Plant Cell Huazhong Agricultural University
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online March 14, 2008; 10.1105/tpc.107.055756

The Plant Cell 20:589-601 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/589    most recent
tpc.107.055756v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.

EMB2473/MIRO1, an Arabidopsis Miro GTPase, Is Required for Embryogenesis and Influences Mitochondrial Morphology in Pollen[W]

Shohei Yamaoka1 and Christopher J. Leaver2

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom

2 Address correspondence to chris.leaver{at}plants.ox.ac.uk.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
The regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis, subcellular distribution, morphology, and metabolism are essential for all aspects of plant growth and development. However, the molecular mechanisms involved are still unclear. Here, we describe an analysis of the three Arabidopsis thaliana orthologs of the evolutionarily conserved Miro GTPases. Two of the genes, MIRO1 and MIRO2, are transcribed ubiquitously throughout the plant tissues, and their gene products localize to mitochondria via their C-terminal transmembrane domains. While insertional mutations in the MIRO2 gene do not have any visible impact on plant development, an insertional mutation in the MIRO1 gene is lethal during embryogenesis at the zygote to four-terminal-cell embryo stage. It also substantially impairs pollen germination and tube growth. Laser confocal and transmission electron microscopy revealed that the miro1 mutant pollen exhibits abnormally enlarged or tube-like mitochondrial morphology, leading to the disruption of continuous streaming of mitochondria in the growing pollen tube. Our findings suggest that mitochondrial morphology is influenced by MIRO1 and plays a vital role during embryogenesis and pollen tube growth.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Mitochondria are the main sites for aerobic energy production and supply various intermediates necessary for cellular metabolism. They are also involved in cellular processes, including the defense response against oxidative stress, calcium signaling, and the regulation and execution of programmed cell death (reviewed in Logan, 2006aGo; McBride et al., 2006Go). Thus, the coordination and regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and function are vital during plant growth and development from zygote to mature plant. In addition, molecular mechanisms also exist to ensure that mitochondria are equally segregated between daughter cells during cell division and are properly distributed in cells undergoing rapid morphological differentiation and metabolic change. Such mechanisms are particularly important in plants, in which mitochondrial function and morphology must adapt in response not only to intracellular signals regulating plant development and differentiation but also to constantly changing external environmental conditions and biotic stresses.

In other eukaryotes, it has been shown that mitochondrial fusion and fission rely on evolutionarily conserved dynamin-like GTPases and their binding partners (reviewed in Yaffe, 1999Go; Okamoto and Shaw, 2005Go; Chan, 2006bGo), while mitochondrial motility is dependent on the cytoskeletal network (reviewed in Hollenbeck, 1996Go; Yaffe, 1999Go; Hollenbeck and Saxton, 2005Go; Boldogh and Pon, 2006Go, 2007Go; Frederick and Shaw, 2007Go). Dysfunction of these dynamic processes often causes developmental defects and diseases in mammals and insects (reviewed in Chan, 2006aGo, 2006bGo). Loss of the dynamin-like GTPases required for mitochondrial fusion causes embryonic lethality in mice (Chen et al., 2003Go) and neurodegenerative diseases in humans (Alexander et al., 2000Go; Delettre et al., 2000Go; Züchner et al., 2004Go). In Drosophila, severe loss of mitochondria in synaptic termini and impaired neurotransmission are caused by disruption of the axonal transport machinery of mitochondria (Stowers et al., 2002Go; Guo et al., 2005Go).

Our understanding of the molecular machinery that regulates mitochondrial morphology and motility in plants is still at an early stage (reviewed in Logan, 2006bGo). It has been shown that mitochondrial fission requires the dynamin-like GTPases (Arimura and Tsutsumi, 2002Go; Arimura et al., 2004aGo; Fujimoto et al., 2004Go; Logan et al., 2004Go). Although frequent fusion events have been demonstrated using fluorescent reporter proteins (Arimura et al., 2004bGo; Sheahan et al., 2005Go), the genes mediating mitochondrial fusion have not been identified. The motility of mitochondria is dependent mainly on actin filaments (Van Gestel et al., 2002Go) and is vital for proper mitochondrial inheritance (Barr et al., 2005Go) and during cell division (Sheahan et al., 2004Go). Changes in mitochondrial morphology and motility are associated with cell growth (Sheahan et al., 2004Go, 2005Go), senescence (Zottini et al., 2006Go), cell death induced by reactive oxygen species (Yoshinaga et al., 2005Go), and various physiological responses (Stickens and Verbelen, 1996Go; Armstrong et al., 2006Go), implying an important role in developmental processes and physiological function in plants.

A novel class of GTPases, the Miro GTPase family, was recently identified in humans (Fransson et al., 2003Go, 2006Go), mice (Shan et al., 2004Go), yeast (Frederick et al., 2004Go), and Drosophila (Guo et al., 2005Go). They contain two GTPase domains and two calcium binding EF-hand motifs and are associated with the outer mitochondrial membrane via their C-terminal transmembrane domains (TMs) (Figure 1A ). The overexpression of human Miro GTPases containing wild-type and mutated functional domains leads to aggregated or thread-like mitochondrial morphology (Fransson et al., 2003Go, 2006Go). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, loss of the Miro GTPase induces pleiotropic effects on mitochondrial morphology, including swollen and tubule-like structures (Frederick et al., 2004Go). Loss of the Drosophila Miro GTPase causes a dysfunction of the axonal mitochondrial transport, leading to abnormal subcellular distribution of mitochondria in neurons and muscles, with the result that mutant larvae do not accumulate mitochondria at the synaptic termini and thus exhibit abnormal locomotion and premature lethality (Guo et al., 2005Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Alignment of the Predicted Amino Acid Sequences of Miro GTPases.

(A) Schematic diagram of the predicted protein structure of the Miro GTPases. EF, EF hand motif.

(B) Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis (MIRO1, -2, and -3), human (hMiro-1 and -2), Drosophila (dMiro), and yeast (Gem1p) Miro GTPases. Black boxes indicate identical amino acid residues, gray boxes indicate conserved amino acid substitutions, solid underlines indicate the GTPase domains, dotted underlines indicate the EF-hand motifs, and the black open box indicates the TM. Sequences were aligned using the default settings in ClustalW version 1.81 (Thompson et al., 1994Go) and shaded using BOXSHADE 3.21 (http://ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html).

 
In this study, we have shown that the Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains three genes encoding putative Miro-related GTPases, that two of the genes, MIRO1 and MIRO2, are transcribed throughout the plant tissues, and that their gene products localize to mitochondria. While mutations in the MIRO2 gene do not have any obvious impact on plant development, a mutation in the MIRO1 gene leads to an arrest of embryogenesis at an early stage and substantially impairs pollen germination and tube growth. Microscopic analysis and live-cell imaging revealed that the miro1 mutation causes abnormal mitochondrial morphology, leading to the disruption of continuous streaming of mitochondria in growing pollen tubes. Our data suggest that proper mitochondrial morphology influenced by MIRO1 is essential for embryogenesis and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
The Arabidopsis Genome Contains Three Miro-Related GTPase Genes
Three orthologous genes of the Miro GTPase, MIRO1 (At5g27540; also known as EMB2473) (Tzafrir et al., 2004Go), MIRO2 (At3g63150), and MIRO3 (At3g05310), were identified in a basic BLAST search (Altschul et al., 1997Go) of the Arabidopsis cDNA database (www.Arabidopsis.org/Blast; Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000Go) using the human Miro-1 (Fransson et al., 2003Go) as a query sequence. They shared 36, 38, and 33% amino acid identity with human Miro-1, respectively, and each contained a putative GTPase domain in the N-terminal region followed by a pair of EF-hand motifs and a second distinct GTPase domain. Single TMs were also predicted at their C termini (Figures 1A and 1B). In previous studies, the C-terminal TM was shown to be responsible for anchoring Miro GTPases onto the outer mitochondrial membrane in yeast (Frederick et al., 2004Go) and humans (Fransson et al., 2006Go).

RT-PCR analysis of all three Arabidopsis Miro-related genes revealed that MIRO1 and MIRO2 are expressed in seedlings, flowers, siliques, stems, mature and senescent rosette leaves, and roots, whereas MIRO3 transcripts were not amplified in any of these tissues (see Supplemental Figure 1 online). Further assessment was done by reference to the Arabidopsis microarray gene expression database GENEVESTIGATOR (https://www.genevestigator.ethz.ch/; Zimmermann et al., 2004Go), which revealed that MIRO1 and MIRO2 are ubiquitously expressed in all plant tissues, and therefore presumably have a vital role, whereas the expression of MIRO3 is almost undetectable (Figure 2 ).


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Gene Expression of the Arabidopsis Miro-Related GTPase Family in Various Plant Tissues.

Data used for the analysis were retrieved from GENEVESTIGATOR (Zimmermann et al., 2004Go). The values shown are means + SD.

 
The C-Terminal TM Is Required for Mitochondrial Localization of MIRO1 and MIRO2
Transient expression of cDNA constructs (GFP-MIRO1TM and GFP-MIRO2TM) containing the putative C-terminal TMs of MIRO1 (amino acid residues 602 to 648) and MIRO2 (amino acid residues 599 to 643) fused to the C terminus of an enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf epidermal cells showed colocalization with mitochondria labeled with the mitochondria-specific probe MitoTracker Orange (n = 150) (Figure 3 ). By contrast, C-terminal TM-deleted mutant proteins of MIRO1 (GFP-MIRO1{Delta}TM) and MIRO2 (GFP-MIRO2{Delta}TM) were excluded from mitochondria and dispersed throughout the cytosol (n = 150) (Figure 3). These results suggest that the C-terminal TM is required for mitochondrial localization of MIRO1 and MIRO2.


Figure 3
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. The C-Terminal TM Is Required for Mitochondrial Localization of MIRO1 and MIRO2.

Confocal images of GFP fluorescence (GFP), MitoTracker Orange staining (MitoTracker), and their merged images (Merged) are shown from tobacco leaf epidermal cells transiently expressing the indicated constructs. Bar = 2 µm.

 
Embryogenesis Is Arrested at an Early Stage in the miro1 Mutant
To investigate the role of Arabidopsis Miro-related GTPase genes during plant development, we identified Arabidopsis mutant lines from the public mutant collections. The miro1 mutant, previously designated emb2473, was obtained from the SeedGenes Project collection (www.seedgenes.org; Tzafrir et al., 2004Go). The miro1 mutant was generated by the introduction of pCSA110 T-DNA, which carries a BASTA resistance gene and a β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene under the control of the pollen-specific LAT52 promoter, into Arabidopsis plants harboring the homozygous quartet1 (qrt1) mutation, which causes mature fertile pollen grains to remain attached to each other (Preuss et al., 1994Go; McElver et al., 2001Go). Sequence analysis revealed that the T-DNA was inserted at the border of the 12th intron and 13th exon of the MIRO1 gene with a 16-bp deletion (Figure 4A ). DNA gel blot analysis demonstrated that the T-DNA insertion was present as a single copy in the miro1 mutant genome (see Supplemental Figure 2 online). Segregation analysis of the self-fertilized miro1 progeny demonstrated that 54% of the progeny were resistant to BASTA, instead of the expected value of 75% (Table 1 ), implying embryonic and/or gametophytic lethality of the miro1 mutant. PCR analysis revealed that a similar percentage (51%; n = 112) of the randomly selected progeny and all of the BASTA-resistant mutant progeny tested (n = 50) carried the T-DNA insertion, suggesting that the BASTA resistance and T-DNA insertion of the miro1 mutant are tightly linked. No homozygous mutant plants were found, suggesting that the homozygous miro1 mutant causes seed lethality.


Figure 4
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Gene Complementation of the miro1 Mutant Using the MIRO1 cDNA under the Control of Its Endogenous Promoter.

(A) Schematic diagram of MIRO1 gene structure and the T-DNA insertion site in the miro1 mutant. Closed boxes indicate exons, and closed arrowheads indicate the positions of primers used for genotyping. The start and stop codons are labeled.

(B) Gene complementation of the miro1 mutant. All of the plants examined carried the homozygous qrt1 background. For homozygous miro1 plants complemented with the transgene (MIRO1 promoter:cDNA), four independent lines were analyzed by genomic PCR amplification. PCR product sizes are indicated at left.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Segregation and Genetic Transmission of the miro1 Mutation

 
We obtained two mutant lines, miro2-1 and miro2-2, harboring T-DNA insertions in the 14th and 12th exon of the MIRO2 gene, respectively, from the SALK collection (Alonso et al., 2003Go). Segregation analysis (see Supplemental Table 1 online) of the heterozygous mutant progeny suggested single T-DNA insertions in both the miro2-1 and miro2-2 mutants. Neither of the homozygous mutant progeny accumulated the full-length MIRO2 transcripts (see Supplemental Figure 3 online). The phenotypes (see Supplemental Figure 4 online) and root cell mitochondrial morphology of both were indistinguishable from those of wild-type plants (see Supplemental Figure 5 online). These findings suggest that MIRO2 does not have a major role in plant development and does not share redundant functions with MIRO1; therefore, we concentrated our further analysis on the miro1 mutant.

To investigate the developmental basis of the lethal phenotype displayed by the miro1 mutant, maturing siliques from wild-type and heterozygous miro1 mutant plants were dissected. The siliques from homozygous qrt1 plants used as the wild-type control contained a well-ordered array of maturing green seeds (Figure 5A ). By contrast, the siliques from heterozygous miro1 mutant plants contained a proportion of aborted white seeds together with wild-type green seeds (Figure 5B). The white aborted seeds then turned brown and did not develop further, while the wild-type seeds developed to maturity (data not shown). More than 500 BASTA-resistant progeny of the miro1 mutant displayed the aborted seed phenotype, suggesting that this mutant phenotype is tightly linked to BASTA resistance and the T-DNA insertion. Together, these findings suggest that the homozygous miro1 mutation causes embryo lethality. However, the percentage of aborted seeds in the mutant siliques was significantly lower (13%; n = 3154) than the expected value of 25%, implying impaired pollen tube growth in the miro1 mutant (Meinke, 1982Go).


Figure 5
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. The Homozygous miro1 Mutant Is Embryo-Lethal.

(A) and (B) Siliques from wild-type (A) and heterozygous miro1 (B) plants. Arrowheads indicate the aborted mutant seeds. Bars = 1 mm.

(C) to (L) DIC images of seeds from heterozygous miro1 mutant siliques.

(C) Wild-type seed containing a transition-stage embryo. Bar = 25 µm.

(D) and (H) miro1 mutant seed containing a two-cell-stage embryo (arrow) (D). A higher magnification of the mutant embryo exhibiting differentiated cell nuclei (arrowheads) is shown in (H). Bars = 25 µm in (D) and 10 µm in (H).

(E) to (G) Wild-type embryos: globular stage (E), transition stage (F), and heart stage (G). Bars = 25 µm.

(I) to (L) miro1 mutant embryos: zygote (I), two-cell stage (J), three-cell stage (K), and four-terminal-cell stage (L). Arrowheads indicate the mutant embryo nuclei. Bars = 10 µm.

 
To identify the developmental stage at which embryo development was arrested in the miro1 mutant, immature seeds from heterozygous miro1 mutant siliques were examined by whole-mount clearing and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. A comparison of embryo development in normal seeds (Figures 5C and 5E to 5G) and aborted seeds (Figures 5D and 5H to 5L) revealed that embryogenesis was arrested at the early developmental stages between the zygote and the four-terminal-cell stage in the miro1 mutant. Of the 80 mutant embryos examined, 8 embryos (10%) did not develop beyond the zygote (Figure 5I), 61 embryos (76%) aborted at the two-cell stage (Figures 5H and 5J), 7 embryos (9%) aborted at the three-cell stage (Figure 5K), and 4 embryos (5%) aborted at the four-terminal-cell stage (Figure 5L). These observations indicate that the homozygous miro1 mutation causes abortion of the embryo at an early stage of development.

Pollen Germination and Tube Growth Are Impaired in the miro1 Mutant
The abnormal segregation of selfed miro1 mutant progeny (Table 1) and the lower than expected number of aborted seeds in the mutant siliques suggested that, in addition to the embryo lethality, genetic transmission through the gametophytes also was impaired. Reciprocal crosses with wild-type plants as the female parent demonstrated severely impaired male genetic transmission in the heterozygous miro1 mutant (Table 1), suggesting that the miro1 mutation strongly affects pollen development and/or germination and tube growth. If this is the case, the apical half region of the mutant silique should display a significantly higher percentage of aborted seeds than the expected 50% (Meinke, 1982Go). Indeed, 84% of the aborted seeds were located in the apical half regions of the miro1 mutant siliques (n = 408). Additionally, the female genetic transmission of the miro1 mutant was reduced slightly (Table 1), suggesting that the miro1 mutation has a weak impact on female gametogenesis. This finding was supported by the fact that the frequency of unfertilized ovules was slightly higher in miro1 mutant siliques (10%; n = 1254) than in wild-type siliques (4%; n = 1288).

The homozygous qrt1 background causes mature fertile pollen grains to remain attached to each other and thus enables tetrad analysis to be performed (Preuss et al., 1994Go). Accordingly, the pollen tetrads from a heterozygous miro1 mutant with the genotype qrt1/qrt1;+/miro1 should contain two mutant and two wild-type pollen grains. However, the four grains were indistinguishable from each other in terms of their size and shape (Figure 6A ). 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining demonstrated that all four of the grains showed correctly differentiated one vegetative and two sperm nuclei (Figure 6B) and equal viability (Figure 6C). These findings suggest that miro1 mutant pollen development is normal and thus does not explain the impaired male genetic transmission.


Figure 6
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Pollen Development in the miro1 Mutant Is Normal.

Mature pollen tetrads from heterozygous miro1 plants (qrt1/qrt1;miro1/+): phase-contrast image (A), DAPI staining of DNA (B), and FDA staining to show viability (C). Note that DAPI staining shows two sperm cell nuclei (arrowheads) and one vegetative cell nucleus (arrow). Bars = 20 µm.

 
The LAT52 promoter:GUS pollen-specific reporter gene contained in the pCSA110 T-DNA (McElver et al., 2001Go) makes it possible to distinguish between the miro1 mutant and wild-type pollen by staining for GUS activity. To assess pollen viability in the miro1 mutant, pollen from wild-type and heterozygous miro1 mutant plants were germinated and stained in 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc) solution, and the germination and tube growth efficiencies were compared (Figures 7A and 7B ). The GUS-negative wild-type pollen showed normal tube growth, while the GUS-positive mutant pollen showed impaired germination and tube growth. Approximately 70% of the wild-type pollen as well as the GUS-negative wild-type pollen from the heterozygous miro1 mutant germinated, and the average tube length reached was ~150 µm (Figure 7D). By contrast, the germination rate of the GUS-positive mutant pollen was decreased to ~40%, and tube growth was reduced as well (Figure 7D). These findings suggest that the miro1 mutation severely impairs pollen germination and tube growth.


Figure 7
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. A Mutation in MIRO1 Impairs Pollen Germination and Tube Growth.

(A) to (C) In vitro germination of pollen from wild-type (qrt1/qrt1;+/+) (A), heterozygous miro1 (qrt1/qrt1;miro1/+) (B), and homozygous miro1 (qrt1/qrt1;miro1/miro1) (C) plants complemented with the MIRO1 promoter:cDNA. All were stained for GUS activity arising from the T-DNA inserted into the MIRO1 locus. Bars = 20 µm.

(D) Pollen tube length from wild-type, heterozygous miro1 (miro1/+), and two lines of homozygous miro1 plants complemented with the MIRO1 promoter:cDNA (cDNA1 and cDNA4). For heterozygous miro1 plants, GUS-positive [GUS(+)] and GUS-negative [GUS(–)] pollen were scored separately. All of the plants examined carried the homozygous qrt1 background. A failure to germinate is represented as zero pollen tube length. The means + SE of three independent experiments are shown (n > 550 for each line).

 
A Mutation in MIRO1 Causes Abnormal Mitochondrial Morphology in Pollen
In order to investigate the role of MIRO1 in regulating mitochondrial morphology and intracellular distribution, mitochondria were visualized in pollen by creating transgenic plants containing GFP fused to a mitochondrial targeting signal sequence (mtGFP) (Logan and Leaver, 2000Go) under the control of the pollen-specific LAT52 promoter (Twell et al., 1990Go; Yang et al., 2001Go). Homozygous qrt1 plants as the wild-type control were compared with heterozygous miro1 mutant plants. Laser confocal microscopy revealed that all four pollen grains in the tetrads from control qrt1 plants (n = 50) contained normal spherical or rod-like mitochondria (Figure 8A ). By contrast, tetrads from heterozygous miro1 mutant plants (n = 50) contained two pollen grains with normal mitochondrial morphology and two with abnormally enlarged mitochondria (Figure 8B). Following germination, using time-lapse confocal microscopy, we showed that in wild-type pollen (n = 34) mitochondria exhibited uniform rod-like morphology (Figure 8C) and high motility, leading to continuous streaming of mitochondria throughout the cytoplasm (Figure 8E; see Supplemental Movie 1 online). This motility is dependent on actin filaments, because disruption of actin filaments in pollen by latrunculin B or cytochalasin D (see Supplemental Figure 6A online) arrested mitochondrial motility (see Supplemental Movies 3 and 4 online), whereas disruption of microtubules by oryzalin or nocodazole (see Supplemental Figure 6B online) did not have any impact on the streaming of mitochondria (see Supplemental Movies 5 and 6 online). Mitochondria in the miro1 mutant pollen (n = 29) exhibited an abnormal morphology and intracellular distribution (Figure 8D). In addition to the abnormal size (Figure 8F; time = 146 s), a large number of mitochondria also showed a tube-like morphology (Figure 8F; time = 49 s). These abnormal mitochondria were motile (see Supplemental Movie 2 online), often leading to transient absence from regions of the pollen cytoplasm (Figure 8F; time = 177 s). This motility was also actin-dependent (see Supplemental Movies 7 to 10 online), suggesting that the miro1 mutation does not affect actin-dependent mitochondrial motility. Together, these observations suggest that the miro1 mutation causes abnormally enlarged or tubulated mitochondrial morphology, leading to disruption of the continuous streaming of mitochondria in the growing pollen tube.


Figure 8
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. A Mutation in MIRO1 Causes Abnormal Mitochondrial Morphology in Pollen.

(A) and (B) Merged confocal images of mitochondrial morphology and distribution in pollen tetrads labeled with mtGFP from wild-type (qrt1/qrt1;+/+) (A) and heterozygous miro1 (qrt1/qrt1;miro1/+) (B) plants. Note that the two miro1 mutant pollen grains (arrowheads in [B]) exhibit abnormally enlarged mitochondrial morphology. Bars = 5 µm.

(C) and (D) Merged confocal images of mitochondrial morphology and intracellular distribution in germinating wild-type (C) and miro1 mutant (D) pollen. Top, GFP fluorescence; bottom, bright-field images. Bars = 5 µm.

(E) and (F) Time-lapse single confocal images of mitochondrial morphology and intracellular distribution in wild-type (E) and miro1 mutant (F) pollen. t indicates the time point of the image in seconds from Supplemental Movies 1 and 2 online ([E] and [F], respectively), in which mitochondrial movement can be seen. In (F), arrows indicate abnormal mitochondria showing tube-like morphology, the arrowhead indicates abnormally enlarged mitochondria, and the dotted area indicates the absence of mitochondria in pollen cytoplasm. Bars = 5 µm.

(G) and (H) Transmission electron micrographs of mitochondria in wild-type (G) and miro1 mutant (H) pollen. Open arrowheads indicate the outer mitochondrial membrane. Bars = 0.2 µm.

 
To investigate the detailed size and structures of their mitochondria, wild-type and miro1 mutant pollen were germinated and visualized by transmission electron microscopy. The wild-type pollen contained rod-like mitochondria with an electron-dense matrix and well-developed inner membrane cristae (Figure 8G). The miro1 mutant pollen contained much larger globular mitochondria (Figure 8H). These findings further support our suggestion that the abnormal mitochondrial morphology seen in miro1 mutant pollen is due to the enlargement but not the aggregation of mitochondria.

MIRO1 cDNA Complements the miro1 Mutant Phenotype
To confirm that the embryo lethality observed in the homozygous miro1 mutant is caused by the insertional mutation in MIRO1, heterozygous miro1 plants were transformed with a vector containing a MIRO1 cDNA fused to the 1.7-kb genomic sequence 5' upstream of the predicted translational start codon of the MIRO1 gene (MIRO1 promoter:cDNA) and the kanamycin-resistant marker gene. Three pairs of primers were designed to amplify the wild-type locus, the miro1 mutant locus containing the inserted T-DNA, and the transgene (Figure 4A). Control PCR amplifications showed that the primer pairs were able to amplify the wild-type and mutant loci but not the transgene in the heterozygous miro1 plants (Figure 4B). PCR screening of the kanamycin-resistant T1 plants with these primer pairs allowed us to identify four independent lines that were homozygous for the miro1 mutant locus and harbored the transgene (Figure 4B). This result demonstrated that the embryo lethality observed in the homozygous miro1 mutant was complemented by the MIRO1 promoter:cDNA transgene.

Two of the homozygous miro1 mutant lines (cDNA1 and cDNA4) harboring the transgene were assessed for pollen viability. The T3 plants from these lines produced pollen tetrads in which all four grains were GUS-positive (Figure 7C), germinated, and exhibited normal tube growth (Figure 7D). The mitochondrial morphology in these pollen tetrads was indistinguishable from that of wild-type plants (see Supplemental Figure 7 online). These results confirm that the MIRO1 transgene reversed the impaired pollen viability and aberrant mitochondrial morphology seen in the miro1 mutant. Together, these data confirm that expression of MIRO1 cDNA under the control of the endogenous promoter complements the miro1 mutant phenotype, namely embryo lethality and impaired pollen germination and tube growth.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of Arabidopsis Miro-Related GTPases
Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that frequently change their morphology and intracellular distribution by various processes, including fission, fusion, and motility. Recent studies have revealed that plants are likely to share similar machinery for the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and motility with other eukaryotic organisms (reviewed in Logan, 2006bGo). In various organisms, the Miro GTPases were identified recently as novel mitochondria-localized GTPases that are involved in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and intracellular distribution (Fransson et al., 2003Go, 2006Go; Frederick et al., 2004Go; Guo et al., 2005Go). Using the predicted human protein sequence, we identified three orthologs of the Miro GTPase encoded in the Arabidopsis genome. The predicted protein structures of these orthologs are highly conserved among the species (Figure 1), and we have shown that two of the genes, MIRO1 and MIRO2, encode proteins that localize to mitochondria via their C-terminal TMs (Figure 3), suggesting that they share similar functions with the previously characterized Miro GTPases.

Gene expression analysis revealed that MIRO1 and MIRO2 are expressed in all tissues examined (Figure 2), suggesting that they are functional in Arabidopsis. However, while a mutation in MIRO1 has a severe impact on mitochondrial morphology (Figure 8) and causes embryo lethality (Figure 5) and impaired pollen germination and tube growth (Figure 7), insertional mutations in MIRO2 do not have any impact on mitochondrial morphology (see Supplemental Figure 5 online) and show no obvious effects on plant development (see Supplemental Figure 4 online). These findings suggest that MIRO1 and MIRO2 are not functionally redundant but, rather, that MIRO1 has a major role in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology during the reproductive process and subsequent embryo development. The role of MIRO1 in later developmental stages was not examined in this study because of the homozygous lethality of the insertional mutation. It could be investigated in the future using another experimental system, for example, by creating transgenic plants that enable the inducible control of MIRO1 expression.

MIRO1 Is Required for Embryogenesis and Pollen Tube Growth
Mutations in the genes involved in the regulation of morphology and intracellular distribution of mitochondria often cause developmental defects and human genetic disease, indicating that mitochondrial morphology and distribution are indispensable for animal development (reviewed in Chan, 2006bGo). In plants, however, the identities of the genes influencing mitochondrial morphology and distribution are not known, and neither are their effects on development. In this study, we have demonstrated that MIRO1 is required for embryogenesis and pollen viability and function in Arabidopsis.

Analysis of an insertional mutant of the MIRO1 gene revealed that it was not possible to recover homozygous mutant plants. The siliques from the heterozygous mutant plants contained a significant proportion of aborted seeds (Figure 5B), suggesting that the homozygous miro1 mutation causes embryo lethality. Most of the aborted seeds contained two-cell-stage embryos (Figures 5D, 5H, and 5J), indicating that the homozygous miro1 mutation severely inhibits embryonic cell division. The Arabidopsis zygote undergoes polarized cell elongation after fertilization and the subsequent asymmetric division to produce the apical and basal cells. The elongating zygote accumulates mitochondria in its apical region, whereas the cytoplasmic density of mitochondria remains uniform in the subsequent apical cell division (Mansfield and Briarty, 1990Go), implying that precise regulation of mitochondrial distribution is required for the progress of embryogenesis. Miro GTPases are known to be involved in regulating mitochondrial morphology and distribution in various organisms (Fransson et al., 2003Go, 2006Go; Frederick et al., 2004Go; Guo et al., 2005Go), and in this study, we demonstrated that MIRO1 has a role in influencing mitochondrial morphology in pollen (Figure 8). Therefore, we propose that the intracellular distribution of mitochondria is regulated by MIRO1 and is essential for the normal progress of embryo development.

We also observed that mutation in MIRO1 severely reduced male genetic transmission (Table 1). Heterozygous miro1 mutant plants produced siliques in which the apical half contains a significantly higher number of aborted seeds than expected, suggesting that pollen development or function is impaired in the miro1 mutant (Meinke, 1982Go). Microscopic analysis and in vitro germination assays revealed that a mutation in MIRO1 does not affect pollen development (Figure 6) but impairs pollen germination and tube growth (Figure 7). Approximately 60% of miro1 mutant pollen grains did not germinate, although the remainders were capable of initiating tube growth. However subsequent tube growth was impaired significantly compared with the wild-type pollen, and <4% were capable of growing to >150 µm in length (Figure 7D). These findings suggest that MIRO1 is required for normal pollen germination and tube growth.

It has been reported that during pollen tube growth mitochondria exhibit continuous streaming in the cytoplasm (Parton et al., 2003Go; Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2007Go). Miro GTPases have been shown to be involved in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and distribution in various organisms; therefore, we postulated that MIRO1 may be required for proper mitochondrial streaming during pollen germination and tube growth. In order to investigate this, we visualized mitochondria by confocal microscopy of the wild-type and miro1 mutant pollen from transgenic plants containing mtGFP under the control of the pollen-specific LAT52 promoter. While uniform morphology (Figures 8A and 8C) and continuous streaming of mitochondria (Figure 8E; see Supplemental Movie 1 online) were observed in wild-type pollen, miro1 mutant pollen exhibited abnormal morphology (Figures 8B, 8D, 8F) and disrupted streaming of mitochondria (Figure 8F; see Supplemental Movie 2 online), including transient absences from regions of the cytoplasm (Figure 8F; time = 177 s). Pollen germination and tube growth involve a significant number of energy- and metabolite-dependent cellular processes, including cell wall synthesis and vesicular trafficking, specifically in the apical region of the tube (reviewed in Krichevsky et al., 2007Go). The disruption of streaming and the abnormal morphology of mitochondria in miro1 mutant pollen may result in reduced energy and metabolite supply to those cytoplasmic regions where such cellular processes are vital for pollen germination and tube growth.

MIRO1 Is Involved in the Regulation of Plant Mitochondrial Morphology
Pollen-specific expression of mtGFP revealed that a miro1 mutation leads to abnormally enlarged or tube-like mitochondria (Figure 8). This finding suggests that MIRO1 plays a role in the regulation of mitochondrial morphology and that the mutation in MIRO1 may cause increased fusion and/or decreased fission of mitochondria. Similar observations have been reported in the analysis of GEM1, a single-copy gene encoding a Miro GTPase in the budding yeast. Loss of GEM1 leads to a pleiotropic defect in mitochondrial morphology, including swollen and tube-like structures (Frederick et al., 2004Go). These data suggest that Miro GTPases may play a role in regulating mitochondrial fusion/fission events in both budding yeast and plants. However, Gem1p is not associated directly with the mitochondrial fusion/fission machineries reported previously, suggesting that Miro GTPases may be involved in a novel pathway for regulating mitochondrial morphology (Frederick et al., 2004Go).

Recent studies in Drosophila suggested the involvement of a Miro GTPase in mitochondrial transport in the neural axon (Guo et al., 2005Go). The Drosophila Miro GTPase associated with a 120-kD protein, designated Milton, to form a protein complex that bound to the kinesin heavy chain, leading to the recruitment of mitochondria to microtubules (Glater et al., 2006Go). The human Miro GTPases also are associated with two Milton orthologs, GRIF-1 and OIP106, which interact with kinesin and mitochondria (Brickley et al., 2005Go; Fransson et al., 2006Go). These studies suggest that the Miro GTPase may be a component of the microtubule-dependent transport machinery of mitochondria (Glater et al., 2006Go; Rice and Gelfand, 2006Go; Frederick and Shaw, 2007Go). Our study demonstrated that mitochondria motility in pollen is actin-dependent and not likely to be affected by the miro1 mutation (see Supplemental Movies 3 to 12 online). We also failed to identify any obvious ortholog of Drosophila Milton in Arabidopsis by a basic BLAST search of the cDNA database (data not shown). These observations suggest that, similar to yeast Gem1p (Frederick et al., 2004Go; Rice and Gelfand, 2006Go; Boldogh and Pon, 2007Go; Frederick and Shaw, 2007Go), MIRO1 plays a major role in influencing mitochondrial morphology and might interact with partner proteins that differ from human and Drosophila Miro GTPases. Future studies on the proteins interacting with MIRO1 may give further insight into the mechanism by which Miro GTPases regulate mitochondrial morphology in plants.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Expression Analysis
Gene expression data were collected from the GENEVESTIGATOR website (www.genevestigator.ethz.ch; Zimmermann et al., 2004Go) with the default settings and processed using Microsoft Excel.

Subcellular Localization Assay
The partial cDNA sequences of MIRO1 and MIRO2 were amplified using Arabidopsis thaliana leaf cDNA (for preparation, see Supplemental Methods online) as template and primer pairs as follows: for MIRO1TM, 5'-TTAAGCGGCCGCTCAGGCAGACGAGCTCTT-3' and 5'-AATTGGTACCAGGAGACCGAAGCAGGCAA-3'; for MIRO1{Delta}TM, 5'-AATTGGTACCAGATGGCGAGATACGCTGC-3' and 5'-AATTGCGGCCGCTATGGAATGCTCAAATGAGG-3'; for MIRO2TM, 5'-AATTGGTACCAGGAGACAGAGTCAGGAAGAAGAAG-3' and 5'-AATTGCGGCCGCTCAAGCATTCTTCCTTGC-3'; and for MIRO2{Delta}TM, 5'-ATGCGGTACCCGATGATGCTCGGTGGAAAG-3' and 5'-AATTGCGGCCGCTATGGAATGCTCATGTGAGG-3'. Ten cycles of PCR were performed at 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 30 s or 2 min, followed by 20 cycles at 98°C for 10 s and 68°C for 30 s or 2 min. The PCR fragments were digested with KpnI and NotI and ligated into the pENTR1a vector (Invitrogen). DNA inserts were transferred into pK7WGF2 (Karimi et al., 2005Go) by Gateway recombination (Invitrogen). Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing the resultant vectors was infiltrated into the leaf epidermal cells of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv SR1) seedlings grown at 21°C on soil under continuous light for 4 to 5 weeks (Batoko et al., 2000Go). Fluorescence was visualized at 30 to 35 h later. GFP fluorescence of the fusion proteins was excited at 488 nm with a 25-mW argon laser, and the emitted light was collected through a 475- to 525-nm filter and acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 laser scanning confocal microscope with a 40x C-Apochromat water-immersion lens (numerical aperture = 1.2). Mitochondria were stained by infiltration of 200 nM MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos (Invitrogen) into the apoplastic space of tobacco leaves. The fluorescence of MitoTracker was excited at 543 nm with a HeNe laser, and the emitted light was collected through a 585- to 615-nm filter. Images were acquired as z-series with 3-µm intervals, merged, and processed using Zeiss LSM Examiner and Adobe Photoshop 7.0.

Mutant Lines and Growth Conditions
A mutant line in the SeedGenes Project collection, emb2473, and two Salk lines, SALK_060075 and SALK_151790 (background Columbia), were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre and designated miro1, miro2-1, and miro2-2, respectively. The genotypes of these lines were confirmed by PCR amplification using gene-specific primers (for miro1, 5'-TCCTGCTGTTTGATTGGTTG-3' and 5'-CTGGTGGATTCTTGTATGGA-3'; for miro2-1, 5'-ATCCGCCAACTCGTGAATAG-3' and 5'-AGAAAAACATCAAGTGTTTTATTACTAAGT-3'; for miro2-2, 5'-GCGAGGGAAATACTGATGGA-3' and 5'-TTCACGAGTTGGCGGATATT-3') and T-DNA–specific primers (for miro1, 5'-GCCTTTTCAGAAATGGATAAATAGCCTTGCTTCC-3'; for miro2-1 and miro2-2, 5'-TGGTTCACGTAGTGGGCCATCG-3'). The template DNA was prepared by the method of Neff et al. (1998)Go. PCR was performed at 96°C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles at 96°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min. Seeds were surface-sterilized and plated onto 0.8% (w/v) agar medium containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog salts (pH 5.8; Duchefa Biochemie), which were supplemented with 7.5 mg/L phosphinothricin or 30 mg/L kanamycin as required. The seeds were vernalized and germinated, and the 10-d-old seedlings were transferred onto soil and grown at 21°C under a 16-h-light/8-h-dark regime.

Histological Analysis
Characterization of the seed phenotype in siliques from homozygous qrt and heterozygous miro1 plants was performed according to the protocol of Yadegari et al. (1994)Go. Seeds were fixed and cleared in chloral hydrate solution, and the embryos were observed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with DIC optics.

Cytological Analysis and in Vitro Germination Assay of Pollen
Cytological analysis of mature pollen grains was performed by incubating pollen in 1 µg/mL DAPI and 20 µM FDA solutions and visualization using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX50). The in vitro germination assays were performed by dipping mature flowers into 1% (w/v) agar medium containing germination buffer (50 mM MES, pH 5.8, 1 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 0.01% [w/v] H3BO3, and 18% [w/v] sucrose) (Fan et al., 2001Go) after which the plates were sealed and incubated at 20°C for 8 to 9 h. Pollen grains were stained at 37°C overnight in 1 mM X-Gluc solution containing 50 mM Na3PO4, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.01% (w/v) Triton X-100, 10 mM EDTA, and 18% (w/v) sucrose and then observed and scored with a Leica MZFLIII microscope. The pollen tube lengths were measured in the captured images using NIH Image version 1.63 (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/).

Visualization of Mitochondria
Plant mitochondria were visualized in plants transformed with a vector containing LAT52 promoter–tobacco etch virus translational enhancer (TEVL) sequence (Yang et al., 2001Go), tobacco mitochondrial β-ATPase signal sequence (Logan and Leaver, 2000Go), and the GFP sequence, which were amplified using pLAT52-TEVL GFP, pGEM-β-ATPase signal sequence:mGFP5, and pK7WGF2 as templates, respectively. Sequences of the primer pairs were as follows: for LAT52 promoter–TEVL, 5'-GGGGACAACTTTGTATAGAAAAGTTGGTCGACATACTCGACTCAGAAGGTA-3' and 5'-GGGGACTGCTTTTTTGTACAAACTTGGGCTATCGTTCGTAAATGGT-3'; for tobacco mitochondrial β-ATPase signal, 5'-GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCACCATGGCTTCTCGGAGGCTTCTC-3' and 5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTTACCAGCGCCGGTGAACTCATCGGTA-3'; and for GFP, 5'-GGGGACAGCTTTCTTGTACAAAGTGGATATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGA-3' and 5'-GGGGACAACTTTGTATAATAAAGTTGCCGCGGTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTC-3'. Thirty-five cycles of PCR were performed at 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 1 min. The amplified sequences were transferred into the pK7m34GW vector (Karimi et al., 2005Go) using the MultiSite Gateway system (Invitrogen). The construct was introduced into the homozygous qrt1 and heterozygous miro1 mutant plants according to the method of Clough and Bent (1998)Go, and three independent T2 plants were used for the microscopic analysis. Pollen grains from these transgenic plants were germinated on 1% (w/v) agar medium containing germination buffer poured on the slide glass and incubated at 20°C for 4 to 6 h. GFP fluorescence of pollen mitochondria was acquired using the confocal microscope as described above. Time-lapse imaging was performed with a series of single confocal images collected by scanning at 2- to 6-s intervals. Mitochondria were also visualized by staining plant materials with 200 nM MitoTracker Orange (Invitrogen). All images were processed using Zeiss LSM Examiner and Adobe Photoshop 7.0.

Transmission Electron Microscopy
Pollen grains from homozygous qrt1 and heterozygous miro1 plants were germinated on 1% (w/v) agar medium containing germination buffer for 2 h. Phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 7.0) containing 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, 3% (w/v) glutaraldehyde, and 18% (w/v) sucrose was then poured onto the agar medium, and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The surfaces of the agar plates were rinsed twice with 50 mM phosphate buffer containing 18% (w/v) sucrose and incubated for a further 2 h in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide. After rinsing with water, agar cubes carrying the germinated pollen grains were excised, dehydrated in a series of acetone solutions (25, 50, 75, and 100% [v/v]) followed by a resin/acetone dilution series (25, 50, and 75% [v/v]), and embedded in epoxy resin. Serial cross sections were examined with a JEOL JEM1010 transmission electron microscope and a Kodak Megaplus model 1.4 digital camera. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0.

Cytoskeletal Inhibitor Experiments
Stock solutions of 1 mM latrunculin B, 10 mM cytochalasin D, 10 mM oryzalin, and 10 mM nocodazole were prepared in DMSO and diluted in germination buffer. Pollen grains were germinated on 1% (w/v) agar medium containing germination buffer for 4 to 6 h and excised as small agar blocks. They were incubated in germination buffer containing 1 µM latrunculin B, 10 µM cytochalasin D, 10 µM oryzalin, and 10 µM nocodazole for 30 min, then mitochondria were visualized as described above. Treatment with 0.1% (w/v) DMSO did not have any effect on mitochondrial motility in pollen (see Supplemental Movies 11 and 12 online).

Gene Complementation
The coding sequence of MIRO1 cDNA and the 1.7-kb 5' upstream sequence were amplified using Arabidopsis leaf cDNA and pBeloBAC clone F15A18 (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000Go) as templates, respectively. Sequences for the primer pairs are as follows: for the coding sequence, 5'-AATTGGTACCAGATGGCGAGATACGCTGC-3' and 5'-TTAAGCGGCCGCTCAGGCAGACGAGCTCTT-3'; for the upstream sequence, 5'-AGGTGGATCCCTCTAAAGTGGTTGTGGTGG-3' and 5'-GTACGGTACCCTGAAACTGCAACACAATCA-3'. Thirty-five cycles of PCR were performed at 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 2 min. The PCR fragments were digested with KpnI/NotI and BamHI/KpnI for MIRO1 cDNA and the upstream sequence, respectively, and ligated into the BamHI–NotI sites of pENTR1a vector (Invitrogen). The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S terminator sequence was amplified by 25 cycles of PCR at 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 30 s using the primers 5'-GCGCGCACTAGTATGCTAGAGTCCGCAAAAAT-3' and 5'-GCGCTTAAGCTTGGTCACTGGATTTTGGTTTT-3' and pK7WGF2 as template. The PCR fragment was digested and inserted into the SpeI–HindIII sites of pKGW (Karimi et al., 2005Go), and these two vectors were used to perform Gateway recombination (Invitrogen). The resultant construct (MIRO1 promoter:cDNA) was confirmed by sequencing and introduced into heterozygous miro1 plants according to the method of Clough and Bent (1998)Go. The T1 plants were selected on 30 mg/L kanamycin, and plants homozygous for the miro1 mutant locus were identified by PCR amplification. Sequences of the primers used were as follows: 5F, 5'-ACTGCCCTTGGAGGACTATC-3', 7F, 5'-TCCTGCTGTTTGATTGGTTG-3', 3R, 5'-CTGGTGGATTCTTGTATGGA-3', and LB1, 5'-GCCTTTTCAGAAATGGATAAATAGCCTTGCTTCC-3'. The positions of these primers are indicated in Figure 4. The primers specific for FIM1 (At4g27600) (5'-TGACAAGGTCTCTCCCAGTTC-3' and 5'-GAACAACCGAGCTTTCTTGC-3') were used for the positive control. The templates were prepared by the method of Neff et al. (1998)Go, and PCR was performed at 96°C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles at 96°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min. The T2 plants homozygous for both the miro1 mutant locus and the transgene were identified by segregation analysis for kanamycin resistance, and the T3 plants were used for further analysis.

Accession Numbers
Arabidopsis Genome Initiative numbers for the genes mentioned in this study are as follows: MIRO1, At5g27540; MIRO2, At3g63150; MIRO3, At3g05310; UBQ10, At4g05320; and FIM1, At4g27600.

Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Figure 1. RT-PCR Analysis of the MIRO Genes.
Supplemental Figure 2. DNA Gel Blot Analysis of the miro1 Mutant.
Supplemental Figure 3. Identification of miro2 Mutants.
Supplemental Figure 4. Phenotypes of Homozygous miro2 Mutants Are Indistinguishable from Those of Wild-Type Plants.
Supplemental Figure 5. Mitochondrial Morphology Is Normal in the Root Cells of miro2 Mutants.
Supplemental Figure 6. Disruption of the Cytoskeleton in Pollen by Cytoskeletal Inhibitors.
Supplemental Figure 7. MIRO1 cDNA under the Control of Its Endogenous Promoter Restores Normal Mitochondrial Morphology in miro1 Mutant Pollen.
Supplemental Table 1. Segregation Analysis of the Heterozygous miro2 Mutants.
Supplemental Movie 1. Mitochondrial Movement in Wild-Type Pollen.
Supplemental Movie 2. Mitochondrial Movement in a miro1 Mutant Pollen Tube.
Supplemental Movie 3. Mitochondrial Movement Is Arrested in Wild-Type Pollen Treated with Latrunculin B.
Supplemental Movie 4. Mitochondrial Movement Is Arrested in Wild-Type Pollen Treated with Cytochalasin D.
Supplemental Movie 5. Mitochondrial Movement in Wild-Type Pollen Treated with Oryzalin.
Supplemental Movie 6. Mitochondrial Movement in Wild-Type Pollen Treated with Nocodazole.
Supplemental Movie 7. Mitochondrial Movement Is Arrested in miro1 Mutant Pollen Treated with Latrunculin B.
Supplemental Movie 8. Mitochondrial Movement Is Arrested in miro1 Mutant Pollen Treated with Cytochalasin D.
Supplemental Movie 9. Mitochondrial Movement in miro1 Mutant Pollen Treated with Oryzalin.
Supplemental Movie 10. Mitochondrial Movement in miro1 Mutant Pollen Treated with Nocodazole.
Supplemental Movie 11. Mitochondrial Movement in Wild-Type Pollen Treated with DMSO.
Supplemental Movie 12. Mitochondrial Movement in miro1 Mutant Pollen Treated with DMSO.
Supplemental Methods. Visualization of the Cytoskeleton in Pollen.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Hugh Dickinson for assistance and advice on electron microscopy and discussion; Ian Moore, Ooi-kock Teh, Marketa Samalova, and Luisa Camacho for assistance and advice on confocal microscopy; Liza A. Pon for critical reading of the manuscript; Jill Harrison for advice; the SeedGenes Project for providing emb2473 seeds; David Twell for providing pLAT52-TEVL GFP plasmid; Sarah Rogers and Megumi Yamaoka for technical assistance; John Baker for image processing; Kentaro Tamura for actin staining and discussion; Takashi Hashimoto and Shin-ichiro Komaki for microtubule staining; and Haruko Okamoto, Miho Takemura, Keiji Nishida, and Kimitsune Ishizaki for discussion.


    Footnotes
 
1 Current address: Ishikawa Prefectural University, 1-308 Suematsu, Nonoichi, Ishikawa 921-8836, Japan. Back

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Christopher J. Leaver (chris.leaver{at}plants.ox.ac.uk).

[W] Online version contains Web-only data. Back

www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.107.055756

Received September 20, 2007; Revision received January 19, 2008. accepted February 29, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Alexander, C., Votruba, M., Pesch, U.E.A., Thiselton, D.L., Mayer, S., Moore, A., Rodriguez, M., Kellner, U., Leo-Kottler, B., Auburger, G., Bhattacharya, S.S., and Wissinger, B. (2000). OPA1, encoding a dynamin-like GTPase, is mutated in autosomal dominant optic atrophy linked to chromosome 3q28. Nat. Genet. 26: 211–215.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Alonso, J.M., et al. (2003). Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796–815.[CrossRef][Medline]

Arimura, S., Aida, G.P., Fujimoto, M., Nakazono, M., and Tsutsumi, N. (2004a). Arabidopsis dynamin-like protein 2a (ADL2a), like ADL2b, is involved in plant mitochondrial division. Plant Cell Physiol. 45: 236–242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arimura, S., and Tsutsumi, N. (2002). A dynamin-like protein (ADL2b), rather than FtsZ, is involved in Arabidopsis mitochondrial division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5727–5731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arimura, S., Yamamoto, J., Aida, G.P., Nakazono, M., and Tsutsumi, N. (2004b). Frequent fusion and fission of plant mitochondria with unequal nucleoid distribution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 7805–7808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Armstrong, A.F., Logan, D.C., Tobin, A.K., O'Toole, P., and Atkin, O.K. (2006). Heterogeneity of plant mitochondrial responses underpinning respiratory acclimation to the cold in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 29: 940–949.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barr, C.M., Neiman, M., and Taylor, D.R. (2005). Inheritance and recombination of mitochondrial genomes in plants, fungi and animals. New Phytol. 168: 39–50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Batoko, H., Zheng, H.-Q., Hawes, C., and Moore, I. (2000). A Rab1 GTPase is required for transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus and for normal Golgi movement in plants. Plant Cell 12: 2201–2217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boldogh, I.R., and Pon, L.A. (2006). Interactions of mitochondria with the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763: 450–462.[Medline]

Boldogh, I.R., and Pon, L.A. (2007). Mitochondria on the move. Trends Cell Biol. 17: 502–510.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brickley, K., Smith, M.J., Beck, M., and Stephenson, F.A. (2005). GRIF-1 and OIP106, members of a novel gene family of coiled-coil domain proteins: Association in vivo and in vitro with kinesin. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 14723–14732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chan, D.C. (2006a). Mitochondria: Dynamic organelles in disease, aging and development. Cell 125: 1241–1252.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chan, D.C. (2006b). Mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22: 79–99.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chen, H., Detmer, S.A., Ewald, A.J., Griffin, E.E., Fraser, S.E., and Chan, D.C. (2003). Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J. Cell Biol. 160: 189–200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clough, S.J., and Bent, A.F. (1998). Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16: 735–743.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Delettre, C., et al. (2000). Nuclear gene OPA1, encoding a mitochondrial dynamin-related protein, is mutated in dominant optic atrophy. Nat. Genet. 26: 207–210.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fan, L.-M., Wang, Y.-F., Wang, H., and Wu, W.-H. (2001). In vitro Arabidopsis pollen germination and characterization of the inward potassium currents in Arabidopsis pollen grain protoplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1603–1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, Å., Ruusala, A., and Aspenström, P. (2003). Atypical Rho GTPases have roles in mitochondrial homeostasis and apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 6495–6502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fransson, Å., Ruusala, A., and Aspenström, P. (2006). The atypical Rho GTPases Miro-1 and Miro-2 have essential roles in mitochondrial trafficking. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 344: 500–510.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Frederick, R.L., McCaffery, J.M., Cunningham, K.W., Okamoto, K., and Shaw, J.M. (2004). Yeast Miro GTPase, Gem1p, regulates mitochondrial morphology via a novel pathway. J. Cell Biol. 167: 87–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frederick, R.L., and Shaw, J.M. (2007). Moving mitochondria: Establishing distribution of an essential organelle. Traffic 8: 1668–1675.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fujimoto, M., Arimura, S., Nakazono, M., and Tsutsumi, N. (2004). A rice dynamin-like protein, OsDRP3A, is involved in mitochondrial fission. Breed. Sci. 54: 367–372.[CrossRef]

Glater, E.E., Megeath, L.J., Stowers, R.S., and Schwarz, T.L. (2006). Axonal transport of mitochondria requires milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is light chain independent. J. Cell Biol. 173: 545–557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo, X., Macleod, G.T., Wellington, A., Hu, F., Panchumarthi, S., Schoenfield, M., Martin, L., Charlton, M.P., Atwood, H.L., and Zinsmaier, K.E. (2005). The GTPase dMiro is required for axonal transport of mitochondria to Drosophila synapses. Neuron 47: 379–393.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hollenbeck, P.J. (1996). The pattern and mechanism of mitochondrial transport in axons. Front. Biosci. 1: 91–116.

Hollenbeck, P.J., and Saxton, W.M. (2005). The axonal transport of mitochondria. J. Cell Sci. 118: 5411–5419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Howden, R., Park, S.K., Moore, J.M., Orme, J., Grossniklaus, U., and Twell, D. (1998). Selection of T-DNA-tagged male and female gametophytic mutants by segregation distortion in Arabidopsis. Genetics 149: 621–631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karimi, M., De Meyer, B., and Hilson, P. (2005). Modular cloning in plant cells. Trends Plant Sci. 10: 103–105.[Web of Science][Medline]

Krichevsky, A., Kozlovsky, S.V., Tian, G.-W., Chen, M.-H., Zaltsman, A., and Citovsky, V. (2007). How pollen tubes grow. Dev. Biol. 303: 405–420.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Logan, D.C. (2006a). The mitochondrial compartment. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 1225–1243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Logan, D.C. (2006b). Plant mitochondrial dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763: 430–441.[Medline]

Logan, D.C., and Leaver, C.J. (2000). Mitochondria-targeted GFP highlights the heterogeneity of mitochondrial shape, size and movement within living plant cells. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 865–871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Logan, D.C., Scott, I., and Tobin, A.K. (2004). ADL2a, like ADL2b, is involved in the control of higher plant mitochondrial morphology. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 783–785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lovy-Wheeler, A., Cárdenas, L., Kunkel, J.G., and Hepler, P.K. (2007). Differential organelle movement on the actin cytoskeleton in lily pollen tubes. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 64: 217–232.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mansfield, S.G., and Briarty, L.G. (1990). Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. II. The developing embryo. Can. J. Bot. 69: 461–476.

McBride, H.M., Neuspiel, M., and Wasiak, S. (2006). Mitochondria: More than just a powerhouse. Curr. Biol. 16: R551–R560.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

McElver, J., et al. (2001). Insertional mutagenesis of genes required for seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 159: 1751–1763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meinke, D.W. (1982). Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: Evidence for gametophytic expression of the mutant genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63: 381–386.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Neff, M.M., Neff, J.D., Chory, J., and Pepper, A.E. (1998). dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: Experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J. 14: 387–392.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Okamoto, K., and Shaw, J.M. (2005). Mitochondrial morphology and dynamics in yeast and multicellular eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39: 503–536.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Parton, R.M., Fischer-Parton, S., Trewavas, A.J., and Watahiki, M.K. (2003). Pollen tubes exhibit regular periodic membrane trafficking events in the absence of apical extension. J. Cell Sci. 116: 2707–2719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Preuss, D., Rhee, S.Y., and Davis, R.W. (1994). Tetrad analysis possible in Arabidopsis with mutation of the QUARTET (QRT) genes. Science 264: 1458–1460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rice, S.E., and Gelfand, V.I. (2006). Paradigm lost: milton connects kinesin heavy chain to miro on mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 173: 459–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shan, Y., Hexige, S., Guo, Z., Wan, B., Chen, K., Chen, X., Ma, L., Huang, C., Zhao, S., and Yu, L. (2004). Cloning and characterization of the mouse Arht2 gene which encodes a putative atypical GTPase. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 106: 91–97.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sheahan, M.B., McCurdy, D.W., and Rose, R.J. (2005). Mitochondria as a connected population: Ensuring continuity of the mitochondrial genome during plant cell dedifferentiation through massive mitochondrial fusion. Plant J. 44: 744–755.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sheahan, M.B., Rose, R.J., and McCurdy, D.W. (2004). Organelle inheritance in plant cell division: The actin cytoskeleton is required for unbiased inheritance of chloroplasts, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in dividing protoplasts. Plant J. 37: 379–390.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stickens, D., and Verbelen, J.-P. (1996). Spatial structure of mitochondria and ER denotes changes in cell physiology of cultured tobacco protoplasts. Plant J. 9: 85–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Stowers, R.S., Megeath, L.J., Górska-Andrzejak, J., Meinertzhagen, I.A., and Schwarz, T.L. (2002). Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends on milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron 36: 1063–1077.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Twell, D., Yamaguchi, J., and McCormick, S. (1990). Pollen-specific gene expression in transgenic plants: Coordinate regulation of two different tomato gene promoters during microsporogenesis. Development 109: 705–713.[Abstract]

Tzafrir, I., Pena-Muralla, R., Dickerman, A., Berg, M., Rogers, R., Hutchens, S., Sweeney, T.C., McElver, J., Aux, G., Patton, G., and Meinke, D. (2004). Identification of genes required for embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 135: 1206–1220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Gestel, K., Köhler, R.H., and Verbelen, J.-P. (2002). Plant mitochondria move on F-actin, but their positioning in the cortical cytoplasm depends on both F-actin and microtubules. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 659–667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yadegari, R., de Paiva, G.R., Laux, T., Koltunow, A.M., Apuya, N., Zimmerman, J.L., Fischer, R.L., Harada, J.J., and Goldberg, R.B. (1994). Cell differentiation and morphogenesis are uncoupled in Arabidopsis raspberry embryos. Plant Cell 6: 1713–1729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yaffe, M.P. (1999). The machinery of mitochondrial inheritance and behavior. Science 283: 1493–1497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang, S., Sweetman, J.P., Amirsadeghi, S., Barghshi, M., Huttly, A.K., Chung, W.-I., and Twell, D. (2001). Novel anther-specific myb genes from tobacco as putative regulators of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase expression. Plant Physiol. 126: 1738–1753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshinaga, K., Arimura, S., Niwa, Y., Tsutsumi, N., Uchimiya, H., and Kawai-Yamada, M. (2005). Mitochondrial behaviour in the early stages of ROS stress leading to cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 96: 337–342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zimmermann, P., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Henning, L., and Gruissem, W. (2004). GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 136: 2621–2632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zottini, M., Barizza, E., Bastianelli, F., Carimi, F., and Lo Schiavo, F. (2006). Growth and senescence of Medicago truncatula cultured cells are associated with characteristic mitochondrial morphology. New Phytol. 172: 239–247.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Züchner, S., et al. (2004). Mutations in the mitochondrial GTPase mitofusin 2 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 2A. Nat. Genet. 36: 449–451.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
S. Fujii and K. Toriyama
Genome Barriers between Nuclei and Mitochondria Exemplified by Cytoplasmic Male Sterility
Plant Cell Physiol., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1484 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/589    most recent
tpc.107.055756v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yamaoka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists