Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

Molecular Structure of the GARP Family of Plant Myb-Related DNA Binding Motifs of the Arabidopsis Response Regulators

Kazuo Hosoda, Aya Imamura, Etsuko Katoh, Tomohisa Hatta, Mari Tachiki, Hisami Yamada, Takeshi Mizuno, Toshimasa Yamazaki
Kazuo Hosoda
aBiochemistry Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aya Imamura
bLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etsuko Katoh
aBiochemistry Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomohisa Hatta
aBiochemistry Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mari Tachiki
bLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hisami Yamada
bLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeshi Mizuno
bLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshimasa Yamazaki
aBiochemistry Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published September 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.002733

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The Type-B Response Regulator 10 (ARR10).

    (A) The structural design of ARR10, a member of the type-B ARR family, is shown schematically compared with those of three other plant proteins (LHY, CCA1, and Myb-like) and the classic mouse c-Myb oncoprotein. The B motif is similar in length and primary sequence to the Myb repeat of c-Myb and the Myb-related domains of the plant proteins. Two truncated polypeptides were used in this study: ARR10-B, corresponding to the B motif of ARR10; and ARR10-RB, containing both the phospho-accepting receiver domain and the B motif.

    (B) Amino acid sequences of the B motifs of the type-B ARRs and the corresponding motifs of other GARP proteins. These sequences are compared with those of the plant Myb-related domains and mouse Myb repeats of the proteins listed in (A), and the conserved amino acids are highlighted.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Isolation of ARR10-Derived Polypeptides.

    The polypeptides used in this study were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, molecular mass marker; lane 2, ARR10-B; lane 3, ARR10-RB. The sequence of ARR10-B's 64 amino acids is shown at bottom.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Nuclear Localization of the GFP Fusion Derivative of ARR10-B.

    The recombinant genes encoding GFP alone, GFP-LIM13, and GFP-ARR10-B were constructed to be under the control of the plant 35S promoter. These DNA constructs were bombarded individually into onion skin epidermal cells. The expression and localization of each product was observed after 24 h of incubation by fluorescence microscopy. Arrows indicate fluorescent nuclei.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    PCR-Assisted Binding Site Selection.

    The scheme illustrates the experimental approach for selecting DNA sequences with high affinity for ARR10-RB. A mixture of 54-base oligonucleotides, in which the central 16 bases were of random sequence, was generated by incorporating each of the four nucleotides at equimolar concentration. Each round of selection consisted of incubation of the 54-bp DNA with ARR10-RB Ni bead complexes, with subsequent purification and amplification of bound DNA for use in the next round of selection. The nucleotide sequences of DNA molecules cloned after the seventh round of selection were aligned to infer the consensus sequence. Note that the flanking invariant nucleotides (lowercase letters) are not included in the selected and aligned sequences (uppercase letters in magenta). Four more selected clones also have been sequenced. They were found to contain tandem AGAT or GATTCG, which also are well explained by the proposed consensus sequences. However, they were not included in the alignment for clarity in the figure.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    DNA Binding Properties of ARR10-B.

    (A) Purified ARR10-B was subjected to DNA binding gel-shift assay using synthetic 32P-labeled DNA 34-mers containing the core AGAT sequence or its variant GGAT.

    (B) Surface plasmon resonance sensorgrams for the binding of ARR10-B to four different immobilized DNA 12-mers at a protein concentration of 10 μM: DNA 1 (d-CACTGATTCAGG/d-CCTGAATCAGTG; red), DNA 2 (d-GCAAGATTCGGC/d-GCCGAATCTTGC; black), DNA 3 (d-GCAAGATCAGGC/d-GCCTGATCTTGC; green), and DNA 4 (d-GCAAGATCTTGC/d-GCAAGATCTTGC; blue). The amounts of immobilized DNAs 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 658, 512, 1136, and 476 resonance units (RU), respectively. The control signals, which were generated by flowing ARR10-B through a blank channel without DNA, have been subtracted.

    (C) Scatchard plots (Req/C versus Req) of signal intensities at the steady states. Kd values were determined to be 5.4, 0.6, 2.7, and 1.0 μM for DNA 1 (red), DNA 2 (black), DNA 3 (green), and DNA 4 (blue), respectively, by fitting the experimental data with the function Req/C = Rmax/Kd − Req/Kd, where Rmax is the maximum response.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Secondary Structure and Thermal Stability of ARR10-B.

    (A) CD spectra of 7.4 μM (green) and 27 μM (magenta) free ARR10-B in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and of 40 μM ARR10-B bound with DNA 2 (blue) in the same buffer containing 160 mM NaCl. The spectrum of the DNA-bound form of ARR10-B was obtained by subtracting the spectrum of DNA 2 from that of the mixture of ARR10-B and DNA 2.

    (B) Thermal denaturation curves of the free and DNA-bound forms of ARR10-B. The curve of the free form (magenta circles) was measured for the solution containing 27 μM polypeptide. The curve of the DNA-bound form (blue circles) was obtained by subtracting the curve of DNA 2 from that of the mixture of ARR10-B and DNA 2 at a protein concentration of 40 μM. The solid lines are the best fits to the experimental data based on a two-state model.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Three-Dimensional Solution Structure of ARR10-B.

    (A) The best-fit superposition of the backbone (N, Cα, and C′) atoms of the final 15 structures of ARR10-B. The structures were superimposed against the energy-minimized average structure using the backbone coordinates of residues 188 to 239.

    (B) Two different views of a ribbon diagram of the energy-minimized average structure of ARR10-B. Side-chain heavy atoms of Trp-188, Leu-192, Phe-196, Val-205, Pro-210, Ile-213, Met-217, Val-219, Leu-222, His-230, and Leu-231 are shown as ball-and-stick models. Hydrophobic interactions between these residues stabilize the three-helix protein structure. The left view is in the same orientation as (A), whereas the right view was obtained by ∼90° clockwise rotation about the vertical axis.

    (C) Structure-based alignment of the amino acid sequences of ARR10-B, the engrailed homeodomain (ENG), and the second and third repeats of c-Myb. The residues in the α-helices of each structure are underlined. Identical residues between ARR10-B and ENG are highlighted in magenta. Asterisks indicate the residues of c-Myb and ENG that interact with their target DNAs. Residues of ARR10-B with + display large chemical shift changes upon binding to DNA 2, and those with # directly contact DNA 2 (see text).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    NMR Chemical Shift Perturbation of ARR10-B upon Binding to DNA.

    (A) Overlay of a selected region of the 1H-15N HSQC spectra obtained at 15°C of ARR10-B in the absence and presence of DNA 1, providing evidence that the binding of ARR10-B to DNA 1 is in fast exchange on the NMR time scale. The arrows show the direction of shifts. ARR10-B/DNA 1 = 1:0 (blue), 1:0.5 (aqua), 1:1 (green), 1:1.5 (orange), and 1:2.5 (magenta).

    (B) Selected region of the single 1H-15N HSQC spectrum obtained at 15°C of ARR10-B in the presence of 0.3 equivalents of DNA 2, which shows two sets of ARR10-B amide signals from the free and DNA-bound forms in slow exchange.

    (C) Changes in the NMR chemical shifts of ARR10-B induced by complex formation with DNA 2 and calculated with the function Δδ = |ΔδHN (blue)| + |0.17Δδ15N (red)|. The positions of the α-helices are indicated schematically as cylinders at the top of the figure.

    (D) Two views of the ARR10-B surface colored magenta to indicate residues whose backbone amide chemical shifts were most sensitive (chemical shift perturbations Δδ > 0.5 ppm) to binding with DNA 2. Note that the side chain of Glu-54, shown in red, was perturbed. The left view is in the same orientation as Figure 7A, whereas the right view was obtained by ∼180° clockwise rotation about the vertical axis.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Scheme of the ARR10-B–DNA Interactions.

    The contacts were derived from intermolecular NOEs between ARR10 and DNA 2. The DNA is represented as a cylindrical projection with phosphates indicated by circles and sugar rings indicated by green boxes. The critical AGATT base pairs are shown in red.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Structural Statistics for ARR10-B

    Parameter{SA}<SA>r
    X-PLOR energies (kcal·mol−1)a
    Etotal 77.6 ± 3.275.8
    Ebond 3.39 ± 0.273.46
    Eangle 58.1 ± 1.358.3
    Eimproper 6.49 ±0.345.97
    Evdw 3.46 ± 0.994.04
    Enoe 5.76 ± 0.843.70
    Ecdih 0.46 ± 0.150.34
    Root-mean-square deviation from
   idealized geometry
    Bond (Å)0.0018 ± 0.000070.0018
    Angle (°) 0.44 ± 0.0050.44
    Improper (°) 0.28 ± 0.010.27
    Root-mean-square deviation from
   experimental restraintsb
    Distance (Å) 0.011 ± 0.00080.0091
    Dihedral angle (°) 0.22 ± 0.040.19
    Ramachandran plot analysis (%)c
    Residues in most favored    regions92.8 (83.7)
    Residues in additional
     allowed regions6.4 (13.0)
    Residues in generously allowed
     regions0.8 (3.0)
    Residues in disallowed regions0.0 (0.3)
    Root-mean-square deviation from
   mean structure (Å)d
    Backbone (N, Cα, C′) atoms 0.72 ± 0.158
    All nonhydrogen atoms 1.21 ± 0.164
    • The notation of the NMR structures is as follows: {SA} is the ensemble of the final 15 simulated annealing structures; <SA>r is the restrained regularized mean structure obtained by averaging the backbone coordinates of the individual SA structures best fitted to each other (residues 188 to 239), followed by restrained regularization of the mean structure.

    • a These values were estimated using X-PLOR 3.1. The final values of the force constants used for the calculations are as follows: 1000 kcal·mol−1·Å−2 for bond lengths, 500 kcal·mol−1·rad−2 for bond angles and improper torsions, 4 kcal·mol−1·Å−4 for the quartic van der Waals term with van der Waals radii set to 0.75 times the values used in the CHARMM empirical energy function, 50 kcal·mol−1·Å−2 for NOE-derived and hydrogen bonding distance restraints with the ceiling value of 1000 kcal·mol-1, and 200 kcal·mol-1·rad-2 for dihedral angle restraints.

    • b None of the structures exhibited interproton distance violations > 0.5 Å or dihedral angle violations > 5°. The distance restraints comprise 402 intraresidue, 246 sequential (|i−j|= 1), 169 medium-range (1 < |i−j| < 5) and 76 long-range (|i−j| ≧ 5) NOEs. The dihedral angle restraints involve 49 ϕ, 51 ψ, 37 χ1, and 10 χ2.

    • c The values were calculated for residues 188 to 239 using PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1996). The corresponding values calculated for all residues (179 to 242), are shown in parentheses.

    • d The atomic root-mean-square deviation values were calculated for residues 188 to 239.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Structure of the GARP Family of Plant Myb-Related DNA Binding Motifs of the Arabidopsis Response Regulators
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Molecular Structure of the GARP Family of Plant Myb-Related DNA Binding Motifs of the Arabidopsis Response Regulators
Kazuo Hosoda, Aya Imamura, Etsuko Katoh, Tomohisa Hatta, Mari Tachiki, Hisami Yamada, Takeshi Mizuno, Toshimasa Yamazaki
The Plant Cell Sep 2002, 14 (9) 2015-2029; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.002733

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Molecular Structure of the GARP Family of Plant Myb-Related DNA Binding Motifs of the Arabidopsis Response Regulators
Kazuo Hosoda, Aya Imamura, Etsuko Katoh, Tomohisa Hatta, Mari Tachiki, Hisami Yamada, Takeshi Mizuno, Toshimasa Yamazaki
The Plant Cell Sep 2002, 14 (9) 2015-2029; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.002733
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 14 (9)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 14, Issue 9
Sep 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • M-Type Thioredoxins Regulate the PGR5/PGRL1-Dependent Pathway by Forming a Disulfide-Linked Complex with PGRL1
  • Allelic Variation of MYB10 Is the Major Force Controlling Natural Variation in Skin and Flesh Color in Strawberry (Fragaria spp.) Fruit
  • Regulation of Aluminum Resistance in Arabidopsis Involves the SUMOylation of the Zinc Finger Transcription Factor STOP1
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire