Plant Cell SoftGenetics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Cell Advance Online Publication
Published on May 2, 2002; 10.1105/tpc.001271


This Article
Right arrow Full Text - TPC Advance Online Pub. (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/5/1173    most recent
tpc.001271v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dooner, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dooner, H. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dooner, H. K.

Received December 13, 2001
Accepted February 11, 2002

Extensive Interallelic Polymorphisms Drive Meiotic Recombination into a Crossover Pathway

Hugo K. Dooner 1*

1 Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855; Department of Plant Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dooner{at}waksman.rutgers.edu.

Recombinants isolated from most meiotic intragenic recombination experiments in maize, but not in yeast, are borne principally on crossover chromosomes. This excess of crossovers is not explained readily by the canonical double-strand break repair model of recombination, proposed to account for a large body of yeast data, which predicts that crossovers (COs) and noncrossovers (NCOs) should be recovered equally. An attempt has been made here to identify general rules governing the recovery of the CO and NCO classes of intragenic recombinants in maize. Recombination was analyzed in bz heterozygotes between a variety of mutations derived from the same or different progenitor alleles. The mutations include point mutations, transposon insertions, and transposon excision footprints. Consequently, the differences between the bz heteroalleles ranged from just two nucleotides to many nucleotides, indels, and insertions. In this article, allelic pairs differing at only two positions are referred to as dimorphic to distinguish them from polymorphic pairs, which differ at multiple positions. The present study has revealed the following effects at these bz heteroalleles: (1) recombination between polymorphic heteroalleles produces mostly CO chromosomes; (2) recombination between dimorphic heteroalleles produces both CO and NCO chromosomes, in ratios apparently dependent on the nature of the heteroalleles; and (3) in dimorphic heterozygotes, the two NCO classes are recovered in approximately equal numbers when the two mutations are point mutations but not when one or both mutations are insertions. These observations are discussed in light of a recent version of the double-strand break repair model of recombination that postulates separate pathways for the formation of CO and NCO products.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists