Plant Cell Blood
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
The Plant Cell 16:1951-1954 (2004)
© 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists


IN THIS ISSUE

Small RNA on the Move

Nancy A. Eckardt, News and Reviews Editor

neckardt{at}aspb.org

Molecular biology experienced a significant shift in thinking in recent years with growing evidence that microRNAs (miRNAs) play a major role in the control of eukaryotic gene expression during development. miRNAs and related small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are 21- to 25-nucleotide long noncoding RNA molecules that regulate translation of protein-coding mRNAs, either by affecting degradation of target mRNAs or the attenuation or termination of translation without mRNA degradation. Both miRNAs and siRNAs are produced from longer RNA precursors through the activity of ribonuclease III–like nucleases called Dicer in animals and DICER-LIKE (DCL) in plants. The main difference between these two classes of small RNA is their point of origin: miRNAs are encoded by their own genes, which are distinct from recognized protein-coding genes, whereas siRNAs are processed from long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) precursors arising from mRNAs, transposons, viruses, or heterchromatic DNA (Bartel and Bartel, 2003Go).

Interestingly, plants appear to have evolved numerous partially overlapping small RNA pathways, which is unlike the situation in many animals. Arabidopsis encodes four DCL proteins (DCL1-4), and Xie et al. (2004)Go have shown that DLC1, DCL2, and DLC3 function in biogenesis of miRNA, viral siRNA, and endogenous siRNA, respectively. Arabidopsis also contains at least three genes encoding RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, which are involved in the production of some siRNAs, and a family of 10 ARGONAUTE proteins, some of which are components of the RNA-induced silencing complex that performs small RNA-induced transcript degradation (Xie et al., 2004Go and references therein). Biochemical and genetic evidence supports the existence of multiple small RNA pathways in plants that may have a wide variety of functions in plant growth and development (Dunoyer et al., 2004Go; Xie et al., 2004Go).

In plants, siRNAs have been studied for many years in relation to posttranscriptional gene silencing, also known as RNA silencing, which is believed to represent a natural defense mechanism against viral infection and the activity of transposable elements (Vance and Vaucheret, 2001Go; Waterhouse et al., 2001Go). dsRNA, which is not normally produced during routine transcription of host protein-encoding genes but often is produced during viral replication or by the activity of other aberrant or pathogenic nucleic acids, is recognized by one or more DCL proteins and processed into siRNAs, which then target the invading transcripts for destruction. Plant virus genomes often encode suppressors of host RNA silencing, such as the helper component–proteinase of potyviruses and the p25 protein encoded by potato virus X, providing support for the notion that RNA silencing is an antiviral mechanism in plants (reviewed in Li and Ding, 2001Go).

miRNAs appear to be another way that eukaryotes use Dicer/DCL recognition of dsRNA to produce small regulatory RNAs. In this case, miRNA precursors encoded within an organism's own genome form a specific fold-back RNA structure creating a double-stranded region that is recognized by Dicer/DCL and cleaved into miRNAs directed against endogenous target mRNAs. miRNAs can act similarly to siRNAs and effect degradation of target mRNAs, or they may cause attenuation or termination of translation without mRNA degradation (Hutvágner and Zamore, 2002Go; Chen, 2004Go). miRNAs often show a high degree of evolutionary conservation across species, and there is growing evidence that they represent a major class of regulatory molecules having broad significance in a wide range of developmental processes in plants and animals (Carrington and Ambros, 2003Go; Bartel, 2004Go). Fifteen classes of miRNAs have been identified in Arabidopsis (Bartel and Bartel, 2003Go and references therein). Rhoades et al. (2002)Go identified 49 predicted targets for 14 different Arabidopsis miRNAs, and the majority of these were transcription factor gene families associated with cell differentiation or developmental patterning. More recently, several miRNAs have been found to play specific roles in plant development, including the regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity (Aukerman and Sakai, 2003Go; Chen, 2004Go), and leaf polarity and morphology (Palatnik et al., 2003Go; Juarez et al., 2004Go; Kidner and Martienssen, 2004Go).

In plants, the long-distance transport of protein and RNA through the phloem plays a critical role in non-cell-autonomous signaling that contributes significantly to plant development (Haywood et al., 2002Go). The systemic spread of RNA silencing via a phloem-transmissible signal is a well-characterized phenomenon that can be readily observed after localized viral infection or with heterografting experiments (Palauqui et al., 1997Go; Voinnet and Baulcombe, 1997Go). Small RNAs have been viewed as a likely candidate for the systemic silencing signal (Hamilton and Baulcombe, 1999Go; Himber et al., 2003Go), but there has been no direct evidence of their transport through the phloem, and the nature of the mobile silencing signal has remained elusive (Mlotshwa et al., 2002Go). The extent to which miRNA function requires long-distance transport through the phloem is unknown and has not been explored previously.

In this issue of The Plant Cell, Yoo et al. (pages 1979–2000) show that small RNA (18 to 25 nucleotides in length) corresponding to authentic regulatory RNAs (siRNA and miRNA) can enter and move through the phloem of several plant species. Furthermore, these authors identify a novel protein, Cucurbita maxima PHLOEM SMALL RNA BINDING PROTEIN1 (CmPSRP1), and show that it likely plays a role in trafficking of small RNA through the phloem. Also in this issue, Sunkar and Zhu (pages 2001–2019) present a library of small RNAs isolated from Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to dehydration, salinity, cold stress, or abscisic acid treatment. They identify 15 new miRNA families that include 26 new miRNAs corresponding to 34 loci and show that some of these miRNAs are expressed in specific tissues and several are upregulated or downregulated in response to abiotic stress. Together, these two reports provide strong support for the idea that small regulatory RNAs are induced in response to a variety of external stimuli and are transported via the phloem to exert non-cell-autonomous control over diverse processes in plant growth and development (Figure 1).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Model Illustrating the Function of the Phloem in Terms of Mediating the Systemic Delivery of Small RNA Molecules to Target Tissues along the Translocation Stream.

Production of siRNA and miRNA species can occur in the companion cells, as well as in neighboring cells, in response to specific input signals. Such signals may be related to viral infection, transposon activation, initiation of miRNA transcription, etc. Phloem entry and exit of these small RNA species may be facilitated by PSRP1. This protein forms a ribonucleoprotein complex with single-stranded (ss), but not double-stranded, si/miRNA, and this complex likely traffics through the plasmodesmata interconnecting the companion cells and sieve tube members. Long-distance delivery of si/miRNA species to specific tissues can mediate control over transcriptional and translational events as well as affording defense against viral pathogens. Potential mechanisms that function to regulate the egress of specific small RNA molecules, along the translocation pathway, remain to be elucidated. (Figure courtesy of Bill Lucas and Byung-Chun Yoo.)

 
Yoo et al. identified small single-stranded RNA 18 to 25 nucleotides in length in the phloem sap of C. maxima (pumpkin), Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Lupinus albus (white lupin), Ricinus communis (caster bean), and Yucca filamentosa (yucca). The group chose these species because of the relative ease of collecting phloem sap and methods that have been established with cucurbits. A library was constructed from C. maxima phloem sap RNA, and sequence comparisons revealed the presence of small RNAs corresponding to several putative target genes, including Transposon-like 1 (TnL1) and TnL2, a small RNA identical to Arabidopsis miR159 proposed to target a MYB transcription factor, and genes encoding a bifunctional endonuclease and an RNA helicase. In addition, RNA gel blot analysis revealed the presence of small RNAs complementary to four previously identified plant miRNAs. Thus, it was determined that phloem sap contains bona fide small regulatory RNAs and not merely, for example, artifacts of RNase contamination or RNA shearing during sample preparation.

Subsequent experiments provided additional proof that small regulatory RNAs are transported through the phloem. In one set of experiments, the authors made use of transgenic Cucurbita pepo (yellow crookneck squash) lines expressing a viral coat protein (CP) gene that were either spontaneously silenced or nonsilenced for CP gene expression. siRNA ~23 nucleotides in length complementary to CP gene sequence was detected in the phloem sap of silenced, but not nonsilenced, CP transgenic lines. CP siRNA also was detected in phloem sap collected from wild-type cucumber scions grafted onto silenced CP transgenic squash lines, but was not detected in phloem sap collected from wild-type scions grafted onto either wild-type squash or nonsilenced transgenic CP squash lines. In another set of experiments, siRNA complementary to viral genomic RNA was detected in the phloem sap of C. maxima infected with Cucumber yellows closterovirus. These experiments provided direct evidence that both viral and transgene siRNA can enter and move through the phloem.

Finally, the authors identified CmPSRP1 as a small RNA binding protein that facilitates movement of small RNA across plasmodesmata. Phloem sap previously has been found to contain proteins involved in mRNA trafficking (Xoconostle-Cázares et al., 1999Go), which prompted Yoo et al. to look for phloem proteins that specifically bind to small RNA. Phloem sap protein blots (wherein proteins were first fractionated with fast protein liquid chromatography and further separated by PAGE) from pumpkin, cucumber, and lupin probed with different RNA species revealed the presence of a 27-kD protein that bound strongly to small RNA. The corresponding CmPSRP1 protein was purified from pumpkin. Conceptual translation of the gene encoding this protein and DNA gel blot analysis indicated that CmPSRP1 is a single copy gene in pumpkin that is not highly homologous to any other gene in plant databases, and RT-PCR using sequence-specific primers showed accumulation of CmPSRP1 transcripts in pumpkin phloem. Importantly, Yoo et al. conducted additional experiments that showed that CmPSRP1 not only preferentially binds ss-small RNA, it also selectively mediates trafficking of ss-small RNA through plasmodesmata. However, the general significance of PSRP1 in miRNA trafficking in plants remains to be determined, considering the apparent lack of conservation among other plant families.

Sunkar and Zhu focused on the discovery of new small regulatory RNAs in Arabidopsis and on investigating a potential role for small RNAs in plant response to abiotic stress. They first constructed a library of small RNAs (15 to 26 nucleotides in length) by size fractionation of RNA isolated and pooled from Arabidopsis seedlings exposed (separately) to cold, dehydration, salinity, and abscisic acid treatment. Approximately 9% of the 2500 cloned sequences corresponded to putative small regulatory RNAs (the remainder appeared to represent breakdown products of rRNA, tRNA, and nucleolar RNAs). Putative miRNAs were identified based on criteria established by Ambros et al. (2003)Go that the 200- to 300-nucleotide sequence surrounding an miRNA is capable of folding into a hairpin structure that is the miRNA precursor. The authors identified 13 of 15 previously characterized miRNA families and 15 new families of miRNA. They next analyzed various databases for Arabidopsis genes with sequence complementarity to the miRNAs to predict potential miRNA target genes. Fifty-one potential targets were identified within protein-coding regions of mRNAs, including genes encoding metabolic enzymes, transcription factors, signal transduction components, protein synthesis, and RNA processing proteins and enzymes in the ubiquitination pathway. Some of the miRNAs and their targets were found to be highly conserved in other plant species, including rice, Lotus, Medicago, and Populus. In addition to miRNAs, the authors also identified 102 other small RNAs that may play important roles in gene regulation.

Next, Sunkar and Zhu examined the potential for miRNA involvement in regulating plant stress responses. They found that the expression of several miRNAs was either upregulated or downregulated by one or more abiotic stress treatments, suggesting that they might be associated with regulation of gene expression in response to stress. One of the interesting observations in this regard was the increase in abundance of miRNA393 after cold, dehydration, and treatment with high salinity or abscisic acid. This miRNA is predicted to target the F-box protein TIR1, which functions as a regulator of auxin signaling through its role in targeting Aux/IAA proteins for degradation via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Aux/IAA proteins repress the activity of auxin response factors and may function as negative or positive regulators of gene transcription (Dharmasiri and Estelle, 2004Go). Abiotic stress induction of miRNA393 could impose another level of regulation on TIR1-mediated responses. A similar investigation by Jones-Rhoades and Bartel (2004)Go identified some of the same new Arabidopsis miRNA families as Sunkar and Zhu and similarly showed that miRNAs can be induced by environmental stress. They showed that miR395, which targets mRNA encoding ATP sulfurylase enzymes that catalyze the first step of inorganic sulfate assimilation, was found to increase in response to sulfate starvation, suggesting that this miRNA might play a role in regulating sulfate metabolism in response to sulfate availability. Both of these studies show that several metabolic and cellular processes, in addition to distinct developmental pathways, may be regulated by miRNAs and that miRNAs can themselves be induced and repressed, adding another layer to the complexities of gene regulation. Moreover, the new miRNAs identified in both of these studies provides a valuable resource for future investigations on the roles of miRNA in the regulation of gene expression during development and in response to environmental conditions.

Together, the work of Yoo et al. and Sunkar and Zhu opens new avenues of research into small regulatory RNAs and propels us several steps forward in understanding the biological functions and mechanism of action of this fascinating and important class of regulatory molecules.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 
Ambros, V., et al. (2003). A uniform system for microRNA annotation. RNA 9, 277–279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aukerman, M.J., and Sakai, H. (2003). Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15, 2730–2741. First published on October 10, 2003; 10.1105/tpc.016238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bartel, B., and Bartel, D.P. (2003). MicroRNAs: At the root of plant development? Plant Physiol. 132, 709–717.[Free Full Text]

Bartel, D.P. (2004). MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Carrington, J.C., and Ambros, V. (2003). Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science 301, 336–338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen, X. (2004). A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303, 2022–2025. First published on July 31, 2003; 10.1126/science.1088060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dharmasiri, N., and Estelle, M. (2004). Auxin signaling and regulated protein degradation. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 302–308.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Dunoyer, P., Lecellier, C.-H., Parizotto, E.A., Himber, C., and Voinnet, O. (2004). Probing the microRNA and small interfering RNA pathways with virus-encoded suppressors of RNA silencing. Plant Cell 16, 1235–1250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamilton, A.J., and Baulcombe, D.C. (1999). A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286, 950–952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haywood, V., Kragler, F., and Lucas, W.J. (2002). Plasmodesmata: Pathways for protein and ribonucleoprotein signaling. Plant Cell 14 (suppl.), S303–S325.[Free Full Text]

Himber, C., Dunoyer, P., Moissiard, G., Ritzenthaler, C., and Voinnet, O. (2003). Transitivity-dependent and -independent cell-to-cell movement of RNA silencing. EMBO J. 22, 4523–4533.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hutvágner, G., and Zamore, P.D. (2002). A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 297, 2056–2060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones-Rhoades, M.W., and Bartel, D.P. (2004). Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA. Mol. Cell 14, 787–799.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Juarez, M.T., Kui, J.S., Thomas, J., Heller, B.A., and Timmermans, M.C.P. (2004). microRNA-mediated repression of rolled leaf1 specifies maize leaf polarity. Nature 428, 84–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kidner, C.A., and Martienssen, R.A. (2004). Spatially restricted microRNA directs leaf polarity through ARGONAUTE1. Nature 428, 81–84.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, W.X., and Ding, S.W. (2001). Viral suppressors of RNA silencing. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12, 150–154.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mlotshwa, S., Voinnet, O., Mette, M.F., Matzke, M., Vaucheret, H., Ding, S.W., Pruss, G., and Vance, V.B. (2002). RNA Silencing and the mobile silencing signal. Plant Cell 14 (suppl.), S289–S301.[Free Full Text]

Palatnik, J.F., Allen, E., Wu, X., Schommer, C., Schwab, R., Carrington, J.C., and Weigel, D. (2003). Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 425, 257–263.[CrossRef][Medline]

Palauqui, J., Elmayan, T., Pollien, J., and Vaucheret, H. (1997). Systemic acquired silencing: Transgenespecific post-transcriptional silencing is transmitted by grafting from silenced stocks to non-silenced scions. EMBO J. 16, 4738–4745.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rhoades, M., Reinhart, B., Lim, L., Burge, B., Bartel, B., and Bartel, D.P. (2002). Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110, 513–520.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sunkar, R., and Zhu, J.-K. (2004). Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16, 2001–2019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vance, V.B., and Vaucheret, H. (2001). RNA silencing in plants: Defense and counterdefense. Science 292, 2277–2280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Voinnet, O., and Baulcombe, D.C. (1997). Systemic signalling in gene silencing. Nature 389, 553–555.[CrossRef][Medline]

Waterhouse, P.M., Wang, M.-B., and Lough, T. (2001). Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against viruses. Nature 411, 834–842.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xie, Z., Johansen, L.K., Gustafson, A.M., Kasschau, K.D., Lellis, A.D., Zilberman, D., Jacobsen, S.E., and Carrington, J.C. (2004). Genetic and functional diversification of small RNA pathways in plants. PLoS Biol. 2, E104. First published on February 24, 2004; 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xoconostle-Cázares, B., Xiang, Y., Ruiz-Medrano, R., Wang, H.-L., Monzer, J., Yoo, B.C., McFarland, K.C., Franceschi, V.R., and Lucas, W.J. (1999). Plant paralog to viral movement protein that potentiates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science 283, 94–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoo, B.-C., Kragler, F., Varkonyi-Gasic, E., Haywood, V., Archer-Evans, S., Lee, Y.M., Lough, T.J., and Lucas, W.J. (2004). A systemic small RNA signaling system in plants. Plant Cell 16, 1979–2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in Plant Cell:

A Systemic Small RNA Signaling System in Plants
Byung-Chun Yoo, Friedrich Kragler, Erika Varkonyi-Gasic, Valerie Haywood, Sarah Archer-Evans, Young Moo Lee, Tony J. Lough, and William J. Lucas
Plant Cell 2004 16: 1979-2000. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Novel and Stress-Regulated MicroRNAs and Other Small RNAs from Arabidopsis
Ramanjulu Sunkar and Jian-Kang Zhu
Plant Cell 2004 16: 2001-2019. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. Lu, Y.-H. Sun, R. Shi, C. Clark, L. Li, and V. L. Chiang
Novel and Mechanical Stress-Responsive MicroRNAs in Populus trichocarpa That Are Absent from Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, August 1, 2005; 17(8): 2186 - 2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eckardt, N. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Plant Biologists