Plant Cell Applied Biosystems SYBR(R) Cells-to-CT(TM) Kits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Cell Advance Online Publication
Published on October 21, 2005; 10.1105/tpc.105.035519


This Article
Right arrow Full Text - TPC Advance Online Pub. (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/11/3111    most recent
tpc.105.035519v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majeran, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Wijk, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majeran, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Wijk, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Majeran, W.
Right arrow Articles by van Wijk, K. J.

Received June 26, 2005
Returned for revision September 5, 2005
Accepted September 24, 2005

Functional Differentiation of Bundle Sheath and Mesophyll Maize Chloroplasts Determined by Comparative Proteomics

Wojciech Majeran 1, Yang Cai 1, Qi Sun 2, and Klaas J. van Wijk 1*

1 Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
2 Computational Biology Service Unit, Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kv35{at}cornell.edu.

Chloroplasts of maize (Zea mays) leaves differentiate into specific bundle sheath (BS) and mesophyll (M) types to accommodate C4 photosynthesis. Consequences for other plastid functions are not well understood but are addressed here through a quantitative comparative proteome analysis of purified M and BS chloroplast stroma. Three independent techniques were used, including cleavable stable isotope coded affinity tags. Enzymes involved in lipid biosynthesis, nitrogen import, and tetrapyrrole and isoprenoid biosynthesis are preferentially located in the M chloroplasts. By contrast, enzymes involved in starch synthesis and sulfur import preferentially accumulate in BS chloroplasts. The different soluble antioxidative systems, in particular peroxiredoxins, accumulate at higher levels in M chloroplasts. We also observed differential accumulation of proteins involved in expression of plastid-encoded proteins (e.g., EF-Tu, EF-G, and mRNA binding proteins) and thylakoid formation (VIPP1), whereas others were equally distributed. Enzymes related to the C4 shuttle, the carboxylation and regeneration phase of the Calvin cycle, and several regulators (e.g., CP12) distributed as expected. However, enzymes involved in triose phosphate reduction and triose phosphate isomerase are primarily located in the M chloroplasts, indicating that the M-localized triose phosphate shuttle should be viewed as part of the BS-localized Calvin cycle, rather than a parallel pathway.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ASPB Publications THE PLANT CELL PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Plant Biologists