|
|
||||||||
First published online September 26, 2003; 10.1105/tpc.013474
American Society of Plant Biologists RPS4-Mediated Disease Resistance Requires the Combined Presence of RPS4 Transcripts with Full-Length and Truncated Open Reading FramesDepartment of Plant Microbiology and Pathology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail gassmannw{at}missouri.edu; fax 573-882-1469
Arabidopsis RPS4 belongs to the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR)nucleotide binding site (NBS)Leu-rich repeat (LRR) class of disease resistance (R) genes. Like other family members in different plant species, RPS4 produces alternative transcripts with truncated open reading frames. The dominant alternative RPS4 transcripts are generated by retention of intron 3 or introns 2 and 3, which contain in-frame stop codons and lie downstream of the NBS-encoding exon. We analyzed the biological significance of these alternative transcripts in disease resistance by removing introns 2 and 3, either individually or in combination, from a functional RPS4-Ler (Landsberg erecta) transgene. Removal of one or both introns abolished the function of the RPS4 transgene, whereas expression was not affected. In addition, a truncated RPS4-Ler transgene encoding the putative TIR and NBS domains was not sufficient to confer resistance, suggesting that the combined presence of regular and alternative RPS4 transcripts is necessary for function. Interestingly, we observed partial resistance in transgenic lines expressing both intron-deficient and truncated transgenes. This finding confirms the requirement for regular and alternative RPS4 transcripts and indicates that alternative transcripts function at the protein level rather than as regulatory RNAs. Together with published results on the tobacco N gene, our data suggest that the generation of alternative TIR-NBS-LRR R gene transcripts is of general biological significance across plant species.
Plants are under constant challenge by potential pathogens and have evolved a broad range of mechanisms to limit pathogen growth (Staskawicz et al., 1995
The Arabidopsis RPS4 gene specifies disease resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato strain DC3000 (DC3000) expressing avrRps4 (Gassmann et al., 1999
Another distinguishing feature of TNL R genes from different plant species is their capacity to generate alternative transcripts with truncated open reading frames (ORFs). These encode putative TIR-NBS (TN) proteins that lack the LRR and C-terminal domains (Jordan et al., 2002
The precise function of alternative R gene transcripts in gene-for-gene resistance remains elusive. To date, the tobacco N gene has been analyzed most carefully. It was shown that the native N gene promoter, the alternative exon within intron 3, and the 3' untranslated region all are required for the correct regulation of alternative transcript expression and full resistance (Dinesh-Kumar and Baker, 2000 Here, we provide evidence that alternative RPS4 transcripts are required for function. We show that the removal of introns 2 and 3 from the functional RPS4-Ler gene abolished avrRps4-specific resistance. In addition, truncated RPS4-Ler gene fragments encoding TN proteins were not sufficient to confer resistance. These data suggest that the combined presence of regular and alternative transcripts is required for RPS4 function. Significantly, we found that expression of both intron-deficient and truncated RPS4 transgenes in double-transgenic plants partially restored avrRps4-specific resistance. Our results indicate that the generation of alternative transcripts may be of general importance for TNL R gene function across plant species.
Alternative RPS4 Transcripts Are Essential for Resistance To determine whether alternative RPS4 transcripts are required for function, we generated RPS4 gene constructs in which introns 1 and 4 remained but introns 2 and/or 3 were removed. These intron-deficient genes were derived from a genomic clone of the functional RPS4-Ler allele driven by its native promoter. Genomic sequences surrounding intron 2 or 3 were swapped for cDNA sequences that were obtained from Ler RNA by reverse transcriptasemediated (RT) PCR (see Methods). The resulting intron-deficient RPS4 clones lacking intron 2, intron 3, or both introns 2 and 3 were introduced into the naturally avrRps4-susceptible accession RLD to obtain stable transformants designated RLD-i2r, RLD-i3r, and RLD-i23r, respectively. We used the RPS4 native promoter and stable transgenic lines to closely mimic the natural system. Transformants containing wild-type RPS4-Ler (RLD-R4L) also were generated as a positive control. For each transgene, homozygous single-locus transgenic lines were selected from 20 independent transformants for disease and in planta bacterial growth assays. In disease assays, two leaves of similar age on a given seedling were infiltrated with virulent DC3000 or DC3000 expressing avrRps4. In the absence of resistance, disease symptoms appear as chlorosis at 5 days after inoculation. As shown in Figure 1A, both Ler and RLD-R4L were resistant to DC3000(avrRps4), whereas RLD was susceptible. Likewise, RLD-i2r, RLD-i3r, and RLD-i23r plants were fully susceptible to DC3000 (avrRps4), indicating that removal of even one intron severely compromises RPS4 function (Figure 1A). Results similar to those shown in Figure 1A were obtained with all transgenic lines tested (four or five independent homozygous transgenic lines for each transgene; data not shown).
Because intronic sequences can affect gene expression, we next tested whether the observed differences in resistance phenotypes were caused by differential transgene expression levels. The presence and number of transgenes in transgenic RLD lines were determined by DNA gel blot analysis (Table 1). Also, the overall expression level of transgenes irrespective of splicing at introns 2 and 3 was measured by quantitative RT-PCR using primers flanking intron 1 of RPS4 (Table 1). A cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence marker was used to distinguish transgene RT-PCR products from products arising from the endogenous rps4-RLD gene (see Methods). The cleaved amplified polymorphic sequenceassisted RT-PCR experiments showed that the expression of transgenes largely correlated with the transgene copy number and was similar to endogenous rps4-RLD expression except in two RLD-i23r lines (Table 1). Importantly, transgene expression levels were similar in resistant RLD-R4L and susceptible RLD-i2r, RLD-i3r, and two of four RLD-i23r lines. These data show that the susceptibility of RLD-i2r, RLD-i3r, and RLD-i23r plants reflects the impaired functionality of the intron-deficient RPS4 genes rather than poor transgene expression.
To quantitatively determine the degree of disease resistance, we measured in planta bacterial growth in representative plant lines. The lines RLD-R4L-C, RLD-i2r-B, RLD-i3r-A, and RLD-i23r-B were chosen based on RPS4 transgene expression levels (Table 1). The growth of virulent DC3000 was similar in all plants tested and comparable to the growth of DC3000(avrRps4) in RLD (data not shown). Consistent with qualitative disease assays, Ler and RLD-R4L-C were resistant to DC3000(avrRps4), whereas RLD-i2r-B, RLD-i3r-A, and RLD-i23r-B were fully susceptible compared with the parental RLD line (Figure 1B). Surprisingly, these data show that the removal of one intron alone completely abolishes RPS4 function, indicating that the number of alternative transcripts generated by wild-type RPS4 genes is close to a threshold required for resistance that is not reached by intron-deficient transgenes.
Intron-Deficient Transgene Transcripts Are Not Spliced Aberrantly As shown in Figure 2A, multiple transcript variants (TV) were detected in all plant lines. Control experiments without reverse transcriptase showed that all products represented RPS4 transcripts, not genomic DNA contamination (Figure 2A). Wild-type RLD showed alternative transcripts arising from the endogenous rps4-RLD gene similar to wild-type Ler (Figure 2A, lanes 2 and 4), explaining why individual transcripts were not absent in transgenic lines expressing intron-deficient transgenes. Sequencing revealed that TV1 retained introns 2 and 3, whereas TV2 was composed of two transcript species of similar size lacking either intron 2 (TV2A) or intron 3 (TV2B) (Figure 2B). TV3, corresponding to the regular transcript with both introns 2 and 3 removed, was the most abundant form in all lines/plants tested (Figure 2A). TV4, the smallest detectable transcript, was present at similar levels in resistant RLD-R4L-C and susceptible RLD-i2r-B plants and was detected weakly in all lines, including wild-type RLD and Ler plants. An additional cryptic intron within exon 3 was found to be spliced out in TV4 (Figures 2B and 2C). Removal of this cryptic intron caused a frameshift in the open reading frame, potentially producing a third truncated protein containing mostly TN domains (Figure 2C). TV2B and TV4 had not been described previously.
Importantly, sequencing of individual TV3 clones from all transgenic plants showed that intron-deficient transgenes in all transgenic lines gave rise to RPS4-Ler mRNAs that were not spliced aberrantly and thus encoded full-length RPS4-Ler protein. These expression and transcript analyses showed that RLD-i2r, RLD-i3r, and RLD-i23r lines were susceptible despite the presence of full-length RPS4-Ler protein-encoding transcripts. Therefore, we concluded that alternative RPS4 transcripts are essential for resistance. In addition, sequencing of individual TV2A and TV2B clones in RLD-i2r and RLD-i3r lines showed that intron-deficient transgenes with only one intron removed still generated transcripts retaining the other intron. Although we cannot exclude altered frequencies of retention, this finding indicated that the retention of intron 2 or 3 did not require the presence of both introns in the pre-mRNA.
Characterization of rps4-RLD Genomic RLD DNA surrounding the two unique amino acid changes in rps4-RLD was amplified and swapped into RPS4-Ler (see Methods). The resulting chimeric RPS4 clones with the amino acid changes N195D, Y950H, and N195D plus Y950H were introduced into RLD plants to obtain stable transformants designated RLD-ND, RLD-YH, and RLD-NDYH, respectively. As shown in Figure 3A, RLD-ND, RLD-YH, and RLD-NDYH plants were susceptible to DC3000(avrRps4), indicating that either one of the amino acid changes compromised RPS4 function. Similar results were obtained with all transgenic lines tested (four or five independent transgenic lines for each transgene). Disease symptoms appeared to be less severe on RLD-YH than on RLD, RLD-ND, and RLD-NDYH, suggesting that RPS4(Y950D) retained residual function.
We again measured the expression level of transgenes by quantitative RT-PCR using specific primers spanning intron 1 of RPS4 (Table 2). As with intron-deficient transgenes, the expression of chimeric transgenes largely correlated with the transgene copy number and was similar to endogenous rps4-RLD expression. Similarly, transgene expression levels were comparable in resistant RLD-R4L and susceptible RLD-ND, RLD-YH, and RLD-NDYH lines, again suggesting impaired transgene function in susceptible lines. In planta bacterial growth was measured in the representative lines RLD-R4L-A, RLD-ND-A, RLD-YH-B, and RLD-NDYH-A (Figure 3B). The growth of virulent DC3000 was similar in all plants tested (data not shown). Ler and RLD-R4L-A were resistant to DC3000(avrRps4), whereas RLD-ND-A, RLD-YH-B, and RLD-NDYH-A were susceptible at various levels (Figure 3B). The growth of DC3000(avrRps4) in RLD-ND-A and RLD-NDYH-A was similar to that in parental RLD plants and to the in planta growth of virulent DC3000. By contrast, the growth of DC3000(avrRps4) was 10-fold lower in RLD-YH-B than in RLD-ND-A, RLD-NDYH-A, and RLD plants and was equally lower than the growth of virulent DC3000 in RLD-YH-B. These findings were consistent with the qualitative disease assay data (Figure 2A).
Together, these data indicate that the amino acid polymorphisms N195D and Y950H specific to rps4-RLD are sufficient to account for the nonfunctionality of rps4-RLD. Importantly, in the context of this study, the N195D polymorphism would be present in truncated proteins encoded by alternative rps4-RLD transcripts. Because RPS4-Ler and rps4-RLD transcript sequences are >99% identical and expressed at similar levels, this finding indicates that alternative RPS4 transcripts function at the protein level rather than as regulatory RNAs.
The Combination of Intron-Deficient and Truncated Transgenes Partially Reconstitutes RPS4 Function
To determine whether the combined presence of intron-deficient and truncated transgenes confers resistance, we transformed the TN-encoding fragments of RPS4-Ler into the RLD-i23r-B line and selected homozygous double-transgenic RLD lines with varying TN transgene insertion numbers (Table 3). Interestingly, double-transgenic lines showed partial resistance with each of the truncated constructs (9 of 11 homozygous lines tested; Table 3, Figure 4B). We measured the degree of resistance in representative lines by in vivo bacterial growth experiments (Figure 4C). All lines were equally susceptible to virulent DC3000, indicating that the expression of truncated RPS4 did not constitutively activate plant defenses. Consistent with the disease assays, the growth of DC3000(avrRps4) was 10-fold lower in RLD-i23r-B-TN0L-A double-transgenic plants than in the corresponding single-transgenic plants and equally lower than the growth of virulent DC3000 in RLD-i23r-B-TN0L-A. This resistance clearly was partial, because the growth of DC3000(avrRps4) in RLD-R4L-A was 30-fold lower than in RLD-i23r-B-TN0L-A. Nevertheless, similar inhibition of DC3000 (avrRps4) growth in RLD-i23r-B-TN0L-A was measured in two additional experiments and was statistically highly significant in each experiment (analysis of variance; P < 0.05).
Importantly, these results show directly that the combined presence of RPS4 full-length and truncated TN-encoding transcripts is required and sufficient for (partial) RPS4 function. The truncated RPS4-Ler transcript in RLD-i23r-B-TN0L-A does not resemble naturally occurring alternative transcripts in that the 3' half of RPS4, including introns 2 and 3, is missing. However, like the natural alternative transcripts, it encodes a truncated TN protein. This finding again suggests that alternative transcripts function at the protein level rather than as regulatory RNAs.
In this study, we have shown that alternative RPS4 transcripts are essential for the function of this R gene. Surprisingly, removal of only one of the two alternatively spliced introns abolished RPS4 function. The characterization of RPS4 transcript variants occurring in wild-type and transgenic lines revealed a new cryptic intron in exon 3. Although rare, removal of this intron also leads to ORF truncation. All of the altered transgenes, including the one lacking both introns 2 and 3, retained the capacity to generate alternative transcripts at some lower frequency, yet all of them failed to confer measurable resistance. We further showed that RPS4 function was partially reconstituted when intron-deficient and truncated RPS4 transgenes were present in the same plant. This finding is a significant advance toward directly showing that the combined presence of transcript variants is required for resistance. Together, these data suggest that resistance requires a minimal number of alternative RPS4 transcripts that is not reached by intron-deficient transgenes. Furthermore, full resistance may depend on finely balanced or tightly regulated numbers of regular and alternative RPS4 transcripts.
Together with the previous study on alternative N gene transcripts (Dinesh-Kumar and Baker, 2000
Lack of Functional Substitution by rps4-RLD or RPS4 Homologs
As a comparison, we aligned the TN-encoding sequence of flax L6 with L9 and M, the two genes that were proposed to substitute for alternative L6 transcript function in transgenic Ward and Trac2 flax lines, respectively (Ayliffe et al., 1999
Alternative Transcripts: Regulatory RNAs or mRNAs Encoding Truncated Proteins? Conversely, truncated RPS4-Ler transgenes that do not resemble naturally occurring alternative RPS4 transcripts were found to partially complement the function of an intron-deficient RPS4-Ler transgene. Note that we did not directly test truncated transgenes with the N195D polymorphism in double-transgenic plants because of the complete lack of complementation by the endogenous rps4-RLD gene, which gives rise to the same spectrum of alternative transcripts as functional RPS4 alleles, in all of our transgenic lines. Future experiments will critically address the existence and stability of functional and nonfunctional truncated RPS4 proteins. Interpretation of our data is complicated by the apparent requirement for a finely balanced ratio of RPS4 transcripts for full resistance, and a regulatory RNA role cannot be excluded at this time. Clearly, investigation of transcript ratios during the infection process and detection of truncated and full-length RPS4 protein are essential next steps. Our success in reconstituting the RPS4 system with two transgenes will allow us to differentially tag the two proteins and vary the expression level of each protein for future biochemical assays.
Based on the observation that alternative TNL R gene transcripts largely encode TN proteins and on the assumption that these truncated proteins are required for resistance, it has been suggested that the LRR domain negatively regulates full-length TNL R protein function (Jordan et al., 2002
Interestingly, the putative truncated TN proteins resemble adapter proteins such as MyD88 that function in animal innate immunity. MyD88 contains a TIR domain and a second proteinprotein interaction domain, the death domain, which allows it to function as an adapter between the interleukin-1 or Toll-like receptor TIR domains and downstream kinase complexes (O'Neill, 2000
Plants, Bacterial Strains, and Disease Inoculations Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato strain DC3000 (DC3000) containing the empty vector pVSP61 or expressing avrRps4 on plasmid pV316-1A were grown as described previously (Hinsch and Staskawicz, 1996 1 x 106 colony-forming units/mL) in 10 mM MgCl2. Disease symptoms appeared as chlorosis in the inoculated leaves at 3 to 5 days after inoculation. In planta bacterial growth assays were performed as described (Whalen et al., 1991
RPS4 Constructs and Plant Transformations To generate intron-deficient constructs of RPS4-Ler, total RNA isolated from Ler plants was used as a template for reverse transcriptasemediated (RT) PCR using random hexamer primers. First-strand cDNA was amplified with Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) using primers flanking intron 2 (forward, 5'-AACGCTGGAACTTCCTCAGG-3'; reverse, 5'-CTGTAGGGCAGCTTAAGGTC-3') and intron 3 (forward, 5'-CAAGGGAAGTTGATCTGAAG-3'; reverse, 5'-TCCTTAAAAGTTGAGCAGCC-3'). Amplified regions included the unique restriction sites Bsu36I and SalI flanking intron 2 and SalI and NdeI flanking intron 3. Individual cloned PCR products were sequenced to verify correct splicing and the absence of amplification errors. Clones were digested with the indicated restriction enzymes and swapped into the RPS4-Ler construct. Constructs were verified by PCR for the absence of introns and by sequencing of cloning junctions. Amino acid exchange constructs were obtained in a similar manner. With RLD genomic DNA as a template, rps4-RLD sequences containing the amino acid polymorphisms were amplified using Pfu DNA polymerase. For sequences containing the N195D polymorphism, the primers 5'-CAAACCTAGACACAGTAGTG-3' (forward) and 5'-CTTGGACAACTCGCCTAAGA-3' (reverse) were used, and for Y950H, the primers 5'-AGTCAGCTTTCTCAACTTAA-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCAATGAAGACATGGTCTA-3' (reverse) were used. The amplified regions included the unique restriction sites BglII and Bsu36I flanking N195D and NdeI and PpuMI flanking Y950H. Note that N195D is the only amino acid difference between RLD and Ler in the amplified region. The amplified region surrounding Y950H contains a second amino acid polymorphism at position 1004 (Ile in Ler, Val in RLD, Columbia-0, Wassilewskija-0, and Poppelsdorf-1). Because this polymorphism is shared between rps4-RLD and the functional alleles in the other accessions, we did not expect this polymorphism to influence the function of RPS4. Individual PCR clones were verified by sequencing. Clones were digested with the indicated restriction enzymes and swapped into the RPS4-Ler construct. Constructs were verified using cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence markers that distinguish RPS4-Ler from rps4-RLD in the swapped regions and by sequencing of cloning junctions. To generate truncated constructs, RPS4-Ler lacking both introns 2 and 3 was digested with SacII (in polylinker) and within the gene with BsaI (partial), SalI, AlwnI (partial), or NdeI, blunted, and religated.
Using XhoI and SacI, RPS4-Ler constructs were subcloned into the binary plant transformation vectors pCLD04541 (Bancroft et al., 1997
RT-PCR Analysis of RPS4 Transcripts To display RPS4 transcript variants, nesting forward primers upstream of intron 2 (distal, 5'-AACTTGCACAGAGCCCCAGC-3'; proximal, 5'-CTGTGGCTCCATCAACACAT-3') and nesting reverse primers downstream of intron 3 (distal, 5'-TCCTTAAAAGTTGATCAGCC-3'; proximal, 5'-GATCGACCCACCTTAAGCAT-3') were used for PCR. RT-PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels for size comparison. TV3 and TV4 bands were cut from a gel and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy cloning vector (Promega, Madison, WI). To enrich for TV1 and TV2A transcripts, a proximal reverse primer with a 3' end within intron 3 (5'-GCATGGTGTGTCCTATTACAG-3') was used; for TV2B, a proximal forward primer with a 3' end within intron 2 (5'-ATGGTGAGACCAGAAGTTCC-3') was used. PCR products were cloned directly into pGEM-T Easy. Three to six clones for each transcript were sequenced to determine transcript origin based on a single nucleotide polymorphism between RLD and Ler within the amplified region. TV3 clones were analyzed in all transgenic lines shown in Figure 2A, whereas TV1 clones were analyzed only in RLD-R4L-C, TV2A clones were analyzed in RLD-R4L-C and RLD-i2r-B, TV2B clones were analyzed in RLD-i3r-A, and TV4 clones were analyzed in Ler, RLD-R4L-C, and RLD-i23r-B. Although not quantitative, this approach enabled a qualitative verification of all possible transgene-derived transcripts in transgenic lines. Upon request, materials integral to the findings presented in this publication will be made available in a timely manner to all investigators on similar terms for noncommercial research purposes. To obtain materials, please contact Walter Gassmann, gassmannw{at}missouri.edu.
Accession Numbers
We thank Dipanwita Saha and Nkemdi Anyanwu for technical assistance, Mark Ellersieck for assistance with statistical analyses, and Jim Schoelz and Sharon Pike for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by University of Missouri Research Board Grant RB 01-133 and U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2002-35319-12639 to W.G.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.013474. Received May 6, 2003; accepted August 15, 2003.
Aarts, N., Metz, M., Holub, E., Staskawicz, B.J., Daniels, M.J., and Parker, J.E. (1998). Different requirements for EDS1 and NDR1 by disease resistance genes define at least two R gene-mediated signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1030610311.
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 33893402. Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.G., and Struhl, K. (1987). Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. (New York: Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience). Axtell, M.J., and Staskawicz, B.J. (2003). Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4. Cell 112, 369377.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Ayliffe, M.A., Frost, D.V., Finnegan, E.J., Lawrence, G.J., Anderson, P.A., and Ellis, J.G. (1999). Analysis of alternative transcripts of the flax L6 rust resistance gene. Plant J. 17, 287292.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Baker, B., Zambryski, P., Staskawicz, B., and Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. (1997). Signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Science 276, 726733. Bancroft, I., Love, K., Bent, E., Sherson, S., Lister, C., Cobett, C., Goodman, H.M., and Dean, C. (1997). A strategy involving the use of high redundancy YAC subclone libraries facilitates the contiguous representation in cosmid and BAC clones of 1.7 Mb of the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Weeds World 4, 19. Bent, A.F. (1996). Plant disease resistance genes: Function meets structure. Plant Cell 8, 17571771.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Clough, S.J., and Bent, A.F. (1998). Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735743.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Dangl, J.L., and Jones, J.D.G. (2001). Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411, 826833.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dinesh-Kumar, S.P., and Baker, B.J. (2000). Alternatively spliced N resistance gene transcripts: Their possible role in tobacco mosaic virus resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 19081913.
Dinesh-Kumar, S.P., Whitham, S., Choi, D., Hehl, R., Corr, C., and Baker, B. (1995). Transposon tagging of tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: Its possible role in the TMV-N-mediated signal transduction pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 41754180.
Dodds, P.N., Lawrence, G.J., and Ellis, J.G. (2001). Six amino acid changes confined to the leucine-rich repeat
Falk, A., Feys, B.J., Frost, L.N., Jones, J.D.G., Daniels, M.J., and Parker, J.E. (1999). EDS1, an essential component of R gene-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis has homology to eukaryotic lipases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 32923297. Flor, H.H. (1971). Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275296.[CrossRef][ISI] Gassmann, W., Hinsch, M.E., and Staskawicz, B.J. (1999). The Arabidopsis RPS4 bacterial-resistance gene is a member of the TIR-NBS-LRR family of disease-resistance genes. Plant J. 20, 265277.[ISI][Medline] Gilliland, G., Perrin, S., and Bunn, H.F. (1990). Competitive PCR for quantitation of mRNA. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White, eds (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), pp. 6069. Hammond-Kosack, K.E., and Jones, J.D.G. (1996). Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 8, 17731791.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Hinsch, M., and Staskawicz, B.J. (1996). Identification of a new Arabidopsis disease resistance locus, RPS4, and cloning of the corresponding avirulence gene, avrRps4, from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9, 5561.[Medline] Imler, J.L., and Hoffmann, J.A. (2001). Toll receptors in innate immunity. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 304311.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Jordan, T., Schornack, S., and Lahaye, T. (2002). Alternative splicing of transcripts encoding Toll-like plant resistance proteins: What's the functional relevance to innate immunity? Trends Plant Sci. 7, 392398.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Lawrence, G.J., Finnegan, E.J., Ayliffe, M.A., and Ellis, J.G. (1995). The L6 gene for flax rust resistance is related to the Arabidopsis bacterial resistance gene RPS2 and the tobacco viral resistance gene N. Plant Cell 7, 11951206.[Abstract] Li, Q.T., and Verma, I.M. (2002). NF-kappa B regulation in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 725734.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Mackey, D., Belkhadir, Y., Alonso, J.M., Ecker, J.R., and Dangl, J.L. (2003). Arabidopsis RIN4 is a target of the type III virulence effector AvrRpt2 and modulates RPS2-mediated resistance. Cell 112, 379389.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Mackey, D., Holt, B.F., Wiig, A., and Dangl, J.L. (2002). RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 108, 743754.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473497.[CrossRef]
Noël, L., Moores, T.L., van der Biezen, E.A., Parniske, M., Daniels, M.J., Parker, J.E., and Jones, J.D.G. (1999). Pronounced intraspecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resistance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11, 20992111. O'Neill, L. (2000). The Toll/interleukin-1 receptor domain: A molecular switch for inflammation and host defence. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 557563.[ISI][Medline]
Parker, J.E., Coleman, M.J., Szabò, V., Frost, L.N., Schmidt, R., van der Biezen, E., Moores, T., Dean, C., Daniels, M., and Jones, J.D.G. (1997). The Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP5 shares similarity to the Toll and interleukin-1 receptors with N and L6. Plant Cell 9, 879894. Parker, J.E., Holub, E.B., Frost, L.N., Falk, A., Gunn, N.D., and Daniels, M.J. (1996). Characterization of eds1, a mutation in Arabidopsis suppressing resistance to Peronospora parasitica specified by several different RPP genes. Plant Cell 8, 20332046.[Abstract]
Staskawicz, B.J., Ausubel, F.M., Baker, B.J., Ellis, J.G., and Jones, J.D.G. (1995). Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance. Science 268, 661667. Tauszig-Delamasure, S., Bilak, H., Capovilla, M., Hoffmann, J.A., and Imler, J.L. (2002). Drosophila MyD88 is required for the response to fungal and Gram-positive bacterial infections. Nat. Immunol. 3, 9197.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Whalen, M.C., Innes, R.W., Bent, A.F., and Staskawicz, B.J. (1991). Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pathogens of Arabidopsis and a bacterial locus determining avirulence on both Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Cell 3, 4959. Whitham, S., Dinesh-Kumar, S.P., Choi, D., Hehl, R., Corr, C., and Baker, B. (1994). The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: Similarity to Toll and the interleukin-1 receptor. Cell 78, 11011115.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||