Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

The Gibberellin Signaling Pathway Is Regulated by the Appearance and Disappearance of SLENDER RICE1 in Nuclei

Hironori Itoh, Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka, Yutaka Sato, Motoyuki Ashikari, Makoto Matsuoka
Hironori Itoh
BioScience Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka
BioScience Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yutaka Sato
BioScience Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Motoyuki Ashikari
BioScience Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Makoto Matsuoka
BioScience Center, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published January 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010319

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Phenotypic Comparison between Wild-Type and SLR1-GFP–Overexpressing Rice Plants.

    (A) Scheme of the chimeric construct consisting of the SLR1 cDNA fused with GFP at the 3′ side and HA at the 5′ side in an in-frame manner under the control of the rice Actin1 promoter (Act1 prom).

    (B) Gross morphologies of 45-day-old wild-type (right) and transgenic plants transformed with Act1 prom::SLR1 (left) or Act1 prom::SLR1-GFP (center).

    (C) Expression of two GA-regulated genes, OsGA20ox and SLR1, in wild-type and SLR1-GFP plants. RNA gel blot analysis was performed using total RNA from wild-type and SLR1-GFP seedlings grown in water with (+) or without (−) 1 μM uniconazol (uni) or 100 μM GA3. Ten micrograms of total RNA was loaded per lane and stained with ethidium bromide (rRNA). The arrowhead and asterisk (middle) indicate the transcript bands corresponding to SLR1-GFP and the endogenous wild-type SLR1, respectively. The values at the bottom of the OsGA20ox and SLR1 panels indicate the relative levels of OsGA20ox and endogenous SLR1 transcript. Each transcript was normalized by rRNA level after quantification using NIH Image software version 1.61. The transcript level in the wild-type plant without any treatments (−GA3, −uni) was set at 1.0.

    (D) Protein gel blot analysis of the endogenous SLR1 protein and the SLR1-GFP fusion protein in wild-type (lane 1), SLR1-GFP (lane 2), and slr1-1 (lane 3) seedlings. Ten micrograms of protein extracts was loaded per lane and probed with anti-SLR1 antibody. Molecular mass markers (in kD) are indicated at left. The extract from slr1-1 was used as a negative control (lane 3). The arrowhead and asterisk indicate the protein bands corresponding to SLR1-GFP and the endogenous wild-type SLR1, respectively. The circle shows the degraded protein derived from the SLR1-GFP protein, because this protein also was recognized by the anti-HA antibody. The antibody also recognized a 50-kD protein (square), which is present in slr1-1 and therefore is not related to SLR1. As a loading control, the Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining profile is shown.

    (E) Elongation of the second leaf sheath in response to GA3 treatment in wild-type (open circles) and SLR1-GFP (closed circles) plants. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean (n = 6).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effect of GA3 on the Subcellular Localization of SLR1-GFP.

    (A) and (D) Confocal microscopic images of GFP fluorescence in young leaf sections from SLR1-GFP overexpressor lines under the control of the rice Actin1 promoter.

    (B) and (E) Nuclei in the same cells as in (A) and (D) were stained with DAPI.

    (C) and (F) Merged images of GFP and DAPI fluorescence.

    Plants were grown with (+GA3, [D] to [F]) or without (non-treat, [A] to [C]) 100 μM GA3 for several days before GFP fluorescence analysis. Bars = 10 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of GA3 on the Amount of SLR1.

    (A) Complementation of the slr1 phenotype with SLR1 prom::SLR1-GFP. Introduction of SLR1 prom::SLR1-GFP rescued the slender phenotype (middle plant). slr1-1 (left) and wild-type (right) plants are shown as control plants.

    (B) to (D) Confocal microscopic images of GFP fluorescence in young leaf sections from SLR1 prom::SLR1-GFP transgenic lines. To block GA biosynthesis, the transgenic rice seedlings were pretreated with 1 μM uniconazol ([C] and [D], +uni) and then treated with 100 μM GA3 for 6 hr ([D], +uni, +GA3 6 hr). non-treat indicates normal growth conditions without any treatment (B). Bars = 10 μm.

    (E) Protein gel blot analysis of the SLR1 protein. Rice seedlings were grown for 1 week under normal conditions (lane 2) or with 1 μM uniconazol (lane 1; uni). For the GA treatment, the seedlings treated with uniconazol then were sprayed with 100 μM GA3 and collected after 6 hr (lane 3). The arrowhead and square indicate the protein bands corresponding to endogenous SLR1 and SLR1 nonrelated protein, respectively. Each lane contains 10 μg of total protein. As a loading control, the Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining profile is shown.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Diagram of the Deleted Constructs for Domain Analysis of SLR1.

    Each domain—DELLA, TVHYNP, Ser/Thr/Val-rich domain (polyS/T/V), LZ, nuclear localization signal (NLS), VHIID, PFYRE motif, and SAW motif—is indicated by different shading. The deleted SLR1 mutants were fused with the GFP coding sequence to generate overproducers for phenotypic analysis (see Figure 5) and subcellular localization studies (see Figure 6). The deletion points in each mutated SLR1 are shown below each box.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Gross Morphologies of 10-Day-Old Wild-Type and Transgenic Seedlings Overproducing the Truncated SLR1-GFP Proteins with GA3 Treatment ([I] to [P]) or Nontreatment ([A] to [H]).

    Plants were grown for 6 days under normal conditions and then treated with or without 100 μM GA3 for another 4 days. Because ΔDELLA, Δspace, ΔTVHYNP, and ΔpolyS/T/V transgenic plants showed a severe dwarf phenotype and never produced any fertile flowers, we used T1 generation plants for the analyses. Asterisks in (I), (J), (N), (O), and (P) show the top of the elongated fourth leaf sheath. Bars = 1 cm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Nuclear GFP Fluorescence Pattern in Young Leaves of Transgenic Plants.

    The same plants shown in Figure 5 were used for analysis of the nuclear localization of SLR1-GFP. To confirm the nuclear localization of the GFP fluorescence, the positions of nuclei were always tested by DAPI staining. non-treat, nontreatment. Bars = 10 μm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Effect of PolyS/T/V Deletion on the Regulation of GA Action.

    (A) Protein gel blot analysis of the fusion proteins in an SLR1-GFP–overproducing plant (lane 1) and two independent lines of ΔpolyS/T/V-GFP–overproducing plants (lanes 2 and 3). Crude extracts were extracted from the shoot apices of each plant. Twenty micrograms of total protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted, and probed with an anti-HA antibody. The arrowhead and asterisk indicate the positions of intact SLR1-GFP and ΔpolyS/T/V-GFP proteins, respectively.

    (B) Endogenous SLR1 protein level in a wild-type plant (lane 1), a SLR1-GFP plant (lane 2), and the ΔpolyS/T/V-GFP line 2 plant used in (A) (lane 3). Protein extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-SLR1 antibody. Each lane contains 20 μg of total protein. The circle shows the degraded protein derived from the ΔpolyS/T/V-GFP protein.

    (C) Level of OsGA20ox transcript. RNA gel blot analysis was performed with total RNA (10 μg) isolated from the shoot apices of the same plants used in (B).

    All of these samples were prepared from adult plants grown for 30 days.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Dimer Formation of SLR1 through the LZ Domain in the Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay.

    For bait constructs (Bait), full-length SLR1, ΔLZ, or ΔC-Ter (see Figure 4) was fused with the G4BD. For the prey construct (Prey), the full-length SLR1 was fused with the G4AD. The relative lacZ activity of various combinations is presented. p53 and T-antigen (simian virus 40 T-antigen) were used as positive controls to evaluate relative binding affinity. For each pairwise combination, five individual transformants were used to measure relative lacZ activity. Error bars represent standard deviations.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Scheme of the Functional Domains of SLR1 for the GA Signaling Pathway.

    The GA signal (yellow circle) is received by the signal perception domain, which consists of the conserved DELLA and TVHYNP regions and the nonconserved spacer region (red). The SLR1 received with the GA signal is degraded rapidly and disappears in the nuclei. The leucine zipper domain (dark blue) is essential for dimer formation by SLR1. The C-terminal half of SLR1 (blue), which is shared with other GRAS family genes, functions as a repression domain to prevent the action of GA. The Ser/Thr/Val-rich region (green) may work as a regulatory domain through the target sites of O-GlcNAcylation–phosphorylation regulation (see text for details).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of Phenotypic Analysis of Transgenic Rice with SLR1 Domain Deletions

    Phenotype
    slr1 Mutant-LikeTallNormalMild DwarfSevere Dwarf
    Relative heighta
    Construct>150>120100%60 to 80%<50%TotalbGA Responsec
    Intact0 (0)d0 (0)9 (25)21 (58)6 (17)36Yese
    ΔDELLA0 (0)0 (0)2 (5)7 (19)28 (76)37No
    Δspace0 (0)0 (0)1 (7)3 (21)10 (71)14No
    ΔTVHYNP0 (0)0 (0)3 (6)10 (21)34 (72)47No
    ΔpolyS/T/V0 (0)0 (0)5 (7)20 (29)44 (64)69Yes
    ΔLZ0 (0)0 (0)21 (88)3 (12)0 (0)24Yes
    ΔC-Ter10 (37)9 (33)8 (30)0 (0)0 (0)27Yesf
    • ↵a Relative height indicates the dwarfism of each transgenic plant compared with wild type as 100%.

    • ↵b Total number of independent T1 transgenic plants examined.

    • ↵c The GA response was determined whether or not application of 100 μM GA3 caused shoot elongation.

    • ↵d Numbers in parentheses indicate the percentages of T1 transgenic plants in each line exhibiting each phenotype.

    • ↵e Yes or no indicates whether or not shoot elongation occurred.

    • ↵f In ΔC-Ter plants, the tall or normal phenotype plants were used to determine the GA response.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Gibberellin Signaling Pathway Is Regulated by the Appearance and Disappearance of SLENDER RICE1 in Nuclei
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Gibberellin Signaling Pathway Is Regulated by the Appearance and Disappearance of SLENDER RICE1 in Nuclei
Hironori Itoh, Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka, Yutaka Sato, Motoyuki Ashikari, Makoto Matsuoka
The Plant Cell Jan 2002, 14 (1) 57-70; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010319

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Gibberellin Signaling Pathway Is Regulated by the Appearance and Disappearance of SLENDER RICE1 in Nuclei
Hironori Itoh, Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka, Yutaka Sato, Motoyuki Ashikari, Makoto Matsuoka
The Plant Cell Jan 2002, 14 (1) 57-70; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010319
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 14 (1)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 14, Issue 1
Jan 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • M-Type Thioredoxins Regulate the PGR5/PGRL1-Dependent Pathway by Forming a Disulfide-Linked Complex with PGRL1
  • Allelic Variation of MYB10 Is the Major Force Controlling Natural Variation in Skin and Flesh Color in Strawberry (Fragaria spp.) Fruit
  • Regulation of Aluminum Resistance in Arabidopsis Involves the SUMOylation of the Zinc Finger Transcription Factor STOP1
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire