Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN THIS ISSUE
You have accessRestricted Access

Epistasis and Genetic Regulation of Variation in the Arabidopsis Metabolome

Nancy A. Eckardt
Nancy A. Eckardt
News and Reviews Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published May 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.061051

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • American Society of Plant Biologists

Many factors contribute to genetic and phenotypic variation within an interbreeding population. Phenotypic variation within a species or population is highly complex; it is often polygenic and quantitative and influenced by environmental and genetic factors. In addition to considerations of allelic variation (dominance), it is recognized that both additive and nonadditive (epistatic) interactions between genes and within gene networks may play an important role. Epistasis describes a nonadditive genetic interaction that results from the activity (or mutation) of one gene masking the phenotype or effect caused by the activity of another gene. This can be contrasted with dominance, which describes an interaction between different alleles at a single genetic locus. There is considerable debate in the literature regarding the importance of epistasis in determining genetic and phenotypic variation. It is often considered that the bulk of genetic variation in populations of both plants and animals is due to additive interactions (i.e., the complementary actions of additive alleles), and nonadditive epistatic interactions are of little consequence (Rieseberg et al., 1999; Hill et al., 2008). However, Rieseberg et al. (1999) noted that this might merely reflect the difficulty of detecting epistatic effects.

Mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) has been used for many years to identify genetic loci that control or influence phenotypic traits. In recent years, the combination of QTL analysis and genomic methods, such as genome-wide gene expression analysis, has allowed greater insights into genetic mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation (e.g., Keurentjes et al., 2007; West et al., 2007). In the issue of The Plant Cell, Rowe et al. (pages 1199–1216) combine large-scale metabolomic analysis with QTL analysis of metabolic traits to investigate QTLs that influence the Arabidopsis thaliana metabolome. The authors identified a large number of metabolite QTLs with moderate phenotypic effects and found frequent epistatic interactions controlling a majority of the metabolic variation. The results suggest that the Arabidopsis metabolome is organized into epistatically interacting networks or clusters that regulate central metabolism.

Rowe et al. conducted untargeted metabolomic analyses on an Arabidopsis Bayreuth-0 (Bay) × Shahdara (Sha) recombinant inbred line (RIL) population described by Loudet et al. (2002) and previously used for targeted metabolite QTL and global expression QTL analyses (Loudet et al., 2003; Calenge et al., 2006; Kliebenstein et al., 2006; Wentzell et al., 2007; West et al., 2007). The untargeted metabolomic approach aims to measure as many metabolites as possible, rather than determining a priori what class of compounds or specific compounds will be investigated. Rowe et al. conducted replicated experiments using gas chromatography–time of flight–mass spectrometry to measure metabolite accumulation in the Arabidopsis Bay and Sha parental accessions and each of 210 Bay × Sha RILs.

The authors provide evidence of transgressive segregation for metabolite accumulation, in that more variation was detected in the RILs than in the parents: a significant fraction of metabolites was found in one or both parents but not detected in all RILs or found in a number of RILs but not detected in either parent, and for metabolites detected in all lines, the RILs showed extreme values compared with the parents. Transgressive segregation refers to the presence of traits or phenotypes in hybrid populations that are extreme relative to either of the parental lines and is considered an important phenomenon by which novel adaptations can arise in hybrid plant populations (Rieseberg et al., 1999). There are a number of mechanisms that could be responsible for transgressive segregation in hybrids. Rieseberg et al. (1999) describe seven possibilities: (1) an elevated mutation rate, (2) reduced developmental stability, (3) nonadditive epistatic effects between alleles, (4) overdominance, (5) unmasking of rare recessive alleles, (6) chromosome number variation, and (7) complementary action of additive alleles. Here, Rowe et al. show that epistatic interactions contribute significantly to the metabolic variation observed in the Arabidopsis Bay × Sha RILs.

The data from metabolites present in the 210 Bay × Sha RILs were used to map QTLs, and 438 QTLs affecting 243 metabolites were identified and mapped. Eleven regions of the genome were identified as metabolite QTL clusters or hot spots that contained more metabolite QTLs than expected by chance, and five of these clusters were coincident with expression QTL hot spots identified by West et al. (2007), suggesting a link with transcript variation. Metabolites were then clustered based on QTL position and allelic effect, thereby connecting the metabolite QTL clusters based on shared regulation of specific metabolites. The authors found that at least four metabolite QTL loci had global effects on central metabolism.

Genome-wide epistasis was assessed by conducting formal ANOVA pairwise tests of epistasis between the 11 identified metabolite QTL clusters. All 55 putative pairwise epistatic interactions between the eleven metabolite QTL clusters were tested against the average accumulation of 557 metabolites within the RILs. For each metabolite, r2 estimates were determined for all significant main effect terms and all significant epistatic terms. For a majority of metabolites, the significant epistatic interactions explained as much or more of the genetic variation than the main effect QTLs. Another ANVOA test involving three of the four metabolite QLT clusters associated with central metabolism revealed a significant three-way epistatic interaction between these clusters. These results suggest that epistasis played a significant role in determining the outcome of metabolite transgressive segregation observed in the Bay × Sha RILs.

Epistasis was also harnessed as a tool for metabolite classification. This use was based on a known epistatic interaction between the AOP and Elong QTLs, which are involved in glucosinolate metabolism and transcript accumulation for aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthetic genes. The authors identified 31 metabolites whose accumulation was determined by an epistatic interaction between these two loci, the majority of which were unidentified compounds that share common QTLs with known glucosinolates and showed either positive or negative epistasis between AOP and Elong. In this way, these known epistatic loci allowed for the identification of additional candidate metabolites that may be associated with glucosinolate biosynthesis. Finally, Rowe et al. applied a logic-based approach to using metabolite differences between RILs to predict biochemical networks. This approach led to the identification of two putative biochemical networks involving previously unknown or uncharacterized metabolites.

This work illustrates the power of combining metabolomics platforms with mapping populations for investigating the genetic regulation of complex biochemical networks. The results show that metabolic pathways are regulated by a number of genetic loci, which frequently interact in a nonadditive or epistatic fashion. A similar study by Lisec et al. (2008) found more limited evidence of epistatic interactions between metabolic QTL in Arabidopsis recombinant inbred and introgression lines derived from accessions Col-0 and C24. Thus, the debate on the importance of the contribution of epistasis to genetic variation in natural populations continues. It is possible that there is an underlying difference in the level of epistasis between the two populations or that some normalization techniques can amplify additivity and/or diminish epistasis in this RIL structure; testing these possibilities requires further investigation. Another recent study by Schauer et al. (2008) examined the inheritance of metabolic QTL in a population of introgression lines of tomato and showed that most of the metabolic QTL introgressed from a wild ancestor of tomato in the domesticated line were dominantly inherited. In this case, the population structure (introgression lines) was specifically designed to maximize the focus on the dominance versus recessivity of additive QTL. The importance of epistasis in populations also is likely to be affected by breeding strategy; for example, Rieseberg et al. (1999) noted differences in transgressive segregation between outcrossing and inbreeding plants. The work of Rowe et al. suggests that increasing the experimental ability to detect epistatic interactions with advanced genomics methods, the use of larger RIL populations, and appropriate statistical analyses may continue to show that epistasis plays important roles in genetic and phenotypic variation in plant populations.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.108.061051

References

  1. ↵
    Calenge, F., Saliba-Colombani, V., Mahieu, S., Loudet, O., Daniel-Vedele, F., and Krapp, A. (2006). Natural variation for carbohydrate content in Arabidopsis. Interaction with complex traits dissected by quantitative genetics. Plant Physiol. 141: 1630–1643.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Hill, W.G., Goddard, M.E., and Visscher, P.M. (2008). Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Keurentjes, J.J.B., Fu, J.Y., Terpstra, I.R., Garcia, J.M., van den Ackerveken, G., Snoek, L.B., Peeters, A.J.M., Vreugdenhil, D., Koornneef, M., and Jansen, R.C. (2007). Regulatory network construction in Arabidopsis by using genome-wide gene expression quantitative trait loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 1708–1713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Kliebenstein, D., West, M., van Leeuwen, H., Loudet, O., Doerge, R., and St. Clair, D. (2006). Identification of QTLs controlling gene expression networks defined a priori. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Lisec, J., Meyer, R., Steinfath, M., Redestig, H., Becher, M., Witucka-Wall, H., Fiehn, O., Torjek, O., Selbig, J., Altmann, T., and Willmitzer, L. (2008). Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana in a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations. Plant J. 53: 960–972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Loudet, O., Chaillou, S., Camilleri, C., Bouchez, D., and Daniel-Vedele, F. (2002). Bay-0 × Shahdara recombinant inbred line population: A powerful tool for the genetic dissection of complex traits in Arabidopsis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1173–1184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Loudet, O., Chaillou, S., Merigout, P., Talbotec, J., and Daniel-Vedele, F. (2003). Quantitative trait loci analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 131: 345–358.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Rieseberg, L.H., Archer, M.A., and Wayne, R.K. (1999). Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. Rowe, H.C., Hansen, B.G., Halkier, B.A., and Kliebenstein, D.J. (2008). Biochemical networks and epistasis shape the Arabidopsis thaliana metabolome. Plant Cell 20: 1199–1216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Schauer, N., Semel, Y., Balbo, I., Steinfath, M., Repsilber, D., Selbig, J., Pleban, T., Zamir, D., and Fernie, A.R. (2008). Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell 20: 509–523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Wentzell, A.M., Rowe, H.C., Hansen, B.G., Ticconi, C., Halkier, B.A., and Kliebenstein, D.J. (2007). Linking metabolic QTL with network and cis-eQTL controlling biosynthetic pathways. PLoS Genet. 3: e162.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    West, M.A.L., Kim, K., Kliebenstein, D.J., van Leeuwen, H., Michelmore, R.W., Doerge, R.W., and St.Clair, D.A. (2007). Global eQTL mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture of transcript level variation in Arabidopsis. Genetics 175: 1441–1450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epistasis and Genetic Regulation of Variation in the Arabidopsis Metabolome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Epistasis and Genetic Regulation of Variation in the Arabidopsis Metabolome
Nancy A. Eckardt
The Plant Cell May 2008, 20 (5) 1185-1186; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.061051

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Epistasis and Genetic Regulation of Variation in the Arabidopsis Metabolome
Nancy A. Eckardt
The Plant Cell May 2008, 20 (5) 1185-1186; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.061051
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 20 (5)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 20, Issue 5
May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • SCREAMing Twist on the Role of ICE1 in Freezing Tolerance
  • Photomorphogenesis, B-Box Transcription Factors, and the Legacy of Magnus Holm
  • On the Habits of Transposons: Dissociation Mapping in Maize and Megabase Sequencing in Wheat Reveal Site Preferences, Distribution, and Evolutionary History
Show more IN THIS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire