Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

In Situ Localization and in Vitro Induction of Plant COPI-Coated Vesicles

Peter Pimpl, Ali Movafeghi, Sean Coughlan, Jürgen Denecke, Stefan Hillmer, David G. Robinson
Peter Pimpl
a Department of Structural Cell Physiology, Albrecht-von-Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Movafeghi
a Department of Structural Cell Physiology, Albrecht-von-Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Coughlan
b AG Biotechnology, DuPont Experimental Station, P.O. Box 0402, Wilmington, Delaware 19880-0402
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Denecke
c Leeds Institute for Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Hillmer
a Department of Structural Cell Physiology, Albrecht-von-Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David G. Robinson
a Department of Structural Cell Physiology, Albrecht-von-Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: David.Robinson@urz.uni-heidelberg.de

Published November 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.11.2219

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Cross-Reactivities of Antisera Raised against Recombinant Proteins Prepared from cDNA Clones for Atγ-, Zm∂-, and ε-COP, AtARF1p, and AtSar1p.

    (A) Cytosolic proteins and total membranes from the organisms indicated were prepared as described in Methods and probed with the above antisera. Equal amounts of protein were added to each lane (30 μg). c, cytosol; m, membrane.

    (B) Complete lanes and molecular masses of the Arabidopsis cytosol and membranes indicate specific recognition of a single antigen of the corresponding size for each of the above-listed antisera.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Immunogold Labeling of Cryosections with Plant COP Antibodies I.

    Shown is the distribution of Atγ-COP homolog in maize roots.

    (A) and (B) Golgi stacks from cells near the meristem.

    (C) Golgi stack from a root cap cell.

    Arrowheads point to labeled budding and released COPI-coated vesicles. c, cis-face of a Golgi stack; t, trans-face of a Golgi stack; SV, slime-containing secretory vesicle. Bars = 100 nm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Immunogold Labeling of Cryosections with Plant COP Antibodies II.

    Shown is labeling of maize root Golgi stacks from cells near the meristem.

    (A) and (B) Labeling with Zm∂- and Zmε-COP antibodies, respectively.

    (C) Labeling with AtArf1p antibodies.

    Arrows point to clathrin-coated vesicles; arrowheads indicate budding COPI-coated vesicles. c, cis-face of a Golgi stack; t, trans-face of a Golgi stack. Bars = 100 nm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Immunogold Labeling of Cryosections with Plant COP Antibodies III.

    Shown is labeling of Arabidopsis root Golgi stacks.

    (A) Labeling with Atγ-COP antibodies.

    (B) Labeling with Zm∂-COP antibodies.

    (C) Labeling with Zmε-COP antibodies.

    Arrowheads point to budding COPI-coated vesicles. Bars = 100 nm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    KI Dissociation of COPI- and COPII-Coat Proteins from Cauliflower Inflorescence Membranes.

    (A) A Golgi-enriched fraction was treated with increasing concentrations of KI, as described in Methods, and then centrifuged to separate the membranes from the extraction medium. The pelleted membranes were then probed for the presence of coat proteins.

    (B) Golgi-enriched membranes were treated as in (A), but with 300 mM KI, and then were probed with GTPase antisera. Lane 1, native membranes; lane 2, KI-stripped membranes.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    In Vitro Recruitment of Cytosolic COPI-Vesicle Coat Proteins onto KI-Stripped Membranes.

    (A) Recruitment of GTPases onto cauliflower membranes. KI-stripped membranes were incubated with cytosol, ATP-regenerating system, and GTPγS for 25 min at 20°C. Membranes with bound proteins were separated from unbound proteins by centrifugation. Small GTPases in each fraction were detected in a protein gel blot with specific antibodies against AtArf1p and AtSar1p. Lane 1 contains KI-stripped membranes before incubation with cytosolic proteins; lane 2, the supernatant after recruitment; and lane 3, the pelleted membranes after recruitment.

    (B) Selective recruitment of coatomer onto cauliflower membranes. KI-stripped membranes were incubated as described in (A), and the sediment and supernatant proteins were screened by protein gel blotting with Atγ-COP and AtSec23p antibodies. Lane 1 contains native membranes; lane 2, KI-stripped membranes; lane 3, cytosolic proteins; lane 4, supernatant after recruitment; and lane 5, pelleted membranes after recruitment.

    (C) Absence of precipitable Atγ-COP, AtArf1p, AtSec23p, and AtSar1p in cytosol only (left). Nonsaturation of coat protein recruitments onto cauliflower membranes (right). The ratio of cytosolic:membrane proteins in the recruitment assay was increased by 30% (lanes 1 and 4), 100% (lanes 2 and 5), and 200% (lanes 3 and 6) over the standard values (6 mg mL–1:0.2 mg L–1). Lanes 1 to 3 represent the supernatant fractions after recruitment; lanes 4 to 6, the corresponding pelleted membrane fractions. S represents the supernatant, P the pellet after recruitment in the absence of membranes. Membranes, medium, incubation, and other conditions were as described in (A). Antibody screening was as described in (A) and (B).

    (D) Heterologous recruitment of COPI-vesicle coat proteins from cauliflower cytosol onto Golgi/ER membranes from tobacco mesophyll. Tobacco membranes were isolated as described in Methods, incubated with cauliflower cytosol, and subsequently screened with antibodies under the conditions used in (A). Lane 1 contains KI-stripped membranes; lane 2, pelleted membranes after recruitment.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    BFA Inhibits Recruitment of Coatomer and AtArf1p in Cauliflower Recruitment Assay.

    Bound coatomer/Arf1p in control and BFA-treated samples was quantified by densitometry of protein gel blots of samples of equal volume. Shown are the results of four separate experiments whose average is given as columns; the error bars represent the extent of the variation between experiments. (+) denotes the presence of 300 μM BFA and (–) the absence of BFA in the incubation media.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Detection of in Vitro–Formed COPI-Coated Vesicles.

    (A) Recruitment of coatomer onto KI-stripped membranes leads to an increase in their equilibrium density. Stripped membranes from cauliflower inflorescence were incubated in the absence or presence of cauliflower cytosolic proteins, as described for Figure 6A. The incubation mixtures were then layered onto sucrose density gradients and centrifuged to equilibrium, as described in Methods. Fractions were screened with antibodies against ER (calnexin, BiP), Golgi (RGP), and COPI/COPII coat proteins (Atγ-COP, AtSec23p). As depicted, stripped membranes banded at densities ∼10% (w/w) less than those at which the recruited membranes did.

    (B) Isolation of COPI-coated vesicles. KI-stripped cauliflower membranes were incubated with cauliflower cytosol under standard conditions, extracted with high-salt reagent (250 mM KCl) for 30 min at 4°C, and centrifuged at 30,000g; the membranes in the supernatant were subjected to isopcynic sucrose density gradient centrifugation as in (A). Equal-volume fractions were then monitored in protein gel blots with the antisera described above. The asterisk denotes the putative COPI-coated vesicle–containing fraction used for Figure 9.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Immunogold Negative Staining of the Contents of Fraction 12 from the Gradient Shown in Figure 8B.

    (A) Overview of normal negative staining. Putative COPI-coated vesicles are indicated with arrowheads, clathrin-coated vesicles with arrows.

    (B) Comparison of clathrin- and COP-coated vesicles. Arrows and arrowheads are as in (A).

    (C) to (J) Gallery of negatively stained putative COPI-coated vesicles decorated with gold-coupled Zmε-COP antibodies.

    Bar in (A) = 1 μm; bar in (B) = 100 nm; bar in (J) = 100 nm for (C) to (J).

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Heterologous in Vitro Induction of COPI-Coated Vesicles from Cauliflower Cytosol and Tobacco Membranes from Plants Expressing α-Amylase–HDEL.

    (A) Incubation performed in the presence (+) of ATP/GTPγS. The histogram represents the profile of α-amylase activity. The protein gel blots of the corresponding fractions document the distributions of calreticulin and Atγ-COP in relation to α-amylase activity.

    (B) Incubation performed in the absence (–) of ATP/GTPγS.

    All incubations and membrane separations were as given in Figure 8B. Activity measurements were performed in triplicate; error bars represent the extent of variation.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Distribution of Immunogold Labling with Plant COP Antibodies

    Golgi Stacks
    Observed
    Gold Particles on CisternaeaGold Particles on
    Vesiclesa
    Gold Particles
    per Stack
    Antibodycis-MostcisMediantransTGNbcis-Halftrans-HalfTotal Gold Particles
    Maize
    Atγ-COP259 (5.2)8 (4.7)6 (3.5)6 (3.5)3 (1.8)78 (45.3)62 (36.0)1726.88
    Zm∂-COP258 (8.2)5 (5.1)4 (4.1)4 (4.1)2 (2.0)42 (42.8)33 (33.7)  983.92
    Zmε-COP259 (6.0)4 (2.7)4 (2.7)3 (2.0)3 (2.0)68 (45.3)59 (33.3)1506.00
    Arabidopsis
    Atγ-COP256 (3.3)3 (2.2)1 (0.6)2 (1.1)1 (0.6)95 (52.8)71 (39.4)1807.20
    Zm∂-COP255 (6.3)3 (3.8)1 (1.2)1 (1.2)0 (0.0)44 (55.0)26 (32.5)  803.20
    Zmε-COP2510 (5.8)5 (2.9)3 (1.8)3 (1.8)1 (0.6)99 (55.6)54 (31.5)1716.84
    • ↵a Numbers in parentheses are percentages.

    • ↵b TGN, trans-Golgi network.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Situ Localization and in Vitro Induction of Plant COPI-Coated Vesicles
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Situ Localization and in Vitro Induction of Plant COPI-Coated Vesicles
Peter Pimpl, Ali Movafeghi, Sean Coughlan, Jürgen Denecke, Stefan Hillmer, David G. Robinson
The Plant Cell Nov 2000, 12 (11) 2219-2235; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2219

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
In Situ Localization and in Vitro Induction of Plant COPI-Coated Vesicles
Peter Pimpl, Ali Movafeghi, Sean Coughlan, Jürgen Denecke, Stefan Hillmer, David G. Robinson
The Plant Cell Nov 2000, 12 (11) 2219-2235; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2219
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 12 (11)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 12, Issue 11
Nov 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • M-Type Thioredoxins Regulate the PGR5/PGRL1-Dependent Pathway by Forming a Disulfide-Linked Complex with PGRL1
  • Allelic Variation of MYB10 Is the Major Force Controlling Natural Variation in Skin and Flesh Color in Strawberry (Fragaria spp.) Fruit
  • Regulation of Aluminum Resistance in Arabidopsis Involves the SUMOylation of the Zinc Finger Transcription Factor STOP1
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire