Plant Cell SoftGenetics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Cell Advance Online Publication
Published on February 24, 2003; 10.1105/tpc.007831


This Article
Right arrow Full Text - TPC Advance Online Pub. (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/3/681    most recent
tpc.007831v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moon, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, Z. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moon, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, Z. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moon, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, Z. R.

Received September 16, 2002
Accepted November 1, 2002

EMF Genes Maintain Vegetative Development by Repressing the Flower Program in Arabidopsis

Yong-Hwan Moon 1, Lingjing Chen 1, Rong Long Pan 1, Hur-Song Chang 2, Tong Zhu 2, Daniel M. Maffeo 1, and Z. Renee Sung 1*

1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
2 Torrey Mesa Research Institute, Syngenta Research and Technology, San Diego, California 92121

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zrsung{at}nature.berkeley.edu.

The EMBRYONIC FLOWER (EMF) genes EMF1 and EMF2 are required to maintain vegetative development and repress flower development. EMF1 encodes a putative transcriptional regulator, and EMF2 encodes a Polycomb group protein homolog. We examined expression profiles of emf mutants using GeneChip technology. The high degree of overlap in expression changes from the wild type among the emf1 and emf2 mutants was consistent with the functional similarity between the two genes. Expression profiles of emf seedlings before flower development were similar to that of Arabidopsis flowers, indicating the commitment of germinating emf seedlings to the reproductive fate. The germinating emf seedlings ectopically expressed flower organ genes, suggesting that vegetative development in wild-type plants results from EMF repression of the flower program, directly or indirectly. In addition, the seed development program is derepressed in the emf1 mutants. Gene expression analysis showed no clear regulation of CONSTANS (CO), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), LEAFY (LFY), and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 by EMF1. Consistent with epistasis results that co , lfy, or ft cannot rescue rosette development in emf mutants, these data show that the mechanism of EMF-mediated repression of flower organ genes is independent of these flowering genes. Based on these findings, a new mechanism of EMF-mediated floral repression is proposed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Plant Biologists