Plant Cell Hybrigenics The Protein Interactions Experts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


First published online October 3, 2008; 10.1105/tpc.108.062166

The Plant Cell 20:2559-2570 (2008)
© 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/2559    most recent
tpc.108.062166v2
tpc.108.062166v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandáková, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lysak, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandáková, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lysak, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mandáková, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lysak, M. A.

Chromosomal Phylogeny and Karyotype Evolution in x=7 Crucifer Species (Brassicaceae)[W]

Terezie Mandáková and Martin A. Lysak1

Department of Functional Genomics and Proteomics, Institute of Experimental Biology, Masaryk University, Brno CZ-625 00, Czech Republic

1 Address correspondence to lysak{at}sci.muni.cz.

Karyotype evolution in species with identical chromosome number but belonging to distinct phylogenetic clades is a long-standing question of plant biology, intractable by conventional cytogenetic techniques. Here, we apply comparative chromosome painting (CCP) to reconstruct karyotype evolution in eight species with x=7 (2n=14, 28) chromosomes from six Brassicaceae tribes. CCP data allowed us to reconstruct an ancestral Proto-Calepineae Karyotype (PCK; n=7) shared by all x=7 species analyzed. The PCK has been preserved in the tribes Calepineae, Conringieae, and Noccaeeae, whereas karyotypes of Eutremeae, Isatideae, and Sisymbrieae are characterized by an additional translocation. The inferred chromosomal phylogeny provided compelling evidence for a monophyletic origin of the x=7 tribes. Moreover, chromosomal data along with previously published gene phylogenies strongly suggest the PCK to represent an ancestral karyotype of the tribe Brassiceae prior to its tribe-specific whole-genome triplication. As the PCK shares five chromosomes and conserved associations of genomic blocks with the putative Ancestral Crucifer Karyotype (n=8) of crucifer Lineage I, we propose that both karyotypes descended from a common ancestor. A tentative origin of the PCK via chromosome number reduction from n=8 to n=7 is outlined. Comparative chromosome maps of two important model species, Noccaea caerulescens and Thellungiella halophila, and complete karyotypes of two purported autotetraploid Calepineae species (2n=4x=28) were reconstructed by CCP.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. L. P. Couvreur, A. Franzke, I. A. Al-Shehbaz, F. T. Bakker, M. A. Koch, and K. Mummenhoff
Molecular Phylogenetics, Temporal Diversification, and Principles of Evolution in the Mustard Family (Brassicaceae)
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2010; 27(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. Wolny and R. Hasterok
Comparative cytogenetic analysis of the genomes of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon and its close relatives
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2009; 104(5): 873 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Han, Z. Zhang, C. Liu, J. Liu, S. Huang, J. Jiang, and W. Jin
Centromere repositioning in cucurbit species: Implication of the genomic impact from centromere activation and inactivation
PNAS, September 1, 2009; 106(35): 14937 - 14941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Plant Biologists