Plant Cell Applied Biosystems SYBR(R) Cells-to-CT(TM) Kits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online December 14, 2007; 10.1105/tpc.107.055905

The Plant Cell 19:3853-3863 (2007)
© 2007 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/12/3853    most recent
tpc.107.055905v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Plant Cell
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, F.
Right arrow Articles by Birchler, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, F.
Right arrow Articles by Birchler, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Han, F.
Right arrow Articles by Birchler, J. A.

Minichromosome Analysis of Chromosome Pairing, Disjunction, and Sister Chromatid Cohesion in Maize[W]

Fangpu Han, Zhi Gao, Weichang Yu and James A. Birchler1

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211-7400

1 Address correspondence to birchlerj{at}missouri.edu.

With the advent of engineered minichromosome technology in plants, an understanding of the properties of small chromosomes is desirable. Twenty-two minichromosomes of related origin but varying in size are described that provide a unique resource to study such behavior. Fourteen minichromosomes from this set could pair with each other in meiotic prophase at frequencies between 25 and 100%, but for the smaller chromosomes, the sister chromatids precociously separated in anaphase I. The other eight minichromosomes did not pair with themselves, and the sister chromatids divided equationally at meiosis I. In plants containing one minichromosome, the sister chromatids also separated at meiosis I. In anaphase II, the minichromosomes progressed to one pole or the other. The maize (Zea mays) Shugoshin protein, which has been hypothesized to protect centromere cohesion in meiosis I, is still present at anaphase I on minichromosomes that divide equationally. Also, there were no differences in the level of phosphorylation of Ser-10 of histone H3, a correlate of cohesion, in the minichromosomes in which sister chromatids separated during anaphase I compared with the normal chromosomes. These analyses suggest that meiotic centromeric cohesion is compromised in minichromosomes depending on their size and cannot be maintained by the mechanisms used by normal-sized chromosomes.


Related articles in Plant Cell:

Naughty Behavior of Maize Minichromosomes in Meiosis
Arnaud Ronceret, Christopher G. Bozza, and Wojciech P. Pawlowski
Plant Cell 2007 19: 3835-3837. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Ronceret, C. G. Bozza, and W. P. Pawlowski
Naughty Behavior of Maize Minichromosomes in Meiosis
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2007; 19(12): 3835 - 3837.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Plant Biologists