Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
OtherLetter to the Editor
You have accessRestricted Access

The Arabidopsis B-Box Zinc Finger Family

Rajnish Khanna, Brent Kronmiller, Don R. Maszle, George Coupland, Magnus Holm, Takeshi Mizuno, Shu-Hsing Wu
Rajnish Khanna
Mendel Biotechnology, Hayward, California 94545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brent Kronmiller
Mendel Biotechnology, Hayward, California 94545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don R. Maszle
Mendel Biotechnology, Hayward, California 94545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Coupland
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding, D-50829 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Magnus Holm
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeshi Mizuno
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shu-Hsing Wu
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published November 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.069088

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • American Society of Plant Biologists

The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encodes >1500 transcription factors, and ∼45% of these belong to families specific to plants (Riechmann et al., 2000). Comparison of the entire complement of transcription factors of Arabidopsis, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed that families common to all eukaryotes are conserved only in the sequence and structure of the domains defining the respective families and that each eukaryotic lineage has diversified greatly to create novel proteins regulating lineage-specific processes (Riechmann et al., 2000). The zinc finger family of proteins is an example of such diversification and it consists of a large number of proteins that are further classified into distinct subfamilies (see SMART, http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/smart/show_motifs.pl). The Zn finger domains form multiple finger-like protrusions that can bind metals like zinc. Proteins with Zn finger domains often contain other specialized interaction domains and have been recognized to bind (1) DNA, as in the case of Zn finger transcription factors, such as Dof and WRKY proteins; (2) RNA, as in the case of the microRNA processing factor SERRATE; and (3) proteins, as is thought to be the case for other Zn finger proteins like the B-box proteins (Borden et al., 1995; Rushton et al., 1995; Yanagisawa, 1995; de Pater et al., 1996; Yanagisawa and Schmidt, 1999; Torok and Etkin, 2001; Yang et al., 2006; Fujioka et al., 2007). The B-box family represents a subgroup of Zn finger proteins that contain one or more B-box domains with specialized tertiary structures that are stabilized by binding Zn ions (Klug and Schwabe, 1995). As indicated above, the B-box domain is thought to be involved in protein–protein interactions. It is not yet known how B-box proteins function at the biochemical level, but they may be involved in modulating protein–protein interactions, such as those occurring in transcriptional complexes. Some of the B-box family members contain additional domains (see below), but it remains to be seen if these regions of the protein confer additional discrete functions. In Arabidopsis, the B-box family consists of 32 proteins (Riechmann et al., 2000; Robson et al., 2001; Chang et al., 2008; Kumagai et al., 2008). The purpose of this letter is to establish a uniform terminology for the B-box proteins. There is a growing effort to understand the functions of B-box proteins; hence, it is timely to provide a uniform nomenclature to this family consistent with the format used for other families, like the basic helix-loop-helix and the MYB families (Stracke et al., 2001; Bailey et al., 2003; Heim et al., 2003; Toledo-Ortiz et al., 2003). We provide a uniform designation for proteins containing one or more copies of the B-box domain (e.g., At BBX1/CO).

CONSTANS (CO) was the first B-box protein to be identified in Arabidopsis (Putterill et al., 1995; Robson et al., 2001). In addition to CO, 16 other CO-Like (COL) proteins have since been identified that contain one or two B-box domains at the N terminus and a CCT (CO, COL, TOC1) domain (Strayer et al., 2000) at the C terminus (Ledger et al., 2001; Robson et al., 2001). Other proteins, STH (STH1), STH2, and STO, were identified that had two tandem B-box domains but lacked the C-terminal CCT domain (Holm et al., 2001; Datta et al., 2007). More recent studies have used different names for some of the other members of the B-box family (Chang et al., 2008; Datta et al., 2008; Kumagai et al., 2008). In order to provide a uniform nomenclature for the B-box protein family, we performed a search to identify a complete set of all Arabidopsis genes with B-box motifs. Consistent with the previous reports (Chang et al., 2008; Kumagai et al., 2008), we found a final set of 32 Arabidopsis B-box proteins (Table 1 ).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Positions of B-Box Domains

SPECIFIC B-BOX MOTIFS FOR A GENOME-WIDE SEARCH IN ARABIDOPSIS

A representative B-box from AT1G78600 was used as a query in a PSI-BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) search against the set of 32 Arabidopsis B-box–containing proteins to identify exact B-box amino acid sequence coordinates within each protein. Of the full set of 32 proteins, 21 had a potential second B-box copy as found by PSI-BLAST analysis. The second B-box motifs are present 5 to 20 residues following the first B-box. In every case, first and second B-box motifs were found in the same orientation. B-box–containing proteins and coordinates of B-box motifs within each protein are shown in Table 1. These results are consistent with previous reports (Putterill et al., 1995; Chang et al., 2008; Kumagai et al., 2008).

Three sets of protein sequence multiple alignments (ClustalW and MUSCLE; Edgar, 2004; Larkin et al., 2007) were constructed with the B-box motif: a set of 32 B-box sequences from the first B-box (N-terminal; called B1 from here on), a set of 21 sequences from the second B-box (termed B2), and a set of 53 sequences containing both B-boxes B1 and B2. A motif was made from each multiple alignment (Figure 1 ) and used as a position-specific score matrix for PSI-BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) search against the full set of TAIR 8 (Swarbreck et al., 2008) Arabidopsis proteins. A cutoff E-value of 0.1 for the length of the B-box region was used for prediction of new B-box–containing proteins. No additional proteins beyond the initial 32 were identified with the B1 or B2 queries; the set of 32 B-box genes is therefore considered complete.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The B-Box Family of Proteins from Arabidopsis Have Two Distinct B-Box Domains.

Motif logos (Schneider and Stephens, 1990; Crooks et al., 2004) of protein alignments of B-box B1 (A) and B2 (B) show differences. Conservation of residues across all proteins is shown by height of each letter; a position with all like residues has a bit score of 4. The 38 conserved residues of B1 and B2 are shown; see Table 1 for individual coordinates of each B-box motif. B1 is more conserved, containing 12 out of 38 residues that are seen in 95% of the 32 family members. B2 shows seven amino acids with 95% conservation. The conserved residues of B2 are also found conserved in B1.

RENAMING OF B-BOX–CONTAINING PROTEINS BASED ON PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

The 32 full-length proteins identified by B-box sequence searches were combined for multiple alignment and phylogeny analyses as a basis for renaming the entire gene family. Proteins were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004), alignments were viewed, and minor adjustments were made using SeaView (Galtier et al., 1996). A Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree was built using MrBayes (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). Blosum62 (Henikoff and Henikoff, 1992) was used as the amino acid model, and alignment gaps were included in the analysis using the binary (restriction site) model. One million generations were run to create two independent phylogenies using metropolis coupling with four chains (Nchains = 4): one cold and three heated chains (Temp = 0.2) (Figure 2 ). Clade posterior probabilities differed by at most 0.02 between the two trees (if differences were seen, both values are shown in Figure 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Phylogenetic Analysis of the Arabidopsis B-Box Family.

Full-length proteins of the 32 B-box members were aligned using MUSCLE (maxiters = 16) (Edgar, 2004). Multiple alignments were viewed and realigned using SeaView (Galtier et al., 1996). MrBayes (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001) was used to construct a Bayesian inference phylogenetic tree with 1,000,000 generations. Bayesian posterior probability values are displayed on the tree as percentages, and if differing values were seen between the two independently run trees, both are displayed. This phylogeny was used to order B-box genes to provide a uniform naming terminology. For full-length protein sequences used and the multiple alignments, see Supplemental Data Set 1 (FASTA format) and Supplemental Figure 1 (alignment) online.

The B-box protein family, now termed BBX, follows a numbering convention starting with the original identified family member CO (Putterill et al., 1995; Robson et al., 2001), continuing by clades in a clockwise rotation on Figure 2 around the phylogenetic tree. CO becomes BBX1, and COL1 to 16 become BBX2 to 17 (Figure 2). Subsequently named proteins, STH, STO, LZF1, and DBB (Holm et al., 2001; Datta et al., 2007, 2008; Chang et al., 2008; Kumagai et al., 2008), are named BBX18 to 32 (Figure 2).

BBX FAMILY STRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION

The Bayesian inference phylogeny from Figure 2 was rooted between the clades of BBX1 to 25 and BBX26 to 32 based on midpoint rooting on the Bayesian majority rule phylogram to give the table arrangement seen in Figure 3 . Schematic illustrations for each identified motif present in proteins are shown to the right of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 3). Corresponding to the schematics is the column “Structure Groups” (Figure 3), where like motif configurations found in phylogenetic clades are designated from I to V. Each member of structure group I contains a B-box B1, a B-box B2, and a CCT domain. Structure group II members are similar to group I, both containing B1, B2, and CCT domains; however, differences in their B2 domains were observed (Chang et al., 2008). Structure group III members contain a B1 and CCT. Structure group IV contains B-box B1 and B2, and no CCT domains are found. Finally, structure group V is made up of members with just a single B1 domain.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Structure Classification of the B-Box Family.

A graphical representation of a phylogeny is shown at left with Arabidopsis Genome Initiative gene names. Schematics of identified protein structures are shown; B-box 1 is labeled as B1, B-box 2 is labeled as B2, and the CCT domain is indicated. Following the structure of each protein is the new BBX naming scheme, synonym/s for proteins, and structure groups. References: 1Koornneef et al. (1991), 2Putterill et al. (1995), 3Robson et al. (2001), 4Kumagai et al. (2008), 5Datta et al. (2007), 6Datta et al. (2008), 7Chang et al. (2008), 8Holm et al. (2001), and 9Datta et al. (2006).

The name CONSTANS is widely used, and we expect that it will continue to be used in the future instead of the BBX1 designation for this locus. Nonetheless, we propose that the scientific community studying the Arabidopsis B-box proteins adopts the designation of the entire B-box family with the suggested uniform nomenclature. Reference to B-box genes (BBX) and proteins (BBX) will follow conventional rules. We suggest that such a designation can be used to describe mutant alleles accordingly, for example, bbx21-1 instead of sth2-1 (Datta et al., 2007) and bbx18-1 instead of dbb1a-1 (Kumagai et al., 2008). Mutants identified first would be designated with one digit (e.g., bbx#-1), subsequent mutants from different labs would be named following a general rule in chronological order, such as bbx#-101 and -102 and bbx#-201 and -202, and so on. Similar approaches have been used previously to unify the nomenclatures for phytochromes (Quail et al., 1994) and phototropins (Briggs et al., 2001) and have been adopted by the scientific community.

B-box proteins from other species would be named following a similar nomenclature scheme. For example, one or more rice proteins clustering with At-BBX1 can be named Os-BBX1a, Os-BBX1b, and so forth. In cases of species-specific B-box proteins, we propose that the naming scheme is continued from BBX33 and onwards (e.g., Os-BBX33 could be a rice-specific B-box protein). Any future orthologs of the hypothetical example Os-BBX33 will follow the rules described above. In cases where two At-BBX proteins can equally be considered as orthologs of one or more proteins from other species, homology-based comparisons can be used to assign the name. For example, two Arabidopsis paralogs may share a single rice ortholog. In such a case, the rice protein will be assigned the name of the Arabidopsis protein with highest homology. This scheme can be expanded for multiple sets of ortholog-paralog combinations. With the continuing availability of new genome sequences, these proposed classification schemes can be followed by the scientific community to provide nomenclature unification while naming proteins of other protein families and other species.

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

  • Supplemental Figure 1. Multiple Alignment of 32 B-Box–Containing Full-Length Arabidopsis Proteins.

  • Supplemental Data Set 1. FASTA Format Multiple Alignment of 32 Arabidopsis B-Box Proteins Aligned with MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004).

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.109.069088

  • ↵[W] Online version contains Web-only data.

References

  1. ↵
    Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bailey, P.C., Martin, C., Toledo-Ortiz, G., Quail, P.H., Huq, E., Heim, M.A., Jakoby, M., Werber, M., and Weisshaar, B. (2003). Update on the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 15: 2497–2502.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Borden, K.L., Lally, J.M., Martin, S.R., O'Reilly, N.J., Etkin, L.D., and Freemont, P.S. (1995). Novel topology of a zinc-binding domain from a protein involved in regulating early Xenopus development. EMBO J. 14: 5947–5956.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Briggs, W.R., et al. (2001). The phototropin family of photoreceptors. Plant Cell 13: 993–997.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Chang, C.S., Li, Y.H., Chen, L.-T., Chen, W.-C., Hsieh, W.-P., Shin, J., Jane, W.-N., Chou, S.-J., Choi, G., Hu, J.-M., Somerville, S., and Wu, S.-H. (2008). LZF1, a HY5-regulated transcriptional factor, functions in Arabidopsis de-etiolation. Plant J. 54: 205–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Crooks, G.E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.M., and Brenner, S.E. (2004). WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14: 1188–1190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Datta, S., Hettiarachchi, C., Johansson, H., and Holm, M. (2007). SALT TOLERANCE HOMOLOG2, a B-box protein in Arabidopsis that activates transcription and positively regulates light-mediated development. Plant Cell 19: 3242–3255.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Datta, S., Hettiarachchi, G.H.C.M., Deng, X.W., and Holm, M. (2006). Arabidopsis CONSTANS-LIKE3 is a positive regulator of red light signaling and root growth. Plant Cell 18: 70–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Datta, S., Johansson, H., Hettiarachchi, C., Irigoyen, M.L., Desai, M., Rubio, V., and Holm, M. (2008). LZF1/SALT TOLERANCE HOMOLOG3, an Arabidopsis B-box protein involved in light-dependent development and gene expression, undergoes COP1-mediated ubiquitination. Plant Cell 20: 2324–2338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    de Pater, S., Greco, V., Pham, K., Memelink, J., and Kijne, J. (1996). Characterization of a zinc-dependent transcriptional activator from Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4624–4631.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Edgar, R.C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792–1797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Fujioka, Y., Utsumi, M., Ohba, Y., and Watanabe, Y. (2007). Location of a possible miRNA processing site in SmD3/SmB nuclear bodies in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 48: 1243–1253.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Galtier, N., Gouy, M., and Gautier, C. (1996). SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: Two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 543–548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Heim, M.A., Jakoby, M., Werber, M., Martin, C., Weisshaar, B., and Bailey, P.C. (2003). The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: a genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 735–747.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. (1992). Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 10915–10919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Holm, M., Hardtke, C.S., Gaudet, R., and Deng, X.W. (2001). Identification of a structural motif that confers specific interaction with the WD40 repeat domain of Arabidopsis COP1. EMBO J. 20: 118–127.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Klug, A., and Schwabe, J.W.R. (1995). Zinc fingers. FASEB J. 9: 597–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    Koornneef, M., Hanhart, C.J., and van der Veen, J.H. (1991). A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 57–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Kumagai, T., Ito, S., Nakamichi, N., Niwa, Y., Murakami, M., Yamashino, T., and Mizuno, T. (2008). The common function of a novel subfamily of B-Box zinc finger proteins with reference to circadian-associated events in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72: 1539–1549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Larkin, M.A., et al. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Ledger, S., Strayer, C., Ashton, F., Kay, S.A., and Putterill, J. (2001). Analysis of the function of two circadian-regulated CONSTANS-LIKE genes. Plant J. 26: 15–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Putterill, J., Robson, F., Lee, K., Simon, R., and Coupland, G. (1995). The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 80: 847–857.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Quail, P.H., Briggs, W.R., Chory, J., Hangarter, R.P., Harberd, N.P., Kendrick, R.E., Koornneef, M., Parks, B., Sharrock, R.A., Schafer, E., Thompson, W.F., and Whitelam, G.C. (1994). Spotlight on phytochrome nomenclature. Plant Cell 6: 468–471.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Riechmann, J.L., et al. (2000). Arabidopsis transcription factors: Genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290: 2105–2110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Robson, F., Costa, M.M., Hepworth, S.R., Vizir, I., Pineiro, M., Reeves, P.H., Putterill, J., and Coupland, G. (2001). Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J. 28: 619–631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Rushton, P.J., Macdonald, H., Huttly, A.K., Lazarus, C.M., and Hooley, R. (1995). Members of a new family of DNA-binding proteins bind to a conserved cis-element in the promoters of alpha-Amy2 genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 29: 691–702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Schneider, T.D., and Stephens, R.M. (1990). Sequence logos: A new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6097–6100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Stracke, R., Werber, M., and Weisshaar, B. (2001). The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 447–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Strayer, C., Oyama, T., Schultz, T.F., Raman, R., Somers, D.E., Mas, P., Panda, S., Kreps, J.A., and Kay, S.A. (2000). Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 289: 768–771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Swarbreck, D., al. (2008). The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: D1009–D1014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Toledo-Ortiz, G., Huq, E., and Quail, P.H. (2003). The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell 15: 1749–1770.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Torok, M., and Etkin, L.D. (2001). Two B or not two B? Overview of the rapidly expanding B-box family of proteins. Differentiation 67: 63–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Yanagisawa, S. (1995). A novel DNA-binding domain that may form a single zinc finger motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 3403–3410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Yanagisawa, S., and Schmidt, R.J. (1999). Diversity and similarity among recognition sequences of Dof transcription factors. Plant J. 17: 209–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Yang, L., Liu, Z., Lu, F., Dong, A., and Huang, H. (2006). SERRATE is a novel nuclear regulator in primary microRNA processing in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 47: 841–850.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Arabidopsis B-Box Zinc Finger Family
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Arabidopsis B-Box Zinc Finger Family
Rajnish Khanna, Brent Kronmiller, Don R. Maszle, George Coupland, Magnus Holm, Takeshi Mizuno, Shu-Hsing Wu
The Plant Cell Nov 2009, 21 (11) 3416-3420; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.069088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Arabidopsis B-Box Zinc Finger Family
Rajnish Khanna, Brent Kronmiller, Don R. Maszle, George Coupland, Magnus Holm, Takeshi Mizuno, Shu-Hsing Wu
The Plant Cell Nov 2009, 21 (11) 3416-3420; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.069088
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • SPECIFIC B-BOX MOTIFS FOR A GENOME-WIDE SEARCH IN ARABIDOPSIS
    • RENAMING OF B-BOX–CONTAINING PROTEINS BASED ON PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
    • BBX FAMILY STRUCTURE CLASSIFICATION
    • SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 21 (11)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 21, Issue 11
November 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Ready, Primed, Go: Ending the Racism Pandemic in Science
  • Planting Equity: Using What We Know to Cultivate Growth as a Plant Biology Community
  • Araport Lives: An Updated Framework for Arabidopsis Bioinformatics
Show more LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire