Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

Blue Light–Dependent in Vivo and in Vitro Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 1

Dror Shalitin, Xuhong Yu, Maskit Maymon, Todd Mockler, Chentao Lin
Dror Shalitin
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuhong Yu
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maskit Maymon
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Mockler
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chentao Lin
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published October 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.013011

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Blue Light–Dependent Phosphorylation of cry1.

    (A) Five-day-old etiolated seedlings were cut above the roots and incubated with 300 μCi of 32P-H3PO4 in water for 3 h in the dark. The tissue aliquots were exposed to blue light (30 μmol·m−2·s−1) for the time indicated or kept in darkness. The cry1 protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-CRY1 antibodies, separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted to a membrane, and analyzed by autoradiography (Autoradiograph) and then by probing an immunoblot with anti-cry1 antibodies (Immuno).

    (B) Immunoblots of samples prepared from wild-type seedlings exposed to blue light for 15 min (15′) or 30 min (30′) at the fluence rate indicated were probed with the anti-CRY1 antibody. The signals of the slow-migrating bands (indicated by the arrow-bracket) are normalized to the fast-migrating band in the same lane (arrowhead), represented as [cry1(Pi)/cry1 (%)], and plotted against the fluence rates (graph at bottom).

    (C) Immunoblot showing dephosphorylation of cry1 in the dark. Etiolated seedlings were exposed to blue light (B; 30 μmol·m−2·s−1) for 1 h and then transferred to dark. Samples were prepared before or after seedlings were transferred to darkness for 15 or 30 min (D15 and D30).

    Arrows with brackets indicate phosphorylated cry1; arrowheads represent nonphosphorylated cry1. wt, wild type.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Blue Light Specificity and the Effect of Phytochrome Mutations on cry1 Phosphorylation.

    (A) Immunoblot showing cry1 phosphorylation in seedlings exposed to blue light (B; 30 μmol·m−2·s−1), far-red light (FR; 50 μmol·m−2·s−1), or red light (R; 50 μmol·m−2·s−1) for the time indicated or kept in the dark (D).

    (B) Immunoblot showing cry1 phosphorylation in samples prepared from the wild type or from phyA, phyB, phyA phyB, phyBDE, and phyABD mutants. Seedlings were grown in the dark and then exposed to blue light (20 μmol·m−2·s−1) for the time indicated. wt, wild type.

    (C) Immunoblot showing cry1 phosphorylation in samples prepared from wild-type or phyA seedlings grown in the dark and then exposed to blue light (30 μmol·m−2·s−1) for 1 h. Protein extracts from light-treated seedlings were incubated with alkaline phosphatase (Alk. PPase) at 30°C for 30 min (+) or analyzed without phosphatase treatment (−).

    Asterisks indicated a band nonspecifically recognized by the antibody.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Long-Hypocotyl Phenotype of the Newly Isolated cry1 Mutants.

    (A) Seedlings were grown in continuous blue light (25 μmol·m−2·s−1) for 5 days, and hypocotyl lengths were measured. wt, wild type.

    (B) Representative seedlings of parental control (phyA), a cry1 reference allele (cry1-304), and nine newly isolated cry1 alleles are shown. cry1-304 and cry1-371 express no CRY1 apoprotein, whereas the other alleles express full-length CRY1 apoprotein.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Immunoblots Showing the Lack of cry1 Phosphorylation and Normal cry2 Phosphorylation in Different cry1 Mutant Alleles.

    (A) Samples were prepared from etiolated seedlings exposed to 25 μmol·m−2·s−1 blue light for the time indicated or from samples kept in the dark (0 h), and immunoblots were probed with anti-CRY1 antibodies (cry1). For a loading control, the membrane was stained with Ponceau red, and a portion of the stained blot showing unspecified proteins is included (stained).

    (B) Samples were prepared from etiolated seedlings exposed to 7 μmol·m−2·s−1 blue light for the time indicated or from samples kept in the dark (0 min). The immunoblot was probed first with anti-CRY2 antibody (cry2), stripped, and reprobed with anti-CRY1 antibody (cry1).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Lesions of the cry1 Mutants.

    Sequences of the cry1 mutants were aligned with the deduced amino acid sequence of CRY1 of the Columbia accession (WT; At4g08920). Residue numbers of CRY1 are indicated above the sequence. White and gray boxes highlight mutant residues of the different alleles.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Blue Light–Dependent Phosphorylation of cry1 in Vitro.

    (A) The cry1 protein purified from insect cells (cry1; 1 μg) and the molecular mass marker proteins (M; 1 μg per band) were fractionated on a SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue.

    (B) to (D) Autoradiographs showing cry1 phosphorylation in vitro. Arabidopsis cry1 ([B] and [C]) and the control protein ubc9 (B) were incubated with γ-32P-ATP, and the reaction products were kept in the dark or exposed to blue light (33 μmol·m−2·s−1) for the time indicated (15 to 60 min). cry1 phosphorylation reaction products incubated with γ-32P-ATP or γ-32P-GTP under blue light (33 μmol·m−2·s−1) for the time indicated (15 to 60 min) are shown in (D).

    (E) The immunoblot of the same membrane used in (C) was probed with the anti-CRY1 antibody.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Blue Light–Dependent in Vivo and in Vitro Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 1
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Blue Light–Dependent in Vivo and in Vitro Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 1
Dror Shalitin, Xuhong Yu, Maskit Maymon, Todd Mockler, Chentao Lin
The Plant Cell Oct 2003, 15 (10) 2421-2429; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.013011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Blue Light–Dependent in Vivo and in Vitro Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Cryptochrome 1
Dror Shalitin, Xuhong Yu, Maskit Maymon, Todd Mockler, Chentao Lin
The Plant Cell Oct 2003, 15 (10) 2421-2429; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.013011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 15 (10)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 15, Issue 10
Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • AUTOPHAGY-RELATED14 and Its Associated Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Complex Promote Autophagy in Arabidopsis
  • Grass-Specific EPAD1 Is Essential for Pollen Exine Patterning in Rice
  • The Cotton Wall-Associated Kinase GhWAK7A Mediates Responses to Fungal Wilt Pathogens by Complexing with the Chitin Sensory Receptors
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire