Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

Silencing of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase MPK6 Compromises Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis

Frank L.H. Menke, Johan A. van Pelt, Corné M.J. Pieterse, Daniel F. Klessig
Frank L.H. Menke
aBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York 14850
bSection of Phytopathology, Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan A. van Pelt
bSection of Phytopathology, Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corné M.J. Pieterse
bSection of Phytopathology, Faculty of Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel F. Klessig
aBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Ithaca, New York 14850
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published April 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015552

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Analysis of Arabidopsis Seedlings Harboring the MPK6ihp Construct.

    (A) RT-PCR analysis of 2-week-old seedlings from Col-0 and MPK6ihp lines for expression of MPK3, MPK4, MPK6, and β-TUB. For each line (L1 to L6) and the Col-0 parent, RNA was extracted from two individual plants as described.

    (B) Kinase activity in response to wounding. Leaves of 4-week-old Col-0 and MPK6ihp-expressing plants were wounded, and protein extracts prepared from samples harvested at the indicated times. Kinase activity was monitored with an in-gel kinase assay using MBP as the substrate. Molecular size markers are indicated at right. These experiments were independently performed twice with two control and two MPK6 silenced lines; similar results were observed.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Specificity of Arabidopsis MAPK Antibodies.

    (A) Crude extracts (5 μg/lane) of E. coli-expressed His-tagged versions of MPK3, MPK4, and MPK6 were loaded onto duplicate blots and subjected to protein gel blot analysis with antibodies raised against MPK3 (α-C-3), MPK4 (α-C-4), and MPK6 (α-N-6). To ensure the recombinant proteins were loaded evenly on the gels, the blots were stripped and reprobed with a T7 antibody (α-T7-tag).

    (B) Protein gel blot analysis of Arabidopsis MAPKs. Crude protein extracts (20 μg/lane) from Col-0 (Con) or MPK6-silenced (Sil) plants were prepared, loaded onto duplicate blots, and subjected to protein gel blot analysis with the α-C-3, α-C-4, or α-N-6 antibodies. Molecular size markers are indicated at left of the panels in (A) and (B).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    MPK6-Silenced Lines Exhibit Reduced Resistance to P. parasitica.

    (A) Seven- to ten-day-old seedlings were inoculated with P. parasitica Emwa1 (105 spores/mL). At 6 to 8 dpi, single cotyledons from 35 to 40 seedlings were analyzed under the microscope and categorized into one of six categories (0, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, 16 to 20, or >20) depending on the number of sporangiophores observed. Col-0 is mostly resistant to this isolate, whereas Ws-0 is highly susceptible. MPK3ihp L5 is the nonsilenced control. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

    (B) Inoculation of Col-0, MPK3ihp L5, and MPK6 silenced lines with P. parasitica Hiks1, which is virulent on the Keswick (Ksk) accession. Inoculation and analysis of 40 to 44 seedlings was done as described in (A).

    (C) Trypan blue staining of P. parasitica Emwa1-inoculated cotyledons at 96 hpi. Trypan blue stains dead leaf cells (including xylem cells) and oomycete hyphae.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    MPK6-Silenced Lines Display Enhanced Susceptibility to P. s. tomato.

    (A) Four-week-old plants were inoculated with P. s. tomato, and four leaf disks per sample were harvested at 0 dpi and 3 dpi. The number of colony forming units (cfu) per sample was calculated and expressed as cfu/mL. Col-0 and MPK3ihp L5 were used as controls, along with the MPK6ihp L1, L4, and L7 lines. Experiments were done twice with similar results.

    (B) Four-week-old plants were inoculated with P. s. tomato expressing avrRpm1, and four leaf disks per sample were harvested at 0 dpi and 3 dpi.

    (C) Four-week-old plants were inoculated with P. s. tomato expressing avrRpt2, and four leaf disks per sample were harvested at 0, 1, and 2 dpi.

    (D) Four-week-old plants were inoculated with P. s. tomato expressing avrRps4, and four leaf disks per sample were harvested at 0, 2, and 3 dpi.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Pathogen-Induced Gene Expression in MPK6-Silenced Plants.

    Four-week-old MPK6-silenced and control plants were dipped in virulent P. s. tomato suspension (108 cfu/mL), and samples were taken at selected time points between 0 hpi and 24 hpi. Samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and RNA extraction and Q-PCR were performed as described in Methods. Equal amounts of RT reaction products were used as templates to amplify selected regions of the indicated genes with specific primer pairs. Expression levels are represented by arbitrary units, which were set at 100 for control line at t = 0. The expression level of all other samples were related to the control sample t = 0. These experiments were done with two controls (Col-0 and MPK3ihp L5) and two MPK6-silenced lines (MPK6ihp L1 and L4), and averages of both lines are shown.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Induced/Acquired Resistance Is Intact in MPK6-Silenced Lines.

    Percentage diseased leaves at 3 dpi with virulent P. s. tomato in ISR- and SAR-expressing plants and control plants. The effectiveness of ISR and SAR expression was tested in MPK6-silenced lines (MPK6ihp4 and MPK6ihp7) and compared with nonsilenced transgenic lines (MPK3ihp4 and MPK3ihp5) and the parent Columbia (Col-0). Error bars indicated SE (n = 18).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Ethylene Responses in MPK6-Silenced Lines.

    (A) and (B) Seeds for MPK6-silenced lines and control lines were germinated in the dark on MS medium containing the indicated amount of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). Four days after germination, the hypocotyl and root lengths of the etiolated seedlings was measured.

    (C) Q-PCR analysis of ethylene-inducible gene expression in control and MPK6-silenced lines. Two-week-old plants were exposed to 5 ppm ethylene, and samples harvested and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen at indicated times. Q-PCR was performed as described in Figure 5. b-CHI, basic Chitinase; B-TUB, β-Tubulin.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Silencing of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase MPK6 Compromises Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Silencing of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase MPK6 Compromises Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis
Frank L.H. Menke, Johan A. van Pelt, Corné M.J. Pieterse, Daniel F. Klessig
The Plant Cell Apr 2004, 16 (4) 897-907; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.015552

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Silencing of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase MPK6 Compromises Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis
Frank L.H. Menke, Johan A. van Pelt, Corné M.J. Pieterse, Daniel F. Klessig
The Plant Cell Apr 2004, 16 (4) 897-907; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.015552
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 16 (4)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 16, Issue 4
Apr 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • SAUR17 and SAUR50 Differentially Regulate PP2C-D1 during Apical Hook Development and Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis
  • AUTOPHAGY-RELATED14 and Its Associated Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Complex Promote Autophagy in Arabidopsis
  • Grass-Specific EPAD1 Is Essential for Pollen Exine Patterning in Rice
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire