Auxin Regulates the Initiation and Radial Position of Plant Lateral Organs

Correspondence to: Cris Kuhlemeier, cris.kuhlemeier{at}pfp.unibe.ch (E-mail), 41-31-332-20-59 (fax)

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Leaves originate from the shoot apical meristem, a small mound of undifferentiated tissue at the tip of the stem. Leaf formation begins with the selection of a group of founder cells in the so-called peripheral zone at the flank of the meristem, followed by the initiation of local growth and finally morphogenesis of the resulting bulge into a differentiated leaf. Whereas the mechanisms controlling the switch between meristem propagation and leaf initiation are being identified by genetic and molecular analyses, the radial positioning of leaves, known as phyllotaxis, remains poorly understood. Hormones, especially auxin and gibberellin, are known to influence phyllotaxis, but their specific role in the determination of organ position is not clear. We show that inhibition of polar auxin transport blocks leaf formation at the vegetative tomato meristem, resulting in pinlike naked stems with an intact meristem at the tip. Microapplication of the natural auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to the apex of such pins restores leaf formation. Similarly, exogenous IAA induces flower formation on Arabidopsis pin-formed1-1 inflorescence apices, which are blocked in flower formation because of a mutation in a putative auxin transport protein. Our results show that auxin is required for and sufficient to induce organogenesis both in the vegetative tomato meristem and in the Arabidopsis inflorescence meristem. In this study, organogenesis always strictly coincided with the site of IAA application in the radial dimension, whereas in the apical–basal dimension, organ formation always occurred at a fixed distance from the summit of the meristem. We propose that auxin determines the radial position and the size of lateral organs but not the apical–basal position or the identity of the induced structures.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Leaf primordia develop in regular patterns from the shoot apical meristem. In the majority of flowering plants, the leaves are arranged in spirals, with the divergence angle between successive leaves approaching the Fibonacci angle of 137.5°, the so-called golden ratio (Steeves and Sussex 1989 ; Lyndon 1990 , Lyndon 1998 ; Jean 1994 ). Molecular and genetic analyses have recently identified various genes that regulate meristem development and leaf formation. Some of these genes encode transcription factors of the homeobox class (Vollbrecht et al. 1991 ; Long et al. 1996 ; Kerstetter et al. 1997 ; Taylor 1997 ; Mayer et al. 1998 ), whereas others, such as clavata1, clavata3, and zwille, appear to be involved in cell-to-cell signaling (Clark et al. 1997 ; Moussian et al. 1998 ; Fletcher et al. 1999 ; Trotochaud et al. 1999 ). Current models postulate that these genes control the balance between meristem self-propagation and the production of organogenic tissue.

Whereas genetic analyses provide us with an ever more detailed description of meristem maintenance and propagation, the molecular nature of the mechanisms that trigger leaf initiation and ensure that leaves form at the proper angles relative to each other remains to be established. In many mutants, disorganized phyllotaxis is part of a pleiotropic phenotype, and the effects on phyllotaxis may well be indirect. Only in the recently described maize abphyl1 mutant has a specific phyllotactic alteration, from distichous (alternate) to decussate (opposite), been observed (Jackson and Hake 1999 ).

Most of the information on the control of phyllotaxis stems not from genetic analyses but from surgical and pharmacological experiments conducted between 20 and 60 years ago (reviewed in Steeves and Sussex 1989 ; Lyndon 1990 , Lyndon 1998 ; Callos and Medford 1994 ). These experiments provided evidence that factors of either a chemical or a physical nature could affect leaf position and the angle between leaves. Not surprisingly, the classical plant hormones, particularly auxin and gibberellin, were implicated, although their specific role in organ initiation and positioning has not been determined (Snow and Snow 1937 ; Gorter 1949 , Gorter 1951 ; Bedesem 1958 ; Kiermayer 1960 ; Schwabe 1971 ; Maksymowych and Maksymowych 1973 ; Maksymowych et al. 1976 ; Maksymowych and Erickson 1977 ; Meicenheimer 1981 ).

Here, we focus on the possible function of auxin. Auxin is thought to be synthesized in young apical tissues and to be transported downward to the maturing stem and to the roots by a polar transport system that can be blocked with specific inhibitors (Davies 1995 ). Exactly which cells within the shoot tip synthesize auxin remains to be determined, and it is entirely open whether the meristem proper is a source of auxin. Similarly, the polar transport pathway has been thoroughly studied in stem tissues (Davies 1995 ), but whether or not it operates within the meristem is not known.

In this study, we describe two complementary systems, namely, vegetative meristems of tomato and inflorescence meristems of the Arabidopsis pin-formed1-1 (pin1-1) mutant, which we used to study the role of auxin in the control of phyllotaxis. Tomato shoot apical meristems are easily accessible, can be cultured on defined media, and are amenable to micromanipulation (Fleming et al. 1997 , Fleming et al. 1999 ). We show that their cultivation on auxin transport inhibitors specifically inhibits leaf initiation, leading to meristems devoid of leaf primordia. Likewise, organ formation is blocked in the inflorescence meristem of the Arabidopsis auxin transport mutant pin1-1. To assess the role of auxin in organ formation and phyllotaxis more directly, we micromanipulated the auxin concentrations in both systems.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Inhibition of Polar Auxin Transport Blocks Leaf Initiation but Not Meristem Propagation
Vegetative tomato shoot apices were cultured on a synthetic medium containing the auxin transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA). This treatment completely inhibited the formation of new leaf primordia, whereas the meristem continued to grow and form stem tissue, leading to a pinlike structure devoid of leaves (cf. Fig 1A and Fig 1B with Fig 1C). Preexisting leaf primordia continued to develop, but leaflets were not initiated and the leaf blade was deformed (Fig 1A, P₁ and P₂). Note that at the beginning of the experiment, the preexisting primordia of the apex shown in Fig 1A (P₁ and P₂) were at the stages of P₁ and P₂ shown in Fig 1C. Axillary meristems grew out (Fig 1A), indicating that apical dominance was reduced. The structurally unrelated auxin transport inhibitors 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) and 9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylic acid (HFCA) gave similar results, but the flavonoids quercetin and apigenin, which are putative endogenous regulators of auxin efflux (Jacobs and Rubery 1988 ), had no effect. Although 10 µM NPA always blocked primordium formation, elongation of the pins was variable. Approximately 50% of the pins grew to only a few hundred micrometers long and then ceased to grow, whereas the remaining pins recovered and grew as much as several millimeters. For further studies, these vigorously growing pins were transferred weekly to new plates containing 10 µM NPA, at which time the base of the pins was trimmed to leave ~200 µm of stem length.

View larger version (135K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Inhibition of Leaf Primordium Initiation by the Auxin Transport Inhibitor NPA and Expression of Diagnostic Genes in NPA-Treated Apices. (A) Culture of tomato apices on NPA-containing medium results in a naked pin (arrowhead), outgrowth of axillary meristems (A), and altered development of preexisting primordia (P1 and P2, with P1 being the youngest primordium at the beginning of the experiment). (B) Close-up of an NPA pin visualized by low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy. (C) Control tomato apex with the meristem (arrowhead) and the three youngest leaf primordia (P1 to P3, with P1 being the youngest), as well as the leaf bases of older primordia (P4 and P6). (D) to (G) Longitudinal sections of NPA pins. (H) to (K) Longitudinal sections of control apices. (D) and (H) show staining with toluidine blue. (E) to (G) and (I) to (K) are the result of in situ hybridizations. (E) and (I) show hybridization with a probe against Rpl2, which encodes a ribosomal protein. (F) and (J) show hybridization with a probe against the homeobox gene LeT6. (G) and (K) are the result of hybridization with a probe against histone H4. Arrowheads indicate the meristem; L, leaflet primordium; P, primordium. Bar in (A) = 2 mm; bars in (B) to (K) = 100 µm.

The pinlike structures, further referred to as NPA pins, exhibited small, densely staining cells at the tip that were arranged in layers as in control meristems (cf. Fig 1D and Fig 1H; Steeves and Sussex 1989 ). The tip of the NPA pins expressed the ribosomal protein Rpl2, a general marker for biosynthetic activity (Fig 1E; Fleming et al. 1993 ). Similarly, LeT6, a gene encoding a homeobox protein that is expressed in meristems (Chen et al. 1997 ), was highly expressed in the same tissue (Fig 1F). Histone H4, which is a marker for cells during S phase (Fleming et al. 1993 ; Brandstatter et al. 1994 ), was expressed only in the most apical cells of the pins, whereas in control apices, histone H4 was also detected in the meristem flanks (Fig 1G and Fig 1K). Because Rpl2, LeT6, and histone H4 are expressed in meristems (Fig 1I to 1K), their presence indicates that NPA pins contain meristematic tissues at the tip. Cortical stripes that stained with toluidine blue (Fig 1D and Fig 1H) and express Rpl2 (Fig 1E and Fig 1I) presumably represent provascular strands and therefore indicate that the basic stem anatomy in NPA pins was not affected. Thus, auxin transport inhibitors specifically inhibit primordium initiation but not meristem self-perpetuation or formation of stem tissues.

Local Treatment with Indole-3-Acetic Acid Induces Leaf Primordia on NPA Pins
Although auxin is thought to be produced in the shoot apex, whether it is produced in the meristem itself is not known (Davies 1995 ). If auxin is produced in the meristem, then NPA would be expected to cause accumulation of auxin within the meristem, and any resulting inhibition of leaf initiation could be attributed to inhibitory concentrations of auxin. If auxin is not produced in the meristem but is transported there from subtending tissues by an NPA-sensitive transporter, then NPA treatment would deplete auxin in the meristem, and inhibition of organ formation would result from the decrease in auxin concentrations in the meristem. In the latter case, application of auxin to the meristem would be expected to rescue organogenesis.

We applied small amounts (estimated as <5% of the volume of the meristem) of lanolin paste containing 0.1 to 30 mM indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) to various positions on the NPA pins, particularly on the flank and tip of the meristem. By taking into account retention in lanolin and photooxidation and diffusion in the tissue, we can reasonably expect these applied concentrations to cover the physiologic concentration range of IAA (Uggla et al. 1996 ). Treatment with auxin at the flank of the meristems induced the formation of bulges, whereas lanolin alone had no effect (Fig 2A and Fig 2B, and Table 1). These bulges, which always coincided with the radial position of IAA application, differentiated into leaf primordia (Fig 2C and Fig 2D). In the longitudinal (apical–basal) dimension, the primordia always formed at a fixed position from the summit, that is, within a ring-shaped zone roughly equivalent to the peripheral zone in untreated meristems (Steeves and Sussex 1989 ; Lyndon 1990 , Lyndon 1998 ).

View larger version (62K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Induction of Leaves on NPA Pins by the Natural Auxin IAA. (A) NPA pin 4 days after treatment with control paste (white arrowhead) at the flank of the meristem (black arrowhead). (B) to (D) Induction of a leaf primordium (arrows in [B] to [D]; P in [D]) on an NPA pin treated with red lanolin paste containing 10 mM IAA (white arrowheads in [B] to [D]). Black arrowheads point to the meristem. The same pin was photographed after 1 day (B), 2 days (C), and 4 days (D). (E) Leaf induced by IAA on an NPA pin. (F) to (K) Leaf primordia induced on NPA pins 1 week after local IAA treatment (red paste) at concentrations of 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 30 mM, respectively. M, meristem; P, primordium. Bars in (A) to (D) and (F) to (K) = 100 µm; bar in (E) = 0.5 cm.

When auxin was applied to the very tip of the meristems, bulges never initiated at the tip but rather emerged at the flank at unpredictable radial positions (data not shown). The primordia induced by IAA exhibited dorsoventrality, turned green, and formed the trichomes typical for leaves (Fig 2C to 2E). At later stages, lateral leaflets were formed in ~50% of the cases; after 2 months, the leaves had reached a length of several centimeters and exhibited all of the structures found in normal leaves (Fig 2E). However, the proportions of the different parts deviated from those of normal leaves; in particular, the petiole was thicker than normal, and only one pair of leaflets was formed (Fig 2E). The size of induced leaf primordia depended on the concentration of auxin (Fig 2F to 2K). Whereas lower concentrations (0.1 and 0.3 mM) induced primordia of approximately normal size (Fig 2F and Fig 2G), higher concentrations (1 to 30 mM) induced primordia that were wider than normal (Fig 2H to 2J) and, in some cases, encompassed the entire meristem (Fig 2K). The frequency of primordium initiation was also dependent on auxin concentration (Table 1).

These experiments show that the NPA pins contain functional meristems capable of leaf formation when supplied with auxin. The site of auxin treatment determined the site of primordium formation in the radial position, but in the longitudinal position, primordia always originated from a ring-shaped region at the flanks of the meristem, as in natural leaf formation. The concentration of auxin determined the number of cells recruited into primordia.

Various growth regulators that have been shown to control cell division and cell expansion in other systems are therefore candidates for a role in primordium formation. We applied gibberellin A₃, the kinetin 6-benzylaminopurine, and brassinolide to the flanks of the meristems of NPA pins. In addition, the effects of fusicoccin, a compound that mimics some aspects of IAA-induced growth by activating H⁺ extrusion into the cell wall (Marre 1979 ), were tested. In contrast to IAA, none of these substances was able to induce primordium formation (Table 2). Thus, induction of primordium formation by IAA on NPA pins is a specific effect.

NPA and IAA Interfere with Primordium Positioning at the Meristem
If local differences in auxin concentration determine leaf position, then it should be possible to disrupt phyllotaxis in a normal meristem by manipulating the auxin concentrations present with exogenous auxin as well as with auxin transport inhibitors. With this in mind, we applied auxin or auxin transport inhibitors to the I₁ and I₂ positions of normal meristems, that is, at the positions where the next two primordia would form (Fig 3A), or to the entire flank of the meristem. Application of IAA to I₁, the site of incipient primordium formation, increased the size of the primordium to be formed at this position (cf. Fig 3B and Fig 3C; see Table 3). Specifically, the base of the primordium was enlarged, often to an extent that it was thicker than the next older primordium, suggesting that more cells were engaged in primordium initiation than normal. Treatment at I₂ (between P₁ and P₂) caused the initiation of ectopic primordia (Fig 3D and Table 3), which were fused to various degrees with P₁. When the entire flank of the meristem was treated with IAA, oversized fused primordia were induced (Fig 3E and Table 3). Note that in Fig 3D and Fig 3E, tissues on different sides of P₁ were induced to form primordia. In Fig 3D, these tissues were in the space between P₁ and P₂, whereas in Fig 3E, they were in the space between P₁ and I₁. This indicates that on both sides of P₁, the flank is able to form primordia if supplied with auxin. However, in the proximity of P₂, the flank tissue did not respond to IAA; consequently, whereas ectopic primordia were always fused to some extent with P₁, they were never fused with P₂ (Fig 3D and Fig 3E). Perhaps at stage P₂, primordia are surrounded by an inhibitory field (Lyndon 1990 ).

View larger version (97K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effects of Treatments of Meristems with IAA and NPA. (A) Schematic representation of a tomato apex with the youngest and the second youngest primordia (P1 and P2, respectively). The large circle delimits the apical meristem, and the small circle marks the central zone, which is not involved in organogenesis. The sites of incipient primordium formation (I1) and the site of the following primordium (I2) are indicated as yellow areas. (B) Control treatment with lanolin (red paste) at the site of incipient primordium formation (I1). The primordium that formed at the I1 position has a normal size relative to P1 (cf. with Fig 1C). (C) Increased primordium size caused by IAA treatment (red paste) at I1. P1 denotes the preexisting primordium. Note that the base of I1 is extended toward P1. (D) Induction of an ectopic primordium by IAA (red paste) at the I2 position (between preexisting primordia P1 and P2). The ectopic primordium is fused to P1. (E) Induction of a large fused leaf primordium caused by IAA treatment (red paste) on the entire flank of the meristem. The fused leaf includes P1 (right side) and I1 (left side). P2 (which would have been toward the viewer) was removed before scanning electron microscopic analysis. (F) Inhibition of primordium initiation by NPA treatment at I1 (red paste) and formation of an ectopic primordium at I2 (arrow, between preexisting primordia P1 and P2). Apices shown in (B) to (D) were examined 3 days after treatment; apices shown in (E) and (F) were analyzed 6 days after treatment. Bars in (B) to (F) = 100 µm.

To determine the effects of local inhibition of auxin transport within the meristem, apices were treated with NPA at I₁. Primordium formation was inhibited at the site of treatment (Fig 3F), whereas on the opposite side of the meristem, that is, at I₂, a primordium was initiated, resulting in a reversal of phyllotaxis. The auxin transport inhibitors 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and 9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylic acid had similar effects, whereas apigenin and quercetin had no effects (Table 3). Taken together, auxin and NPA both affected organ positioning but had opposite effects.

Phyllotaxis in Recovering NPA Pins Is Variable
Leaf positioning is known to be affected by preexisting leaf primordia (Snow and Snow 1931 , Snow and Snow 1933 ; Callos and Medford 1994 ). The NPA pins are devoid of leaves and therefore provide a simple system with which to test the role of preexisting leaves. After 5 weeks of culture on NPA and repeated removal of the basal stem portion, the pins lacked any trace of leaves. Three days after transfer to synthetic medium without NPA, pins spontaneously initiated new primordia (Fig 4A). These always originated from the flank of the meristem. Primordium formation continued and resulted in distichous (Fig 4B; 30%), spiral (Fig 4C; 18%), or whorled phyllotaxis (Fig 4D; 27%); the remaining pins either were fasciated or did not recover at all (n = 60). Interestingly, recovering apices returned to spiral phyllotaxis after production of a few whorled leaves (Fig 4E). In general, the apices initiated axillary meristems soon after primordium formation (Fig 4B and Fig 4C). These results show that preexisting leaves are not required for primordium formation per se but for correct phyllotactic patterning. Both the occurrence of distichous phyllotaxis and the symmetry observed in whorled phyllotaxis (Fig 4B and Fig 4D) suggest the involvement of lateral inhibition in the patterning of the plant apex (Lyndon 1990 ; Meinhardt 1994 ).

View larger version (153K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Phyllotaxis in Pins Recovering from NPA. (A) Primordium initiation on an NPA pin 3 days after transfer to NPA-free medium. (B) to (E) Phyllotaxis on apices 7 days after transfer to NPA-free medium (n = 60). Shown are distichous phyllotaxis (B), spiral phyllotaxis (C), whorled phyllotaxis (D), and reversion from whorled to spiral phyllotaxis (E). A, axillary meristem; M, apical meristem; P, primordia initiated concomitantly; P1, P2, P3, successive primordia, with P1 being the youngest. Bars in (A) to (E) = 100 µm.

Local Treatment with IAA Induces Flower Primordia on Inflorescence Apices of the Arabidopsis Mutant pin1-1
The effects of NPA on tomato apices resemble the phenotype of the Arabidopsis pin1-1 mutant (Okada et al. 1991 ). This mutant is affected in auxin transport in the inflorescence stem, the genetic defect for which was recently traced to a putative auxin efflux carrier (Galweiler et al. 1998 ). The pin1-1 mutation affects leaf formation and development of the inflorescence. Two aspects of the mutant phenotype are particularly striking in the context of our experiments with tomato apices. In pin1-1 plants, leaves are often fused or cup shaped and are oversized from the initial stages of development (cf. Fig 5A with Fig 5B and Fig 5C), suggesting that the number of cells recruited is larger than normal. This leaf phenotype resembles the leaves triggered on NPA pins by IAA at higher concentrations (Fig 2I to 2K). Second, mutant inflorescences are greatly reduced to a pinlike shoot that resembles the pins produced by tomato meristems in the presence of NPA (Okada et al. 1991 ; cf. Fig 1B and Fig 5D).

View larger version (139K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Leaf and Inflorescence Phenotype of the Arabidopsis pin1-1 Mutant and Induction of Flowers by IAA. (A) Wild-type Arabidopsis seedling with two leaf primordia. (B) pin1-1 seedling with one fused leaf primordium. (C) pin1-1 seedling with a cup-shaped leaf primordium. (D) Inflorescence apex of a pin1-1 mutant plant devoid of flowers. The arrowhead indicates the meristem. (E) to (H) Induction of flowers by treatment with 1 mM IAA (red paste) at the flank. Apices were analyzed 38 hr (arrow points to local bulge) (E), 4 days (F), 7 days (G), and 11 days (H) after treatment. Arrowheads in (E) to (H) denote the meristem. (I) Induction of a circular bulge (arrow) around the flank by treatment for 2 days with 1 mM IAA at the top of the meristem (arrowhead). (J) Circular flower induced after 6 days by treatment as given in (I). Note that the circular flower does not correspond to a single normal flower but rather is a ring of several flowers that are laterally fused; consequently, petaloid organs are found on the adaxial side of the circular carpel. In the center, the indeterminate inflorescence meristem is maintained (not visible). (K) Flowers (arrows) induced after 4 days by treatment as given in (I); in this case, the initial ring bulge broke into several individual flowers. Two of these are partially fused (on the lower left side). C, carpel; Co, cotyledon; F, flower primordium; P, petal; Pa, papilla; Pr, leaf primordium. Bars in (A) to (C), (G), and (H) = 500 µm; bars in (D) to (F) and (I) = 100 µm; bars in (J) and (K) = 200 µm.

In light of our results, the phenotype of the pin1-1 mutant might be caused by abnormally high amounts or mislocalization of auxin in vegetative meristems, leading to induction of broad leaf primordia, and by the lack of auxin in the apical inflorescence meristem, which prevents flower formation. To test this hypothesis, we applied auxin in lanolin paste to the flanks of inflorescence meristems of pin1-1 mutants. This treatment induced the formation of flower primordia at the site of treatment (85%; n = 80). In control treatments with lanolin, primordium formation was observed in only two cases (n = 57). A low frequency of spontaneous organ formation may be expected because pin1-1 mutant plants occasionally form aberrant flowers after the pins have reached a length of several centimeters (Okada et al. 1991 ). Therefore, for all further analyses of auxin-induced flower formation, we used young pins <1 cm long just after their emergence from the rosette. In such young pins, spontaneous organ formation was never observed.

Treatment with 1 mM IAA at the flank of pin1-1 apices induced bulges at the site of treatment after 38 hr (Fig 5E and Table 4), and the bulges later developed into flower primordia (Fig 5F). These flowers initiated two to four whorls of organs; after a week, they had reached a length of ~0.5 mm (Fig 5G). Although the flowers reached normal sizes, their architecture was aberrant. Each had a large carpel with papillae at the tip surrounded by a variable number of petaloid organs (Fig 5H). Similar defects have been described for the flowers of Arabidopsis wild-type plants that had been treated with auxin transport inhibitors and in the escape flowers in pin1-1 mutants (Okada et al. 1991 ).

Treatments with 0.1 mM IAA at the flank had similar effects, but the frequency was less and the induced flowers were smaller than those developing after treatment with 1 mM IAA (Table 4). Application of IAA at 10 µM had no effect (Table 4). Treatment with 1 mM IAA at a position ~100 µm below the flank induced only small bulges at a reduced frequency, and treatments 200 µm below the flank had no effect (Table 4), indicating that the maximal range of auxin diffusion in the apical tissues is between 100 and 200 µm. When Arabidopsis inflorescence pins were treated with 1 mM IAA on the summit of the meristem, ring-shaped bulges were induced around the flank of the entire meristem (Fig 5I and Table 4); however, the center of the meristem never responded to IAA treatment. At later times, the ring-shaped bulges developed into circular flowers that consisted of a large, ring-shaped carpel with petaloid organs both inside and outside the carpel (Fig 5J), or the ring broke into discrete flowers arranged in a circle (Fig 5K). Treatments with 0.1 mM IAA on the top resulted in the induction of incomplete ring-shaped bulges (Table 4); application on the top of IAA at 10 µM had no effect (Table 4).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Auxin Transport Is Required for Lateral Organ Formation
Tomato apices can be dissected and cultured in vitro on defined media. Under such conditions, the apices grow normally and initiate leaves in the regular spiral phyllotactic pattern (Fleming et al. 1997 , Fleming et al. 1999 ). Apices cultured on medium containing NPA or other specific inhibitors of polar auxin transport, however, were unable to initiate new leaf primordia. Stem growth in such pinlike structures was not affected, and according to histology and gene expression analysis, normal-structured meristems were maintained at the summit of the pins (Fig 1). Thus, inhibition of auxin transport specifically blocked primordium initiation but not meristem self-propagation or the formation of stem tissues. The tomato NPA pins are reminiscent of the pin-shaped inflorescences of the Arabidopsis pin1-1 mutant, which has a defect in auxin transport caused by the inactivation of a putative membrane efflux carrier for auxin (Okada et al. 1991 ; Galweiler et al. 1998 ).

Exogenous Auxin Restores Organ Formation on Tomato NPA Pins and on Arabidopsis pin1-1 Inflorescence Apices
Leaf initiation in NPA-treated tomato meristems could be restored by applying microdroplets of auxin to defined positions on the meristem. The effect was specific for auxin, because no other hormone was able to trigger primordium formation. Fusicoccin, an inducer of plasma membrane proton pumps (Marre 1979 ), had no effect either, indicating that acidification of the extracellular space was not sufficient to induce primordium formation.

Whereas auxin induced leaf primordia on vegetative tomato pins, it induced flower primordia on Arabidopsis pin1-1 inflorescence apices. Therefore, auxin appears to trigger organogenesis without determining organ identity, which suggests that other factors in the meristem determine organ identity. In this context, it would be interesting to analyze organ formation on floral NPA pins of tomato. Unfortunately, we were not able to perform such experiments because the floral apices could not be cultured in vitro.

Whether the meristem itself produces auxin is not known; therefore, inhibition of auxin transport could lead to either an accumulation or a depletion of auxin in the meristem, depending on whether or not the meristem is a source of auxin. The fact that application of exogenous auxin can relieve the block of primordium formation in tomato and Arabidopsis pins suggests that meristems do not produce sufficient amounts of auxin to permit organ formation and that, under natural conditions, auxin is transported acropetally into the meristem by a specific NPA-inhibitable transport system. However, as long as the actual auxin concentrations within the meristem are not known, alternative explanations cannot be excluded. In particular, under natural conditions, auxin transport and reallocation within the meristem are conceivably the basis of primordium initiation rather than acropetal transport.

Auxin Plays a Role in the Radial Positioning of Leaf Primordia
A striking aspect of our work is the correlation between the site at which auxin is applied and the site of organ initiation. In the radial dimension, the correlation was perfect in both tomato and Arabidopsis pins: primordia formed exactly at the position where auxin was applied. In contrast, in the apical–basal dimension, organ initiation invariantly occurred at a fixed distance of ~50 to 100 µm from the tip of the meristem, just as in natural meristems (Fig 1C). This was true even when auxin was applied slightly above or below this area or at the very tip of the meristem (Fig 2 and Fig 5). This zonation is reminiscent of the classical zonation model in which, according to histology and gene expression patterns, the meristem is subdivided into central and peripheral zones (Steeves and Sussex 1989 ; Lincoln et al. 1994 ; Laufs et al. 1998a ; Lyndon 1998 ; Fletcher et al. 1999 ; Nishimura et al. 1999 ). The central zone has been proposed to serve as a pool of stem cells, whereas the peripheral zone presumably is the site of organogenesis (Medford 1992 ; Clark 1997 ; Meyerowitz 1997 ). Although this zonation model convincingly explains the apical–basal patterning of the meristem, it does not shed light on the radial patterning.

We propose the existence of two independent patterning systems in the meristem. The first is the apical–basal pattern, which may be specified by genes such as shoot meristemless, wuschel, clavata, and mgoun (Long et al. 1996 ; Clark et al. 1997 ; Laufs et al. 1998b ; Mayer et al. 1998 ; Fletcher et al. 1999 ) and the maintenance of which does not depend on auxin. The second, the radial patterning system, is conditioned by auxin and determines where within the peripheral zone organs are initiated. The results of the experiments presented in Fig 3 show that the effect of auxin is not limited to pins but is probably critical in normal meristems as well. In the presence of preexisting leaves, auxin can induce ectopic and fused primordia at the flank of the meristem (Fig 3B and Fig 3C). Conversely, NPA inhibits leaf formation at the site of application and leads to primordium initiation at the opposite side. In keeping with the results of previous experiments, the simplest explanation for these findings is that under natural conditions, localized accumulation of auxin in the meristem, mediated by an NPA-inhibitable auxin transporter, determines the radial position of organ initiation.

Interestingly, interference with auxin transport also affects the radial patterning of embryos. When developing embryos were incubated in media containing auxin transport inhibitors, they exhibited defects in bilateral symmetry, ranging from the lack of cotyledons to collarlike cotyledons (Liu et al. 1993 ; Hadfi et al. 1998 ). pin1-1 mutant embryos exhibit similar defects (Okada and Shimura 1994 ), indicating that auxin transport is important for the establishment of bilateral symmetry in embryogenesis and possibly for the initiation of cotyledons.

A Model for Patterning of the Meristem
If auxin determines radial leaf position, then how could auxin transport itself be directed? Preexisting primordia are known to influence future primordium position (Snow and Snow 1931 , Snow and Snow 1933 ; Callos and Medford 1994 ). Therefore, we analyzed phyllotaxis in meristems that were grown for prolonged periods on NPA and in which all radial patterning information that derived from preexisting primordia was erased. When such apices were no longer treated with NPA, they resumed primordium formation, but phyllotaxis was virtually random (Fig 4). These results show that preexisting leaves, although dispensable for leaf initiation per se, are required for correct leaf positioning. We propose that the influence of preexisting leaves on phyllotaxis is mediated by their vasculature, possibly by defining the routes of auxin transport to the meristem. Such a relationship between vasculature and phyllotaxis has been suggested on the basis of histologic analysis (Larson 1975 ; Kirchoff 1984 ). Auxin transport is associated with the vasculature; conversely, auxin induces vascular differentiation (Sachs 1991 ; Davies 1995 ). Such a positive feedback mechanism (Sachs 1991 ), in which the vascular prepattern in the apex is used as a template to determine further leaf positioning, could explain the remarkable regularity and stability of phyllotactic systems (Steeves and Sussex 1989 ; Lyndon 1990 , Lyndon 1998 ; Jean 1994 ).

How could the action of auxin lead to the initiation of primordia? Previous experiments have shown that expansin, a protein with cell wall–loosening activity, can induce leaflike structures on the meristem (Fleming et al. 1997 ). In addition, a gene encoding an expansin is upregulated at the site of incipient leaf initiation under natural conditions (Reinhardt et al. 1998 ). Conceivably, expansin is a downstream effector of auxin action, and expansin expression possibly is directly regulated by auxin. However, the leaves induced by auxin differ from the structures induced by the exogenous expansin protein. The bulges in the latter case were devoid of vascular bundles, displayed only limited dorsoventrality, and rarely developed beyond the initial stages (Fleming et al. 1997 ). Thus, auxin is able to trigger the entire developmental program for leaf formation, whereas expansin protein triggers only a subset of the steps in leaf development.

Taken together, our results demonstrate that auxin plays a central role in organ initiation and positioning at the meristem in both tomato and Arabidopsis plants. We propose that when meristem cells are displaced from the center to the periphery, they become competent to respond to auxin with leaf formation. If auxin is absent during their passage through the peripheral region, then the cells lose the competence for organ initiation and acquire the default identity of stem tissue. If they are induced by auxin, then they acquire a new identity and become committed to organogenesis. Thus, auxin-mediated radial patterning is superimposed on the basic apical–basal pattern in the meristem (central, peripheral, and submeristematic zone), which is maintained independent of auxin. The combined positional information from these two patterning systems determines cell fate and thus phyllotaxis.

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Plant Growth and in Vitro Culture
Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum cv Moneymaker) were grown as described previously (Reinhardt et al. 1998 ). Shoot apices were dissected and cultured according to Fleming et al. 1997 . The auxin transport inhibitors N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA; Interchim, Montluçon, France), 9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylic acid (HFCA; Sigma), and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA; Sigma) were added to the medium from 10 mM stock solutions in DMSO to a final concentration of 10 µM. The flavonoids quercetin and apigenin were added to the medium at concentrations of 10 and 100 µM each. For in situ hybridization analysis and treatments with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), tomato apices were cultured on 10 µM NPA for 3 weeks before fixation or application of IAA. Pin-shaped apices used for the analysis of initial phyllotactic patterning were generated by culturing tomato apices for 5 weeks on 10 µM NPA. The bases of the apices were trimmed, and the apices were transferred to new NPA plates once a week.

Seeds (Arabidopsis thaliana; accession number CS8065 from the Arabidopsis Information Management System; http://aims.cps.msu edu/aims/) were surface-sterilized and grown on Murashige and Skoog plates (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) for 1 week before potting. Plants were grown under an 8-hr-light/16-hr-dark regime at 22°C.

Treatments of Plant Apices
For local treatments of apices, IAA (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), 6-benzylaminopurine (Sigma), gibberellin A₃ (Fluka), NPA, quercetin (Sigma), or apigenin (Sigma) 1 M stock solutions in DMSO were dissolved in a prewarmed (50°C) paste consisting of lanolin with 2.5% paraffin (Merck). Brassinolide (CIDtech Research, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada) and fusicoccin (Sigma) were dried under vacuum from 10 mM stock solutions in ethanol and dissolved directly in prewarmed lanolin paste. The paste was manually administered to cultured tomato apices with yellow, drawn plastic pipette tips. Tomato NPA pins treated with IAA were further cultured on plates containing 10 µM NPA. Arabidopsis pin-formed1-1 (pin1-1) inflorescence apices were treated similarly as tomato apices, but the apices were left on the intact plant.

In Situ Hybridizations and Microscopy
In situ hybridizations were performed as described by Reinhardt et al. 1998 . Apices and seedlings were viewed with a variable-pressure scanning electron microscope (model S-3500N; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Digital images were pseudocolored for clarity.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Catherine Perrot-Rechenmann, Heinz Richner, Andrew J. Fleming, and Pia Stieger for critical reading of the manuscript and Jeroen Stuurman for discussion. This work was supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation grant to C.K. and D.R.

Received November 22, 1999; accepted February 24, 2000.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION METHODS REFERENCES

Bedesem, P.P. (1958) Histogenetic effects of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid on the shoot apices and leaf primordia of tomato. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 85:434-472.

Brandstätter, J., Rossbach, C., and Theres, K. (1994) The pattern of histone H4 expression in the tomato shoot apex changes during development. Planta 192:69-74[Web of Science][Medline].

Callos, J.D., and Medford, J.I. (1994) Organ positions and pattern formation in the shoot apex. Plant J. 6:1-7.

Chen, J.-J., Janssen, B.-J., Williams, A., and Sinha, N. (1997) A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: Alterations in leaf shape and implications for morpholocical evolution. Plant Cell 9:1289-1304[Abstract].

Clark, S.E. (1997) Organ formation at the vegetative shoot meristem. Plant Cell 9:1067-1076[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Clark, S.E., Williams, R.W., and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1997) The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89:575-585[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Davies, P.J. (1995) Plant Hormones—Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Fleming, A.J., Mandel, T., Roth, I., and Kuhlemeier, C. (1993) The patterns of gene expression in the tomato shoot apical meristem. Plant Cell 5:297-309[Abstract].

Fleming, A.J., McQueen-Mason, S., Mandel, T., and Kuhlemeier, C. (1997) Induction of leaf primordia by the cell wall protein expansin. Science 276:1415-1418[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Fleming, A.J., Caderas, D., Wehrli, E., McQueen-Mason, S., and Kuhlemeier, C. (1999) Analysis of expansin-induced morphogenesis on the apical meristem of tomato. Planta 208:166-174[CrossRef][Web of Science].

Fletcher, J.C., Brand, U., Running, M.P., Simon, R., and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1999) Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283:1911-1914[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Gälweiler, L., Guan, C., Müller, A., Wisman, E., Mendgen, K., Yephremov, A., and Palme, K. (1998) Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 282:2226-2230[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Gorter, C.J. (1949) The influence of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid on the growing points of tomatoes. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. 52:1185-1193.

Gorter, C.J. (1951) The influence of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid on the growing points of tomatoes. II. The initiation of ring fasciations. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 54:181-190.

Hadfi, K., Speth, V., and Neuhaus, G. (1998) Auxin-induced developmental patterns in Brassica juncea embryos. Development 125:879-887[Abstract].

Jackson, D., and Hake, S. (1999) Control of phyllotaxis in maize by the abphyl1 gene. Development 126:315-323[Abstract].

Jacobs, M., and Rubery, P.H. (1988) Naturally occurring auxin transport regulators. Science 241:346-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Jean, R.V. (1994) Phyllotaxis: A Systematic Study in Plant Morphogenesis. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Kerstetter, R.A., Laudencia-Chingcuanco, D., Smith, L.G., and Hake, S. (1997) Loss-of-function mutations in the maize homeobox gene, knotted1, are defective in shoot meristem maintenance. Development 124:3045-3054[Abstract].

Kiermayer, O. (1960) Die Formative Wirksamkeit der 2,3,5-Trijodobenzoesäure (TIBA) in Gegenwart von Gibberellinsäure (GA). Planta 55:153-168.

Kirchoff, B.K. (1984) On the relationship between phyllotaxy and vasculature: A synthesis. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 89:37-51.

Larson, P.R. (1975) Development and organization of the primary vascular system in Populus deltoides according to phyllotaxy. Am. J. Bot. 62:1084-1099[CrossRef][Web of Science].

Laufs, P., Grandjean, O., Jonak, C., Kiêu, K., and Traas, J. (1998a) Cellular parameters of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1375-1389[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Laufs, P., Dockx, J., Kronenberger, J., and Traas, J. (1998b) MGOUN1 and MGOUN2: Two genes required for primordium initiation at the shoot apical and floral meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125:1253-1260[Abstract].

Lincoln, C., Long, J., Yamaguchi, J., Serikawa, K., and Hake, S. (1994) A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6:1859-1876[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Liu, C.-M., Xu, Z.-H., and Chua, N.-H. (1993) Auxin polar transport is essential for the establishment of bilateral symmetry during early plant embryogenesis. Plant Cell 5:621-630[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Long, J.A., Moan, E.I., Medford, J.I., and Barton, M.K. (1996) A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 379:66-69[CrossRef][Medline].

Lyndon, R.F. (1990) Plant Development—The Cellular Basis. London, Unwin Hyman.

Lyndon, R.F. (1998) The Shoot Apical Meristem—Its Growth and Development. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Maksymowych, R., and Erickson, R.O. (1977) Phyllotactic change induced by giberellic acid in Xanthium shoot apices. Am. J. Bot. 64:33-44[CrossRef][Web of Science].

Maksymowych, R., and Maksymowych, A.B. (1973) Induction of morphogenetic changes and acceleration of leaf initiation by giberellic acid in Xanthium pennsilvanicum. Am. J. Bot. 60:901-906.

Maksymowych, R., Cordero, R.E., and Erickson, R.O. (1976) Long-term developmental changes in Xanthium induced by giberellic acid. Am. J. Bot. 63:1047-1053[CrossRef][Web of Science].

Marrè, E. (1979) Fusicoccin: A tool in plant physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30:273-288[Web of Science].

Mayer, K.F.X., Schoof, H., Haecker, A., Lenhard, M., Jürgens, G., and Laux, T. (1998) Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95:805-815[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Medford, J.I. (1992) Vegetative apical meristems. Plant Cell 4:1029-1039[Free Full Text].

Meicenheimer, R.D. (1981) Changes in Epilobium phyllotaxy induced by N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid and -4-chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid. Am. J. Bot. 68:1139-1154[CrossRef][Web of Science].

Meinhardt, H. (1994) Models of pattern formation and their application to plant development. In Barlow P.W., Carr D.J., eds. Positional Controls in Plant Development. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. 1–32.pp.

Meyerowitz, E.M. (1997) Genetic control of cell division patterns in developing plants. Cell 88:299-308[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Moussian, B., Schoof, H., Haecker, A., Jürgens, G., and Laux, T. (1998) Role of the zwille gene in the regulation of central shoot meristem fate during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J. 17:1799-1809[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Nishimura, A., Tamaoki, M., Sato, Y., and Matsuoka, M. (1999) The expression of tobacco knotted1-type class 1 homeobox genes corresponds to regions predicted by the cytohistological zonation model. Plant J. 18:337-347[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline].

Okada, K., and Shimura, Y. (1994) The pin-formed gene. In Bowman J.J., ed. Arabidopsis, An Atlas of Morphology and Development. New York, Springer-Verlag. 180–183.pp.

Okada, K., Ueda, J., Komaki, M.K., Bell, C.J., and Shimura, Y. (1991) Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in early stages of Arabidopsis floral bud formation. Plant Cell 3:677-684[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Reinhardt, D., Wittwer, F., Mandel, T., and Kuhlemeier, C. (1998) Localized upregulation of a new expansin gene predicts the site of leaf formation in the tomato meristem. Plant Cell 10:1427-1437[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Sachs, T. (1991) Pattern Formation in Plant Tissues. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Schwabe, W.W. (1971) Chemical modification of phyllotaxis and its implications. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 25:301-322[Medline].

Snow, M., and Snow, R. (1931) Experiments on phyllotaxis. I. The effect of isolating a primordium. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 221:1-43[CrossRef].

Snow, M., and Snow, R. (1933) Experiments on phyllotaxis. II. The effect of displacing a primordium. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 222:354-400.

Snow, M., and Snow, R. (1937) Auxin and leaf formation. New Phytol. 36:1-18.

Steeves, T.A., and Sussex, I.M. (1989) Patterns in Plant Development. 2nd ed New York, Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C.B. (1997) knox-on effects on leaf development. Plant Cell 9:2102-2105.

Trotochaud, A.E., Hao, T., Wu, G., Yang, Z., and Clark, S.E. (1999) The CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase requires CLAVATA 3 for its assembly into a signaling complex that includes KAPP and a Rho-related protein. Plant Cell 11:393-405[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Uggla, C., Moritz, T., Sandberg, G., and Sundberg, B. (1996) Auxin as a positional signal in pattern formation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9282-9286[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Vollbrecht, E., Veit, B., Sinha, N., and Hake, S. (1991) The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature 350:241-243[CrossRef][Medline].

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Scacchi, K. S. Osmont, J. Beuchat, P. Salinas, M. Navarrete-Gomez, M. Trigueros, C. Ferrandiz, and C. S. Hardtke Dynamic, auxin-responsive plasma membrane-to-nucleus movement of Arabidopsis BRX Development, June 15, 2009; 136(12): 2059 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-R. Wang, H. Hu, G.-H. Wang, J. Li, J.-Y. Chen, and P. Wu Expression of PIN Genes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Tissue Specificity and Regulation by Hormones Mol Plant, May 18, 2009; (2009) ssp023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Ploense, M.-F. Wu, P. Nagpal, and J. W. Reed A gain-of-function mutation in IAA18 alters Arabidopsis embryonic apical patterning Development, May 1, 2009; 136(9): 1509 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.-h. Lee, R. Johnston, Y. Yang, A. Gallavotti, M. Kojima, B. A.N. Travencolo, L. d. F. Costa, H. Sakakibara, and D. Jackson Studies of aberrant phyllotaxy1 Mutants of Maize Indicate Complex Interactions between Auxin and Cytokinin Signaling in the Shoot Apical Meristem Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 205 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Girin, K. Sorefan, and L. Ostergaard Meristematic sculpting in fruit development J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2009; 60(5): 1493 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Hakman, H. Hallberg, and J. Palovaara The polar auxin transport inhibitor NPA impairs embryo morphology and increases the expression of an auxin efflux facilitator protein PIN during Picea abies somatic embryo development Tree Physiol, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 483 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Bayer, R. S. Smith, T. Mandel, N. Nakayama, M. Sauer, P. Prusinkiewicz, and C. Kuhlemeier Integration of transport-based models for phyllotaxis and midvein formation Genes & Dev., February 1, 2009; 23(3): 373 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lodha, C.F. Marco, and M.C.P. Timmermans Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Homeostasis in Plants Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 15, 2009; (2009) sqb.2008.73.044v1. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Cheng, G. Qin, X. Dai, and Y. Zhao NPY genes and AGC kinases define two key steps in auxin-mediated organogenesis in Arabidopsis PNAS, December 30, 2008; 105(52): 21017 - 21022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ehlert, M. A. Schottler, G. Tischendorf, J. Ludwig-Muller, and R. Bock The paramutated SULFUREA locus of tomato is involved in auxin biosynthesis J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2008; 59(13): 3635 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schuetz, T. Berleth, and J. Mattsson Multiple MONOPTEROS-Dependent Pathways Are Involved in Leaf Initiation Plant Physiology, October 1, 2008; 148(2): 870 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gallavotti, S. Barazesh, S. Malcomber, D. Hall, D. Jackson, R. J. Schmidt, and P. McSteen sparse inflorescence1 encodes a monocot-specific YUCCA-like gene required for vegetative and reproductive development in maize PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 15196 - 15201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gallavotti, Y. Yang, R. J. Schmidt, and D. Jackson The Relationship between Auxin Transport and Maize Branching Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1913 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-I. Itoh, K.-I. Hibara, Y. Sato, and Y. Nagato Developmental Role and Auxin Responsiveness of Class III Homeodomain Leucine Zipper Gene Family Members in Rice Plant Physiology, August 1, 2008; 147(4): 1960 - 1975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Pandey, E. Gaquerel, K. Gase, and I. T. Baldwin RNA-Directed RNA Polymerase3 from Nicotiana attenuata Is Required for Competitive Growth in Natural Environments Plant Physiology, July 1, 2008; 147(3): 1212 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Dubrovsky, M. Sauer, S. Napsucialy-Mendivil, M. G. Ivanchenko, J. Friml, S. Shishkova, J. Celenza, and E. Benkova Auxin acts as a local morphogenetic trigger to specify lateral root founder cells PNAS, June 24, 2008; 105(25): 8790 - 8794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Barazesh and P. McSteen Barren inflorescence1 Functions in Organogenesis During Vegetative and Inflorescence Development in Maize Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 389 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Goldshmidt, J. P. Alvarez, J. L. Bowman, and Y. Eshed Signals Derived from YABBY Gene Activities in Organ Primordia Regulate Growth and Partitioning of Arabidopsis Shoot Apical Meristems PLANT CELL, May 1, 2008; 20(5): 1217 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-W. Wang, R. Schwab, B. Czech, E. Mica, and D. Weigel Dual Effects of miR156-Targeted SPL Genes and CYP78A5/KLUH on Plastochron Length and Organ Size in Arabidopsis thaliana PLANT CELL, May 1, 2008; 20(5): 1231 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Pinon, J. P. Etchells, P. Rossignol, S. A. Collier, J. M. Arroyo, R. A. Martienssen, and M. E. Byrne Three PIGGYBACK genes that specifically influence leaf patterning encode ribosomal proteins Development, April 1, 2008; 135(7): 1315 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bainbridge, S. Guyomarc'h, E. Bayer, R. Swarup, M. Bennett, T. Mandel, and C. Kuhlemeier Auxin influx carriers stabilize phyllotactic patterning Genes & Dev., March 15, 2008; 22(6): 810 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Chevalier, D. Perazza, F. Laporte, G. Le Henanff, P. Hornitschek, J.-M. Bonneville, M. Herzog, and G. Vachon GeBP and GeBP-Like Proteins Are Noncanonical Leucine-Zipper Transcription Factors That Regulate Cytokinin Response in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 1142 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Kramer Computer models of auxin transport: a review and commentary J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2008; 59(1): 45 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Wu and P. McSteen The role of auxin transport during inflorescence development in maize (Zea mays, Poaceae) Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1745 - 1755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. V. Kurepin, R. J. N. Emery, R. P. Pharis, and D. M. Reid Uncoupling light quality from light irradiance effects in Helianthus annuus shoots: putative roles for plant hormones in leaf and internode growth J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2007; 58(8): 2145 - 2157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Borghi, M. Bureau, and R. Simon Arabidopsis JAGGED LATERAL ORGANS Is Expressed in Boundaries and Coordinates KNOX and PIN Activity PLANT CELL, June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1795 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. McSteen, S. Malcomber, A. Skirpan, C. Lunde, X. Wu, E. Kellogg, and S. Hake barren inflorescence2 Encodes a Co-Ortholog of the PINOID Serine/Threonine Kinase and Is Required for Organogenesis during Inflorescence and Vegetative Development in Maize Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 1000 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tanaka, M. Watanabe, M. Sasabe, T. Hiroe, T. Tanaka, H. Tsukaya, M. Ikezaki, C. Machida, and Y. Machida Novel receptor-like kinase ALE2 controls shoot development by specifying epidermis in Arabidopsis Development, May 1, 2007; 134(9): 1643 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Maisch and P. Nick Actin Is Involved in Auxin-Dependent Patterning Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1695 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Peaucelle, H. Morin, J. Traas, and P. Laufs Plants expressing a miR164-resistant CUC2 gene reveal the importance of post-meristematic maintenance of phyllotaxy in Arabidopsis Development, March 15, 2007; 134(6): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Izhaki and J. L. Bowman KANADI and Class III HD-Zip Gene Families Regulate Embryo Patterning and Modulate Auxin Flow during Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, February 1, 2007; 19(2): 495 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Silverstone, T.-S. Tseng, S. M. Swain, A. Dill, S. Y. Jeong, N. E. Olszewski, and T.-p. Sun Functional Analysis of SPINDLY in Gibberellin Signaling in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 987 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sauer, J. Balla, C. Luschnig, J. Wisniewska, V. Reinohl, J. Friml, and E. Benkova Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARF-dependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity. Genes & Dev., October 15, 2006; 20(20): 2902 - 2911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. FAMBRINI, E. BONSIGNORI, F. RAPPARINI, G. CIONINI, V. MICHELOTTI, D. BERTINI, R. BARALDI, and C. PUGLIESI stem fasciated, a Recessive Mutation in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), Alters Plant Morphology and Auxin Level Ann. Bot., October 1, 2006; 98(4): 715 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Balanza, M. Navarrete, M. Trigueros, and C. Ferrandiz Patterning the female side of Arabidopsis: the importance of hormones J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3457 - 3469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Semba, S.-Y. Han, H. R. Qin, K. A. McCorkell, D. Iliopoulos, Y. Pekarsky, T. Druck, F. Trapasso, C. M. Croce, and K. Huebner Biological Functions of Mammalian Nit1, the Counterpart of the Invertebrate NitFhit Rosetta Stone Protein, a Possible Tumor Suppressor J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28244 - 28253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Carraro, C. Forestan, S. Canova, J. Traas, and S. Varotto ZmPIN1a and ZmPIN1b Encode Two Novel Putative Candidates for Polar Auxin Transport and Plant Architecture Determination of Maize Plant Physiology, September 1, 2006; 142(1): 254 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kessler, B. Townsley, and N. Sinha L1 Division and Differentiation Patterns Influence Shoot Apical Meristem Maintenance Plant Physiology, August 1, 2006; 141(4): 1349 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. E. Tax and A. Durbak Meristems in the movies: live imaging as a tool for decoding intercellular signaling in shoot apical meristems. PLANT CELL, June 1, 2006; 18(6): 1331 - 1337. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. KORN Anodic Asymmetry of Leaves and Flowers and its Relationship to Phyllotaxis Ann. Bot., June 1, 2006; 97(6): 1011 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Scheres and J. Xu Polar auxin transport and patterning: grow with the flow Genes & Dev., April 15, 2006; 20(8): 922 - 926. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Scarpella, D. Marcos, J. Friml, and T. Berleth Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport Genes & Dev., April 15, 2006; 20(8): 1015 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Hartweck, R. K. Genger, W. M. Grey, and N. E. Olszewski SECRET AGENT and SPINDLY have overlapping roles in the development of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heyn. J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(4): 865 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kawakatsu, J.-I. Itoh, K. Miyoshi, N. Kurata, N. Alvarez, B. Veit, and Y. Nagato PLASTOCHRON2 Regulates Leaf Initiation and Maturation in Rice PLANT CELL, March 1, 2006; 18(3): 612 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Jonsson, M. G. Heisler, B. E. Shapiro, E. M. Meyerowitz, and E. Mjolsness An auxin-driven polarized transport model for phyllotaxis PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1633 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. B. de Reuille, I. Bohn-Courseau, K. Ljung, H. Morin, N. Carraro, C. Godin, and J. Traas Computer simulations reveal properties of the cell-cell signaling network at the shoot apex in Arabidopsis PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1627 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Smith, S. Guyomarc'h, T. Mandel, D. Reinhardt, C. Kuhlemeier, and P. Prusinkiewicz A plausible model of phyllotaxis PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1301 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Pekker, J. P. Alvarez, and Y. Eshed Auxin Response Factors Mediate Arabidopsis Organ Asymmetry via Modulation of KANADI Activity PLANT CELL, November 1, 2005; 17(11): 2899 - 2910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Poupart, A. M. Rashotte, G. K. Muday, and C. S. Waddell The rib1 Mutant of Arabidopsis Has Alterations in Indole-3-Butyric Acid Transport, Hypocotyl Elongation, and Root Architecture Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1460 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Xu, L. Zhu, H. Shou, and P. Wu A PIN1 Family Gene, OsPIN1, involved in Auxin-dependent Adventitious Root Emergence and Tillering in Rice Plant Cell Physiol., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1674 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Treml, S. Winderl, R. Radykewicz, M. Herz, G. Schweizer, P. Hutzler, E. Glawischnig, and R. A. T. Ruiz The gene ENHANCER OF PINOID controls cotyledon development in the Arabidopsis embryo Development, September 15, 2005; 132(18): 4063 - 4074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Alexander, E. A. Mellor, and J. A. Langdale CORKSCREW1 Defines a Novel Mechanism of Domain Specification in the Maize Shoot Plant Physiology, July 1, 2005; 138(3): 1396 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hay and M. Tsiantis From genes to plants via meristems Development, June 15, 2005; 132(12): 2679 - 2684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Clay and T. Nelson Arabidopsis thickvein Mutation Affects Vein Thickness and Organ Vascularization, and Resides in a Provascular Cell-Specific Spermine Synthase Involved in Vein Definition and in Polar Auxin Transport Plant Physiology, June 1, 2005; 138(2): 767 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Green, M. J. Prigge, R. B. Katzman, and S. E. Clark CORONA, a Member of the Class III Homeodomain Leucine Zipper Gene Family in Arabidopsis, Regulates Stem Cell Specification and Organogenesis PLANT CELL, March 1, 2005; 17(3): 691 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. SAITO, S. YAMASAKI, N. FUJII, and H. TAKAHASHI Possible Involvement of CS-ACS1 and Ethylene in Auxin-induced Peg Formation of Cucumber Seedlings Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 413 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Reinhardt, M. Frenz, T. Mandel, and C. Kuhlemeier Microsurgical and laser ablation analysis of leaf positioning and dorsoventral patterning in tomato Development, January 1, 2005; 132(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Zgurski, R. Sharma, D. A. Bolokoski, and E. A. Schultz Asymmetric Auxin Response Precedes Asymmetric Growth and Differentiation of asymmetric leaf1 and asymmetric leaf2 Arabidopsis Leaves PLANT CELL, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 77 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pfluger and P. Zambryski The role of SEUSS in auxin response and floral organ patterning Development, October 1, 2004; 131(19): 4697 - 4707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Champagne and N. Sinha Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts? Development, September 15, 2004; 131(18): 4401 - 4412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. MAUSETH Giant Shoot Apical Meristems in Cacti Have Ordinary Leaf Primordia but Altered Phyllotaxy and Shoot Diameter Ann. Bot., July 1, 2004; 94(1): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Fu and M. J. Scanlon Clonal Mosaic Analysis of EMPTY PERICARP2 Reveals Nonredundant Functions of the Duplicated HEAT SHOCK FACTOR BINDING PROTEINs During Maize Shoot Development Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1381 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kwiatkowska Surface growth at the reproductive shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana pin-formed 1 and wild type J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2004; 55(399): 1021 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Hardtke, W. Ckurshumova, D. P. Vidaurre, S. A. Singh, G. Stamatiou, S. B. Tiwari, G. Hagen, T. J. Guilfoyle, and T. Berleth Overlapping and non-redundant functions of the Arabidopsis auxin response factors MONOPTEROS and NONPHOTOTROPIC HYPOCOTYL 4 Development, March 1, 2004; 131(5): 1089 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. Keller, R. Stahlberg, L. S. Barkawi, and J. D. Cohen Long-Term Inhibition by Auxin of Leaf Blade Expansion in Bean and Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, March 1, 2004; 134(3): 1217 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Miyoshi, B.-O. Ahn, T. Kawakatsu, Y. Ito, J.-I. Itoh, Y. Nagato, and N. Kurata PLASTOCHRON1, a timekeeper of leaf initiation in rice, encodes cytochrome P450 PNAS, January 20, 2004; 101(3): 875 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Liu, W. Ni, M. E. Griffith, Z. Huang, C. Chang, W. Peng, H. Ma, and D. Xie The ASK1 and ASK2 Genes Are Essential for Arabidopsis Early Development PLANT CELL, January 1, 2004; 16(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Campanoni, B. Blasius, and P. Nick Auxin Transport Synchronizes the Pattern of Cell Division in a Tobacco Cell Line Plant Physiology, November 1, 2003; 133(3): 1251 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. J. Steynen and E. A. Schultz The FORKED genes are essential for distal vein meeting in Arabidopsis Development, October 1, 2003; 130(19): 4695 - 4708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Scanlon The Polar Auxin Transport Inhibitor N-1-Naphthylphthalamic Acid Disrupts Leaf Initiation, KNOX Protein Regulation, and Formation of Leaf Margins in Maize Plant Physiology, October 1, 2003; 133(2): 597 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Byrne, A. T. Groover, J. R. Fontana, and R. A. Martienssen Phyllotactic pattern and stem cell fate are determined by the Arabidopsis homeobox gene BELLRINGER Development, September 1, 2003; 130(17): 3941 - 3950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Reinhardt, M. Frenz, T. Mandel, and C. Kuhlemeier Microsurgical and laser ablation analysis of interactions between the zones and layers of the tomato shoot apical meristem Development, September 1, 2003; 130(17): 4073 - 4083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Korves and J. Bergelson A Developmental Response to Pathogen Infection in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, September 1, 2003; 133(1): 339 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhao, X. Dai, H. E. Blackwell, S. L. Schreiber, and J. Chory SIR1, an Upstream Component in Auxin Signaling Identified by Chemical Genetics Science, August 22, 2003; 301(5636): 1107 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Parker, R. Schofield, B. Sundberg, and S. Turner Isolation of COV1, a gene involved in the regulation of vascular patterning in the stem of Arabidopsis Development, May 15, 2003; 130(10): 2139 - 2148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wyrzykowska and A. Fleming Cell division pattern influences gene expression in the shoot apical meristem PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5561 - 5566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nelissen, J. H. Clarke, M. De Block, S. De Block, R. Vanderhaeghen, R. E. Zielinski, T. Dyer, S. Lust, D. Inze, and M. Van Lijsebettens DRL1, a Homolog of the Yeast TOT4/KTI12 Protein, Has a Function in Meristem Activity and Organ Growth in Plants PLANT CELL, March 1, 2003; 15(3): 639 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sabatini, R. Heidstra, M. Wildwater, and B. Scheres SCARECROW is involved in positioning the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis root meristem Genes & Dev., February 1, 2003; 17(3): 354 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Micol and S. Hake The Development of Plant Leaves Plant Physiology, February 1, 2003; 131(2): 389 - 394. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Stuurman, F. Jaggi, and C. Kuhlemeier Shoot meristem maintenance is controlled by a GRAS-gene mediated signal from differentiating cells Genes & Dev., September 1, 2002; 16(17): 2213 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Takahashi, S. Matsuhara, M. Abe, and Y. Komeda Disruption of a DNA Topoisomerase I Gene Affects Morphogenesis in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, September 1, 2002; 14(9): 2085 - 2093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Avsian-Kretchmer, J.-C. Cheng, L. Chen, E. Moctezuma, and Z. R. Sung Indole Acetic Acid Distribution Coincides with Vascular Differentiation Pattern during Arabidopsis Leaf Ontogeny Plant Physiology, September 1, 2002; 130(1): 199 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Pagnussat, M. Simontacchi, S. Puntarulo, and L. Lamattina Nitric Oxide Is Required for Root Organogenesis Plant Physiology, July 1, 2002; 129(3): 954 - 956. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Golz and A. Hudson Signalling in Plant Lateral Organ Development PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S277 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. HOLLOWAY and M. LANTIN Maintaining Apical Dominance in the Fern Gametophyte Ann. Bot., April 1, 2002; 89(4): 409 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Tobena-Santamaria, M. Bliek, K. Ljung, G. Sandberg, J. N.M. Mol, E. Souer, and R. Koes FLOOZY of petunia is a flavin mono-oxygenase-like protein required for the specification of leaf and flower architecture Genes & Dev., March 15, 2002; 16(6): 753 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Aida, T. Vernoux, M. Furutani, J. Traas, and M. Tasaka Roles of PIN-FORMED1 and MONOPTEROS in pattern formation of the apical region of the Arabidopsis embryo Development, January 9, 2002; 129(17): 3965 - 3974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Keyes, J. V. Taylor, R. P. Apkarian, and D. G. Lynn Dancing Together. Social Controls in Parasitic Plant Development Plant Physiology, December 1, 2001; 127(4): 1508 - 1512. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Benjamins, A. Quint, D. Weijers, P. Hooykaas, and R. Offringa The PINOID protein kinase regulates organ development in Arabidopsis by enhancing polar auxin transport Development, October 15, 2001; 128(20): 4057 - 4067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Eckardt, H.-T. Cho, R. M. Perrin, and M. R. Willmann Plant Biology 2001 PLANT CELL, October 1, 2001; 13(10): 2165 - 2173. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Cleland Unlocking the mysteries of leaf primordia formation PNAS, September 25, 2001; 98(20): 10981 - 10982. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. McSteen and S. Hake barren inflorescence2 regulates axillary meristem development in the maize inflorescence Development, August 1, 2001; 128(15): 2881 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Casimiro, A. Marchant, R. P. Bhalerao, T. Beeckman, S. Dhooge, R. Swarup, N. Graham, D. Inzé, G. Sandberg, P. J. Casero, et al. Auxin Transport Promotes Arabidopsis Lateral Root Initiation PLANT CELL, April 1, 2001; 13(4): 843 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T Vernoux, J Kronenberger, O Grandjean, P Laufs, and J Traas PIN-FORMED 1 regulates cell fate at the periphery of the shoot apical meristem Development, January 12, 2000; 127(23): 5157 - 5165. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (238) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reinhardt, D. Articles by Kuhlemeier, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reinhardt, D. Articles by Kuhlemeier, C. Agricola Articles by Reinhardt, D. Articles by Kuhlemeier, C.