|
|
||||||||
|
A Mutation in the pale aleurone color1 Gene Identifies a Novel Regulator of the Maize Anthocyanin PathwayDavid A. Selingera and Vicki L. Chandleraa Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 Correspondence to: Vicki L. Chandler, chandler{at}ag.arizona.edu (E-mail), 520-621-7186 (fax)
By screening for new seed color mutations, we have identified a new gene, pale aleurone color1 (pac1), which when mutated causes a reduction in anthocyanin pigmentation. The pac1 gene is not allelic to any known anthocyanin biosynthetic or regulatory gene. The pac1-ref allele is recessive, nonlethal, and only reduces pigment in kernels, not in vegetative tissues. Genetic and molecular evidence shows that the pac1-ref allele reduces pigmentation by reducing RNA levels of the biosynthetic genes in the pathway. The mutant does not reduce the RNA levels of either of the two regulatory genes, b and c1. Introduction of an anthocyanin structural gene promoter (a1) driving a reporter gene into maize aleurones shows that pac1-ref kernels have reduced expression resulting from the action of the a1 promoter. Introduction of the reporter gene with constructs that express the regulatory genes b and c1 or the phlobaphene pathway regulator p shows that this reduction in a1-driven expression occurs in both the presence and absence of these regulators. Our results imply that pac1 is required for either b/c1 or p activation of anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression and that pac1 acts independently of these regulatory genes.
The maize anthocyanin pathway provides an excellent system for the study of gene expression. The pathway is well characterized genetically, biochemically, and molecularly, and the product, a purple pigment, is easily scored visually for both the presence and intensity of pigment (reviewed in
Although the anthocyanin pathway in maize has been studied since the beginning of the 20th century, we suspected that more genes affect this pathway than have been identified. Our reasoning derives in part from the identification, in other plants, of genes distinct from the regulatory genes identified in maize (
Isolation of pale aleurone color1
The pac1 Mutant Is Not Allelic to Known Anthocyanin Genes
pac1 Maps to Chromosome 5L To confirm the B-A mapping result and to more precisely map pac1, we localized pac1 relative to pr1, which is also located on chromosome 5L and determines whether the anthocyanin pigment will be red (pr1) or purple (Pr1). The F1 seed from a cross between the pac1-ref Pr1 homozygote and a Pac1 pr1 homozygous stock was planted and backcrossed to the original B-Peru, pac1-ref Pr1 stock (see Figure 2 for a diagram of the crosses involved). This backcross was done, rather than a self-cross, for two reasons. First, because the kernels in the pac1-ref stock were colored by B-Peru, whereas the kernel color in the pr1 stock was due to R-r, the F1 plant was heterozygous for both B-Peru and R-r, and thus, a selfed ear would have produced colorless seeds at a frequency of one to 16 due to the doubly recessive b and r class of seeds. These colorless seeds would be very difficult to distinguish from pac1-ref kernels. Second, the pale red kernels from the pac1-ref pr1 recombinant class may have been difficult to distinguish. To avoid these problems, we planted 100 pale kernels from this backcross and testcrossed 79 plants by the Pac1 pr1 stock. Recombination events in the F1 generation were recovered in the backcross as pac1-ref pr1/pac1-ref Pr1 seeds that had a pale purple seed color phenotype. The other recombinant class yielded Pac1 Pr1/pac1-ref Pr1 seeds that had a dark purple phenotype (Figure 2). In contrast, nonrecombinant gametes produced pac1-ref Pr1/pac1-ref Pr1 pale seeds and Pac1 pr1/pac1-ref Pr1 dark purple seeds.
We selected for pac1-ref homozygotes by planting the pale seeds. We were able to determine how many of these seeds carried the recombinant pac1-ref pr1 chromosome by crossing them to the Pac1 pr1 stock. From a total of 79 plants, 27 produced ears with 50% purple/50% red seed, which indicated a recombinant, and 52 had ears with 100% purple seed. This result gives a recombination frequency of 34%. Thus, pac1 and pr1 are linked (P < 0.01) and are separated by ~34 centimorgans (cM). Because pr1 is located ~19 cM from the centromere on chromosome 5L, and we know from the B-A mapping that pac1 is on chromosome 5L, it appears that pac1 maps to the telomere proximal region of the long arm of chromosome 5, a region of the maize genome that contains no other known anthocyanin genes.
The pac1-ref Allele Reduces the Pigmentation of the Seed Directed by an Allele of r
Two plants gave 100% mottled seed in the ears from the outcross to the b and r tester. Both of these plants produced 100% pale seeds in the ears from the self-cross, and these ears looked very similar to those from plants homozygous for B-Peru and pac1-ref (an example of each is shown in Figure 1B). Nine additional plants gave three-quarters pigmented seeds in the testcross, with approximately one-third of pigmented seeds being mottled. This outcome is expected for plants that are heterozygous for both B-Peru and R-r. The pac1 genotype was confirmed by testcrossing the progeny from the selfed ears to the B-Peru, pac1-ref stock. This result indicates that pac1-ref prevents the normal dark pigmentation produced by R-r as well as that produced by B-Peru and thus that pac1-ref is not specific to B-Peruinduced pigmentation. Because the R-r allele also colors two other seed tissues, the embryo and the scutellum, we could assess whether pac1-ref affects the pigmentation of these two tissues. Scutellum color was reduced in a manner similar to that of the aleurone. The scutellum is a diploid, zygotic tissue, and the observation that pac1-ref alters pigment in this tissue indicates that the activity of pac1 is not confined to the triploid endosperm tissues. Unlike the scutellum, pigmentation of the embryo was very similar to that of wild-type seeds.
The pac1-ref Allele Does Not Noticeably Affect the Anthocyanin Pigmentation of Plant Tissues Induced by the B-I or r-r Alleles To determine whether pac1-ref affects the pigmentation of the anthers that is directed by the r-r allele of r, we generated pac1-ref homozygous plants that carried at least one copy of r-r. These plants were produced by a scheme of crosses similar to those used to generate the B-I, pac1-ref stock. These r-r and pac1-ref/pac1-ref plants had the same intensity of anther pigmentation as seen in wild-type plants. These results show that Pac1 is not required for normal expression of anthocyanin pigments in most of the vegetative tissues of the plant.
The pac1-ref Allele Reduces the RNA Levels of the Biosynthetic Genes a1, bz1, and c2 but Does Not Reduce b or c1 RNA Levels Ears were harvested 35 days after pollination, and the crowns of pale (B-Peru/B-Peru and pac1-ref/pac1-ref) kernels and dark (B-Peru/b and Pac1/pac1-ref) kernels were collected. Total RNA was prepared, and 10 µg of this RNA was used in each RNase protection reaction. Figure 4 shows the results of three RNase protection experiments. For the first experiment, a1, b, c1, and actin probes were used; for the second, b, c2, and actin probes were used; and for the third, bz1 and actin probes were used. In each experiment, the results from the anthocyanin probes were normalized against the actin RNA level. The three experiments revealed that pac1-ref kernels had significantly less a1, bz1, and c2 RNA compared with the heterozygous kernels. These results indicate that pac1-ref reduces pigmentation by reducing the expression of the biosynthetic genes.
In addition, the pac1-ref/pac1-ref kernels had no reduction in b and c1 RNA levels compared with the heterozygous kernels. This result indicates that pac1-ref does not reduce pigment by reducing the expression of the known regulatory genes of the pathway. The slightly higher b and c1 RNA levels in the pac1-ref homozygous kernels are probably due to the dosage of B-Peru and/or background effects, which are examined in the Discussion section. Because pac1-ref kernels had markedly reduced expression of the biosynthetic genes but normal expression of the regulatory genes, pac1 represents a new regulator of the anthocyanin pathway in maize.
The pac1-ref Allele Affects Both B/C1 Activation and P Activation of the a1 Promoter To test whether pac1-ref is specific to B/C1 activation, we introduced a reporter construct consisting of the a1 promoter driving expression of the firefly luciferase (luc) cDNA into either Pac1, b, C1 kernels or pac1-ref, b, C1 kernels. To determine whether the a1 promoter was induced, we introduced the a1::luc reporter, together with either the B-Peru and C1 cDNA constructs driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter or with the P cDNA driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. We tested 50 ng of the regulatory constructs with 2.5 µg of the reporter construct. In this experiment, a clear defect in a1-driven luciferase expression was evident in the pac1-ref kernels in both the B/C1 and P cotransformed samples (Figure 5). In addition, the level of luciferase expression in the absence of any regulatory genes was reduced in pac1-ref aleurones relative to the wild-type aleurones. We also performed experiments using 20 ng of DNA of each of the regulatory gene constructs and 2.5 µg of DNA of the a1::luc reporter. In these experiments, a defect in B/C1 induction was clearly seen in the pac1-ref kernels, but the P induction differences were too small to reveal any reduction in the pac1-ref kernels (data not shown). We found that the bombardment of the a1::luc reporter construct by itself into B-Peru, C1, Pac1 aleurones produced a luciferase expression level similar to that produced by b, C1, Pac1 kernels bombarded with the a1::luc reporter and 20 ng of each of the CaMV 35S B and C1 regulatory gene constructs (data not shown). Because the activation of the a1 promoter by both B/C1 and P is affected, the activity of pac1 is not specific to the B/C1 regulation of the a1 promoter.
The pac1-ref mutant allele defines a new regulator of the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, pac1. It maps to chromosome 5L and affects both B-Peru and R-rdirected expression of anthocyanin pigmentation of the aleurone and scutellum. Like several other genes in the anthocyanin pathway, pac1 shows an apparent tissue specificity. All of the known alleles of b and r show tissue specificity (
We have shown that pac1 is involved in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression (and possibly part of the phlobaphene pathway), but we do not know whether pac1 is specific to the anthocyanin pathway, as the regulators b, c1, pl, and r are thought to be. The lack of other phenotypes in the pac1 mutant suggests that pac1 is a specific regulator of anthocyanin genes. However, because we have only one allele, it is possible that this allele is defective only for some of the functions of the native gene. For instance, the vp1 gene has such alleles; a class of vp1 alleles that are defective for C1 activation but have no viviparous phenotype has been identified ( The pac1 gene appears to regulate different parts of the entire anthocyanin pathway: c2 is at the beginning of the pathway, a1 is at the branch point with the phlobaphene pathway, and bz1 is at the last step of anthocyanin pigment synthesis. The RNA levels of all three of these biosynthetic genes were dramatically reduced in pac1-ref kernels. We suspect that the same reductions occur with the other anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. Given that the pac1-ref allele appears to affect the ability of the p gene product to induce the a1 promoter, pac1 may in fact affect more than just the genes in the anthocyanin pathway.
The pac1-ref allele affects the activation of the a1 promoter by both b/c1 and p in transient assays. We have not formally tested for the effect of the pac1-ref allele on anthocyanin or phlobaphene pigmentation of the pericarp, where p is normally expressed. However, based on the fact that pericarp is a maternal tissue and thus more akin to the vegetative parts of the plant than to the aleurone, we suspect that it would have no effect, because pac1-ref does not affect anthocyanin expression in any of the vegetative tissues that we have examined. In theory, we could have detected pac1-ref effects in B-Imediated pericarp pigmentation. However, this detection was not possible for two reasons: first, the pericarp color is variable with respect to different maize stocks, and second, it depends on the presence of the strong Pl-Rhoades allele of pl. Our B-I pac1-ref stocks all contained Pl'-mahogany, the weak, paramutant derivative allele of Pl-Rhoades ( Biosynthetic gene RNA levels are dramatically reduced by pac1-ref, but the b and c1 RNA levels are actually slightly higher in pac1-ref kernels than in wild-type kernels (Figure 4). Although it is possible that there is opposite regulation of the regulatory genes by pac1 or feedback regulation through the pathway, we think other explanations are more likely. The apparent increase of b and c1 RNA in pac1-ref kernels is most likely due to background effects but may also reflect the difference in dosage of the B-Peru allele in the wild-type and pac1 samples. In the RNase protection experiments, the dosage of C1 was the same in both the wild-type kernels and pac1-ref kernels, but the dosage of B-Peru differed in the two samples. Because the wild-type sample resulted from an outcross of the pac1-ref plants to a standard b and r tester stock and the B-Peru and pac1-ref plants were used as male, there is only one copy of B-Peru in the wild-type endosperm (and thus aleurone cells) versus the three copies of B-Peru in the pac1-ref kernels. Another possible factor in the difference in C1 and possibly B-Peru RNA levels in the two samples is the slight difference in the backgrounds of the two samples. The wild-type sample was an outcross to a b tester stock that is derived from a different genetic background than the pac1-ref stock. Because the expression of many phenotypic traits, including anthocyanin expression, can vary considerably in different lines of maize, the difference in backgrounds may be the cause of the slight differences in b and c1 RNA levels. Assuming that the lesion in the pac1-ref allele results in reduced expression or no expression of the normal gene product, the low level of a1::luc expression in pac1-ref kernels even in the presence of the B/C1 or P proteins indicates that pac1 is required for either B/C1 or P activation of a1. In addition to the reduction of a1::luc reporter expression when cotransfected with the regulatory gene cDNAs in pac1-ref aleurones, we also saw a reduction of expression in pac1-ref kernels when the a1::luc reporter gene was transfected without the regulatory genes. These data, combined with the modest induction by b/c1 or p even in the absence of pac1 function, suggest that the Pac1 gene product is not required for B/C1 and P to bind the promoter. The reduction in luciferase expression is not due to pac1-ref affecting the CaMV promoter used to drive the regulatory gene cDNA constructs because the transformation control, the Renilla luciferase cDNA, is also driven by the same promoter. Thus, any pac1-ref effect on CaMV 35S activity would have altered the levels of expression of all the genes. This alteration would not have affected the ratio of luc expression to Renilla luc expression because both the regulatory genes and the transformation control are driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. Because we saw a change in the ratio of firefly luc activity, driven by the a1 promoter, to Renilla luc activity, driven by the CaMV 35S promoter, and because Renilla luc levels were similar in both wild-type and pac1-ref aleurones, we conclude that the reduction of expression seen in pac1-ref aleurones is specific to the activation of the a1 promoter in this assay.
Based on our data, it seems likely that the normal product of the pac1 gene acts independently of the B/C1 and P proteins to produce its effects on the activation of the a1 promoter. Because the other anthocyanin promoters have strong similarities in sequence and structure to the a1 promoter (
Genetic Stocks and Nomenclature
RNA Extraction from Aleurone Tissue and Quantification of a1, b, bz1, c1, and c2 RNA
Transient Transfection and Assay of a1 Promoter Activity in pac1 and Wild-Type Kernels
We thank Rich Jorgensen for a critical reading of this manuscript. We thank Susan Belcher for assistance with the genetic experiments, Charles Carey and Wim van Heeckeren for the subcloning of RNase protection templates, and Charles Carey for assistance with the RNase protection procedure. The Molecular Dynamics Storm 860 System used in this work was purchased with Grant No. DAAG559710102 from the Department of Army Research. D.A.S. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Jane Coffin-Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research, and the work was supported by Grant No. 96-35301-3179 from the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program/U.S. Department of Agriculture to V.L.C. Received August 7, 1998; accepted October 19, 1998.
Beckett, J.B. (1994). Locating recessive genes to chromosome arms with B-A translocations. In The Maize Handbook, M. Freeling and V. Walbot, eds (New York: Springer-Verlag), pp. 315327.
Chandler, V.L., and Walbot, V. (1986) DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:1767-1771
Chandler, V.L., Radicella, J.P., Robbins, T.P., Chen, J., and Turks, D. (1989) Two regulatory genes of the maize anthocyanin pathway are homologous: Isolation of B utilizing R genomic sequences. Plant Cell 1:1175-1183 Coe, E.H., Jr. (1979) Specification of the anthocyanin biosynthetic function by B and R in maize. Maydica 24:49-58[ISI]. Coe, E.H., Jr. (1985). Phenotypes in corn: Control of pathways by alleles, time and place. In Plant Genetics, M. Freeling, ed (New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.), pp. 509521. Coe, E.H., Jr., and Neuffer, M.G. (1977). The genetics of corn. In Corn and Corn Improvement, 2nd ed, G.F. Sprague, ed (Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy), pp. 111223.
Coe, E.H., Jr., McCormick, S.M., and Modena, S.A. (1981) White pollen in maize. J. Hered. 72:318-320 Coe, E.H., Jr., Neuffer, M.G., and Hoisington, D.A. (1988). The genetics of corn. In Corn and Corn Improvement, 3rd ed, G.F. Sprague and J. Dudley, eds (Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy), pp. 81258. Cone, K.C., Cocciolone, S.M., Burr, F.A., and Burr, B. (1993) Maize anthocyanin regulatory gene pl is a duplicate of c1 that functions in the plant. Plant Cell 5:1795-1805[Abstract].
de Vetten, N., Quattrocchio, F., Mol, J., and Koes, R. (1997) The an11 locus controlling flower pigmentation in petunia encodes a novel WD-repeat protein conserved in yeast, plants, and animals. Genes Dev. 11:1422-1434
Fraser, A.C. (1924) Heritable characters of maize XVII. Intensified red and purple aleurone color. J. Hered. 15:119-123 Gilman, M. (1993). Ribonuclease protection assay. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F.M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D. Moore, J.G. Seidman, J.A. Smith, and K. Struhl, eds (New York: John Wiley and Sons), pp. 4.7.14.7.8. Goff, S.A., Klein, T.M., Roth, B.A., Fromm, M.E., Cone, K.C., Radicella, J.P., and Chandler, V.L. (1990) Transactivation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes following transfer of b regulatory genes into maize tissues. EMBO J. 9:2517-2522[ISI][Medline].
Goff, S.A., Cone, K.C., and Chandler, V.L. (1992) Functional analysis of the transcriptional activator encoded by the maize B gene: Evidence for a direct functional interaction between two classes of regulatory proteins. Genes Dev. 6:864-875 Grotewold, E., Drummond, B.J., Bowen, B., and Peterson, T. (1994) The myb-homologous P gene controls phlobaphene pigmentation in maize floral organs by directly activating a flavonoid biosynthetic gene subset. Cell 76:543-553[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. Hanson, M.A., Gaut, B.S., Stec, A.O., Fuerstenberg, S.I., Goodman, M.M., Coe, E.H., Jr., and Doebley, J.F. (1996) Evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize kernels: The role of regulatory and enzymatic loci. Genetics 143:1395-1407[Abstract].
Hattori, T., Vasil, V., Rosenkrans, L., Hannah, L.C., McCarty, D.R., and Vasil, I.K. (1992) The viviparous-1 gene and abscisic acid activate the C1 regulatory gene for anthocyanin biosynthesis during seed maturation in maize. Genes Dev. 6:609-618 Hollick, J.B., Patterson, G.I., Coe, E.H., Jr., Cone, K.C., and Chandler, V.L. (1995) Allelic interactions heritably alter the activity of a metastable maize pl allele. Genetics 141:709-719[Abstract]. Holton, T.A., and Cornish, E.C. (1995) Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 7:1071-1083[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Kermicle, J.L. (1970) Dependence of the R-mottled aleurone phenotype in maize on mode of sexual transmission. Genetics 66:69-85
Klein, T.M., Roth, B.A., and Fromm, M.E. (1989) Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes introduced into intact maize tissues by microprojectiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6681-6685 Larson, R.L., Bussard, J.B, and Coe, E.H., Jr. (1986) Gene-dependent flavonoid 3'-hydroxylation in maize. Biochem. Genet. 24:615-624[CrossRef][Medline].
Lesnick, M.L., and Chandler, V.L. (1998) Activation of the maize anthocyanin gene a2 is mediated by an element conserved in many anthocyanin promoters. Plant Physiol. 117:437-445
Lorenz, W.W., McCann, R.O., Longiaru, M., and Cormier, M.J. (1991) Isolation and expression of a cDNA encoding Renilla reniformis luciferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4438-4442
Ludwig, S.R., Habera, L.F., Dellaporta, S.L., and Wessler, S.R. (1989) Lc, a member of the maize R gene family responsible for tissue-specific anthocyanin production, encodes a protein similar to transcriptional activators and contains the Myc-homology region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:7092-7096
Ludwig, S.R., Bowen, B., Beach, L., and Wessler, S.R. (1990) A regulatory gene as a novel visible marker for maize transformation. Science 247:449-450 McCarty, D.R., Carson, C.B., Lazar, M., and Simonds, S.C. (1989a) Transposable element induced mutations of the viviparous-1 gene of maize. Dev. Genet. 10:473-481[CrossRef].
McCarty, D.R., Carson, C.B., Stinard, P.S., and Robertson, D.S. (1989b) Molecular analysis of viviparous-1: An abscisic acidinsensitive mutant of maize. Plant Cell 1:523-532
Melton, D.A., Krieg, P.A., Rebagliati, M.R., Maniatis, T., Zinn, K., and Green, M.R. (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:7035-7056 Mol, J., Jenkins, G., Schafer, E., and Weiss, D. (1996) Signal perception, transduction, and gene expression involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 15:525-557. Patterson, G.I., Harris, L.J., Walbot, V., and Chandler, V.L. (1991) Genetic analysis of B-Peru, a regulatory gene in maize. Genetics 126:205-220. Paz-Ares, J., Ghosal, D., Wienand, U., Peterson, P.A., and Saedler, H. (1986) Molecular cloning of the c locus of Zea mays: A locus regulating the anthocyanin pathway. EMBO J. 5:829-833[ISI][Medline].
Robertson, D.S. (1955) The genetics of vivipary in maize. Genetics 40:745-760 Sainz, M.B., Grotewold, E., and Chandler, V.L. (1997) Evidence for direct activation of an anthocyanin promoter by the maize C1 protein and comparison of DNA binding by related Myb domain proteins. Plant Cell 9:611-625[Abstract].
Selinger, D.A., Lisch, D., and Chandler, V.L. (1998) The maize regulatory gene, B-Peru, contains a DNA rearrangement that specifies tissue-specific expression through both positive and negative promoter elements. Genetics 149:1125-1138 Styles, E.D., and Ceska, O. (1977) The genetic control of flavonoid synthesis in maize. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 19:289-302.
Styles, E.D., and Coe, E.H., Jr. (1986) Unstable expression of an R allele with a3 in maize. J. Hered. 77:389-393 Styles, E.D., Ceska, O., and Seah, K. (1973) Developmental differences in action of R and B alleles in maize. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 15:59-72[ISI]. Tuerck, J.A., and Fromm, M.E. (1994) Elements of the maize A1 promoter required for transactivation by the anthocyanin B/C1 or phlobaphene P regulatory genes. Plant Cell 6:1655-1663[Abstract]. Wessler, S.R. (1994). Isolation of RNA from Wx and wx endosperms. In The Maize Handbook, M. Freeling and V. Walbot, eds (New York: Springer-Verlag), pp. 545546.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE |