and Clegg, M.T. (1984) Molecular evolution of chloroplast DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:291-301[Abstract].

Denecke, J., Goldman, M.H.S., Demolder, J., Seurinck, J., and Botterman, J. (1991) The tobacco luminal binding protein is encoded by a multigene family. Plant Cell 3:1025-1035[Abstract/Free Full Text].

DeRocher, A., and Vierling, E. (1995) Cytoplasmic HSP70 homologues of pea: Differential expression in vegetative and embryonic organs. Plant Mol. Biol. 27:441-456[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Dhankher, O.P., Drew, J.E., and Gatehouse, J.A. (1997) Characterization of a pea hsp70 gene which is both developmentally and stress-regulated. Plant Mol. Biol. 34:345-352[Medline].

Drzymalla, C., Schroda, M., and Beck, C.F. (1996) Light-inducible gene HSP70B encodes a chloroplast-localized heat shock protein in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.. Plant Mol. Biol. 31:1185-1194[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Duck, N., McCormick, S., and Winter, J. (1989) Heat shock protein hsp70 cognate gene expression in vegetative and reproductive organs of Lycopersicon esculentum.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3674-3678[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Ellis, R.J. (1993) The general concept of molecular chaperones. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 339:257-261[CrossRef].

Flaherty, K.M., DeLuca-Flaherty, C., and McKay, D.B. (1990) Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70K heat-shock cognate protein. Nature 346:623-628[CrossRef][Medline].

Flynn, G.C., Chappell, T.G., and Rothman, J.E. (1989) Peptide binding and release by proteins implicated as catalysts of protein assembly. Science 245:385-390[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Gaut, B.S., Morton, B.R., McCaig, B.C., and Clegg, M.T. (1996) Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: Synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10274-10279[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Gavel, Y., and von Heijne, G. (1990) Cleavage-site motifs in mitochondrial targeting peptides. Protein Eng. 4:33-37[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Günther, E., and Walter, L. (1994) Genetic aspects of the hsp70 multigene family in vertebrates. Experimentia 30:987-1001.

Gupta, R.S., and Golding, G.B. (1993) Evolution of HSP70 gene and its implications regarding relationships between archaebacteria, eubacteria and eukaryotes. J. Mol. Evol. 37:573-582[Web of Science][Medline].

Gupta, R.S., Aitken, K., Falah, M., and Singh, B. (1994) Cloning of Giardia lamblia heat shock protein HSP70 homologs: Implications regarding origin of eukaryotic cells and of endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2895-2899[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Guy, C.L., and Haskell, D. (1987) Induction of freezing tolerance in spinach is associated with the synthesis of cold acclimation–induced proteins. Plant Physiol. 84:872-878[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Heschl, M.F., and Baillie, D.L. (1990) The HSP70 multigene family of Caenorhabditis elegans.. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 96:633-637.

Hightower, L.E., Sadis, S.E., and Takenaka, I.M. (1994). Interactions of vertebrate hsc70 and hsp70 with unfolded proteins and peptides. In The Biology of Heat Shock Proteins and Molecular Chaperones, R.I. Morimoto, A. Tissières, and C. Georgopoulos, eds (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp. 179–207.

Hughes, A.L. (1993) Nonlinear relationships among evolutionary rates identify regions of functional divergence in heat-shock protein 70 genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:243-255[Abstract].

Ingolia, T.D., and Craig, E.A. (1982) Drosophila gene related to the major heat shock–induced gene is transcribed at normal temperatures and not induced by heat shock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:525-529[Abstract/Free Full Text].

James, P., Pfund, C., and Craig, E.A. (1997) Functional specificity among Hsp70 molecular chaperones. Science 275:387-389[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Joshi, C.P., Kumar, S., and Nguyen, H.T. (1996) Application of modified differential display technique for cloning and sequencing of the 3' region from three putative members of the wheat HSP70 gene family. Plant Mol. Biol. 30:641-646[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Kalinski, A., Rowley, D.L., Loer, D.S., Foley, C., Buta, G., and Herman, E.M. (1995) Binding-protein expression is subject to temporal, developmental and stress-induced regulation in terminally differentiated soybean organs. Planta 195:611-621[Web of Science][Medline].

Kawula, T.H., and Lelivelt, M.J. (1994) Mutations in a gene encoding a new Hsp70 suppress rapid DNA inversion and bgl activation, but not proU derepression in hns-1 mutant Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 176:610-619[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Ko, K., Bornemisza, O., Kourtz, L., Ko, Z.W., Plaxton, W.C., and Cashmore, A.R. (1992) Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding a cognate 70-kDa heat shock protein of the chloroplast envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 267:2986-2993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Koes, R.E., Spelt, C.E., Mol, J.N.M., and Gerats, A.G.M. (1987) The chalcone synthase multigene family of Petunia hybrida (V30): Sequence homology, chromosomal localization and evolutionary aspects. Plant Mol. Biol. 10:375-385.

Koizumi, N., and Sano, H. (1997) Isolation of two genes encoding luminal binding protein from Arabidopsis thaliana.. Plant Physiol. 113:664.

Kourtz, L., and Ko, K. (1997) The early stage of chloroplast protein import involves Com70. J. Biol. Chem. 272:2808-2813[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Lee, J.H., and Schoffl, F. (1996) An Hsp70 antisense gene affects the expression of HSP70/HSC70, the regulation of HSF, and the acquisition of thermotolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana.. Mol. Gen. Genet. 252:11-19[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Lelivelt, M.J., and Kawula, T.H. (1995) Hsc66, an Hsp70 homolog of Escherichia coli, is induced by cold shock but not by heat shock. J. Bacteriol. 177:4900-4907[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Li, Q.-B., and Guy, C.L. (1996) Prolonged final extension time increases cloning efficiency of PCR products. BioTechniques 21:192-196[Web of Science][Medline].

Li, Q.-B., Anderson, J.V., and Guy, C.L. (1994) A cDNA clone encoding a spinach 70-kilodalton heat-shock cognate. Plant Physiol. 105:457-458[Medline].

Liberek, K., Skowyra, D., Zylicz, M., Johnson, C., and Georgopoulos, C. (1991) The Escherichia coli DnaK chaperone, the 70-kDa heat shock protein eukaryotic equivalent, changes conformation upon ATP hydrolysis, thus triggering its dissociation from a bound target protein. J. Biol. Chem. 266:14491-14496[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Lin, T.Y., Duck, N.B., Winter, J., and Folk, W.R. (1991) Sequences of two hsc 70 cDNAs from Lycopersicon esculentum.. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:475-478[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Marshall, J.S., and Keegstra, K. (1992) Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding the major Hsp70 of the pea chloroplast stroma. Plant Physiol. 100:1048-1054[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Marshall, J.S., DeRocher, A.E., Keegstra, K., and Vierling, E. (1990) Identification of heat shock protein hsp70 homologues in chloroplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:374-378[Abstract/Free Full Text].

McKay, D.B., Wilbanks, S.M., Flaherty, K.M., Ha, J.-H., O'Brien, M.C., and Shirvanee, L.L. (1994). Stress-70 proteins and their interaction with nucleotides. In The Biology of Heat Shock Proteins and Molecular Chaperones, R.I. Morimoto, A. Tissières, and C. Georgopoulos, eds (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), pp. 153–177.

Minton, K.W., Karmin, P., Hahn, G.M., and Minton, A.P. (1982) Nonspecific stabilization of stress-susceptible proteins by stress-resistant proteins: A model for the biological role of heat shock proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:7107-7111[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Moniz de Sa, M., and Drouin, G. (1996) Phylogeny and substitution rates of angiosperm actin genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1198-1212[Abstract].

Mooney, B., and Harmey, M.A. (1996) The occurrence of hsp70 in the outer membrane of plant mitochondria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 218:309-313[CrossRef][Medline].

Morimoto, R.I., Tissières, A., and Georgopoulos, C., eds (1994). The Biology of Heat Shock Proteins and Molecular Chaperones. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Mues, G.I., Munn, T.Z., and Raese, J.D. (1986) A human gene family with sequence homology to Drosophila melanogaster Hsp70 heat shock genes. J. Biol. Chem. 261:874-877[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Munro, S., and Pelham, H.R. (1987) A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell 48:899-907[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Neumann, D., Emmermann, M., Thierfelder, J.-M., zur Nieden, U., Clericus, M., Braun, H.-P., Nover, L., and Schmitz, U.K. (1993) HSP68—A DnaK-like heat-stress protein of plant mitochondria. Planta 190:32-43[Medline].

Neven, L.G., Haskell, D.W., Hofig, A., Li, Q.-B., and Guy, C.L. (1993) Characterization of a spinach gene responsive to low temperature and water stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 21:291-305[CrossRef][Medline].

Nover, L., and Scharf, K.-D. (1997) Heat stress proteins and transcription factors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53:80-103[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Ohta, T. (1994) Further examples of evolution by gene duplication revealed through DNA sequence comparisons. Genetics 138:1331-1337[Abstract].

Pierpaoli, E.V., Sandmeier, E., Baici, A., Schonfeld, H.J., Gisler, S., and Christen, P. (1997) The power stroke of the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE molecular chaperone system. J. Mol. Biol. 269:757-768[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Rassow, J., von Ahsen, O., Bömer, U., and Pfanner, N. (1997) Molecular chaperones: Towards a characterization of the heat-shock protein family. Trends Cell Biol. 7:129-133.

Rensing, S.A., and Maier, U.-G. (1994) Phylogenetic analysis of the stress-70 protein family. J. Mol. Evol. 30:80-86.

Roberts, J.K., and Key, J.L. (1991) Isolation and characterization of a soybean hsp70 gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:671-683[Medline].

Rochester, D.E., Winer, J.A., and Shah, D.M. (1986) The structure and expression of maize genes encoding the major heat shock protein, hsp70. EMBO J. 5:451-458[Web of Science][Medline].

Rubin, D.M., Mehta, A.D., Zhu, J., Shoham, S., Chen, X., Wells, Q.R., and Palter, K.B. (1993) Genomic structure and sequence analysis of Drosophila melanogaster HSC70 genes. Gene 128:155-163[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Saitou, N., and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425[Abstract].

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Schilke, B., Forster, J., Davis, J., James, P., Walter, W., Laloraya, S., Johnson, J., Miao, B., and Craig, E. (1996) The cold sensitivity of a mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking a mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 is suppressed by loss of mitochondrial DNA. J. Cell Biol. 134:603-613[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Schnell, D.J., Kessler, F., and Blobel, G. (1994) Isolation of components of the chloroplast protein import machinery. Science 266:1007-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Seaton, B.L., and Vickery, L.E. (1994) A gene encoding a DnaK/hsp70 homolog in Escherichia coli.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2066-2070[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Storozhenko, S., De Pauw, P., Kushnir, S., Van Montagu, M., and Inze, D. (1996) Identification of an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding a HSP70-related protein belonging to the HSP110/SSE1 subfamily. FEBS Lett. 390:113-118[CrossRef][Medline].

Swofford, D.L. (1993). Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. (Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey).

Tatusov, R.L., Koonin, E.V., and Lipman, D.J. (1997) A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631-637[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Walker, E.L., Weeden, N.F., Taylor, C.B., Green, P., and Coruzzi, G.M. (1995) Molecular evolution of duplicate copies of genes encoding cytosolic glutamine synthetase in Pisum sativum.. Plant Mol. Biol. 29:1111-1125[Web of Science][Medline].

Wang, H., Goffreda, M., and Leustek, T. (1993) Characteristics of an Hsp70 homolog localized in higher plant chloroplasts that is similar to DnaK, the Hsp70 of prokaryotes. Plant Physiol. 102:843-850[Abstract].

Waters, E.R. (1995) The molecular evolution of the small heat-shock proteins in plants. Genetics 141:785-795[Abstract].

Waters, E.R., Lee, G.J., and Vierling, E. (1996) Evolution, structure and function of the small heat shock proteins in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 47:325-338.

Watts, F.Z., Walters, A.J., and Moore, A.L. (1992) Characterization of PHSP1, a cDNA encoding a mitochondrial HSP70 from Pisum sativum.. Plant Mol. Biol. 18:23-32[CrossRef][Medline].

Wimmer, B., Lottspeich, F., Van der Klei, I., Veenhuis, M., and Gietl, C. (1997) The glyoxysomal and plastid molecular chaperone (70-kDa heat shock protein) of watermelon cotyledons are encoded by a single gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13624-13629[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Wrobel, R.L., O'Brian, G.R., and Boston, R.S. (1997) Comparative analysis of BiP gene expression in maize endosperm. Gene 204:105-113[CrossRef][Medline].

Wu, C.H., Caspar, T., Browse, J.A., Lindquist, S., and Somerville, C. (1988) Characterization of an HSP70 cognate gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 88:731-740[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Wu, S.H., Wang, C., Chen, J., and Lin, B.L. (1994) Isolation of a cDNA encoding a 70-kDa heat-shock cognate protein expressed in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana.. Plant Mol. Biol. 25:577-583[CrossRef][Medline].

Zhou, J., and Kleinhofs, A. (1996) Molecular evolution of nitrate reductase genes. J. Mol. Evol. 42:432-442[Medline].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P.-H. Su and H.-m. Li
Arabidopsis Stromal 70-kD Heat Shock Proteins Are Essential for Plant Development and Important for Thermotolerance of Germinating Seeds
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 1231 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
M. V. Lara, M. F. Drincovich, G. L. Muller, V. G. Maurino, and C. S. Andreo
NADP-malic Enzyme and Hsp70: Co-purification of Both Proteins and Modification of NADP-malic Enzyme Properties by Association with Hsp70
Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 997 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. E. Kirst, D. J. Meyer, B. C. Gibbon, R. Jung, and R. S. Boston
Identification and Characterization of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation Proteins Differentially Affected by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 218 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Y.-J. Chen, M.-f. Wu, Y.-h. Yu, M. F. Tam, and T.-Y. Lin
Developmental Expression of Three Mungbean Hsc70s and Substrate-binding Specificity of the Encoded Proteins
Plant Cell Physiol., November 15, 2004; 45(11): 1603 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Ortiz and L. Cardemil
Heat-shock responses in two leguminous plants: a comparative study
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2001; 52(361): 1711 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. W. Hamilton III, S. J. McNaughton, and J. S. Coleman
Molecular, physiological, and growth responses to sodium stress in C4 grasses from a soil salinity gradient in the Serengeti ecosystem
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2001; 88(7): 1258 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. Y. Sung, E. Vierling, and C. L. Guy
Comprehensive Expression Profile Analysis of the Arabidopsis Hsp70 Gene Family
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2001; 126(2): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
E. W. Hamilton III and J. S. Coleman
Heat-shock proteins are induced in unstressed leaves of Nicotiana attenuata (Solanaceae) when distant leaves are stressed
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2001; 88(5): 950 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Q.-B. Li and C. L. Guy
Evidence for Non-Circadian Light/Dark-Regulated Expression of Hsp70s in Spinach Leaves
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 1633 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guy, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.-B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Plant Biologists