Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticlePLANT HORMONES AND DEVELOPMENTAL SIGNALING
You have accessRestricted Access

Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings

Ruth R. Finkelstein, Srinivas S. L. Gampala, Christopher D. Rock
Ruth R. Finkelstein
aDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srinivas S. L. Gampala
bDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher D. Rock
bDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published May 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010441

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Domain Structure of B3 and bZIP Domain Transcription Factors Affecting ABA Response.

    Percentages shown beneath the conserved domains in B3 domain family proteins indicate the range of similarity to maize VP1 among orthologs from Arabidopsis, rice, oat, carrot, bean, resurrection plant, and poplar and with the related FUS3 protein. Comparisons among the bZIP domain family represent percentage of similarity to ABI5 within the conserved domains among homologous genes in Arabidopsis, sunflower, and rice. The EmBP-1 protein used for comparison was from wheat.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Scheme of Signaling Pathways in Seed Development.

    Arrows represent promotion of processes or expression of the regulators. Bars represent inhibitors of the indicated processes. The positions of loci do not imply the order of gene action.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Regulation of ABA-Responsive Promoter Activity in a Rice Embryonic Protoplast Transient Expression System.

    (A) Fold effect of transiently expressed bZIP transcription factors on the ABA activation of the wheat Em promoter. Rice protoplasts were transformed with Em-GUS and/or the effector construct 35S-EmBP1, Ubi-ABI5, Ubi-ABF1, Ubi-ABF3, or 35S-VP1 and treated with or without 100 μM ABA for 16 hr. Fold activation of Em-GUS was calculated relative to control (no ABA, no effector) and normalized to the non-ABA-inducible Ubi-LUC reporter, which was cotransformed as an internal control. Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different from the control (P < 0.002; two-sided Student's t test, equal variance assumed). Daggers indicate that treatments with effectors resulted in a significant difference in Em-GUS activity from ABA treatment alone (P < 0.007; two-sided Student's t test, equal variance assumed). “Dummy” DNA was transformed along with Em-GUS to balance the total amount of input plasmid DNA between various treatments. Comparisons were done between paired samples from parallel experiments and plotted to obtain the meta-analysis. Error bars represent ±sem, with three or four replicates per sample.

    (B) ABI5 interacts synergistically with ABA and VP1 to transactivate the wheat Em promoter. Protoplasts were transformed with either Em-GUS alone or in combination with Ubi-ABI5 and/or 35S-VP1 constructs. Numbers in parentheses indicate average fold activation compared with ABA induction alone. Asterisks indicate values that are significantly different from the control (P < 0.003; two-sided paired Student's t test). The dagger indicates that ABI5/VP1 synergy is significantly different from activation by any of the effectors alone (P < 1 × 10−7; two-sided paired Student's t test). Error bars represent ±sem, with three replicates per sample. (Figure modified from Gampala et al. [2002]; reprinted with permission.)

    (C) 1-Butanol (1-But) antagonizes to the same extent the ABA induction of Em-GUS and ABI5 and VP1 synergy with ABA. Experimental treatments and fold induction calculations were as described in (A). Numbers in parentheses indicate the relative percentage inhibition of Em-GUS expression compared with control samples (no 1-butanol added). Asterisks indicate that ABI5 and VP1 synergy with ABA is significantly different from ABA activation alone (P < 0.01; two-sided Student's t test, equal variance assumed). Daggers indicate significant difference from the no butanol treatment (P < 0.008; two-sided Student's t test, equal variance assumed). Values are averages (±sem) of three replicate transformations.

    In (A) to (C), the y axis indicates fold induction in Em-GUS activity per unit of Ubi-LUC.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Scheme of Signaling Pathways That Interact with the ABA Regulation of Germination.

    Arrows represent promotion of processes or expression of the regulators. Bars represent inhibitors of the indicated processes. The positions of loci do not imply the order of gene action.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Sensitivity of Seedlings of Wild-Type, abi, and ABI Overexpression Lines to Glc.

    (A) Growth and anthocyanin accumulation in seedlings exposed to Glc. Seed of the indicated genotypes were incubated on minimal mineral salt media supplemented with 0, 4, or 6% Glc for 7 days before scoring individuals with either expanded true leaves or pink cotyledons caused by anthocyanin accumulation. The low percentages of either characteristic observed for the ABI overexpression lines on all media, and even for the wild-type lines on high Glc, reflect the inhibition of both germination and seedling growth.

    (B) Seedlings of the indicated genotypes after 7 days of growth on 4% Glc. The 35S::ABI3 line is isolate C7A19, described by Parcy et al. (1994); the 35S::ABI4 line is isolate 114, described by Söderman et al. (2000); the 35S::ABI5 transgene contains an ABI5 cDNA, extending 23 bp 5′ to the initiating codon, fused downstream of the 35S promoter of Cauliflower mosaic virus in pGA643 (T. Lynch and R.R. Finkelstein, unpublished data).

    Col, Columbia; Ws, Wassilewskija.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mutants Defective in ABA Synthesis or Response

    SpeciesMutationSelection/ScreenPhenotypeAlleles or
 OrthologsGene productReferences
    Arabidopsisaba1Suppressors of non-germinating GA-deficient linesABA deficient; wilty; decreased stress or ABA induction of gene expression; sugar-resistant seedling growthlos6
 npq2Zeaxanthin epoxidaseKoornneef et al., 1982; Ishitani et al., 1997; Niyogi et al. 1998; Xiong et al., 2001b
    aba2Reduced dormancyABA deficient; wilty; decreased stress or ABA induction of gene expression; sugar-resistant seedling growthgin1
 isi4
 sis4Leon-Kloosterziel et al., 1996; Laby et al., 2000; Rook et al., 2001
    aba3Reduced dormancyABA deficient; wilty; decreased stress or ABA induction of gene expression; freezing sensitive; sugar-resistant seedling growthfrs1
 los5Aldehyde oxidase MocoLeon-Kloosterziel et al., 1996; Ishitani et al., 1997; Llorente et al., 2000; Rook et al., 2001; Xiong et al., 2001c
    aao3Wilty phenotypeABA-deficient leaves; wilty, but near-normal seed dormancyTomato
 sitiens?Aldehyde oxidaseSeo et al., 2000
    abi1-1ABA-resistant germinationNondormant seed; pleiotropic defects in vegetative ABA responseProtein phosphatase 2CKoornneef et al., 1984; Leung et al., 1994; Meyer et al., 1994
    abi2-1ABA-resistant germinationSimilar to abi1-1Protein phosphatase 2CKoornneef et al., 1984; Leung et al., 1997; Rodriguez et al., 1998
    abi3ABA-resistant germinationPleiotropic defects in seed maturation; vegetative effects on plastid differentiationCereal
 VP1 B3 domain transcription factorKoornneef et al., 1984; Giraudat et al., 1992
    abi4ABA-resistant germinationSugar- and salt-resistant germination and seedling growthgin6
 isi3
 san5
 sis5
 sun6APETALA2 domain transcription factorFinkelstein, 1994; Finkelstein et al., 1998; Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000; Huijser et al., 2000; Laby et al., 2000; Rook et al., 2001
    abi5ABA-resistant germinationSlightly sugar-resistant germination and seedling growthAtDPBF1bZIP domain transcription
 factorFinkelstein, 1994; Finkelstein and Lynch, 2000a; Lopez-Molina and Chua, 2000
    abi8ABA-resistant germinationStunted growth, defective stomatal regulation; male sterileFinkelstein and Lynch, 1997
    abh1ABA-hypersensitive germination and guard cell responsePleiotropic; also enhanced drought tolerancemRNA CAP binding proteinHugouvieux et al., 2001
    era1Enhanced response to ABA at germinationEnhanced stomatal response/drought tolerance, meristem defectwiggumFarnesyl transferase,
 β-subunitCutler et al., 1996
    era3Enhanced response to ABA at germinationAllelic to ein2; ethylene insensitiveein2Membrane-bound metal sensor?Alonso et al., 1999; Ghassemian et al., 2000
    ctr1Enhance ABA resistance of abi1-1Reduced dormancy, constitutive triple response to ethyleneProtein kinase
 (Raf family)Kieber et al., 1993; Beaudoin et al., 2000
    gca1
 gca2ABA-resistant
 root growthPleiotropic effects on growth, stomatal regulation, and germinationHimmelbach et al., 1998; Pei et al., 2000
    gca3-gca8ABA-resistant
 root growthHimmelbach et al., 1998
    ade1Deregulation of KIN2:: LUC expressionNo growth phenotypeFoster and Chua, 1999
    hlq
 sbrAberrant patterns
 of Dc3::GUS
 expressionPleiotropic, seedling lethalRock, 2000; Subramanian et al., 2002
    hos1Hypersensitive to osmotic stress induction of RD29::LUCHypersensitive to ABA-induced gene expressionRING finger
 protein(Ishitani et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2001
    hos2
 hos5Hypersensitive to osmotic stress induction of RD29::LUCHypersensitive to ABA-induced gene expressionIshitani et al., 1997; Xiong et al., 1999
    sad1Supersensitive to ABA and drought induction of RD29::LUCReduced ABA biosynthesis, hypersensitive to ABA inhibition of germination and root growthU6-related
 Sm-like small ribonucleopro-
 teinXiong et al., 2001a
    cla1Chloroplasts alteredABA deficient1-Deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthaseEstévez et al., 2001
    hyl1Hyponastic leavesHypersensitive to ABADouble-stranded RNA binding proteinLu and Fedoroff, 2000
    axr2Auxin-resistant root growthResistant to ABA and ethylene; dominant negativeIAA7 transcription regulationWilson et al., 1990; Nagpal et al., 2000
    bri1Brassinosteroid insensitiveABA hypersensitiveSer/Thr protein kinaseLi and Chory, 1997; Steber and McCourt, 2001
    det2De-etiolatedABA hypersensitiveSteroid reductaseSteber and McCourt, 2001
    fry1Constitutive expression of RD29::LUCABA hypersensitiveInositol polyphos-phate-1-phos-phataseXiong et al., 2001b
    jar1
 jin4Jasmonic acid resistantHypersensitive to ABA-inhibition of germinationStaswick et al., 1992; Berger et al., 1996
    lec1Leafy cotyledons, seed lethalSlightly ABA-resistant germinationCCAAT-box binding, HAP3 homologMeinke et al., 1994; Parcy et al., 1997; Lotan et al., 1998
    los1Low sensitivity to osmotic stress induction of RD29::LUCLow sensitivity to ABA induction of gene expression
    prl1Hypersensitivity to Glc and SucHypersensitive to ABA (also to cytokinin, ethylene, and auxin)Nuclear WD40 domain proteinNémeth et al., 1998; Bhalerao et al., 1999
    sax1Hypersensitive to auxinABA hypersensitive, BR deficientEphritikhine et al., 1999
    uvs66UV light sensitivityHypersensitive to ABA inhibition of root growthAlbinsky et al., 1999
    Resurrection
 plantcdt-1ABA-independent desiccation toleranceConstitutive ABA response in callus culturesRegulatory RNA or small peptideFurini et al., 1997
    BarleycoolDecreased leaf temperatureABA insensitivity in guard cellsRaskin and Ladyman, 1988
    Maizevp1ViviparousABA-insensitive seedsABI3B3-domain transcription factorRobertson, 1955; McCarty et al., 1991
    vp2-
 vp14ViviparousABA deficientRobertson, 1955; Neill et al., 1986; Schwartz et al., 1997
    reaDefective
 germinationRed embryonic axis caused by anthocyanins; ABA-resistant germination; occasional viviparySturaro et al., 1996
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Transcriptional Regulators Implicated in ABA Signaling

    Binding Site/Factor ClassGenusFactorReferences
    ABA response elements (ABREs)/bZIPsArabidopsisABI5/AtDPBF1
 AtDPBF2
 AtDPBF3/AREB3
 AtDPBF4
 AtDPBF5/ABF3
 ABF1
 ABF2/AREB1
 ABF4/AREB2Choi et al., 2000; Finkelstein and Lynch, 2000a; Lopez-Molina and Chua, 2000; Uno et al., 2000
    GBF3Lu et al., 1996
    HelianthusDPBF1, -2 and -3Kim et al., 1997; Kim and Thomas, 1998
    OryzaTRAB1Hobo et al., 1999
    PhaseolusPvZIP6AF369792a
    ROM2 (repressor)Chern et al., 1996
    TriticumEmBP-1Guiltinan et al., 1990
    RY/Sph elements/B3 domain proteinsArabidopsisABI3Giraudat et al., 1992
    AvenaAfVP1Jones et al., 1997
    CraterostigmaCpVP1Chandler and Bartels, 1997
    DaucusC-ABI3Shiota et al., 1998
    PhaseolusPvALFBobb et al., 1995
    PopulusPtABI3Rohde et al., 1998
    OryzaOsVP1Hattori et al., 1994
    TriticumTaVP1Bailey et al., 1999
    Zea maysVP1McCarty et al., 1991
    MYBArabidopsisAtMYB2Abe et al., 1997
    MYCArabidopsisAtMYCAbe et al., 1997
    Unknown/HD-ZipArabidopsisATHB6
 ATHB7
 ATHB12Söderman et al., 1996; Lee and Chun, 1998; Söderman et al., 1999
    Unknown/AP2ArabidopsisABI4Finkelstein et al., 1998; Söderman et al., 2000
    • ↵a Member of the ABI5 homologous subfamily, but no direct evidence for a role in ABA signaling; isolated from ethylene-treated leaf abscission zones of bean.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Genes Implicated in ABA Signaling by Reverse Genetics or Expression Pattern

    Locus/GeneEngineered EffectPhenotypeResponse to ABAGene ProductReferences
    AAPK
 (from
 Vicia faba)Dominant
   negativeNo ABA-induced stomatal closure; no ABA activation of plasma membrane anion channelsActivatedSer/Thr
   protein kinaseLi and Assmann, 1996;
 Li et al., 2000
    AMBP
 kinase (from
 Pisum sativum)Activation; correlated
   with stomatal closure
   & dehydrin expressionABA-activated
   myelin basic
   protein kinaseBurnett et al., 2000
    ARSK1Induced by ABA or NaClRoot specific
   ser/thr kinaseHwang and Goodman,
 1995
    ATCDPK1
 ATCDPK1aConstitutively active
   mutants expressed
   transiently in maize
   leaf protoplastsConstitutive activation of an ABA responsive reporter gene (HVA1-LUC)Calcium-dependent
   protein kinasesSheen, 1996
    AtIP5PIIOverexpressionABA-insensitive  germination, growth  and gene expressionInositol
   polyphosphate
   5-phosphatase IISanchez and Chua, 2001
    AtPLC1Antisense suppressionABA-insensitive germination, growth and gene expressionPhosphoinositide
   specific
   phospholipase CSanchez and Chua, 2001
    AtPP2CWild-type and mutant proteins expressed transiently in maize leaf protoplasts; antisense suppressionOver-expression blocked ABA-inducible transcription; null mutation had little effect; dominant interfering mutant strongly repressed ABA responses. Antisense conferred increased sensitivity to ABA-induced cold-tolerance and growth inhibitionProtein
   phosphatase 2CSheen, 1998; Tahtiharju and Palva, 2001
    AtRac1/Rop6Dominant-positive and dominant-negativeDominant positive blocked ABA-mediated effects on actin cytoskeleton and stomatal closure; dominant negative induced closure in absence of ABASmall GTPaseLemichez et al., 2001
    Repressed; correlated with cell division activityCyclin-dependent
   kinaseHemerly et al., 1993
    GPA1T-DNA insertionIncreased leaf transpiration; no ABA inhibition of guard cell K+in channels and pH-independent ABA-activation of anion channelsG protein α-subunitWang et al., 2001
    Induced by ABA and NaCl; may function in stress responseGSK3/shaggy-like
   protein kinasePiao et al., 1999
    ABA effect unknown; induced by osmotic stressHis kinase
   osmosensorUrao et al., 1999
    ICK1Induced; may suppress cell divisionInhibitor of cyclin-
 dependent kinaseWang et al., 1998
    MAPKKKABA effect unknown; induced by abiotic stressesMitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinaseMizoguchi et al., 1996
    PIP5KInduced by ABA and abiotic stressesPhosphatidylinosi-tol-4-phosphate 5-kinaseMikami et al., 1998
    PKABA1Constitutive expressionSuppression of GA-inducible gene expression in aleurone; small effect on the ABA induction of a LEA geneInducedSer/Thr-protein kinase (from barley)Gómez-Cadenas et al., 1999
    PLDαAntisenseDecreased ABA and ethylene promotion of senescencePhospholipase DαFan et al., 1997
    ROP2Dominant negative constitutiveAltered sensitivity to germination inhibition by ABARho-type small GTPaseLi et al., 200
    RPK1Induced by ABA and abiotic stresses; abiotic stress-induction not ABA-dependentReceptor-like protein kinaseHong et al., 1997
    Unknown; induced by abiotic stressesRibosomal S6 kinase-likeMizoguchi et al., 1996
    WAPK (from tobacco)InducedWounding-induced protein kinaseLee et al., 1998
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Comparison of Vivipary and ABA Sensitivity in abi, fus3, and lec1 Monogenic and Digenic Mutants

    Percent Germination on ABAb
    GenotypePercent Viviparya3 μM100 μM
    Wild type (Wasilewskija)000
    abi4070
 (56–88)0
    abi5039
 (18–60)0
    lec13.5
 (0–7)32
 (0–55)0
    abi4, lec10.6
 (0–1.4)10097
 (94–100)
    abi5, lec112
 (2–32)49
 (39–58)4
 (3–4)
    fus305
 (0–16)0
    abi4, fus319
 (9–34)10096
 (88–100)
    abi5, fus318
 (5–28)10074
 (53–94)
    • ↵a The presence of germinated seeds in mature dry siliques was scored in at least four batches of 60 to 400 seed; high variability partly reflects the dependence on RH.

    • ↵b Germination of seeds excised from siliques in late embryogenesis, just before desiccation, was scored after 3 days of incubation at 4°C followed by 7 days at 22°C in continuous light on minimal mineral salt medium supplemented with the indicated concentrations of ABA; variability partly reflects differences in viabilities among excised seed lots.

    • Percentages shown are means of multiple assay values; ranges are presented in parentheses.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings
Ruth R. Finkelstein, Srinivas S. L. Gampala, Christopher D. Rock
The Plant Cell May 2002, 14 (suppl 1) S15-S45; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010441

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Abscisic Acid Signaling in Seeds and Seedlings
Ruth R. Finkelstein, Srinivas S. L. Gampala, Christopher D. Rock
The Plant Cell May 2002, 14 (suppl 1) S15-S45; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010441
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ABA PERCEPTION
    • IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNALING INTERMEDIATES
    • ABA SIGNALING IN SEEDS AND SEEDLINGS
    • ABA SIGNALING IN VEGETATIVE STRESS RESPONSES
    • CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 14 (suppl 1)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 14, Issue suppl 1
May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Ubiquitination and Auxin Signaling
  • Brassinosteroids and Plant Steroid Hormone Signaling
  • Control of Flowering Time
Show more PLANT HORMONES AND DEVELOPMENTAL SIGNALING

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire