Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherIN BRIEF
You have accessRestricted Access

Transposon Trouble: Macrotransposition and Chromosome Remodeling in Maize

Jennifer Mach
Jennifer Mach
Science Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published August 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.200812

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • American Society of Plant Biologists

Transposons were first recognized by their ability to generate chromosome breaks and now are implicated in many genome changes, including fluctuations in genome size, inversions, translocations, deletions, and duplications (reviewed in Feschotte and Pritham, 2007). At the single-gene level, transposons produce mutations, both on insertion and excision, and can capture and rearrange gene fragments. All this variation can spell trouble for the host genome but may also produce adaptive changes in gene coding sequence and regulation. Cut-and-paste transposons are particularly adept at producing rearrangements because their transposition mechanism produces double-stranded DNA breaks. Linked pairs of related transposons cause even more rearrangements through alternative transposition reactions where transposase reacts with the ends of two different transposons. Depending on the orientation of the elements, this can produce chromosome breakage, deletions, inversions, and other rearrangements. The ability of linked transposons to undergo macrotransposition, that is, mobilization of both transposons and the host sequences in between, has been proposed to contribute to breakdowns in synteny but is difficult to capture experimentally.

Huang and Dooner (pages 2019–2032) examined the results of alternative transposition reactions, starting with a maize line containing two linked transposons in direct orientation. The first transposon is a Ds element inserted in the bronze (bz) locus. This mutation is not stable, as the Ds element can be excised by transposase from the second element, an Ac 6.5 kb away. To identify rearrangements, the authors screened for bz mutants that had become stable. Genetic tests showed whether or not the transposons had moved, and a carefully designed set of PCR reactions, followed by DNA gel blots and sequencing, showed whether the region had been rearranged. Not surprisingly, the majority of the rearrangements isolated were imprecise transposon excisions or excisions coupled with deletions, all of which can generate a stable bz phenotype. More interestingly, a stable bz phenotype could be produced by macrotransposition of a fragment containing the two transposons and the host sequences in between. In this screen, several such events were isolated: these contained an excision of the macrotransposon, and several also had a reinsertion of the macrotransposon, usually at a closely linked site. The latter group showed a stable bz phenotype, as excision of the macrotransposon removes part of the bz locus, but they retained the transposon-mediated propensity for chromosome breakage (see figure ). This novel mobilization of host genes by macrotransposition adds another mechanism to the toolkit by which transposons restructure the genome.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Chromosome breakage causes formation of colorless sectors in the kernel. Rearrangements showing different chromosome breakage activity levels ([A] to [C]). Chromosome with excision of both transposons, showing no breakage activity (D).

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.108.200812

References

  1. ↵
    Feschotte, C., and Pritham, E.J. (2007). DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41: 331–368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Huang, J.T., and Dooner, H.K. (2008). Macrotransposition and other complex chromosomal restructuring in maize by closely linked transposons in direct orientation. Plant Cell 20: 2019–2032.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transposon Trouble: Macrotransposition and Chromosome Remodeling in Maize
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Transposon Trouble: Macrotransposition and Chromosome Remodeling in Maize
Jennifer Mach
The Plant Cell Aug 2008, 20 (8) 2008; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.200812

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Transposon Trouble: Macrotransposition and Chromosome Remodeling in Maize
Jennifer Mach
The Plant Cell Aug 2008, 20 (8) 2008; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.200812
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 20 (8)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 20, Issue 8
August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
  • Slice and Dice: DCL2 Mediates the Production of 22-Nucleotide siRNAs that Influence Trait Variation in Soybean
  • How to Eat One’s Feelings: Autophagy and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire