Plant Cell Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
The Plant Cell 16:2837-2839 (2004)
© 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists


IN THIS ISSUE

Host Proteins Guide Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation

Nancy A. Eckardt, News and Reviews Editor

neckardt{at}aspb.org

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is widely used for genetic transformation of plants because of its natural ability to transfer foreign DNA into the host plant genome. It is also a significant plant pathogen that causes crown gall disease on several agronomically important species, including grape vines, stone fruit, and nut trees (DeCleene and DeLey, 1976Go). After infection of a host plant, the bacterium transfers several virulence (Vir) proteins and a segment of DNA (called transfer DNA or T-DNA) from its tumor-inducing plasmid into the plant cell. With the help of Vir proteins, the T-DNA is then translocated into the host cell nucleus and integrated into the host genome, eliciting crown gall disease as oncogenes present within the T-DNA direct the uncontrolled proliferation of crown gall tumors. For use as a genetic tool, the oncogenes are removed such that genetic transformation can be effected without the development of disease. Despite the importance and widespread use of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a genetic tool, the mechanisms of T-DNA transfer into the plant cell and integration into the host genome are not well understood. Increased understanding of these processes will likely pave the way for improvements in transformation technology (Gelvin, 2003Go).

We are beginning to have a reasonable understanding of the key factors involved in the regulation of T-DNA nuclear import and genomic integration (reviewed in Zupan et al., 2000Go; Gelvin, 2003Go). T-DNA enters the plant cell bound to VirD2, an endonuclease that is involved in the cleavage of the T-DNA from the tumor-inducing plasmid, resulting in the production of the single-stranded T-DNA molecule covalently bound to VirD2 at the 5' end. Several other Vir proteins are transferred into the plant cell along with the T-DNA, including VirE2, which subsequently binds to and coats the T-DNA along its length. VirD2 and VirE2 contain nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences and are likely involved in mediating nuclear import of the T-DNA complex through interactions with Arabidopsis proteins, including VIP1 and possibly KAP-{alpha}. VIP1 binds VirE2, and antisense inhibition of VIP1 expression has been correlated with a reduction in nuclear targeting of VirE2 (Tzfira et al., 2001Go). AtKAP-{alpha} belongs to a family of proteins known as importins, which are known to be involved in nuclear translocation of proteins containing NLS sequences. Ballas and Citovsky (1997)Go showed that AtKAP-{alpha} binds VirD2 in vitro in an NLS-dependent manner, but in vivo evidence for a role for this protein in nuclear import of T-DNA is lacking.

After nuclear import, bound VirD2 and the coat of VirE2 and VIP1 proteins are removed before (or during) T-DNA integration into the host genome. Tzfira et al. (2004)Go have shown that bacterial VirF, which localizes to the plant cell nucleus along with the T-DNA complex, is an F-box protein that interacts with VIP1 and destabilizes both VIP1 and VirE2, presumably by targeting them for proteasomal degradation. VirF also interacts with the Arabidopsis Skp1 homolog ASK1 and thus may form an SCF (Skp1-cullin-F-box) complex with ASK1 (Schrammeijer et al., 2001Go). Tzfira et al. (2004)Go found that VirF did not interact with or destabilize VirD2, which suggests that VirD2 may remain bound to the T-DNA until a later stage. There is evidence that VirD2 plays an additional role in guiding the efficiency or precision of genomic integration (Mysore et al., 1998Go; Tinland et al., 2000).

By contrast, far less is known about the mechanism and regulation of T-DNA and Vir protein transport into the plant cell. The bacterium uses a Type IV secretion system (T4SS) to transfer the T-DNA complex and Vir proteins across the double membrane of the bacterial envelope (reviewed in Cascales and Christie, 2003Go). The bacterial T4SS is a complex of subunits encoded by 11 virB genes and virD4. There are two main structural components to the complex: a membrane-associated transporter complex that spans the bacterial double membrane and a closely associated T-pilus, which is an exocellular filamentous appendage. Bacterial pili perform various functions associated with mediating bacterial adhesion to specific targets in the environment. The T-pilus is structurally and functionally similar to the F-pilus, which mediates cell–cell adhesion and transfer of DNA during bacterial conjugation (Zupan et al., 2000Go; Cascales and Christie, 2004Go). The T-pilus is essential for T-DNA transfer to a foreign host and for Agrobacterium virulence, but its precise function, along with the mechanism of T-DNA and Vir protein transport across the plant plasma membrane, remains unknown. In this issue of The Plant Cell, Hwang and Gelvin (pages 3148–3167) report on the identification of four Arabidopsis proteins that interact with the main T-pilus protein, VirB2, and show that the presence of these proteins is required for efficient transformation.

The authors used a yeast two-hybrid assay to identify four Arabidopsis proteins that interact with VirB2: three related proteins of previously unknown function named VirB2-Interacting (BTI) proteins (BTI1-3) and a Ras-related small GTPase, AtRAB8. Further tests in yeast showed that all four proteins interact specifically with VirB2 and not with any other Agrobacterium Vir proteins tested. The BTI proteins were found to interact with each other and with AtRAB8 in vitro. Experiments using antisense RNA and RNA interference directed against each of the BTI proteins and AtRAB8, and overexpression of BTI proteins, further suggested that all four proteins have activity associated with efficient transformation. Interestingly, a transient increase in the levels of BTI proteins was observed immediately after Agrobacterium infection. Finally, localization of green fluorescent protein:BTI fusion proteins with confocal microscopy showed that the BTI proteins preferentially localize to the periphery of root cells in transgenic plants (see figure). The authors hypothesize that the three BTI proteins and AtRAB8 interact with the T-pilus in vivo and are involved in the initial interaction of Agrobacterium with plant cells.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Arabidopsis BTI Proteins Accumulate at the Plant Cell Periphery and Interact with the Major Agrobacterium T-Pilus Protein VirB2.

The figure shows a confocal microscopic image of a transgenic Arabidopsis root expressing a BTI1:GFP fusion protein.

 
Analysis of the protein sequences of the three BTI proteins and AtRAB8 lends support to the notion that these proteins might play a role in delivery of T-DNA and Vir proteins across the plant plasma membrane. The BTI proteins share a reticulon (RTN) homology domain comprising two large hydrophobic regions separated by an ~66–amino acid loop at the C terminus. RTNs make up a family of proteins that are enriched in endoplasmic reticulum membranes in animals. Oertle et al. (2003)Go identified more than 250 RTN-like genes in highly divergent eukaryotes, including fungi, animals, and plants. These authors hypothesize that RTN proteins arose early during eukaryotic evolution in conjunction with the establishment of the endomembrane system, in which they putatively play a fundamental role. Rab GTPases are known to play key regulatory roles in membrane trafficking, particularly in events related to vesicle formation and initiation of vesicle docking (Schimmøller et al., 1998Go). Rab proteins that have been characterized cycle between a GDP-bound inactive form and a GTP-bound active form. Activated GTP-bound Rab proteins are associated with transport vesicles. After membrane fusion of the vesicles, GTP hydrolysis yields inactive GDP-bound Rab, which is recycled back to the membrane of origin by the action of other proteins.

The work of Hwang and Gelvin provides some of the first information on the black box surrounding the function of the T-pilus and factors involved in regulating transport of the T-DNA complex across the plant plasma membrane. It remains unknown whether the T-pilus forms a conduit through which T-DNA and Vir proteins are transported into the plant cell or whether it merely serves to make first contact with the plant cell surface and plays some other role in the formation of a transport complex across the plasma membrane (Gelvin, 2003Go). The identification of these four plant proteins that localize to the plant cell periphery and specifically interact with VirB2 should help to guide further investigation of this question.

In addition, knowledge of plant proteins involved in the regulation of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation may lead to improvements in engineering of plant transformation systems and the development of this valuable tool in recalcitrant species. Using another approach, Nam et al. (1999)Go initiated a project that has led to the identification of numerous T-DNA insertional mutants of Arabidopsis that are resistant to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (rat). More than 125 rat mutants have been identified that disrupt various steps in the transformation process, ranging from the initial attachment of bacteria to plant roots to nuclear import and T-DNA integration (Zhu et al., 2003Go). It is evident that successful transformation requires the participation and assistance of numerous host proteins.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
Ballas, N., and Citovsky, V. (1997). Nuclear localization signal binding protein from Arabidopsis mediates nuclear import of Agrobacterium VirD2 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10723–10728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cascales, E., and Christie, P.J. (2004). Definition of a bacterial Type IV secretion pathway for a DNA substrate. Science 304, 1170–1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cascales, E., and Christie, P.J. (2003). The versatile bacterial type IV secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 137–149.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

DeCleene, M., and DeLey, J. (1976). The host range of crown gall. Bot. Rev. 42, 389–466.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Gelvin, S.B. (2003). Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the "gene-jockeying" tool. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 16–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hwang, H.-H., and Gelvin, S.B. (2004). Plant proteins that interact with VirB2, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens pilin protein, mediate plant transformation. Plant Cell 16, 3148–3167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mysore, K.S., Bassuner, B., Deng, X.-B., Darbinian, N.S., Motchoulski, A., Ream, W., and Gelvin, S.B. (1998). Role of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirD2 protein in T-DNA transfer and integration. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11, 668–683.[Web of Science][Medline]

Nam, J., Mysore, K.S., Zheng, C., Knue, M.K., Matthysse, A.G., and Gelvin, S.B. (1999). Identification of T-DNA tagged Arabidopsis mutants that are resistant to transformation by Agrobacterium. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261, 429–438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Oertle, T., Klinger, M., Stuermer, C.A.O., and Schwab, M.E. (2003). A reticular rhapsody: Phylogenic evolution and nomenclature of the RTN/Nogo gene family. FASEB J. 17, 1238–1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schimmøller, F., Simon, I., and Pfeffer, S.R. (1998). Rab GTPases, directors of vesicle docking. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22161–22164.[Free Full Text]

Schrammeijer, B., Risseeuw, E., Pansegrau, W., Regensburg-Tuink, T.J.G., Crosby, W.L., and Hooykaas, P.J.J. (2001). Interaction of the virulence protein VirF of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with plant homologs of the yeast Skp1 protein. Curr. Biol. 11, 258–262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stachel, S.E., and Zambryski, P.C. (1989). Generic trans-kingdom sex? Nature 340, 190–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tinland, B., Schoumacher, F., Gloeckler, V., Bravo-Angel, A.M., and Hohn, B. (1995). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence D2 protein is responsible for precise integration of T-DNA into the plant genome. EMBO J. 14, 3585–3595.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tzira, T., Vaidya, M., and Citovsky, V. (2001). VIP1, an Arabidopsis protein that interacts with Agrobacterium VirE2, is involved in VirE2 nuclear import and Agrobacterium infectivity. EMBO J. 20, 3596–3607.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tzira, T., Vaidya, M., and Citovsky, V. (2004). Involvement of targeted proteolysis in plant genetic transformation by Agrobacterium. Nature 431, 87–92.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhu, Y., et al. (2003). Identification of Arabidopsis rat mutants. Plant Physiol. 132, 494–505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zupan, J., Muth, T.R., Draper, O., and Zambryski, P. (2000). The transfer of DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plants: A feast of fundamental insights. Plant J. 23, 11–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Related articles in Plant Cell:

Plant Proteins That Interact with VirB2, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Pilin Protein, Mediate Plant Transformation
Hau-Hsuan Hwang and Stanton B. Gelvin
Plant Cell 2004 16: 3148-3167. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Plant Biologists