Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscriber Help
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscriber Help
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board and Staff
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleGenomics Article
You have accessRestricted Access

Ten Years of Enhancer Detection: Lessons from the Fly

Hugo J. Bellen
Published December 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.12.2271
Hugo J. Bellen
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Gene Enhancer Detectors and Gene Traps Used in the Past 10 Years.

    Promoter traps require endogenous promoters (P) ([A] and [F]). Enhancer detectors capitalize on the presence of nearby genomic enhancers (E)

    ([B], [G], and [I] to [K]). Gene traps contain splice acceptor (SA) sites to produce fusions to the reporter gene ([C] to [E] and [H]).

    (A) The Mu bacteriophage construct first used in E. coli. lacZ, lacY, and lacA form the bacterial lac operon.

    (B) The first P-element enhancer detector used in Drosophila.

    (C) By providing an SA site at the 5′ end of lacZ, retroviral insertions may produce fusion proteins.

    (D) Similar to (C), but the fusion protein (βgeo) consists of the endogenous protein fused to both β-galactosidase and neomycin.

    (E) The advantages of ROSAβgal (C) and ROSAβgeo (D) are combined into one vector.

    (F) A construct used in C. elegans as a promoter trap for genomic fragments inserted into a transformation vector.

    (G) Enhancer detector used in Arabidopsis.

    (H) Gene trap used in Arabidopsis.

    (I) Second-generation enhancer detector used in Drosophila.

    (J) Similar to P-lArB (I).

    (K) Commonly used enhancer detector in Drosophila.

    Adh, alcohol dehydrogenase gene, which can be used as a positive and negative selectable marker; AmpR, ampicillin resistance; bpA, poly(A) addition site; GUS, β-glucuronidase; hsp, heat shock protein gene poly(A) addition site; hsp-w, white gene of Drosophila used to identify transformants; IRES, internal ribosomal entry site; KanR, kanamycin resistance; LTR, long terminal repeat of retrovirus; mini-w+, a white gene of Drosophila; neo, neomycin resistance gene; ORI, original of replication of E. coli; pBS, Bluescript vector; PGK, a consititutive promoter expressed in all cells; puro, puromycine resistance gene; rol-6, a dominant marker to identify transformants; rosy, eye color marker to identify transformants; SD, splice donor site; TRS, translation initiation site; unc53 3′end, a poly(A) addition site.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Other P-Element Vectors in Drosophila.

    (A) The GAL4–UAS system relies on an enhancer detector that drives GAL4 expression in specific cells. The GAL4 protein then binds to UAS sites on a separate P element to activate another gene, such as the reporter gene lacZ. SV40, poly(A) addition site from SV40.

    (B) Because of the presence of Su(Hw) sites in this P element (see text), the mutagenesis efficiency is double that of most P elements. yellow+ is body color marker.

    (C) A bipartite system can be used to direct misexpression of endogenous genes (see text). The first P element drives GAL4 expression in specific cells. GAL4 in turn activates a hybrid UAS-containing promoter on the second P element. The UAS-containing promoter faces outward and may lead to transcripts that include adjacent genes in the genome.

    Abbreviations are as given in the legend to Figure 1.

PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 11 (12)
The Plant Cell Online
Vol. 11, Issue 12
Dec 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ten Years of Enhancer Detection: Lessons from the Fly
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
Citation Tools
Ten Years of Enhancer Detection: Lessons from the Fly
Hugo J. Bellen
The Plant Cell Online Dec 1999, 11 (12) 2271-2281; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.11.12.2271

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ten Years of Enhancer Detection: Lessons from the Fly
Hugo J. Bellen
The Plant Cell Online Dec 1999, 11 (12) 2271-2281; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.11.12.2271
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • HISTORY AND PRINCIPLES
    • BEYOND THE FRUIT FLY
    • GENERATION AND USE OF CELL-SPECIFIC AND TISSUE-SPECIFIC MARKERS IN DROSOPHILA
    • ENHANCER DETECTORS AS MUTAGENS
    • MANIPULATING GENE EXPRESSION, CELL VIABILITY, AND CELL FUNCTION
    • ENHANCER SUPPRESSORS
    • OTHER AVENUES
    • SIGNIFICANCE TO GENOMICS
    • Acknowledgments
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Genome-Wide Analysis of NBS-LRR–Encoding Genes in Arabidopsis
  • Laser-Capture Microdissection, a Tool for the Global Analysis of Gene Expression in Specific Plant Cell Types: Identification of Genes Expressed Differentially in Epidermal Cells or Vascular Tissues of Maize
  • A High-Throughput Arabidopsis Reverse Genetics System
Show more GENOMICS ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Plant Direct
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire