Plant Cell email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

First published online December 8, 2006; 10.1105/tpc.106.047290

The Plant Cell 18:3476-3490 (2006)
© 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/12/3476    most recent
tpc.106.047290v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.

Molecular Identification and Physiological Characterization of a Novel Monosaccharide Transporter from Arabidopsis Involved in Vacuolar Sugar Transport[W]

Alexandra Wormita, Oliver Trentmanna, Ingmar Feifera, Christian Lohrb, Joachim Tjadena, Stefan Meyerc, Ulrike Schmidtc, Enrico Martinoiac and H. Ekkehard Neuhausa,1

a Pflanzenphysiologie, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany
b Zelluläre Neurobiologie, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, D-67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany
c Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Universität Zürich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail neuhaus{at}rhrk.uni-kl.de; fax 49-631-2052600.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
The tonoplast monosaccharide transporter (TMT) family comprises three isoforms in Arabidopsis thaliana, and TMT–green fluorescent protein fusion proteins are targeted to the vacuolar membrane. TMT promoter–ß-glucuronidase plants revealed that the TONOPLAST MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTER1 (TMT1) and TMT2 genes exhibit a tissue- and cell type–specific expression pattern, whereas TMT3 is only weakly expressed. TMT1 and TMT2 expression is induced by drought, salt, and cold treatments and by sugar. During cold adaptation, tmt knockout lines accumulated less glucose and fructose compared with wild-type plants, whereas no differences were observed for sucrose. Cold adaptation of wild-type plants substantially promoted glucose uptake into isolated leaf mesophyll vacuoles. Glucose uptake into isolated vacuoles was inhibited by NH4+, fructose, and phlorizin, indicating that transport is energy-dependent and that both glucose and fructose were taken up by the same carrier. Glucose import into vacuoles from two cold-induced tmt1 knockout lines or from triple knockout plants was substantially lower than into corresponding wild-type vacuoles. Monosaccharide feeding into leaf discs revealed the strongest response to sugar in tmt1 knockout lines compared with wild-type plants, suggesting that TMT1 is required for cytosolic glucose homeostasis. Our results indicate that TMT1 is involved in vacuolar monosaccharide transport and plays a major role during stress responses.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
In plants, sugars fulfill essential functions as a main energy source, as substrates for polymer synthesis, as transport and storage compounds, or as carbon precursors required for a wide number of anabolic and catabolic reactions. In most plant species, sugars are present mainly in the form of the disaccharide sucrose or as glucose and fructose representing the major monosaccharides (ap Rees, 1994Go).

Long-distance transport of sugars in plants connects source and sink organs and occurs in the phloem sieve cells (Ruiz-Medrano et al., 2001Go). By contrast, short-distance transport into a plant cell occurs either symplastically through plasmodesmata or apoplastically via highly specific, monosaccharide or disaccharide transport proteins energized by proton symport (Ward et al., 1998Go; Bush, 1999Go; Williams et al., 2000Go). Arabidopsis thaliana possesses >60 putative isoforms of monosaccharide transporters separated in various clades (Lalonde et al., 2004Go), and 14 of these proteins represent the well-characterized plasma membrane–located hexose carrier group STP (Büttner and Sauer, 2000Go). In addition, Arabidopsis harbors ~10 disaccharide transporter isoforms (Lalonde et al., 2004Go), and all of these plasma membrane–located carriers together with other homologous proteins from animals, fungi, and bacteria constitute a large protein family (Henderson, 1991Go; Saier, 2000Go).

In addition to transport across the plasma membrane, carrier-mediated sugar transport has also been demonstrated across organellar membranes such as the inner plastid envelopes (Schäfer et al., 1977Go; Rost et al., 1997Go) or the vacuolar tonoplast (Rausch, 1991Go; Martinoia et al., 2000Go). Vacuoles play a central role in the long-term or temporary storage of sugars. Storage tissues such as red beet (Beta vulgaris) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) stalks accumulate large amounts of sucrose that is used as an energy source when these tissues turn to source metabolism (Buchanan et al., 2000Go). In leaves, sugars accumulate during the daytime and are released from the vacuole at night (Martinoia et al., 1987Go). In that case, the vacuole represents a short-time storage vessel that allows the plant to store excess soluble carbohydrates. Furthermore, several plants, such as barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum), synthesize fructans in leaf vacuoles using sucrose as a precursor (Cairns et al., 2000Go).

Facilitated diffusion as well as energized proton antiport mechanisms have been described for monosaccharide and sucrose transport into isolated vacuoles or tonoplast vesicles prepared from a large number of plant species (Guy et al., 1979Go; Thom and Komor, 1984Go; Daie and Wilusz, 1987Go; Martinoia et al., 1987Go; Rausch, 1991Go; Shiratake et al., 1997Go). Accordingly, putative tonoplast-localized sugar carriers have been identified in proteomic approaches (Carter et al., 2004Go; Endler et al., 2006Go) or in immunological studies (Chiou and Bush, 1996Go). It was recently shown that Hv Sut2 and At Suc4 transport sucrose (Weise et al., 2000Go; Weschke et al., 2000Go) and that these carriers reside in the vacuolar membrane (Endler et al., 2006Go). However, the exact role of these transport proteins is still open to debate. In chloroplasts, a glucose and a maltose transporter have been identified (Weber et al., 2000Go; Nittyla et al., 2004Go), but only the latter has been characterized on both the molecular and functional levels (Nittyla et al., 2004Go).

Here, we report on a monosaccharide transporter from Arabidopsis. This protein has three isoforms in Arabidopsis, and all members of this carrier group exhibit their highest sequence similarity to bacterial sugar carriers and not to the functionally analyzed plant plasma membrane–located hexose carriers (STP). Based on subcellular localization studies, on transport studies using isolated vacuoles from cold-adapted wild-type or knockout lines, and on altered sugar accumulation and allocation in knockout mutants during either cold adaptation or sugar feeding, we present evidence for vacuolar monosaccharide transporters from Arabidopsis at both the molecular and functional levels.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of Arabidopsis Tonoplast Monosaccharide Transporter–Type Proteins
During screening of the Arabidopsis EST library, we discovered a cDNA clone (No. 8B8T74) encoding a carrier exhibiting highest similarity to bacterial monosaccharide transporters. We sequenced the full-length clone and (after having performed localization studies; see below) named the deduced protein TONOPLAST MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTER1 (TMT1). TMT1 comprises 734 amino acid residues and shows 32% similarity to the bacterial glucose transporter GTR from Synechocystis species and 26% similarity to the plasma membrane–located Arabidopsis glucose transporter STP1 (Figure 1 ). The substantially lower similarity of TMT1 to the sucrose transporter SUC1 (16%; Figure 1) further indicates that TMT1 is a member of the monosaccharide and not the disaccharide transporter family. Two additional TMT isoforms have been amplified via PCR from first-strand cDNA: TMT2 contains 739 amino acid residues, and TMT3 contains 729 amino acid residues (see Supplemental Figure 1 online). TMT proteins exhibiting substantial structural similarities to the Arabidopsis homologs have also been identified in dicotyledonous plants such as Medicago (accession number AC131026) and grape vine (Vitis vinifera; accession number AAX47312) and in monocotyledonous species such as barley (accession number Q8GT52) and rice (Oryza sativa; accession number Os02g13560). All members of the TMT protein group exhibit higher structural similarities to prokaryotic hexose carriers than to the plant plasma membrane–located and functionally analyzed carriers of the STP group (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 1. Alignment of the Amino Acid Sequences of TMT1 and Selected Sugar Transporters.

At, Arabidopsis thaliana; GTR, glucose transporter; Ss, Synechocystis species PCC6803; STP1, plasma membrane–located sugar (monosaccharide) transporter; SUC1, plasma membrane–bound sucrose transporter; TMT1, TONOPLAST MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTER1. Numbers indicate amino acid positions, and black bars indicate transmembrane domains of TMT1 predicted by the program SOAP in PCgene.

 
TMT1 exhibits 12 predicted transmembrane domains (Figure 1) and shows a uniquely large centrally located hydrophilic loop connecting transmembrane domains 6 and 7 (Figure 1). This loop spans ~320 amino acid residues in length, which is nearly four to five times larger than the corresponding structures in all other known monosaccharide transporters from prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and is not present in the Synechocystis homolog (Henderson, 1991Go; Mueckler, 1993Go; Barrett et al., 1999Go). Similar to TMT1, isoforms TMT2 and TMT3 also exhibit an extraordinary long centrally located loop (see Supplemental Figure 1 online).

Subcellular Localization of Arabidopsis TMT Proteins
Recently, a proteome analysis of the Arabidopsis and barley tonoplast indicated the presence of TMT1 and TMT2 in this membrane (Carter et al., 2004Go). However, because proteome analyses might provide false information on the presence of proteins in specific subcellular fractions as a result of contamination from other organelles, we used an alternative approach by expressing TMT–green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion proteins in both tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) protoplasts and Arabidopsis cell suspension culture protoplasts. We included TMT3 in this analysis because, in contrast with TMT1 and TMT2, the third TMT isoform has not been identified in a proteome analysis (Carter et al., 2004Go).

Figure 2A shows chlorophyll autofluorescence in chloroplasts present in an isolated tobacco protoplast. TMT1-GFP fluorescence is clearly distinct from chloroplast autofluorescence and reveals a tonoplast and not a plasma membrane localization of the fusion protein. This tonoplast localization is indicated because of the large size of the marked membrane, which appears sporadically indented by chloroplasts (Figure 2B), and is further substantiated in the merged image (Figure 2C). Similarly, the transient expression of TMT1-GFP in protoplasts from an Arabidopsis suspension culture leads to decoration of the tonoplast (Figure 2E). The corresponding merged image (Figure 2F) clearly revealed the thin cytoplasmic space between the labeled tonoplast and the plasma membrane.


Figure 2
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 2. Subcellular Localization of an N-Terminal TMT1-GFP Fusion Protein in Tobacco Protoplasts or Protoplasts from an Arabidopsis Suspension Culture.

(A) Autofluorescence of chloroplasts in tobacco protoplasts.

(B) Localization of the TMT1-GFP fusion protein in tobacco protoplasts.

(C) Merge of (A) and (B).

(D) Bright-field image of an Arabidopsis cell suspension protoplast.

(E) Localization of the TMT1-GFP fusion protein in an Arabidopsis suspension culture cell.

(F) Merge of (D) and (E).

 
As shown for TMT1-GFP, the fusion protein TMT3-GFP is also located in the vacuolar membrane from both transiently transformed Arabidopsis suspension culture cells and tobacco protoplasts (data not shown; see Supplemental Figures 2A to 2C online).

Tissue, Cell, and Stress Specificity of TMT1, TMT2, and TMT3 Gene Expression
RNA gel blot hybridization analysis revealed the highest TMT1 mRNA levels in juvenile (sink) and adult (source) leaves, followed by flower tissues (Figure 3 ). Root and stem tissues accumulated substantially less TMT1 transcript (Figure 3). By contrast, TMT2 mRNA accumulated mainly in root and stem tissues and less in juvenile and adult leaves or in flower tissues (Figure 3). Interestingly, TMT3 mRNA was not detectable by RNA gel blot analysis (data not shown), indicating a very low expression level.


Figure 3
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 3. RNA Gel Blot Analysis of TMT1 and TMT2 Transcript Accumulation in Various Arabidopsis Tissues.

Plants were grown for 6 to 14 weeks under standard growth conditions. Flower and stem tissues were taken from ~12- to 14-week-old plants. Full length cDNAs of TMT1 and TMT2 were used as probes. The high specificity of probes used was analyzed by dot blot (data not shown).

 
To gain more information on the promoter activity of all three TMT genes, we generated TMT1-, TMT2-, and TMT3-promoter–ß-glucuronidase (GUS) plants. Figure 4A reveals that the TMT1 gene is actively transcribed in pollen cells and in all tissues from developing seedlings at 2 d after germination. Young leaves from plants grown on soil (3 weeks old) exhibited slightly higher TMT1-promoter–GUS activity than older leaves (Figure 4A). TMT1 expression in flowers is attributable mainly to its expression in petals, filaments, and pollen cells still wrapped by anther envelopes (Figure 4A). Developing seeds, still embedded in siliques, did not exhibit substantial GUS activity (Figure 4A). Thin cuts of embedded leaves showed that TMT1 is expressed in different cell types. TMT1 gene expression is most prominent in mesophyll cells and in cells surrounding the vascular tissue and lower epidermis and is less prominent in the upper epidermis (see Supplemental Figure 3 online).


Figure 4
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 4. Histochemical Localization of TMT Gene Expression.

(A) TMT1-promoter–GUS.

(B) TMT2-promoter–GUS.

(C) TMT3-promoter–GUS.

 
Figure 4B shows that TMT2-promoter–GUS activity is relatively low in germinating seedlings (at day 2 after germination) or in 5-d-old cotyledons. In young roots, TMT2-promoter–GUS activity was restricted to the stele, and in mature leaves, only the edge areas showed GUS activity (Figure 4B). In undeveloped floral side buds, in petals, and in filaments, TMT2-promoter–GUS activity was substantial.

TMT3 mRNA was not detectable by RNA gel blot analysis (see above). Accordingly, TMT3-promoter–GUS activity was low in all tissues tested. Arabidopsis tissues manifesting TMT1- and/or TMT2-promoter–GUS activity, such as young leaves and filaments, did not exhibit TMT3-promoter–GUS activity (Figure 4C). Only at the very edges of source leaves was a limited TMT3-promoter–GUS activity present. In sum, we found that TMT3-promoter–GUS activity was low in all tissues tested and that TMT1- and TMT2-promoter–GUS activities differed in tissue specificity and developmental stage.

To obtain information on how different environmental or stress conditions act on TMT gene expression, we analyzed alterations of corresponding mRNA levels in response to cold treatment, to sugar or salt level, and to drought. Already after 24 h in the cold (9°C), mature Arabidopsis plants had increased TMT1 mRNA content, and after 48 h in the cold, TMT1 mRNA reached a maximal level that did not increase further (Figure 5 ). TMT2 mRNA levels did not respond markedly to cold treatment, as there was only a slight increase of TMT2 mRNA after 24 h in the cold compared with the level at the beginning of the experiment (Figure 5). Control plants (kept at standard growth conditions, 21°C) showed exactly the same TMT1 and TMT2 mRNA levels as at the beginning of the experiment, and cold treatment did not promote the accumulation of TMT3 mRNA above the detection level (data not shown).


Figure 5
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 5. RNA Gel Blot Analysis of TMT1 and TMT2 mRNA Accumulation in Response to Sugar Availability and Environmental Stress Stimuli.

For analysis of the effects of salt treatment on gene expression, total RNA of 7-d-old seedlings grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium was harvested. For analysis of the effects of sugar feeding on gene expression, total RNA of 7-d-old seedlings grown in liquid culture was harvested. Five percent monosaccharide represents a concentration of ~280 mM, and 5% sucrose represents a concentration of ~146 mM. For analysis of the effects of cold and drought stress on gene expression, total RNA of leaves from 5-week-old soil-grown plants was isolated. Total RNA represents the loading control.

 
The presence of high sugar levels during the growth of Arabidopsis in liquid culture medium (Scheible et al., 2004Go) also affected TMT1 and TMT2 mRNA levels (Figure 5). The addition of 5% glucose promoted the accumulation of both TMT1 and TMT2 mRNA (Figure 5). Five percent fructose in the growth medium slightly stimulated TMT2 but not TMT1 mRNA accumulation, and the presence of sucrose (1 or 5%) led to a higher accumulation of TMT1 mRNA compared with TMT2 mRNA (Figure 5). Similar to cold treatment, the presence of sugars did not promote the accumulation of TMT3 mRNA above the detection level (data not shown).

When Arabidopsis plants were subjected to salt stress by increasing NaCl concentrations in the growth medium, accumulation of TMT1 and TMT2 mRNA was observed (Figure 5). However, the salt concentrations required to attain the highest TMT1 and TMT2 transcripts were different: 150 mM NaCl provoked the highest TMT1 mRNA levels, whereas TMT2 mRNA levels attained their maximum at 200 mM NaCl (Figure 5). NaCl did not promote the accumulation of TMT3 mRNA (data not shown).

Drought stress, induced by stopping watering of soil-grown Arabidopsis plants, stimulated the accumulation of TMT1 mRNA (Figure 5). Seven days after stopping watering, TMT1 transcripts were significantly higher than at the beginning of the experiment or in daily-watered control plants (Figure 5; data not shown). After 7 d of drought treatment, TMT2 mRNA accumulated slightly (Figure 5), but drought stress did not promote any detectable accumulation of TMT3 mRNA (data not shown).

Identification of tmt Knockout Mutants
Knockout mutants created by T-DNA insertions represent a frequently used powerful system to study the physiological function of a protein. A T-DNA insertion mutant for TMT1 has been identified in the Syngenta library and has been named tmt1::tDNA1. The T-DNA insertion in this mutant is located in exon 1 (Figure 6A ). The homozygous genotype of the tmt1::tDNA1 mutation has been confirmed by PCR on genomic DNA (see Supplemental Figure 4A online). RT-PCR analysis showed the absence of tmt1 mRNA in the mutant plant (Figure 6B). Similarly, tmt1::tDNA2 contains a T-DNA insertion in exon 3 (Figure 6A). The homozygous genotype of the tmt1::tDNA2 mutation has been confirmed by PCR on genomic DNA (see Supplemental Figure 4A online). RT-PCR analysis showed the absence of tmt1 mRNA in the mutant (Figure 6B).


Figure 6
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 6. Molecular Characterization of Homozygous tmt1::tDNA1, tmt1::tDNA2, tmt2::tDNA, and tmt1-2-3::tDNA Mutants.

(A) Positions of T-DNA insertions in the TMT genes. Arrows indicate primer positions and the direction of polymerase activity. Primer sequences are given in the legend to Supplemental Figure 4 online.

(B) RT-PCR analysis of cDNA extracted from leaves of wild-type, tmt1::tDNA1, tmt1::tDNA2, tmt2::tDNA, tmt1-2::tDNA, and tmt1-2-3::tDNA plants with gene-specific primer pairs. To reveal the presence of TMT1 mRNA, the primer pair AW31 and AW32 was used; to reveal the presence of TMT2 mRNA, the primer pair AW29 and AW30 was used; and to reveal the presence of TMT3 mRNA, the primer pair AW27 and AW28 was used. The size standard used is a PstI-digested {lambda}-phage DNA.

 
The tmt2::tDNA line contains a T-DNA insertion in exon 5 (Figure 6A). The homozygous genotype of the tmt2::tDNA mutation was confirmed by PCR on genomic DNA (see Supplemental Figure 4B online), and RT-PCR analysis revealed the absence of tmt2 mRNA in the mutant (Figure 6B). Finally, the tmt3::tDNA contains a T-DNA insertion in exon 3 (Figure 6A). The homozygous genotype of the tmt3::tDNA mutation was confirmed by PCR on genomic DNA (see Supplemental Figure 4B online), and RT-PCR analysis confirmed the absence of TMT3 mRNA in the mutant (Figure 6B).

In addition to these single knockout lines, we also created double and triple tmt knockout mutants by crossing the single knockout plants. A double knockout line was created by crossing tmt1::tDNA1 with tmt2::tDNA (see Supplemental Figure 4C online). RT-PCR analysis showed the absence of tmt1 and tmt2 mRNA in the double mutant (Figure 6B). For generation of a triple mutant, we crossed the homozygous double mutant with the homozygous tmt3::tDNA line and identified the corresponding mutant lacking all functional TMT genes (see Supplemental Figure 4D online). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the absence of all three TMT mRNA species in the triple mutant (Figure 6B). None of the mutants mentioned exhibited any distinctive phenotypic features when grown under standard growth conditions.

Monosaccharide Transport into Isolated Vacuoles from Wild-Type Plants or tmt Knockout Mutants
To this point, it was impossible to detect glucose transport activity by heterologous expression of any of the three TMT proteins in bakers' or fission yeast mutants lacking endogenous glucose carriers, or in Pichia pastoris (data not shown). This result is in agreement with the failure of another research group trying to express the sugarcane homolog (Casu et al., 2003Go). Although the yeast lines mentioned above exhibited large amounts of TMT1, TMT2, or TMT3 mRNA (data not shown), the corresponding TMT proteins were always absent, as revealed using either a His tag–specific antibody or an antibody raised against the large hydrophilic loop present in TMT1 (Figure 1; data not shown).

However, we have shown that the TMT1 gene in particular is strongly induced during cold adaptation and is highly responsive upon glucose administration (Figure 5). Therefore, it was of interest to analyze whether monosaccharide transport into the Arabidopsis vacuole is increased after cold adaptation. For this purpose, we isolated leaf mesophyll vacuoles either from control wild-type plants (grown under standard growth conditions at 21°C) or from plants transferred for 2 d into the cold (9°C) before vacuole isolation.

Wild-type vacuoles isolated from plants grown under standard growth conditions took up 0.28 nmol [14C]glucose/µL vacuole after 10 min of incubation, whereas vacuoles isolated from wild-type plants previously incubated for 2 d at 9°C exhibited an internal concentration of 0.83 nmol [14C]glucose/µL vacuole after 10 min of incubation (Figure 7A ).


Figure 7
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 7. Uptake of [14C]Glucose into Isolated Arabidopsis Mesophyll Vacuoles.

(A) Effects of cold treatment on glucose uptake into wild-type vacuoles. Plants were either grown under standard growth conditions or incubated for 2 d at 9°C before vacuole isolation. Transport of [U-14C]glucose (100 µM) was conducted for 10 min.

(B) Effector studies of glucose uptake into vacuoles isolated from cold-induced wild-type plants. Plants were incubated for 2 d at 9°C before vacuole isolation. Labeled glucose was given at a concentration of 100 µM. Effectors were given at the indicated concentrations. [U-14C]glucose (100 µM) uptake was allowed for 10 min.

(C) Glucose uptake into vacuoles isolated from wild-type, tmt1::tDNA1-, and tmt1::tDNA2 plants. Plants were incubated for 2 d at 9°C before vacuole isolation, and labeled glucose was given at a concentration of 100 µM.

(D) Time course of glucose uptake into vacuoles isolated from wild-type and tmt1-2-3::tDNA plants. Plants were incubated for 2 d at 9°C before vacuole isolation, and radioactively labeled glucose was given at a concentration of 100 µM. Open triangles represent vacuoles from tmt1-2-3::tDNA plants, and closed diamonds represent vacuoles from wild-type plants.

All data given represent means of three individual experiments, each with three to four replicate samples, ± SE.

 
To gain further insight into the biochemical characteristics of TMT-catalyzed sugar import, we analyzed the effect of ammonium, fructose, or the sugar transporter inhibitor phlorizin on glucose import into wild-type vacuoles (Figure 7B). The presence of the protonophore NH4Cl (5 mM) reduced the glucose import rate into isolated vacuoles from cold-induced Arabidopsis plants by ~42%, 5 mM fructose inhibited glucose uptake by ~45%, and 1 mM phlorizin reduced glucose uptake by ~81% (Figure 7B). Higher phlorizin concentrations did not result in any further reduction in glucose uptake (data not shown).

To determine whether the T-DNA insertion in the TMT1 gene correlates with decreased glucose uptake activity into corresponding vacuoles, we compared glucose uptake rates into vacuoles isolated from wild-type, tmt1::tDNA1, and tmt1::tDNA2 plants. For this experiment, all plant lines were transferred for 2 d into the cold (9°C) before vacuole isolation. After 10 min of incubation, wild-type vacuoles contained 0.92 nmol [14C]glucose/µL vacuole, whereas tmt1::tDNA1 and tmt1::tDNA2 vacuoles had taken up 0.34 and 0.39 nmol [14C]glucose/µL vacuole, respectively, within the same time (Figure 7C). This result reveals that the two independent tmt1 knockout lines exhibited a substantially reduced capacity to import glucose into the vacuole.

Although homolog 1 was the most prominently expressed TMT gene in Arabidopsis leaves (Figures 3 and 4A), it was of interest to reveal whether glucose transport into vacuoles isolated from the triple tmt knockout line was decreased further. Therefore, we isolated vacuoles from cold–induced wild-type and tmt triple mutant plants and compared the relative glucose uptakes. From Figure 7D, it is obvious that glucose uptake into triple knockout vacuoles was significantly lower than into wild-type vacuoles. However, the decrease observed in the triple mutant was not substantially lower than that observed in the two independent tmt1::tDNA knockout lines (Figures 7C and 7D).

Sugar Levels in Wild-Type Plants and tmt Knockout Mutants
Under standard growth conditions (10 h of light, 21°C), none of the TMT mutants (including the triple mutant) showed any visible phenotypic difference compared with wild-type plants. However, because TMT1 and TMT2 are induced in the cold and because vacuolar glucose transport activity is strongly upregulated during cold incubation, we were interested to know whether this observation is also reflected by the leaf sugar content in the chosen growth conditions.

Under standard growth conditions, glucose contents were 0.57 µmol/g fresh weight in wild-type plants and 0.39 and 0.41 µmol/g fresh weight, respectively, in the two tmt1 mutant lines (Figure 8A ), representing slightly (~30%) reduced glucose contents. A similar reduction (~28%) was also observed for fructose (Figure 8A), whereas sucrose contents were very similar in wild-type and mutant plants (Figure 8A). tmt2::tDNA and tmt3::tDNA lines grown under standard growth conditions did not exhibit any altered sugar levels compared with wild-type plants (data not shown). The double knockout plant and the triple knockout line showed similarly reduced glucose and fructose levels as the tmt1 T-DNA lines when grown under standard conditions, whereas the triple mutant contained less glucose and fructose. Glucose amounted to 0.45 and 0.24 µmol/g fresh weight in the double and triple mutants, respectively, and fructose accumulated to 0.11 and 0.05 µmol/g fresh weight in the double and triple mutants, respectively (Figure 8A).


Figure 8
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 8. Effects of Cold Treatment on Sugar Levels in Arabidopsis Leaves.

(A) Sugar contents in leaves from 5-week-old wild-type, tmt1::tDNA1, tmt1::tDNA2, tmt1-2::tDNA, and tmt1-2-3::tDNA plants.

(B) Sugar levels from 5-week-old wild-type, tmt1::tDNA1, tmt1::tDNA2, tmt1-2::tDNA, and tmt1-2-3::tDNA plants after 24 h of cold stress (9°C) and permanent light. Dark gray bars represent wild-type samples, white bars represent tmt1::tDNA1 samples, light gray bars represent tmt1::tDNA2 samples, black bars represent tmt1-2::tDNA samples, and middle gray bars represent tmt1-2-3::tDNA samples.

Data represent means of three independent experiments ± SE.

 
To analyze whether the differences observed for glucose and fructose would be more pronounced during cold stress (leading to the accumulation of tmt1 and tmt2 mRNA; Figure 5), we transferred wild-type and knockout plants into the cold (9°C) and incubated the plants for 24 h under permanent light (light was given to promote net sugar accumulation by photosynthesis). Twenty-four hours after transfer of wild-type plants into the cold, glucose accumulated ~10-fold to a concentration of 5.5 µmol/g fresh weight, fructose accumulated to 2.3 µmol/g fresh weight, and sucrose doubled to ~2.4 µmol/g fresh weight (Figure 8B). However, in both knockout lines, the changes in monosaccharides differed markedly from the corresponding changes in wild-type leaves. Twenty-four hours after transfer into the cold, tmt1::tDNA1 and tmt1::tDNA2 leaves contained only 2.0 and 2.7 µmol glucose/g fresh weight, respectively (Figure 8B). Fructose accumulated in both knockout lines to only 0.5 and 0.7 µmol/g fresh weight, respectively (Figure 8B). Interestingly, under cold stress conditions, the double tmt mutant contained significantly less hexose compared with the single tmt1 T-DNA insertion lines (0.52 µmol/g fresh weight glucose and 0.14 µmol/g fresh weight fructose) (Figure 8B). Upon cold stress, the triple mutant contained glucose and fructose levels similar to concentrations observed in the double mutant, namely 0.53 µmol/g fresh weight glucose and 0.12 µmol/g fresh weight fructose. In contrast with the two tmt1 knockout mutants, the double and triple mutants also showed slightly reduced sucrose levels upon 24 h of cold stress (Figure 8B).

Sugar Feeding into Leaf Discs from Wild-Type or tmt1::tDNA Lines
An impaired glucose transport into the vacuole may lead to increased cytosolic glucose concentrations and thus affect carbohydrate-regulated genes. The CHLOROPHYLLab BINDING PROTEIN1 gene (CAB) and NITRATE REDUCTASE1 (NR1) represent sugar-regulated plant genes (Koch, 1996Go). Therefore, these two genes are suitable candidates to test whether cytosolic glucose contents are altered in TMT1 mutants, because if this is the case, altered transcript levels should be observed. For this analysis, leaf discs from 4- to 5-week-old plants were prepared 3 h after the onset of illumination and subsequently incubated for 24 h in the dark in the presence of various sugars (each sugar was present at a concentration of 100 mM). Dark incubation was chosen to prevent photosynthesis-driven sugar accumulation. Subsequently, total RNA from leaf discs was isolated and RNA gel blot hybridization was conducted to quantify the levels of CAB mRNA (known to be downregulated by sugars) and NR1 mRNA (known to be upregulated by sugars) (Koch, 1996Go).

At the beginning of the incubation experiment, leaves from wild-type and the two independent knockout plants contained very similar levels of CAB and NR1 mRNA, respectively (Figure 9 ). Wild-type leaf discs incubated in the presence of glucose, fructose, or sorbitol showed no obvious decrease of CAB mRNA compared with the 0-h control, whereas sucrose provoked a decrease of CAB mRNA (Figure 9). Interestingly, in both TMT1 knockout lines, the sugars glucose, fructose, and sucrose induced a significantly stronger decrease of CAB mRNA compared with the corresponding wild-type leaf discs (Figure 9).


Figure 9
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Figure 9. Quantification of mRNA Coding for CAB1 or NR1 in Leaf Samples from Wild-Type, tmt1::tDNA1, and tmt1::tDNA2 Plants.

Leaf discs were taken from 6-week-old soil-grown plants at 3 h after illumination and incubated for 24 h in the dark in either water or water supplemented with the solutes indicated (each at 100 mM). Subsequently, total RNA was isolated and probed for the relative abundance of mRNA coding for CAB1 or NR1. rRNA represents the loading control. Sor, sorbitol.

 
The levels of NR1 mRNA in wild-type leaf discs incubated in sugars were higher than those in leaf discs incubated in water (Figure 9). This observation concurs with the known sugar induction of the NR1 gene (Koch, 1996Go). However, each of the sugars tested provoked a stronger stimulatory effect upon the NR1 gene in leaf discs prepared from tmt1::tDNA1 or tmt1::tDNA2 plants (Figure 9).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Sugars fulfill many essential functions in all types of plant cells. Therefore, it is not surprising that lower and higher plant species possess a large number of sugar transporter isoforms exhibiting tightly controlled cell- and tissue-specific expression patterns (Büttner and Sauer, 2000Go). Here, we describe a monosaccharide carrier, named TMT, that has three isoforms in Arabidopsis (Figure 1; see Supplemental Figure 1 online). The occurrence of TMT-type sugar carriers is not restricted to Arabidopsis, as a homolog has been identified in sugarcane (Casu et al., 2003Go). Although the transport activity and the subcellular localization of the sugarcane carrier have not been demonstrated, it has been speculated that this transport protein might be involved in cellular sugar import (Casu et al., 2003Go). By contrast, we present evidence that TMT proteins from Arabidopsis reside in the tonoplast, as suggested from vacuolar proteome data (Carter et al., 2004Go; Endler et al., 2006Go), and that these transporters play a central role in vacuolar hexose transport, mainly under stress conditions.

The structural similarities between TMT proteins and the cyanobacterial monosaccharide transporter GTR (Figure 1; see Supplemental Figure 1 online) appear remarkable considering the long evolutionary distance between plants and prokaryotes. However, because of the presence of TMT homologs in two cyanobacterial species, namely Synechocystis species (Figure 1) and Nostoc punctiforme (data not shown), it is possible to develop an evolutionary scenario explaining the presence of these transporters in plants. Accordingly, this gene was integrated into the nuclear genome during early plant evolution, but the gene product was not recruited to the inner plastidic envelope membrane but to the tonoplast (Figure 2; see Supplemental Figure 2 online) (Carter et al., 2004Go). The localization of TMT1 in a cell compartment different from the plastid is consistent with the absence of an N-terminal transit peptide in all TMT proteins (see Supplemental Figure 1 online) required for the integration of membrane proteins into the inner plastidic envelope membrane (Flügge, 1999Go).

In contrast with all other plant monosaccharide transporters analyzed to date at the functional level (Büttner and Sauer, 2000Go), TMT proteins reside in the vacuolar membrane. Here, we present two observations strongly indicating a vacuolar localization of TMT proteins: first, TMT1- and TMT3-GFP proteins transiently synthesized in tobacco protoplasts or in Arabidopsis suspension culture cells reside in the tonoplast (Figure 2; see Supplemental Figure 2 online); second, vacuoles isolated from two independent tmt1::tDNA mutant lines, or from the tmt triple mutant, exhibited substantially reduced rates of glucose import (Figures 7C and 7D). Moreover, two of the three TMT proteins have been identified in the tonoplast within a proteomic analysis (Carter et al., 2004Go). In addition, the observation that glucose and fructose accumulation is impaired in the cold further indicates that TMT proteins reside in the tonoplast and contribute to monosaccharide transport.

It is well known that in Arabidopsis leaves, osmotic or cold stress leads to the degradation of starch and consequently to increased glucose levels (Alberdi and Corcuera, 1991Go; Yano et al., 2005Go; Kaplan et al., 2006Go). Interestingly, both of these environmental stimuli induced the accumulation of tmt1 mRNA (Figure 5), and concomitantly, a strong stimulation of glucose uptake into isolated mesophyll vacuoles was observed in wild-type plants (Figure 7A). This correlation leads to the conclusion that TMT1 transport is regulated at the transcriptional level. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that posttranslational modification of TMT1 or the two additional isoforms occurs and contributes to an upregulation of vacuolar glucose import upon cold induction. Nevertheless, because vacuoles from tmt knockout plants exhibit a far lower glucose transport activity (Figures 7C and 7D) and because tmt mutants are substantially impaired in cold-induced accumulation of monosaccharides (Figure 8B), these carriers are likely to be central elements of vacuolar glucose and fructose accumulation during the cold stress response.

The observation that both the TMT1 and TMT2 genes are induced by sugar feeding (Figure 5) might additionally be taken as further indication for an in vivo transport function of TMT proteins. Keeping in mind that the vacuole contains the largest part of monosaccharides in mesophyll cells (Farré et al., 2001Go), sugar feeding induces carbohydrate accumulation in the cytoplasm and the subsequent accumulation in the vacuole. However, sugar sensing takes place in the cytosol by specific hexokinases (Jang et al., 1997Go), and both tmt1 knockout lines exhibited an oversensitized molecular sugar response, as revealed by the strong repression of CAB1 mRNA and the increased accumulation of NR1 mRNA compared with wild-type plants (Figure 9). This oversensitized sugar response strongly suggests that tmt knockout mutants cannot transfer freshly imported sugars into the vacuole as efficiently as the wild-type plants. In this way, sugars accumulate in the cytosol, where they induce a signal cascade leading to the deregulation of CAB1 and NR1 gene expression (Figure 9). This observation proves the importance of the efficient transfer and temporary deposition of metabolites for an optimal regulation of cytosolic carbohydrate metabolism.

The TMT protein family comprises three isoforms in Arabidopsis (see Supplemental Figure 1 online). According to the gene expression analysis (Figure 3) and promoter–GUS activity studies (Figure 4A), TMT1 is the most highly expressed member of this family in Arabidopsis leaves. These data are in accordance with those from the GENEVESTIGATOR database (Zimmermann et al., 2004Go), in which the maximal expression level of TMT1 in leaves is ~3-fold that of TMT2 and at least 10-fold that of TMT3. Interestingly, TMT1 gene expression, and partly TMT2 gene expression, is strong in young developing tissues and in pollen cells (Figure 4). Cells in young tissues and pollen cells are characterized by a rapid expansion, and it is possible that monosaccharide transport catalyzed by TMT proteins contributes to some extent to this process.

The tmt1 knockout mutants exhibit ~60% reduced glucose transport activity compared with wild-type plants (Figure 7C). This reduction is not increased further in the triple deletion mutant. (Figures 7C and 7D). However, the results on sugar accumulation during cold stress indicate that TMT2 (which is also induced under these conditions) might also play a role in the vacuolar hexose allocation in leaves. During cold stress, the tmt1-2::tDNA double mutant accumulates consistently less glucose and fructose than the tmt1 single knockout lines (Figure 8B). The discrepancy between the transport results and the sugar accumulation pattern could be attributable to different causes. (1) Vacuole uptake experiments on Arabidopsis vacuoles are extremely difficult to carry out and always exhibit a considerable standard deviation. Therefore, small differences observed between tmt1 and tmt1-2 knockout lines will not be statistically significant. (2) According to a recent gene expression analysis, TMT1 mRNA is distributed similarly between mesophyll and epidermis cells, whereas TMT2 mRNA is preferentially present in the epidermis (Suh et al., 2005Go). However, the vacuole isolation procedure established by us selects for mesophyll vacuoles, whereas sugar quantifications were performed on whole leaf extracts. However, in whole leaf extracts, the role of TMT2 might be more visible, because the corresponding gene appears to be highly expressed in the epidermis layers. (3) Vacuole transport studies were performed at a relatively low substrate concentration (100 µM). However, it cannot be excluded that TMT1 and TMT2 exhibit different kinetic properties and that TMT2 possesses a lower affinity for glucose and hence plays a minor role at the concentration tested. To perform a careful biochemical analysis of TMT1, TMT2, and TMT3, either a non-yeast-based expression system has to be established that allows the synthesis of these intracellular monosaccharide transporters or, alternatively, overexpression and purification of the TMT proteins in planta and subsequent incorporation in liposomes have to be envisaged.

Phlorizin, a known inhibitor of a wide range of monosaccharide carriers (Ehrenkranz et al., 2005Go), inhibited glucose import into isolated vacuoles below the level of glucose import present in vacuoles isolated from the tmt triple mutant (Figure 7). This observation indicates that besides the contribution of TMT1, TMT2, and TMT3 to vacuolar glucose import, other tonoplast-localized monosaccharide transporters exist. In any case, the biochemical data from isolated wild-type vacuoles reveal that the TMT1-coupled glucose transport is inhibited by the protonophore NH4+ and by fructose (Figure 7B). The inhibitory effect of NH4+ (Figure 7B) substantiates the assumption that glucose import linked to the presence of TMT1 is energy-dependent. This conclusion is in agreement with the observation that a fraction of the total vacuolar glucose transport capacity is dependent upon an existing proton motive force (Rausch, 1991Go; Martinoia and Ratajczak, 1997Go).

The observation that tmt knockout lines showed a markedly reduced ability to accumulate glucose and fructose upon cold stress (Figure 8B) can be taken as indirect evidence that TMT proteins accept both monosaccharides as substrates. However, the inhibitory effect of fructose on glucose uptake into cold stress–induced Arabidopsis vacuoles (Figure 7B) provides further experimental evidence that TMT proteins accept both sugars as substrates. This conclusion is in agreement with the biochemical properties of the cyanobacterial homolog GTR (Schmetterer, 1990Go).

Interestingly, a proteome analysis of barley mesophyll vacuoles revealed the presence of a TMT homolog in the tonoplast fraction (Endler et al., 2006Go). To date, transport experiments on barley vacuoles have been performed solely with plants grown at approximately room temperature, and it would be interesting to reveal whether cold induction of barley leaves would also lead to an energized glucose transport. TMT activity might be dependent on both translational activation (Figure 5) and posttranslational activation. Therefore, it will be interesting in the future to analyze whether the role of the extraordinarily large, centrally located loop domain present in all TMT proteins might contribute to this altered mode of transport.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
REFERENCES
 
Cultivation of Plants and Seedlings
Arabidopsis thaliana plants were grown in a growth chamber in soil at 21°C (day and night), and light was present at 150 µmol·m–2·s–1 for 10 h/d (standard growth conditions). For cold stress induction, plants were grown for 6 weeks in the growth chamber and subsequently transferred for 24 h (or 48 h) into a cooled growth chamber (9°C). Drought stress was applied to 5-week-old plants (grown under standard conditions) by withholding water for up to 7 d. For salt stress analysis, surface-sterilized seeds were sown on agar plates containing half-strength MS salts, 0.8% agar, 1% sucrose, 0.05% MES (adjusted to pH 5.7 with KOH), and various NaCl concentrations. Before germination, plates were incubated at 4°C for 2 d in the dark and subsequently transferred to the growth chamber, and growth was continued for 7 d under short-day conditions. To study the effect of sugars on gene expression, wild-type or mutant seedlings were grown for 7 d in liquid half-strength MS medium containing 0.05% MES (adjusted to pH 5.7 with KOH) and glucose, fructose, or sucrose if indicated (Scheible et al., 2004Go).

Construction of the Sequence Alignment
Multiple alignments of protein sequences were performed with the program ClustalX (Thomson et al., 1994Go). Transmembrane domains were predicted by the program SOAP in PCgene.

Cloning of the Arabidopsis TMT1-GFP and TMT3-GFP Constructs and Confocal Microscopy
To construct the TMT1-GFP and TMT3-GFP fusion proteins, we first amplified the entire TMT1 and TMT3 cDNAs by PCR using the Pfu-DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The primers used for TMT1 were the sense primer ML 44 (5'-CCACGCGTCTGAGTCTACTAAAGAG-3') and the antisense primer ML 45 (5'-AGTTACAAGCTCGAGATCCTTAGAAGG-3'). For the TMT3 construct, the primers used were the sense primer AW3 (5'-AATCACTGTAATCTAGAAAAAGATGAGGAG-3') and the antisense primer AW4 (5'-AAGCTGCAGCCTCGAGCTGTTTTGC-3'). The obtained DNA fragments were cleaved with XbaI and XhoI, respectively, and inserted in-frame in front of the GFP coding region using the vector GFP2 (Kost et al., 1998Go), leading to the final TMT1-GFP and TMT3-GFP constructs under the control of a 35S promoter.

Protoplasts isolated from sterile-grown tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv W38) were transformed with column-purified plasmid DNA (30 µg/0.5 x 106 cells) as given (Wendt et al., 2000Go). After 1 d of incubation at 24°C in the dark, protoplasts in Petri dishes were checked for the presence of green fluorescence by use of a laser-scanning system (LSM510; Carl Zeiss). GFP was excited at 488 nm, and the emission was detected by a photomultiplier through a 505- to 530-nm band-pass filter using an Achroplan 40x/0.75W objective.

Alternatively, cells from an Arabidopsis cell suspension culture (Millar et al., 2001Go) were transiently transformed with column-purified plasmid DNA. The fusion constructs were introduced into Arabidopsis protoplasts (Song et al., 2003Go) by polyethylene glycol–mediated transformation (Jin et al., 2001Go). Expression of the fusion constructs was monitored at various times after transformation by confocal laser-scanning microscopy using a Leica DM IRE2 microscope with a 63x Plan-Apochromat oil-immersion objective coupled to a TCS-SP2 spectral confocal and multiphoton microscope (Leica Microsystems). Images were processed with the Leica confocal software.

TMT Insertional Mutations
The Arabidopsis knockout mutants tmt1::tDNA1 and tmt2::tDNA were kindly provided by the Torrey Mesa Research Institute. A second, independent tmt1 knockout line (designated tmt1::tDNA2) was bought from the GABI-KAT consortium (Max-Planck-Institute), and a third knockout mutant, tmt3::tDNA, was provided by the SALK library (Salk Institute for Biological Studies).

To generate double knockout mutants (designated tmt1-2::tDNA) lacking TMT1 and TMT2 transporter genes, homozygous tmt1::tDNA1 and homozygous tmt2::tDNA mutants were crossed. To obtain a null mutant (tmt1-2-3::tDNA) lacking all three functional TMT genes, the homozygous double knockout plants were crossed with a homozygous tmt3::tDNA mutant.

All knockout lines were analyzed by RT-PCR for the absence of the TMT1, TMT2, or TMT3 transcript, respectively, caused by T-DNA insertions. Total leaf RNA from plants grown in the growth chamber was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Subsequently, DNase-treated RNA was transcribed into cDNA via reverse transcriptase (Superscript II; Invitrogen). With the cDNA as template, PCR was performed with 35 cycles of 95°C for 45 s, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, finishing with an extension at 72°C for 2 min. RT-PCR products were checked on 1% agarose gels.

The following gene-specific primers were used: for TMT1, AW31 (5'-GATGTTACCGATGAGATGGC-3') and AW32 (5'-GGAAAATCCCACTCCGAGTG-3'); for TMT2, AW29 (5'-GAGAAGATGAATCGGGACAG-3') and AW30 (5'-GATGCCTGAGAACTGCTGAAG-3'); and for TMT3, AW27 (5'-GATGTTCAGGCGAGCTTGC-3') and AW28 (5'-CTCCTGCCTTCCCATCATTC-3').

cDNA Clones
The full-length TMT1 cDNA clone (clone No. 8B8T74) derived from the Arabidopsis EST project (Newman et al., 1994Go) was cloned according to standard protocols (Sambrook et al., 1989Go). For the analysis of sugar-induced molecular responses, we quantified the levels of mRNAs encoding CAB1 and NR1. The full-length cDNAs for CAB1 (At2g34430) and NR1 (At1g77760) were amplified using a first-strand cDNA preparation as template, and the amplification products were cloned into the plasmid pBSK and sequenced.

Generation of TMT-Promoter–GUS Mutants and Histochemical Localization of GUS Activity
For the generation of the promoter–GUS constructs, the binary vector pGPTV (Becker et al., 1992Go) containing the ß-glucuronidase (uidA) gene from Escherichia coli was used. For the generation of the TMT1- and TMT2-promoter–GUS fusions, a promoter region of ~1.3 kb was cloned upstream of the GUS gene. For the generation of the TMT3-promoter–GUS fusion, a region of ~850 bp was cloned. The promoter regions of the TMT genes (including 30 bp of the coding regions) were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA and were sequenced to check that the correct product was amplified. For amplification of the promoter regions, the following primers were used: for TMT1, RW1 (5'-TCTACCCTTTCAATTATCTATCAATGTTGC-3') and RW2 (5'-GGCGAGAGCAACCCGGGTCGCTCCCTTC-3'); for TMT2, RW3 (5'-GAGACTGTATGTCGACTTTGGTACTCGG-3') and RW4 (5'-GTTGCGTTATCCCGGCTTGTAACAAGTTG-3'); and for TMT3, GUS3-for (5'-CTCTGCTCAAAGGTCGACAAAATTAAC-3') and GUS3-rev (5'-CTATCGCAGCTGCTAAAGCAAC-3'). After blunt-end ligation of the PCR products in the T7 orientation into the SmaI-restricted pBSK vector, the TMT1 construct was restricted with HindIII and SmaI, the TMT2 promoter was restricted with SalI and SmaI, and the TMT3 construct was restricted with SalI and PvuII and subsequently inserted in-frame with the GUS gene. The resulting constructs were used for Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation. Transformation of Arabidopsis was conducted according to the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998Go).

Whole seedlings (grown on MS agar plates) and other tissues from transgenic plants grown on soil under standard growth conditions were collected in ice-cold acetone (90%). After 20 min of incubation at room temperature, samples were stained according to standard protocols (Weigel and Glazebrook, 2002Go). From each construct, we analyzed 10 to 14 independent lines, and representative results are presented.

Treatment of Leaf Discs for mRNA Quantification, Extraction of Total RNA, and RNA Gel Blot Hybridization
To analyze the effects of sugars on the levels of CAB1 and NR1 mRNAs in wild-type and knockout mutant plants, we prepared leaf discs (0.7 cm in diameter) from plants grown for ~4 to 5 weeks in the growth chamber. Three hours after illumination, discs were either transferred directly into liquid nitrogen (controls) or incubated for 24 h in either water or water supplemented with the indicated solutes. Incubation took place in Petri dishes (containing 30 mL of the given solution) in the dark at room temperature (Neuhaus and Stitt, 1989Go). To prevent anaerobic conditions, samples were incubated on a laboratory shaker at 30 rpm during incubation. Leaf discs used for RNA extraction were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until RNA extraction.

The relative accumulation of TMT mRNA was analyzed in different Arabidopsis tissues prepared from plants grown in the growth chamber. Tissues were harvested and immediately transferred into liquid nitrogen. Total sample RNA was extracted using the Purescript-RNA extraction kit (Gentra Systems). RNA gel blot hybridization was performed as described (Thulke and Conrath, 1998Go). Labeling of probes was performed using the Ready-To-Go random prime kit (Amersham-Pharmacia). After hybridization, the membranes were washed according to standard procedures, and blots were visualized with a Cyclon phosphor imager (Packard).

Glucose and Fructose Uptake into Isolated Mesophyll Vacuoles and Carbohydrate Quantification
For isolation of intact Arabidopsis vacuoles, wild-type or knockout mutant plants were grown for 4 to 5 weeks under standard growth conditions (see above). If not stated otherwise, plants were grown for 2 d at 9°C before vacuole isolation. Isolation of vacuoles was performed as described previously (Frangne et al., 2002Go; Song et al., 2003Go). Essentially, mesophyll protoplasts were enriched by enzymatic digestion and centrifugation, and corresponding vacuoles were isolated after mild hypoosmotic treatment of protoplasts. Because enzymatic digestion has to occur for 2.5 h at room temperature, we incubated the resulting protoplasts from cold-adapted plants subsequently for 1 h on ice (to allow a putatively cold-dependent modification of vacuolar glucose transport). We showed elsewhere that Arabidopsis vacuoles essentially isolated according to this protocol do not contain other cellular organelles or intact protoplasts (Emmerlich et al., 2003Go). We checked that intermediate cold incubation of enriched protoplasts, before vacuole isolation (see above), did not alter the purity of the final vacuole preparation (data not shown).

Transport studies of [U-14C]glucose into isolated vacuoles were performed using the silicone oil centrifugation technique (Martinoia and Rentsch, 1992Go; Emmerlich et al., 2003Go). Transport was conducted for 10 min (if not stated otherwise) and terminated by centrifugation of intact vacuoles through a layer of silicone oil. Radioactively labeled glucose was given at a concentration of 100 µM (specific radioactivity of 185 kBq/nmol), and Mg2+-ATP (present at a concentration of 1 mM) was given to energize isolated vacuoles.

Sugar extraction from Arabidopsis leaves and spectroscopic quantification were performed as described by Quick et al. (1989)Go.

Accession Numbers
GenBank/EMBL accession numbers and Arabidopsis Genome Initiative locus identifiers for the genes mentioned in this article are as follows: TMT1, Z50752 and At1g20840;TMT2, AJ532570 and At4g35300; TMT3, AJ532571 and At3g51490.

Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Figure 1. Alignment of the Amino Acid Sequences of the Three Arabidopsis TMT Isoforms.
Supplemental Figure 2. Subcellular Localization of a TMT3-GFP Fusion Protein in Arabidopsis Suspension Culture Cells.
Supplemental Figure 3. Histochemical TMT1-Promoter-GUS Staining at the Cellular Level.
Supplemental Figure 4. PCR Analysis Using Genomic DNA from Wild-Type, tmt1::tDNA1-, tmt1::tDNA2, tmt2::tDNA, tmt3::tDNA, tmt1-2::tDNA, and tmt1-2-3::tDNA Plants.


   Acknowledgments
 
Arabidopsis knockout lines were provided by the Torrey Mesa Research Institute. Work in the laboratory of H.E.N. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant NE 418/3-2), the Federal State of Rheinland-Pfalz (Stiftung Innovation, Projekt 61/766), and the Nano-Bio-Center at the University of Kaiserslautern. U.S. and E.M. were supported by the European Union project Novel Ion Channels in Plants (EU HPRN-CT-00245; BBW 01.0598).


   Footnotes
 
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: H. Ekkehard Neuhaus (neuhaus{at}rhrk.uni-kl.de).

[W] Online version contains Web-only data. Back

www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.106.047290

Received September 8, 2006; Revision received October 18, 2006. accepted November 3, 2006.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Alberdi, M., and Corcuera, L.J. (1991). Cold-acclimation in plants. Phytochemistry 30, 3177–3184.[CrossRef]

ap Rees, T. (1994). Plant physiology. Virtue on both sides. Curr. Biol. 4, 557–559.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Barrett, M.P., Walmsley, A.R., and Gould, G.W. (1999). Structure and function of facilitative sugar transporters. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 496–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Becker, D., Kemper, E., Schell, J., and Masterson, R. (1992). New plant binary vectors with selectable markers located proximal to the left T-DNA border. Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1195–1197.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Buchanan, B.B., Gruissem, W., and Jones, R.L. (2000). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. (Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists).

Bush, D.R. (1999). Sugar transporters in plant biology. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2, 187–191.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Büttner, M., and Sauer, N. (2000). Monosaccharide transporters in plants: Structure, function and physiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1465, 263–274.[Medline]

Cairns, A.J., Pollock, C.J., Gallagher, J.A., and Harrison, J. (2000). Fructans: synthesis and regulation. In Photosynthesis: Physiology and Metabolism, R.C. Leegood, T.D. Sharkey, and C.H. Foyer, eds (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 301–320.

Carter, C., Pan, S., Zouhar, J., Avila, E.L., Girke, T., and Raikhel, N.V. (2004). The vegetative vacuole proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals predicted and unpredicted proteins. Plant Cell 16, 3285–3303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Casu, R.E., Christopher, P.L., Rae, A.L., McIntryre, L., Dimmock, C.M., and Manners, J.M. (2003). Identification of a novel sugar transporter homologue strongly expressed in maturing stem vascular tissues of sugarcane by expressed sequence tag and microarray analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 371–386.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chiou, T.J., and Bush, D.R. (1996). Molecular cloning, immunochemical localization to the vacuole, and expression in transgenic yeast and tobacco of a putative sugar transporter from sugar beet. Plant Physiol. 110, 511–520.[Abstract]

Clough, S.J., and Bent, A.F. (1998). Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Daie, J., and Wilusz, J.E. (1987). Facilitated transport of glucose in isolated phloem segments of celery. Plant Physiol. 84, 711–715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ehrenkranz, J.R., Lewis, N.G., Kahn, C.R., and Roth, J. (2005). Phlorizin: A review. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 21, 31–38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Emmerlich, V., Linka, N., Reinhold, T., Hurth, M.A., Traub, M., Martinoia, E., and Neuhaus, H.E. (2003). The plant homolog to the human sodium/dicarboxylic cotransporter is the vacuolar malate carrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11122–11126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Endler, A., Meyer, S., Schelbert, S., Schneider, T., Weschke, W., Peters, S.W., Keller, F., Baginsky, S., Martinoia, E., and Schmidt, U.G. (2006). Identification of a vacuolar sucrose transporter in barley and Arabidopsis mesophyll cells by a tonoplast proteomic approach. Plant Physiol. 141, 196–207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farré, E.M., Tiessen, A., Roessner, U., Geigenberger, P., Trethewey, R.N., and Willmitzer, L. (2001). Analysis of the compartmentation of glycolytic intermediates, nucleotides, sugars, organic acids, amino acids, and sugar alcohols in potato tubers using a nonaqueous fractionation method. Plant Physiol. 127, 685–700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Flügge, U.I. (1999). Phosphate translocators in plastids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 27–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Frangne, N., Eggmann, T., Koblischke, C., Weissenböck, G., Martinoia, E., and Klein, M. (2002). Flavone glucoside uptake into barley mesophyll and Arabidopsis cell culture vacuoles. Energization occurs by H+-antiport and ATP-binding cassette-type mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 128, 726–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guy, M., Reinhold, L., and Michaeli, D. (1979). Direct evidence for a sugar transport mechanism in isolated vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 64, 61–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Henderson, P.J.F. (1991). Sugar transport proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1, 590–601.[CrossRef]

Jang, J.C., Leon, P., Zhou, L., and Sheen, J. (1997). Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. Plant Cell 9, 5–19.[Medline]

Jin, J.B., Kim, Y.A., Kim, S.J., Lee, D.H., Cheong, G.-W., and Hwang, I. (2001). A new dynamin-like protein, ADL6, is involved in trafficking from the trans-Golgi network to the central vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13, 1511–1525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaplan, F., Sung, D.J., and Guy, C.L. (2006). Roles of ß-amylase and starch breakdown during temperature stress. Physiol. Plant. 126, 120–128.[CrossRef]

Koch, K.E. (1996). Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 509–540.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kost, B., Spielhofer, P., and Chua, N.-H. (1998). A GFP-mouse talin fusion protein labels plant actin filaments in vivo and visualizes the actin cytoskeleton in growing pollen tubes. Plant J. 16, 393–401.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lalonde, S., Wipf, D., and Frommer, W.B. (2004). Transport mechanisms for organic forms of carbon and nitrogen between source and sink. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 341–372.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martinoia, E., Kaiser, G., Schramm, M.J., and Heber, U. (1987). Sugar transport across the plasmalemma and the tonoplast of barley mesophyll protoplasts: Evidence for different transport systems. J. Plant Physiol. 131, 467–478.[Web of Science]

Martinoia, E., Massoneau, A., and Frangne, N. (2000). Transport processes of solutes across the vacuolar membrane of higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 41, 1175–1181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martinoia, E., and Ratajczak, R. (1997). Transport of organic molecules across the tonoplast. In The Plant Vacuole: Advances in Botany Research, A. Leigh and D. Sanders, eds (London: Academic Press), pp. 365–400.

Martinoia, E., and Rentsch, D. (1992). Uptake of malate and citrate into plant vacuoles. In Transport and Receptor Proteins of Plant Membranes, D.T. Cooke and D.T. Clarkson, eds (New York: Plenum Press), pp. 101–109.

Millar, A.H., Sweetlove, L.J., Giege, P., and Leaver, C.J. (2001). Analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome. Plant Physiol. 127, 1711–1727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mueckler, M. (1993). Glucokinase, glucose sensing, and diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 427–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neuhaus, H.E., and Stitt, M. (1989). Perturbation of photosynthesis in spinach leaf discs by low concentrations of methyl viologen. Planta 179, 51–60.[CrossRef]

Newman, T., De Bruin, F.J., Green, P., Keegstra, K., Kende, H., McIntosh, L., Ohlrogge, J.B., Raikel, N., Sommerville, S., Thomashow, M., Retzel, E., and Sommerville, C.R. (1994). Genes galore: A summary of methods for accessing results from large-scale partial sequencing of anonymous Arabidopsis clones. Plant Physiol. 106, 1241–1255.[Abstract]

Nittyla, T., Messerli, G., Trevisan, M., Chen, J., Smith, A., and Zeeman, S.C. (2004). A previously unknown maltose transporter essential for starch degradation in leaves. Science 203, 87–89.

Quick, W.P., Neuhaus, H.E., Feil, R., and Stitt, M. (1989). Fluoride leads to an increase of inorganic pyrophosphate and an inhibition of photosynthetic sucrose synthesis in spinach leaves. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 973, 263–271.

Rausch, T. (1991). The hexose transporters at the plasma membrane and the tonoplast of higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 82, 134–142.[CrossRef]

Rost, S., Frank, C., and Beck, E. (1997). The chloroplast envelope is permeable for maltose but not for maltodextrins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1291, 221–227.

Ruiz-Medrano, R., Xoconostle-Cazares, B., and Lucas, J. (2001). The phloem as a conduit for inter-organ communication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 202–209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Saier, M.H. (2000). A functional-phylogenetic classification system for transmembrane solute transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 345–411.

Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Schäfer, G., Heber, U., and Heldt, H.W. (1977). Glucose transport into spinach chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 60, 286–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scheible, W.R., Morcuende, R., Czechowski, T., Fritz, C., Osuna, D., Palacios-Rojas, N., Schindelasch, D., Thimm, O., Udvardi, M.K., and Stitt, M. (2004). Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 136, 2483–2499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmetterer, G.R. (1990). Sequence conservation among the glucose transporter from cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and mammalian glucose transporters. Plant Mol. Biol. 14, 697–706.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Shiratake, K., Kanayama, Y., and Yamaki, S. (1997). Characterization of hexose transporter for facilitated diffusion of the tonoplast vesicles from pear fruit. Plant Cell Physiol. 38, 910–916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song, W.Y., Sohn, E.J., Martinoia, E., Lee, Y.J., Yang, Y.Y., Jasinski, M., Forestier, C., Hwang, I., and Lee, Y. (2003). Engineering tolerance and accumulation of lead and cadmium in transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 914–919.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Suh, M.C., Samuels, A.L., Jetter, R., Kunst, L., Pollard, M., Ohlrogge, J., and Beisson, F. (2005). Cuticular lipid composition, surface structure, and gene expression in Arabidopsis stem epidermis. Plant Physiol. 139, 1649–1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thom, M., and Komor, E. (1984). Role of the ATPase of sugar-cane vacuoles in energization of the tonoplast. Eur. J. Biochem. 138, 93–99.[Web of Science][Medline]

Thomson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. (1994). CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thulke, O.U., and Conrath, U. (1998). Salicylic acid has a dual role in the activation of defense related genes in parsley. Plant J. 14, 35–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ward, E.R., Kuhn, C., Tegeder, M., and Frommer, W.B. (1998). Sucrose transport in higher plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 178, 41–71.[Web of Science][Medline]

Weber, A., Servaites, J.C., Geiger, D.E., Koffler, H., Hille, D., Groner, F., Hebbeker, U., and Flügge, U.I. (2000). Identification, purification, and molecular cloning of a putative plastidic glucose translocator. Plant Cell 12, 787–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weigel, D., and Glazebrook, J. (2002). Arabidopsis. A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).

Weise, A., Barker, L., Kuhn, C., Lalonde, S., Buschmann, H., Frommer, W.B., and Ward, J.M. (2000). A new subfamily of sucrose transporters, SUT4, with low affinity/high capacity localized in enucleate sieve elements of plants. Plant Cell 12, 1345–1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wendt, U.K., Wenderoth, I., Tegeler, A., and Von Schaewen, A. (2000). Molecular characterization of a novel glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J. 23, 723–733.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Weschke, W., Panitz, R., Sauer, N., Wang, Q., Neubohn, B., Weber, H., and Wobus, U. (2000). Sucrose transport into barley seeds: Molecular characterization of two transporters and implications for seed development and starch accumulation. Plant J. 21, 455–467.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Williams, L.E., Lemoine, R., and Sauer, N. (2000). Sugar transporter in higher plants—A diversity of roles and complex regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 283–289.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yano, R., Nakamura, M., Yoneyama, T., and Nishida, I. (2005). Starch-related alpha-glucan/water dikinase is involved in the cold-induced development of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 138, 837–846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zimmermann, P., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Hennig, L., and Gruissem, W. (2004). GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 136, 2621–2632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in Plant Cell:

A Family of Novel Monosaccharide Transporters Involved in Vacuolar Sugar Transport in Arabidopsis
Nancy A. Eckardt
Plant Cell 2006 18: 3353a. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
A. M. Borland, H. Griffiths, J. Hartwell, and J. A. C. Smith
Exploiting the potential of plants with crassulacean acid metabolism for bioenergy production on marginal lands
J. Exp. Bot., April 23, 2009; (2009) erp118v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
E. Antony, T. Taybi, M. Courbot, S. T. Mugford, J. A. C. Smith, and A. M. Borland
Cloning, localization and expression analysis of vacuolar sugar transporters in the CAM plant Ananas comosus (pineapple)
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1895 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant CellHome page
S. Schneider, D. Beyhl, R. Hedrich, and N. Sauer
Functional and Physiological Characterization of Arabidopsis INOSITOL TRANSPORTER1, a Novel Tonoplast-Localized Transporter for myo-Inositol
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2008; 20(4): 1073 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Schneider, A. Schneidereit, P. Udvardi, U. Hammes, M. Gramann, P. Dietrich, and N. Sauer
Arabidopsis INOSITOL TRANSPORTER2 Mediates H+ Symport of Different Inositol Epimers and Derivatives across the Plasma Membrane
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2007; 145(4): 1395 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/12/3476    most recent
tpc.106.047290v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wormit, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neuhaus, H. E.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Plant Biologists