Plant Cell BIOBASE Corporation
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Cell Advance Online Publication
Published on February 19, 2002; 10.1105/tpc.010373


This Article
Right arrow Full Text - TPC Advance Online Pub. (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/2/407    most recent
tpc.010373v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dawe, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dawe, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dawe, R. K.

Received August 22, 2001
Accepted October 23, 2001

Independently Regulated Neocentromere Activity of Two Classes of Tandem Repeat Arrays

Evelyn N. Hiatt 1, Edward K. Kentner 1, and R. Kelly Dawe 2*

1 Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
2 Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602; Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kelly{at}dogwood.botany.uga.edu.

Tandem repeat arrays often are found in interstitial (i.e., normally gene-rich) regions on chromosomes. In maize, genes on abnormal chromosome 10 induce the tandem repeats that make up knobs to move poleward on the meiotic spindle. This so-called neocentromere activity results in the preferential recovery, or meiotic drive, of the knobs in progeny. Here we show that two classes of repeats differ in their capacity to form neocentromeres and that their motility is controlled in trans by at least two repeat-specific activators. Microtubule dynamics appear to contribute little to the movement of neocentromeres (they are active in the presence of taxol), suggesting that the mechanism of motility involves microtubule-based motors. These data suggest that maize knob repeats and their binding proteins have coevolved to ensure their preferential recovery in progeny. Neocentromere-mediated drive provides a plausible mechanism for the evolution and maintenance of repeat arrays that occur in interstitial positions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Plant Biologists