| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
First published online January 19, 2005; 10.1105/tpc.104.028100 © 2005 American Society of Plant Biologists The Rb7 Matrix Attachment Region Increases the Likelihood and Magnitude of Transgene Expression in Tobacco Cells: A Flow Cytometric Study
a Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7614 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail steven_spiker{at}ncsu.edu; fax 919-515-3355.
Many studies in both plant and animal systems have shown that matrix attachment regions (MARs) can increase expression of transgenes in whole organisms or cells in culture. Because histochemical assays often indicate variegated transgene expression, a question arises: Do MARs increase transgene expression by increasing the percentage of cells expressing the transgene (likelihood), by increasing the level of expression in expressing cells (magnitude), or both? To address this question, we used flow cytometry to measure green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in individual tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells from lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. We conclude that MAR-mediated overall increases in transgene expression involve both likelihood and magnitude. On average, cell lines transformed with the Rb7 MAR-containing vector expressed GFP at levels 2.0- to 3.7-fold higher than controls. MAR lines had fewer nonexpressing cells than control lines (10% versus 45%), and the magnitude of GFP expression in expressing cells was greater in MAR lines by 1.9- to 2.9-fold. We also show that flow cytometry measurements on cells from isogenic lines are consistent with those from populations of independently transformed cell lines. By obviating the need to establish isogenic lines, this use of flow cytometry could greatly simplify the evaluation of MARs or other sequence elements that affect transgene expression.
In recent years, gene transfer into a wide variety of plant species has become almost common practice, but lack of predictable and reliable transgene expression has plagued efforts to fully exploit gene transfer technology for plant improvement and basic research. Initially, major differences in transgene expression between independent primary transformants were attributed to transgene silencing caused by integration of transgenes into or near heterochromatin regions, a phenomenon similar to position effects that have been well characterized in Drosophila melanogaster (fruitfly) (reviewed in Weiler and Wakimoto, 1995  ). We now know that gene silencing is more complex, and although we are still far from understanding variability in the silencing of transgenes, great progress has been made in understanding transcriptional gene silencing, posttranscriptional gene silencing, and the interplay between the two (Carrington and Ambros, 2003; Grewal and Moazed, 2003; Matzke and Matzke, 2003; Schramke and Allshire, 2003).
It is clear that to derive maximum benefits from the use of transgenic plants for biotechnology and basic research, gene silencing must be understood, and methods to combat gene silencing must be devised. One approach that has shown promise in combating gene silencing involves the use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to flank transgenes (Allen et al., 2000
Direct comparison of the results of the different studies are difficult to make because various plant species, MARs, transformation methods, promoters, and reporter genes have been used. Both cultured cells and intact plants have served as experimental material, and a wide variety of tissues in various stages of development have been sampled. In nearly all cases, histochemical approaches and/or extractive approaches have been used to assess activity of reporter genes. Histochemical approaches are not quantitative, but they do reveal cell-to-cell epigenetic variation in reporter gene expression. Approaches in which the product of the reporter gene is extracted from tissues and then measured are quantitative, but they obscure epigenetic cell-to-cell differences. Attempts have been made using the firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase reporter gene to simultaneously quantitate transgene expression and spatial variation in transgene expression in whole tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (van Leeuwen et al., 2001
In assays for transgene expression in both cultured cells and in whole plants, we and others have noticed that the expression is often variegated (Allen et al., 1993
To test this possibility, we have used flow cytometry to measure green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in individual, cultured tobacco cells from clonal lineages of cells transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Binary vectors used for transformation carried a GFP reporter gene flanked on both sides by the tobacco Rb7 MAR, which we have previously used (Allen et al., 1996
To test the effect of MARs on GFP expression in A. tumefaciens–transformed tobacco cells in culture, we used a T-DNA construct in which the GFP cassette was flanked on both sides by the Rb7 MAR. This construct is denoted MGFPM (Figure 1). We compared results for this construct with results for two control constructs. In the first control (GFP), the GFP cassette is inserted into the T-DNA alone. In the second control, the GFP cassette is flanked by a 1.2-kb region of phage  DNA that does not bind to tobacco nuclear matrices (N. Mendu and S. Spiker, unpublished results). This control (LGFPL) allows us to discriminate sequence-dependent MAR effects from effects that may be due to MARs acting simply as spacer elements to distance the GFP cassette from neighboring T-DNA and host genomic DNA. The soluble-modified, red-shifted GFP with its enhanced fluorescence (Davis and Vierstra, 1998) was used because similar GFP variants were found to be more suitable for flow cytrometry (reviewed in Galbraith et al., 1999b).
Improved Flow Cytometry Resolution by Debris Discrimination Because tobacco suspension cells grow in filamentous structures that cannot be analyzed by flow cytometry, it is necessary to disrupt the cell walls that hold these filaments together. A gentle digestion with cellulases and pectolyases releases individual cells as protoplasts, which can pass one at a time through the flow cell of the cytometer to measure GFP expression in individual cells. The protoplasting procedure creates some debris, such as free nuclei and some protoplasts with compromised plasma membrane integrity. GFP diffuses out of free nuclei and compromised protoplasts. Thus, GFP-expressing protoplasts with damaged membranes would be counted as nonexpressing protoplasts. Because this would lead to an underestimate of GFP in the cell population, including these entities in our analyses would yield spurious results. To illustrate these phenomena, a cell line was identified that had high levels of uniform, nonvariegated, GFP fluorescence before protoplasting. As determined by microscopy, all cells in this cell line had levels of GFP fluorescence that were indistinguishable from one another (data not shown). Protoplasts were prepared from this cell line, stained with propidium iodide, and subjected to confocal microscopy (Figure 2A). Clearly, GFP fluorescence is not uniform for all protoplasts. Protoplasts with compromised plasma membrane integrity allow GFP to diffuse out of the cell and propidium iodide to diffuse in and stain the nucleus. Despite having defects in plasma membrane integrity, these protoplasts may still be able to maintain their size and general shape. Spurious flow cytometry data from these protoplasts and from free nuclei can be excluded from analysis by measuring and accounting for the high levels of red fluorescence associated with propidium iodide staining.
Intrinsic physical parameters such as forward light scatter (a measure of particle size) and side light scatter (a measure of cytoplasmic granularity) (Shapiro, 1995 ) can be used to discriminate between clusters of light scatter values from cells and debris such as damaged cells, which often have reduced light scatter properties (McGann et al., 1988). Some of the data from debris in our protoplast preparations can thus be excluded by gating, that is, including only data points consistent with the light-scattering properties of protoplasts, as defined by an oval outline in Figure 2C. When gating based only on light scattering is used, it appears as though a substantial proportion of the cells (32% in this example) have low levels of fluorescence equivalent to those of wild-type cells (cf. Figure 2D with 2B). Because microscopic evaluation of the cells before protoplasting showed that all cells displayed uniform GFP fluorescence, it appears that the proportion of cells that have no GFP fluorescence can be overestimated if the protoplasts with compromised membranes and residual nuclei are not gated away (Figure 2D). This problem can be alleviated by gating data based on both side light scatter (to exclude data from debris that is not consistent with light scatter properties of protoplasts) and from red fluorescence associated with propidium iodide staining (to exclude data from free nuclei and protoplasts with compromised membranes that have allowed GFP to diffuse out of the cell and propidium iodide to diffuse in and stain nuclei). When the same data as shown in Figures 2C and 2D were gated based on side light scatter and red fluorescence (Figure 2E), only 0.9% of the cells had fluorescence properties consistent with wild-type cells (Figure 2F). With this approach, the error associated with false-negative cells can be greatly reduced and the ability to quantitate the proportion of cells with no detectable GFP fluorescence greatly improved. This gating approach was used in all analyses that follow.
Rb7 MAR Increases the Likelihood and Magnitude of GFP Expression in Individual Cell Lines
Variegation (variation within lines) of green fluorescence is evident in Figure 3. Whereas some lines have cells with either a low mode of green fluorescence (  10 RFU and in the range of autofluorescence of wild-type cells) or a high mode of green fluorescence (300 RFU or higher), other cell lines have cells that display multiple modes of green fluorescence (e.g., lines 5, 6, and 7 in Figure 3A). In many of these lines, an intermediate mode of green fluorescence occurs (50 RFU). In some lines, the range of green fluorescence is so wide that modes are less distinct (e.g., line 7 in Figure 3B). Even in lines that have only high levels of green fluorescence, variegation occurs. For example, in the highest expressing of the LGFPL lines (line 10 in Figure 3B), the green fluorescence profile has an obvious shoulder. Figure 3 illustrates the cell-to-cell and line-to-line variation in green fluorescence that would be obscured if only summary statistics were presented. However, summary statistics are necessary to quantitate the effects that MARs have on GFP expression in the transformed cell lines. Presented in Figure 4A are the average green fluorescence values per cell in all cell lines transformed with a given construct in each of the replicate experiments. Cells that have green fluorescence properties characteristic of wild-type cells (below 17 RFU) are termed GFP negative cells, whereas cells that have levels of green fluorescence greater than wild-type cells are termed GFP positive cells. Data from all cells, both GFP negative and GFP positive, are included in Figure 4A. This type of analysis is analogous to transgene expression studies in which the product of the reporter gene is extracted from a large population of cells. The resulting quantitative measurements ignore cell-to-cell variation within cell lines. In the data shown in Figure 4A, expression levels of the two controls (LGFPL and GFP alone) are not significantly different in each replicate (P > 0.05, see Methods). Cell lines transformed with the MAR construct (MGFPM) had significantly higher GFP fluorescence in each replicate (P < 0.05) when compared with lines carrying GFP alone. Fold increases of 1.99, 3.69, and 2.11 were observed in the three replicates.
Increases in GFP expression resulting from the use of the Rb7 MAR in transgenic experiments could be accounted for by two possible scenarios, which are not mutually exclusive: (1) a greater percentage of expressing cells in lines containing MGFPM (likelihood) and/or (2) higher levels of expression in individual cells in lines containing MGFPM (magnitude). Flow cytometric analysis, unlike extractive procedures, allows for the quantification of subpopulations of GFP expression needed to investigate these two possibilities. To address the first possibility, the percentage of GFP negative cells was determined for each cell line. The averages of these percentages for all cell lines of each treatment in each of the three replicates are shown in Figure 4B. The two control lines (LGFPL and GFP alone) are not statistically different in each replicate (P > 0.05). Cell lines transformed with the MAR-containing construct (MGFPM) had significantly lower percentages of negative cells than controls (P < 0.05) in replicates 1 and 2 (replicate 1, GFP 45% and MGFPM 6%; replicate 2, GFP 41% and MGFPM 2%). In replicate three, cell lines transformed with the MAR-containing construct had borderline significant (P = 0.064) lower percentages of negative cells than controls (GFP 50% and MGFPM 23%). These results support the hypothesis that the presence of Rb7 MAR increases the likelihood of GFP expression by decreasing the percentage of nonexpressing cells. MARs may also increase overall levels of GFP expression by increasing the magnitude of expression in the expressing cells. To address this possibility, the average green fluorescence per expressing cell in all cell lines transformed with a given construct in each of the replicate experiments is plotted in Figure 4C. Strikingly, the range of green fluorescence above the 75th percentile for cell lines transformed with MGFPM extends to higher values than the controls. There are more cell lines with higher average levels of green fluorescence (GFP positive cells only) in the MAR treatments than in controls. When the means are compared, the two control lines (LGFPL and GFP alone) are not statistically different in each replicate (P > 0.05). In replicates two and three, cell lines transformed with MGFPM had significantly higher green fluorescence than control lines (P < 0.05) with fold increases of 2.85 and 1.87, respectively. In replicate one, expressing cells in cell lines transformed with MGFPM had a higher average level of green fluorescence than those transformed with control constructs, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.23). Even though our criteria for statistical significance was not met in all replicates, these results support the hypothesis that the Rb7 MAR can increase the magnitude of GFP expression in expressing cells.
GFP Expression Is Stable over Time with and without Continued Selection
Rb7 MAR Increases the Likelihood and Magnitude of GFP Expression in Population Cell Cultures Plots of histograms and summary statistics in Figures 3 and 4 indicate that including the Rb7 MAR in T-DNA vectors increases both the likelihood and the magnitude of GFP expression. The graphical representations in Figure 6 support these conclusions. By averaging all of the histograms from each treatment in the second replicate as shown in Figure 6A, overall differences between treatments can be observed. Rb7 MAR-containing lines on average have more expressing cells, and these cells express at higher levels compared with control lines. Note that MAR-containing lines and control lines have approximately the same proportion of GFP positive cells expressing at 300 RFU and below, but the MAR-containing lines have a much higher proportion of cells expressing above 300 RFU. This shoulder at the higher end of the profile could account for nearly all of the MAR-mediated reduction in the percentage of nonexpressing cells.
In traditional approaches to determining the effect of specific DNA elements (e.g., promoters, enhancers, and MARs), many separate independently transformed cell lines are created, and the averages of transgene expression in the lines are measured. This approach can be quite laborious. Because flow cytometry allows detection of GFP expression in individual cells, it is possible to pool large populations of cells derived from many different transformation events and still retain an underlying distribution of GFP expression that would be lost if cell lines were pooled and assayed with a traditional, extractive approach. This pooling strategy allows for the assessment of the effect of any specific DNA element on transgene expression across a wide range of A. tumefaciens–mediated transformation events. Instead of isolating and propagating individual cell lines, aliquots of entire A. tumefaciens and tobacco cell culture cocultivations (representing numerous independent transformants) were used to initiate liquid cultures under kanamycin selection. Cells from these pooled lines were subjected to the same flow cytometry analysis as outlined previously for individual cell lines. The results are shown in Figure 6B. Strikingly, MGFPM population culture lines have fewer GFP negative cells (7.7%) than the GFP and LGFPL lines, which collectively average 33.9% GFP negative cells. This observation is very similar to the results in individual cell lines (Figures 4B and 6A). Another distinguishing feature is that population culture lines containing MGFPM have shoulders on the high end of the profile. The presence of this subset of cells expressing GFP at a higher level than control constructs is consistent with our observations in individual cell lines (Figures 4C and 6A).
Variegated GFP Expression Arises from Cells with the Same Genotype
In our experiments, cell lines are originally identified as microcalli that appear as small colonies on a lawn of nontransformed tobacco NT-1 cells. It is likely that each microcallus results from a single transformation event as the microcalli are well separated on the culture plates. Nevertheless, the possibility that the microcalli are chimeric exists. The microcalli are picked and subcultured on solid media containing kanamycin before transfer to liquid media. During cell line propagation on solid medium containing kanamycin, sectors of GFP expression were sometimes observed (Figure 7A, left column). Sectors were observed in all three rounds of solid selection (data not shown). Approximately one-third of the calli displayed sectors of GFP fluorescence on the second plate of solid selection, whereas approximately one-tenth of the calli displayed sectors of GFP fluorescence on the third plate of solid selection. To minimize the possibility of carrying chimeric lines into liquid culture, only small subsets of cells (pieces
To determine whether sectors arose from a mixture of transformation events or are descendents of an epigenetic change after a single transformation event, tissues from sectors of single calli were independently propagated as shown in the right column of Figure 7A. The calli in the left column of Figure 7A result from enlargement of the original microcalli picked from the transformation plates. Thus, the calli in the right column of Figure 7A have not undergone the additional round of subculturing that was performed for all other previously mentioned individual NT-1 lines (see Methods). Calli from the sectors were used to initiate liquid suspension cultures and subjected to flow cytometry analysis (Figure 7B). In all cases, cultures derived from sectors, which by visual inspection had higher levels of GFP fluorescence, were demonstrated by flow cytometry to have a higher percentage of positive cells and/or higher levels of fluorescence in positive cells. To determine if the sectors have the same genotype, DNA from the liquid suspension cultures arising from the sectors was isolated and subjected to DNA gel blot analysis (Figure 8). A 458-bp region common to all of the T-DNA constructs tested was used to probe genomic DNA cut with a methylation-insensitive restriction enzyme, HindIII. Because this enzyme cuts only once in the T-DNA, the resulting fragments will have distinct sizes based on the next closest genomic HindIII site (unless a tandem T-DNA repeat flanks the right border). In four out of five sector pairs, the banding patterns match exactly (Figure 8, sector pairs 1, 2, 3, and 5), indicating a single transformation event. Sector pair 4 clearly has a different banding pattern, suggesting this cell line may be composed of lineages representing two distinct transformation events. In any case, four out of five sector pairs demonstrate banding patterns consistent with identical genotypes. This is most likely an overestimate of the frequency of chimerism in populations used to generate data in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6A because we investigated chimerism only in lines that displayed sectoring. Furthermore, the sectored calli were subjected to one fewer round of subculturing than the lines used to investigate the effects of MARs on transgene expression. Based on the observations that only one of five cell lines with obvious sectoring was chimeric and that of the cell lines used to generate data concerning the effect of MARs on GFP expression only one in 10 had obvious sectoring, we would estimate that only one in 50 (2%) of our cell lines was chimeric.
Whereas methods for using flow cytometry based on GFP expression in plants have been available for several years (Galbraith et al., 1995 ; Sheen et al., 1995), few applications have been reported. These examples include abscisic acid signal transduction in rice (Oryza sativa) (Desikan et al., 1999; Hagenbeek et al., 2000; Gampala et al., 2001; Hagenbeek and Rock, 2001), root development in Arabidopsis thaliana (Birnbaum et al., 2003), flow cytometry protocol development and mosaic observations in tobacco leaves (Bohanec et al., 2002; Bastar et al., 2004), and nuclear targeting in tobacco (Grebenok et al., 1997). Only the last four cases contained examples of flow cytometry analysis of stably transformed plants, and of these only the last three studies include attempts to quantify GFP expression. One of the true powers of flow cytometry is analysis of heterogeneity in a cell population because properties are measured on an individual cell basis rather than as a population average (Yanpaisan et al., 1999). The data presented here represent an application of flow cytometry to characterize epigenetic variation that can exist in transgenic plant cell populations.
An important factor in our ability to quantitate GFP expression variegation in stably transformed cell lines is to accurately estimate the number of cells that have wild-type levels of fluorescence. Because of the nature of the protoplasting procedure and the fact that in this study several samples had to be prepared simultaneously and rapidly, nuclei and protoplasts with compromised plasma membrane integrity frequently occurred in our preparations. Because GFP diffuses out of compromised protoplasts but they may have physical properties otherwise nearly indistinguishable from intact protoplasts, the number of cells with wild-type levels of fluorescence can be overestimated. To correct for this phenomenon, we used an approach common in animal systems by which cells are stained with propidium iodide to exclude necrotic cells from analysis, for example, Migliaccio et al. (2000)
We have previously characterized the effects of flanking tobacco Rb7 MAR sequences on transgene expression in NT-1 tobacco suspension culture cells and whole tobacco plants (Allen et al., 1996 The MAR-mediated increases in GFP expression that we observed were in part due to a greater proportion of cells that express GFP (i.e., cells in which GFP was not silenced). Additionally, some of the cells that express GFP express it at higher levels in MAR-containing lines than in control lines. Even in cell lines demonstrated not to be chimeric, we often observed epigenetic differences in the levels of GFP expression as evidenced by more than one mode of GFP expression level (Figure 7). The results presented in Figure 3 demonstrate that variegation within cell lines may be obscured by traditional extractive methods of quantitating-reporter gene expression.
In work we report here, we were able to assess epigenetic variation in transgene expression within isogenic cell lines. Because Brouwer et al. (2002) We set out to determine whether flow cytometry could be used to assess the effect of MARs on transgene expression in cultures derived from large pools of transformed cells and whether conclusions drawn from work with pools of transformed lines would parallel those drawn from work with individual cell lines. We found that flow cytometry of population cultures transformed with MAR-containing constructs resulted in distinctive profiles of GFP expression that were not present in control population cultures. These profiles are consistent with our observations on individual cell lines. In both cases, presence of the Rb7 MAR increased the percentage of expressing cells as well as the levels of expression in a subpopulation of expressing cells. Our results indicate that population cultures studied by flow cytometry may be a useful tool to quickly and easily evaluate the effect of various sequence elements on transgene expression. Whereas flow cytometry analysis allowed us to quantify differing modes of GFP expression within cell lines, it is possible that these differences could be attributed to chimeric cell populations. A few of the cell lines exhibited sectors that differed in GFP expression in calli cultured on solid media. DNA gel blot analysis demonstrated that in most cases the sectoring was due to epigenetic changes after an original transformation event rather than genetic chimerism. For example, in sector pair 5 (Figure 7), there was a complete loss of GFP expression, and this loss of expression was not accompanied by the loss of the T-DNA insert tested in DNA gel blots (Figure 8). However, in one of the five sectored lines we tested, the original microcallus was most likely composed of cells from more than one transformation event. This observation stresses the need for additional rounds of subculturing to increase the probability of fixing a single genotype in each cell line. Our results in individual cell lines were based on one additional round of solid media subculture, which is expected to further minimize the frequency of chimeric cell lines.
In this study, we have not investigated the molecular mechanism by which the Rb7 MAR increases GFP expression. However, we have observed that cells with the same genotype can include both GFP negative and GFP positive cells and that the Rb7 MAR reduces the frequency of GFP negative, nonexpressing cells. These results are consistent with previous suggestions (Allen et al., 2000
Although it is generally accepted that MARs function only upon stable integration into the genome, minor increases in transient expression have been reported for the Rb7 MAR, suggesting a possible classical enhancer effect (Allen et al., 1996 In summary, we have used flow cytometry to measure GFP expression in individual plant cells. Our results indicate that the Rb7 MAR increases the proportion of cells expressing the transgene, presumably by reducing gene silencing, while also increasing the levels of expression in a subpopulation of expressing cells. Our observations on the effect of the Rb7 MAR on transgene expression are consistent between individual isogenic cell lines and large pools of transformed cell lines. Thus, the use of flow cytometry to assess gene expression in pools of transformed cell lines may provide a tool to quickly evaluate the effect of various DNA elements on transgene expression of many transformation events.
Recombinant Plasmids Standard cloning techniques (Sambrook et al., 1989 ) were used to create three binary vectors with T-DNA regions containing GFP described in Figure 1. The first control construct (pGFP) was kindly provided by Luke Mankin and originally described as pLMNC-b47 (Mankin, 2000). This binary vector (pGFP) contains the GFP cassette from psmRS-GFP (Davis and Vierstra, 1998) as well as the nptII kanamycin resistance gene cassette and binary vector backbone from pGPTV-KAN (Becker et al., 1992). To generate an additional control construct (pLGFPL), the GFP cassette from psmRS-GFP (Davis and Vierstra, 1998) was cloned into pLMNC-b73 (Mankin, 2000), replacing the GUS cassette and resulting in GFP flanked by direct repeats of a 1.2-kb region of phage DNA (GenBank accession number J02459, nucleotides 21231 to 22425). Similarly, the MAR-containing construct (pMGFPM) was made by cloning the same GFP cassette into pLMNC-b72 (Mankin, 2000), replacing the GUS cassette and resulting in GFP flanked by direct repeats of the 1.2-kb Nicotiana tabacum Rb7 MAR fragment from pRb7-6 (Hall et al., 1991). All T-DNA constructs contained the same orientation of gene cassettes and the same vector backbone sequences.
Plant Cell Transformation and Propagation
During the growth on the second fresh medium plate previously mentioned, many calli exhibited a sectored GFP phenotype. To investigate the possibility that the sectored calli were chimeric (the result of multiple transformation events), calli of a subset of these were further investigated. While under far-blue light (described below), small pieces of calli ( Population-based liquid cultures were initiated by resuspending the original A. tumefaciens and NT-1 cocultivation plate with 5 mL of media supplemented with 200 mg/L of Timintin and 50 mg/L of kanamycin. Of this 5 mL, 400 µL were plated on solid medium to isolate individual cell lines as described previously, and the remaining 4.6 mL became the population culture.
GFP Imaging
Sample Preparation, Flow Cytometry, and Analysis
Protoplasts were stored on ice a maximum of 2 h until flow cytometry was conducted. The flow cytometer FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA) was operated at a laser wavelength of 488 nm with a power output of 15 mW, using a sort-sense flow cell equipped with a 100-nm orifice. Forward angle light scatter signals, side angle light scatter signals, and fluorescence emission signals corresponding to wavelengths of 520 to 530 nm (green) and 564 to 606 nm (yellow/orange) were collected at a maximum flow rate of 1000 cells/s with a total accumulation of 15,000 viable cells based on populations of minimal propidium iodide staining. To collect data on 15,000 viable cells, To ensure that degradation of laser intensity and other instrument-specific fluctuations did not affect our results taken over several time points, Flow Check YG 6.0 microspheres (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) were used to calibrate the flow cytometer before each use. Three distinct intensities of green fluorescence provided three calibration points to adjust the PMT voltage of the green channel. Because the fluorescence intensities of the microspheres in one set may not match those of a second set from the same manufacturer, the PMT voltage of the green channel was adjusted to match calibration points for the original set, and then with the same instrument settings, microspheres from the second set were analyzed to determine the new calibration points for this second set.
Because neither green fluorescence intensity data nor percentage of GFP positive cells were normally distributed as determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Chakravarti et al., 1967
DNA Extraction and DNA Gel Blot Analysis
We thank the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center and Richard Vierstra for kindly providing psmRS-GFP and Luke Mankin for kindly providing pLMNC-b47, pLMNC-b72, and pLMNC-b73. We thank Janet Dow at the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine Flow Cytometry Facility. We also thank Kirk Francis, Niki Robertson, and Arthur Weissinger for helpful discussions and Jeff Thorne and Amy Anderson for statistical consultation. Christopher Halweg was supported by a Tri-Agency fellowship (National Science Foundation/USDA/Department of Energy) and a Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need fellowship (Department of Education).
1 Current address: Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.  The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Steven Spiker (steven_spiker{at}ncsu.edu). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.104.028100. Received September 30, 2004; accepted November 24, 2004.
Allen, G.C., Hall, G., Jr., Michalowski, S., Newman, W., Spiker, S., Weissinger, A.K., and Thompson, W.F. (1996). High-level transgene expression in plant cells: Effects of a strong scaffold attachment region from tobacco. Plant Cell 8, 899–913.[Abstract]
Allen, G.C., Hall, G.E., Jr., Childs, L.C., Weissinger, A.K., Spiker, S., and Thompson, W.F. (1993). Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell 5, 603–613. Allen, G.C., Spiker, S., and Thompson, W.F. (2000). Use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to minimize transgene silencing. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 361–376.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
An, G.H. (1985). High-efficiency transformation of cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 79, 568–570. Bastar, M.T., Luthar, Z., Skof, S., and Bohanec, B. (2004). Quantitative determination of mosaic GFP gene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 22, 939–944.[Medline] Becker, D., Kemper, E., Schell, J., and Masterson, R. (1992). New plant binary vectors with selectable markers located proximal to the left T-DNA border. Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1195–1197.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Birnbaum, K., Shasha, D.E., Wang, J.Y., Jung, J.W., Lambert, G.M., Galbraith, D.W., and Benfey, P.N. (2003). A gene expression map of the Arabidopsis root. Science 302, 1956–1960. Bode, J., Stengert-Iber, M., Kay, V., Schlake, T., and Dietz-Pfeilstetter, A. (1996). Scaffold/matrix-attached regions: Topological switches with multiple regulatory functions. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 6, 115–138.[ISI][Medline] Bohanec, B., Luthar, Z., and Rudolf, K. (2002). A protocol for quantitative analysis of green fluorescent protein-transformed plants, using multiparameter flow cytometry with cluster analysis. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 44, 145–153. Bonifer, C., Vidal, M., Grosveld, F., and Sippel, A.E. (1990). Tissue specific and position independent expression of the complete gene domain for chicken lysozyme in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 9, 2843–2848.[ISI][Medline]
Breyne, P., Vanmontagu, M., Depicker, A., and Gheysen, G. (1992). Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell 4, 463–471.
Brouwer, C., Bruce, W., Maddock, S., Avramova, Z., and Bowen, B. (2002). Suppression of transgene silencing by matrix attachment regions in maize: A dual role for the maize 5' ADH1 matrix attachment region. Plant Cell 14, 2251–2264. Butaye, K.M., Goderis, I.J., Wouters, P.F., Pues, J.M., Delaure, S.L., Broekaert, W.F., Depicker, A., Cammue, B.P., and De Bolle, M.F. (2004). Stable high-level transgene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana using gene silencing mutants and matrix attachment regions. Plant J. 39, 440–449.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Callaway, A., Liu, W., Andrianov, V., Stenzler, L., Zhao, J., Wettlaufer, S., Jayakumar, P., and Howell, S.H. (1996). Characterization of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) resistance in virus-resistant ecotypes of Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 9, 810–818.[Medline]
Carrington, J.C., and Ambros, V. (2003). Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science 301, 336–338. Chakravarti, I.M., Laha, R.G., and Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics. (New York: Wiley). Cheng, Z.Q., Targolli, J., and Wu, R. (2001). Tobacco matrix attachment region sequence increased transgene expression levels in rice plants. Mol. Breed. 7, 317–327.[CrossRef] Davis, S.J., and Vierstra, R.D. (1998). Soluble, highly fluorescent variants of green fluorescent protein (GFP) for use in higher plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 36, 521–528.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] De Bolle, M.F.C., Butaye, K.M.J., Coucke, W.J.W., Goderis, I.J.W.M., Wouters, P.F.J., van Boxel, N., Broekaert, W.F., and Cammue, B.P.A. (2003). Analysis of the influence of promoter elements and a matrix attachment region on the inter-individual variation of transgene expression in populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 165, 169–179.[CrossRef] De Buck, S., Jacobs, A., Van Montagu, M., and Depicker, A. (1998). Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and cotransformation frequencies of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants and tobacco protoplasts. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11, 449–457.[Medline] Desikan, R., Hagenbeek, D., Neill, S.J., and Rock, C.D. (1999). Flow cytometry and surface plasmon resonance analyses demonstrate that the monoclonal antibody JIM19 interacts with a rice cell surface component involved in abscisic acid signalling in protoplasts. FEBS Lett. 456, 257–262.[Medline] Dougherty, W.G., and Parks, T.D. (1995). Transgenes and gene suppression: Telling us something new? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 399–405.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Fukuda, Y., and Nishikawa, S. (2003). Matrix attachment regions enhance transcription of a downstream transgene and the accessibility of its promoter region to micrococcal nuclease. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 665–675.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Galbraith, D.W., Anderson, M.T., and Herzenberg, L.A. (1999a). Flow cytometric analysis and FACS sorting of cells based on GFP accumulation. Methods Cell Biol. 58, 315–341.[Medline] Galbraith, D.W., Herzenberg, L.A., and Anderson, M.T. (1999b). Flow cytometric analysis of transgene expression in higher plants: Green fluorescent protein. Methods Enzymol. 302, 296–315.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Galbraith, D.W., Lambert, G.M., Grebenok, R.J., and Sheen, J. (1995). Flow cytometric analysis of transgene expression in higher plants: Green-fluorescent protein. Methods Cell Biol. 50, 3–14.[ISI][Medline]
Gampala, S.S., Hagenbeek, D., and Rock, C.D. (2001). Functional interactions of lanthanum and phospholipase D with the abscisic acid signaling effectors VP1 and ABI1-1 in rice protoplasts. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9855–9860. Grebenok, R.J., Lambert, G.M., and Galbraith, D.W. (1997). Characterization of the targeted nuclear accumulation of GFP within the cells of transgenic plants. Plant J. 12, 685–696.[CrossRef]
Grewal, S.I., and Moazed, D. (2003). Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science 301, 798–802.
Hagenbeek, D., Quatrano, R.S., and Rock, C.D. (2000). Trivalent ions activate abscisic acid-inducible promoters through an ABI1-dependent pathway in rice protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 123, 1553–1560. Hagenbeek, D., and Rock, C.D. (2001). Quantitative analysis by flow cytometry of abscisic acid-inducible gene expression in transiently transformed rice protoplasts. Cytometry 45, 170–179.[Medline]
Hall, G., Jr., Allen, G.C., Loer, D.S., Thompson, W.F., and Spiker, S. (1991). Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9320–9324. Han, K.H., Ma, C.P., and Strauss, S.H. (1997). Matrix attachment regions (MARs) enhance transformation frequency and transgene expression in poplar. Transgenic Res. 6, 415–420. |
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
