Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

RAR1 and NDR1 Contribute Quantitatively to Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, and Their Relative Contributions Are Dependent on the R Gene Assayed

Pablo Tornero, Peter Merritt, Ari Sadanandom, Ken Shirasu, Roger W. Innes, Jeffery L. Dangl
Pablo Tornero
aDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Merritt
bDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ari Sadanandom
cSainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Shirasu
cSainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger W. Innes
bDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffery L. Dangl
aDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
dDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and Curriculum in Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published May 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.001032

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    lra1 Mutants Do Not Respond to Inducible Expression of avrRpm1.

    Three-week-old plants containing an inducible avrRpm1 expression system were sprayed with estradiol and stained with trypan blue 24 hr later. Trypan blue stains leaf veins and dead cells, revealing the region undergoing HR.

    (A) Line a11 (RPM1, LRA1). Note the extent of cell death.

    (B) Line a11r (rpm1-1, LRA1) contains the transgene from a11 crossed into the isogenic rpm1-1 allele. Note the lack of cell death.

    (C) and (D) lra1-1 (RPM1, lra1-1) (C) and lra1-2 (RPM1, lra1-2) (D). The arrows point to areas of faint staining. Note that the lra1-1 mutant is Atrar1-21 and the lra1-2 mutant is Atrar1-22.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    LRA1/PBS2 Is AtRAR1.

    (A) Structure of the AtRAR1 gene. The predicted protein is portrayed in single-letter amino acid abbreviations. The mutations found in Atrar1-21 to Atrar1-28 are underlined. Nucleotides not present in the mRNA are shown in italic type.

    (B) Relationship of Atrar1 mutations to the RAR1 protein domain structure. “C to Y” indicates a missense mutation resulting in a Cys-to-Tyr substitution. “STOP” indicates mutations that produce a stop codon. The allele number follows each mutation.

    (C) AtRAR1 protein expression in the allelic series. Total proteins were extracted from each of the mutants and analyzed by protein gel blot analysis using anti-RAR1 serum. Equal loading was ensured by Ponceau staining. The top arrow indicates a molecular mass marker of 33 kD, and the bottom arrow indicates a molecular mass marker of 25 kD. Note that there is no detectable protein in the Atrar1-20 mutant or in the mutants produced by stop codons (Atrar1-21, -22, -24, -25, and -28), and there is less detectable protein where a mutation from Cys to Tyr has occurred (Atrar1-23, -26, and -27).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    AtRAR1 and NDR1 Act Differently to Control R Function.

    Wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis lines were inoculated with Pst DC3000 strains containing the indicated avr genes. On day 0 (white columns) and day 3 (black columns), bacteria were extracted from the plants and enumerated. Bacterial numbers are expressed as the logarithm of colony-forming units per milligram of fresh weight (cfu/mg FW). The average and se of four independent replicates are shown. These experiments were performed three times with similar results. ndr1-1 was described previously (Century et al., 1995).

    (A) The susceptible control is a11r, an isogenic a11 derivative but in a rpm1-1 background (Grant et al., 1995).

    (B) The susceptible control is the isogenic rps2-101C allele (Mindrinos et al., 1994).

    (C) The susceptible control is the isogenic rps5-2 allele (Warren et al., 1998).

    (D) The susceptible control is accession RLD (Hinsch and Staskawicz, 1996).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Staining of HR and Reactive Oxygen Intermediates in Atrar1 and Related Mutants upon Pst DC3000(avrRpm1) Inoculation.

    Plants were inoculated as described in Table 1 on the right side of the leaf and stained with trypan blue 20 hr after inoculation ([A], [C], [E], [G], and [I]) or with DAB 1.5 hr after inoculation ([B], [D], [F], [H], and [J]). Trypan blue stains veins and dead cells dark blue, and DAB stains total peroxides as a brown precipitate, as indicated by the arrow in panel (B).

    (A) and (B) a11.

    (C) and (D) a11r.

    (E) and (F) ndr1-1.

    (G) and (H) Atrar1-21.

    (I) and (J) Atrar1-21 ndr1-1.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Staining of HR Sites and Production of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates Is Altered during RPP7-Mediated Responses.

    Plants were inoculated with Pp strain Hiks1 by spraying with an aqueous suspension containing 5 × 104 oospores/mL and then stained with trypan blue 5 days after inoculation ([A] to [E]) or with DAB 2 days after inoculation ([F] and [G]). The arrows in panels (F) and (G) point to sites of hyphae penetration.

    (A) and (F) a11.

    (B) rpp7.

    (C) ndr1-1.

    (D) and (G) Atrar1-21.

    (E) Atrar1-21 ndr1-1.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Atrar1 and ndr1-1 Affect RPP7 Function Additively.

    Plants were inoculated with Pp strain Hiks1 as described in Figure 5. Seven days after inoculation, the plants were stained with trypan blue, and the interactions sites were classified as HR, trailing necrosis (TN), and free hyphae (FH). A minimum of 591 interactions per genotype from three independent experiments are represented.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    RPM1-myc in Atrar1 Mutants.

    Plants were harvested at 5 weeks of age, and total extracts were prepared as described by Boyes et al. (1998). Arrows with numbers indicate the positions of molecular mass markers (kD). The arrows at both sides of the figure indicate the position of RPM1-myc. Three independent experiments were performed, and each gave similar results.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Genetic Requirements for the R Gene Functions Tested.

    The font size reflects the relative contribution of each locus to the function of each R protein listed at top. A larger font implies that the null mutant compromises R function severely, and a smaller font implies a moderate effect. A locus placed in the same vertical orientation implies a single pathway. Note that the order of action can be inferred clearly only in the case of RPM1. Loci side by side imply that no relationship was determined, and split arrows represent parallel pathways.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    HR in rar1 Mutant Plants

    No. of Leaves Exhibiting Visible HRa
    Bacterial GenotypebCol-0rar1-20
    avrB::Ωc1 of 532 of 45
    avrRpt255 of 6124 of 55
    avrRpm159 of 5912 of 60
    avrPphB65 of 6817 of 60
    • ↵a Number of leaves showing visible tissue collapse out of the total number of leaves injected at 18 to 24 hr after injection.

    • ↵b Pst strains expressing the indicated avirulence genes were injected at an OD600 of 0.075 (∼3.75 × 107 colony-forming units/mL).

    • ↵c This strain expresses a nonfunctional avr gene and is unable to induce a visible HR in Col-0 plants.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RAR1 and NDR1 Contribute Quantitatively to Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, and Their Relative Contributions Are Dependent on the R Gene Assayed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
RAR1 and NDR1 Contribute Quantitatively to Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, and Their Relative Contributions Are Dependent on the R Gene Assayed
Pablo Tornero, Peter Merritt, Ari Sadanandom, Ken Shirasu, Roger W. Innes, Jeffery L. Dangl
The Plant Cell May 2002, 14 (5) 1005-1015; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.001032

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
RAR1 and NDR1 Contribute Quantitatively to Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, and Their Relative Contributions Are Dependent on the R Gene Assayed
Pablo Tornero, Peter Merritt, Ari Sadanandom, Ken Shirasu, Roger W. Innes, Jeffery L. Dangl
The Plant Cell May 2002, 14 (5) 1005-1015; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.001032
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 14 (5)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 14, Issue 5
May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Ectopic Expression of the Transcriptional Regulator silky3 Causes Pleiotropic Meristem and Sex Determination Defects in Maize Inflorescences
  • SAUR17 and SAUR50 Differentially Regulate PP2C-D1 during Apical Hook Development and Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis
  • AUTOPHAGY-RELATED14 and Its Associated Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Complex Promote Autophagy in Arabidopsis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire