Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

C-23 Hydroxylation by Arabidopsis CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reveals a Novel Shortcut in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis

Toshiyuki Ohnishi, Anna-Maria Szatmari, Bunta Watanabe, Satomi Fujita, Simona Bancos, Csaba Koncz, Marcel Lafos, Kyomi Shibata, Takao Yokota, Kanzo Sakata, Miklos Szekeres, Masaharu Mizutani
Toshiyuki Ohnishi
aInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna-Maria Szatmari
bInstitute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bunta Watanabe
aInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satomi Fujita
aInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Bancos
bInstitute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Csaba Koncz
cMax Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, D-50829 Koeln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcel Lafos
cMax Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, D-50829 Koeln, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyomi Shibata
dDepartment of Biosciences, Teikyo University, Utsunomiya, 320-8551, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takao Yokota
dDepartment of Biosciences, Teikyo University, Utsunomiya, 320-8551, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kanzo Sakata
aInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miklos Szekeres
bInstitute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masaharu Mizutani
aInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published November 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.045443

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Pathways of BR Biosynthesis Deduced from in Vivo Metabolite Conversion Analyses.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Null Mutations Caused by T-DNA Insertions in the CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Genes.

    (A) Exon-intron structures of the CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 genes. Bars represent exons, and numbers indicate exon sizes in nucleotide base pairs. Arrowheads show T-DNA insertion sites in the cyp90c1 and cyp90d1 mutant alleles.

    (B) RT-PCR transcript analysis of the CYP90C1, CYP90D1, and UBQ10 transcripts in wild-type Col-0, cyp90c1, cyp90d1, and cyp90c1 cyp90d1 seedlings.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Morphology of the CYP90C1- and CYP90D1-Deficient Mutants.

    (A) to (H) Seven-day-old etiolated ([A] to [D]) and light-grown ([E] to [H]) seedlings. Wild-type Col-0 ([A] and [E]), cyp90c1 ([B] and [F]) cyp90d1 ([C] and [G]), and cyp90c1 cyp90d1 ([D] and [H]). Bar = 5 mm.

    (I) to (M) One-month-old wild-type Col-0 (I), cyp90c1 (J), cyp90d1 (K), and cyp90c1 cyp90d1 ([L] and [M]) plants. Bars = 30 mm in (I) to (L) and 5 mm in (M).

    (N) to (Q) Flowers of wild-type (N), cyp90c1 (O), cyp90d1 (P), and cyp90c1 cyp90d1 (Q) plants. Bar = 5 mm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    GC-MS Analysis of BR Metabolites Produced by Heterologously Expressed CYP90C1 and CYP90D1.

    Selected ion chromatograms of the reaction products generated by CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 from 6-deoxoCT and CT, respectively.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Rescue of Hypocotyl and Cotyledon Elongation in the cyp90c1 cyp90d1 Mutant by BRs.

    Hypocotyl elongation of etiolated seedlings (A) and cotyledon elongation of light-grown seedlings (B) treated by intermediates (100 nM) of the early and late C-6 oxidation pathways. Hypocotyl elongation of etiolated seedlings (C) and cotyledon elongation of light-grown seedlings (D) treated by intermediates (100 nM) of the early C-22 oxidation pathway. Seedlings of det2 were used as control. Ctr, control; 22-OHCR, 22-hydroxycampesterol; 3-epi-6-deoxoCT, 3-epi-6-deoxocathasterone; 22,23-diOHCR, 22,23-dihydroxycampesterol. Panels show representative experiments. Values are averages of 50 seedlings; error bars indicate se.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Proposed Pathway of BR Biosynthesis.

    The flow of intermediates is indicated by arrows. The C-23 hydroxylation shortcuts from 22-OH-4-3-one to 22,23-diOH-4-en-3-one, from 22-OH-3-one to 6-deoxo3DT, and from 3-epi-6-deoxoCT to 6-deoxoTY are highlighted by thick arrows. The conversion steps catalyzed by CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 are indicated.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    GC-MS Data of Products Obtained in CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reconstitution Assays

    EnzymeSubstrateProductRetention Time (min)Characteristic Ions m/z (Relative Intensity Percentage)
    CYP90C122-OHCR22,23-OHCR10.34529 (0.6), 438 (4.1), 243 (8.1), 129 (100)
    synthetic10.37529 (0.3), 438 (3.3), 243 (7.8), 129 (100)
    22-OH-4-en-3-one22,23-OH-4-en-3-one11.55454 (2.1), 281 (3.1), 229 (25.9), 124 (100)
    synthetic11.53454 (1.0), 281 (1.2), 229 (25.8), 124 (100)
    22-OH-3-one6-deoxo3DT10.72456 (3.4), 283 (7.7), 231(100), 155 (52.5)
    synthetic10.70456 (1.4), 283 (3.7), 231(100), 155 (52.3)
    3-epi-6-deoxoCT6-deoxoTY9.68530 (0.3), 440 (8.0), 425 (18.8), 215 (100)
    synthetic9.68530 (0.2), 440 (6.7), 425 (17.2), 215 (100)
    6-deoxoCT6-deoxoTE10.46530 (0.8), 516 (4.8), 425 (7.4), 215 (100)
    synthetic10.46530 (0.1), 516 (4.5), 425 (8.5), 215 (100)
    CYP90D122-OHCR22,23-OHCR10.35529 (0.1), 438 (4.1), 243 (7.3), 129 (100)
    synthetic10.37529 (0.3), 438 (3.3), 243 (7.8), 129 (100)
    22-OH-4-en-3-one22,23-OH-4-en-3-one11.51454 (2.1), 281 (3.3), 229 (25.9), 124 (100)
    synthetic11.53454 (1.0), 281 (1.2), 229 (25.8), 124 (100)
    22-OH-3-one6-deoxo3DT10.70456 (1.7), 283 (6.3), 231(100), 155 (54.5)
    synthetic10.70456 (1.4), 283 (3.7), 231(100), 155 (52.3)
    3-epi-6-deoxoCT6-deoxoTY9.68530 (0.1), 440 (7.3), 425 (18.6), 215 (100)
    synthetic9.68530 (0.2), 440 (6.7), 425 (17.2), 215 (100)
    6-deoxoCT6-deoxoTE10.46530 (0.8), 516 (4.6), 425 (7.1), 215 (100)
    synthetic10.46530 (0.1), 516 (4.5), 425 (8.5), 215 (100)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Kinetic Parameters of CYP90C1- and CYP90D1-Catalyzed Reactions with 22-HydroxyBRs

    Kmkcatkcat/Km
    EnzymesSubstrate(μM)(min−1)(min−1 μM−1)
    CYP90C122-OHCR19.4 ± 1.180.11 ± 0.010.0057 ± 0.0003
    22-OH-4-en-3-one4.94 ± 0.021.40 ± 0.050.29 ± 0.02
    22-OH-3-one8.61 ± 0.342.75 ± 0.040.32 ± 0.01
    3-epi-6-deoxoCT6.61 ± 0.383.01 ± 0.220.45 ± 0.018
    6-deoxoCT35.9 ± 1.350.14 ± 0.0040.0038 ± 0.0002
    CYP90D122-OHCR18.1 ± 1.010.12 ± 0.010.0068 ± 0.0008
    22-OH-4-en-3-one0.77 ± 0.031.01 ± 0.071.32 ± 0.09
    22-OH-3-one0.73 ± 0.041.27 ± 0.051.73 ± 0.14
    3-epi-6-deoxoCT1.06 ± 0.031.10 ± 0.041.04 ± 0.006
    6-deoxoCT16.9 ± 1.120.29 ± 0.010.017 ± 0.001
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Endogenous BR Levels of Col-0 and cyp90c1 cyp90d1 Plants (ng kg−1 FW)

    BRsWild Typecyp90c1 cyp90d1Wild Typecyp90c1 cyp90d1
    1st Analysis 27.1 g (FW) 54.4 g (FW)2nd Analysis 20.0 g (FW) 44.2 g (FW)
    CTNDNDNDND
    TENDND3.5Trace
    3DTNDND4710
    TYNDNDTraceND
    22-OHCR326305180215
    22-OH-4-en-3-oneNDNDNDND
    22-OH-3-one412380950448
    6-deoxoCT15021057772456
    3-epi-6-deoxoCT913625697427
    22,23-diOHCRNDNDNDND
    22,23-diOH-4-en-3-oneNDNDNDND
    6-deoxoTE1541864020
    6-deoxo3DT2666225525
    6-deoxoTY91145988ND
    6-deoxoCS394ND13183
    CS177ND141ND
    BLNDNDNDND
    • ND, not detectable; FW, fresh weight.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figure 1 - Heterologous Expression of the CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Proteins in Baculovirus/Insect Cell System.
    • Supplemental Figure 2 - Relative Activities of C-23 Hydroxylation Reactions with 22-Hydroxylated BRs.
    • Supplemental Table 1 - GC-MS Data of Products Obtained in CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reconstitution Assays.
    • Supplemental Protocol 1
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
C-23 Hydroxylation by Arabidopsis CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reveals a Novel Shortcut in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
C-23 Hydroxylation by Arabidopsis CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reveals a Novel Shortcut in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis
Toshiyuki Ohnishi, Anna-Maria Szatmari, Bunta Watanabe, Satomi Fujita, Simona Bancos, Csaba Koncz, Marcel Lafos, Kyomi Shibata, Takao Yokota, Kanzo Sakata, Miklos Szekeres, Masaharu Mizutani
The Plant Cell Nov 2006, 18 (11) 3275-3288; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.045443

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
C-23 Hydroxylation by Arabidopsis CYP90C1 and CYP90D1 Reveals a Novel Shortcut in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis
Toshiyuki Ohnishi, Anna-Maria Szatmari, Bunta Watanabe, Satomi Fujita, Simona Bancos, Csaba Koncz, Marcel Lafos, Kyomi Shibata, Takao Yokota, Kanzo Sakata, Miklos Szekeres, Masaharu Mizutani
The Plant Cell Nov 2006, 18 (11) 3275-3288; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.045443
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 18 (11)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 18, Issue 11
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Molecular Mechanism Underlying the Synergetic Effect of Jasmonate on Abscisic Acid Signaling during Seed Germination in Arabidopsis
  • Substrate Specificity of LACCASE8 Facilitates Polymerization of Caffeyl Alcohol for C-Lignin Biosynthesis in the Seed Coat of Cleome hassleriana
  • Abscisic Acid-Triggered Persulfidation of the Cys Protease ATG4 Mediates Regulation of Autophagy by Sulfide
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire