Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
You have accessRestricted Access

Phloem Ultrastructure and Pressure Flow: Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related Agglomerations Do Not Affect Translocation

Daniel R. Froelich, Daniel L. Mullendore, Kåre H. Jensen, Tim J. Ross-Elliott, James A. Anstead, Gary A. Thompson, Hélène C. Pélissier, Michael Knoblauch
Daniel R. Froelich
aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington 99164-4236
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel L. Mullendore
aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington 99164-4236
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kåre H. Jensen
bDepartment of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim J. Ross-Elliott
aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington 99164-4236
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James A. Anstead
cCollege of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania 16802
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary A. Thompson
cCollege of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania 16802
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hélène C. Pélissier
aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington 99164-4236
dDepartment of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Knoblauch
aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman Washington 99164-4236
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: knoblauch@wsu.edu

Published December 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.093179

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Epifluorescence of SEOR1-YFP in Living Roots.

    (A) An Arabidopsis plant grown in a Micro-ROC. The root hairs of the plant are in contact with the soil, while the roots are forced to grow along the cover slip.

    (B) A root tip and a young part of a root as observed by epifluorescence in a Micro-ROC. Cells were stained with synapto-red to visualize cell outline. Bright spots along the root are SEOR1-YFP fusion proteins. The image is a single frame of Supplemental Movie 1 online.

    (C) and (D) Higher magnification of SEOR1-YFP fusion proteins (C). In young vascular tissue, the proteins appear as round amorphous bodies (arrows), which increase in size and become elongated in consecutive slightly older areas ([D], arrow).

    (E) Early indication of root branch formation is the abundance of SEOR1-YFP bodies beside the file (arrow).

    (F) After the root tip broke through the cortical layer, a new vascular file formed.

    (G) A root containing numerous amorphous bodies in a file (arrows).

    (H) Ten hours later, the amorphous bodies have developed into more defined structures (arrows).

    Bars = 150 μm in (B), 25 μm in (C) and (D), 50 μm in (E) and (F), and 100 μm in (G) and (H).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    In Vivo Observation of Sieve Tube Structure.

    (A) SEOR1-YFP fusion protein distribution within vascular bundles shows files containing amorphous bodies (solid arrows) and files containing fine strands (dashed arrows).

    (B) and (C) GFP specifically tagged to the sieve tube ER (green) reveals that SEOR1-YFP (cyan) is located in sieve elements. Arrows point toward sieve plates.

    (D) Loading of phloem with CFDA (red) shows that fine SEOR1-YFP filaments (cyan) are located within mature, translocating sieve tubes. Amorphous bodies are located outside of translocating files.

    (E) and (F) In older root tissue, a large amount of SEOR1-YFP is abundant in sieve tubes. Consecutive files lead into branch roots (E). Before dispersion, amorphous SEOR1-YFP bodies (arrow) are indicative of young developing sieve tubes and do not translocate CFDA (red).

    (G) and (H) At highest resolution, the ER (green) is surrounded by a fine SEOR1-YFP filament meshwork (cyan).

    (I) SEOR1-YFP filaments cover and/or traverse a sieve plate (arrow), outlining the sieve plate pores.

    (J) Despite the presence of filaments (cyan) in the pores, sieve tubes are fully functional, as indicated by translocation of CFDA (red).

    Bars = 25 μm in (A) to (E) and (G), 75 μm in (F), and 5 μm in (H) to (J).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    TEM of Sieve Tubes in Arabidopsis.

    (A) and (B) Standard chemical fixation of tissue sections of Arabidopsis shows the typical abundance of P protein filaments (dashed arrow) in front of the sieve plate ([A], solid arrow) or in the sieve plate pores (B). Remnants of sieve element plastids ([B], open arrows) can be found around the sieve plate.

    (C) and (D) Standard fixation of whole Arabidopsis plants resembles images after gentle preparation. Protein filaments (dashed arrows) are located in the lumen of the sieve element, but a sieve element plastid (asterisk) in front of the sieve plate (solid arrow) is intact.

    (E) Arabidopsis phloem tissue after plunge freezing of entire plants. Phloem parenchyma cells (PP) are completely destroyed by the freezing procedure, but sieve elements (SE) and companion cells (CC) show unprecedented preservation. Sieve element plastids (asterisk) and mitochondria (solid arrows) are well preserved. Most importantly, protein filaments (dashed arrows) are not randomly located in the lumen but consist of longitudinally aligned filaments at the margins of the cells.

    Bars = 1000 nm in (A), (B), and (E) and 500 nm in (C) and (D).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Fine Structure of Arabidopsis Sieve Tubes.

    (A) Cross section of an Arabidopsis vascular bundle showing two sieve elements. Large bundles of filaments (solid arrows) are located at the margins of the cells. Filaments and sieve element plastids (dashed arrow) fill a significant portion of the tube lumen.

    (B) and (C) Tangential section through the marginal layer of a sieve element showing aligned filaments in a bundle (B). While the filaments are usually aligned in parallel to the sieve elements’ (SE) long axis, they appear flexible and may bend backward (C).

    (D) Sieve plate pores are unobstructed and do not contain any detectable callose.

    (E) Cross section of a sieve element (SE) showing stacked ER cisternae. The ER is usually not as well preserved as in standard fixed tissue. It appears to descend into a less defined amorphous ground matrix.

    (F) A sieve element plastid with a smooth surface in direct contact with sieve tube sap.

    (G) A cross section through a sieve element showing a variety of sieve tube components, such as mitochondria, P protein filaments (solid arrow), ER (open arrow), and electron-dense vesicles (dashed arrow) embedded in an amorphous ground matrix.

    (H) Two mitochondria (asterisks) covered by a halo of proteins (dashed arrow) that attach them to protein filaments (solid arrow).

    (I) In other cases, mitochondria (asterisk) are surrounded by membranes from which electron-dense vesicles (solid arrows) may bud off. Again, membranes are not in direct contact with the mitochondria but are attached by small proteins (dashed arrows). The electron-dense vesicles and mitochondria are usually embedded in the amorphous ground matrix (open arrow), while P protein filaments and sieve element plastids are always in contact with sieve tube sap.

    Bars = 1000 nm in (A), 500 nm in (B) to (E), (G), and (I), and 250 nm in (F) and (H).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    SEOR1 Mutant-DNA Insertion Line.

    (A) A representation of the Arabidopsis gene At3g01680 indicating the location of the T-DNA insertion in the GABI-KAT 609F04 line and the location of a possible weak promoter indicated by analysis using PlantpromoterDB 2.0 (http://ppdb.agr.gifu-u.ac.jp/ppdb/cgi-bin/index.cgi). Also shown are three sections amplified by RT-PCR showing that a truncated mRNA product containing sections 2 and 3 is produced in the T-DNA insertion mutant. C, amplification control; KO, GABI-KAT 609f04; WT, wild-type Arabidopsis line Columbia.

    (B) Immunolocalization using a P protein–specific antibody indicates P proteins are absent in GABI-KAT 609F04 (insets are higher magnification images of single vascular bundles), and RT-PCR analysis shows the expression of the adjacent gene At3g01670 (70) is unaffected in the At3G01680 (80) T-DNA insertion mutant (Actin serves as an amplification control).

    (C) TEM micrograph of SEOR1 T-DNA insertion mutant after standard chemical fixation. Filaments filling the lumen of the sieve tube as shown in Figure 3 are absent.

    (D) and (E) TEM micrographs of At SEOR1 T-DNA insertion mutant after freeze substitution of whole plants. At SEOR1 filaments are absent, but all other structures, such as ER, mitochondria, and clamps proteins surrounding the mitochondria, are present.

    (F) Transformation of KO:GABI-KAT 609f04 with At SEOR1-GFP leads to filament formation.

    Bars = 100 μm in (B) (inset = 20 μm), 1 μm in (C), 500 nm in (D) and (E), and 3 μm in (F).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Obstructions in Arabidopsis Sieve Tubes.

    (A) to (D) Protein agglomerations (cyan) in the lumen of sieve tubes are variable. In many sieve elements, filaments are located at the margins of the cells.

    (A) The presence of filaments on the sieve plate (arrow) outlines their location.

    (B) A larger agglomeration of P protein (dashed arrows) on both sides of a sieve plate (solid arrow). The P protein agglomerations fray out into filaments. Some of the filaments connect through the sieve plate.

    (C) and (D) Overview images of CFDA (red) translocating sieve tubes containing massive P protein agglomerations. Sieve plates (solid arrows) are often not directly covered with P protein agglomerations. Some agglomerations appear to completely fill the lumen of the tube (dashed arrows), while others only cover part of it (open arrows).

    (E) Two P protein agglomerates. The upper agglomeration frays out into filaments. Some darker spots indicate the location of organelles, in this case most likely mitochondria. The lower agglomerate is completely amorphous.

    (F) The same sieve tubes as shown in (E). The upper file is fully mature and translocates CFDA (red) despite the presence of the large P protein agglomeration (dashed arrow) in front of the sieve plate (solid arrow). The lower tube is not fully mature. The amorphous P protein body (arrowhead) has not transformed into strands and is not translocating CFDA, while the next sieve element on the left in the same file is in the transition phase.

    (G) Three consecutive images of a FRAP experiment. The dashed arrow indicates the location of the P protein agglomeration shown in (E). The tube has been bleached by the laser and quickly refills after decrease of the laser energy indicating transport.

    (H) Four TEM images of a serial section of a sieve tube in the area of the sieve plate.

    (H1) to (H4) A cross section through the plate shows several open pores in the center, while significant portions at the margin of the plate are covered with filaments (H1). In consecutive sections (~1 μm apart from each other), filaments fill >50% of the lumen (H2) and move toward the membrane (H3) until they form discrete bundles (H4).

    (I) Serial section through an Arabidopsis sieve plate, oriented in a slight angle in relation to the sieve tube.

    (I1) and (I2) While most pores are open (I1), filaments are present on the plate (I2).

    (I3) Higher magnification of sieve pores in the sieve plate shown in (I2) (box). SEOR1 filaments can be seen in some pores ([I3], arrows).

    (I4) A few micrometers behind the plate, filaments move toward the margins.

    (J) Four images of a serial section through the lumen of a sieve tube containing an agglomeration. Major parts of the lumen are filled with P protein filaments, but a channel is unobstructed. The filaments are mostly oriented in parallel and have a pseudocrystalline appearance. A sieve element plastid is abundant in J4. The distance from (J1) to (J4) is 7 μm.

    Bars = 10 μm in (A) and (B), 25 μm in (C), (D), (F), and (G), 5 μm in (E), and 500 nm in (H) to (J).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    SEOR1-Like Filaments in Tobacco and Black Cottonwood.

    (A) A cross section through a tobacco sieve element (SE) shows several sieve element (SE) plastids covered with Arabidopsis SEOR1 filaments and bundles.

    (B) A tangential section through an Arabidopsis sieve element along the organelle containing layer close to the plasma membrane. A large SEOR1 bundle of multiple filaments covers the membrane.

    (C) Longitudinal section through a black cottonwood sieve tube. The preservation is not as good as in Arabidopsis and tobacco, but Arabidopsis SEOR1-like filaments are visible.

    Bars = 1000 nm (A) and (B) and 150 nm in (C).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Schematic Reconstruction of an Arabidopsis Sieve Tube.

    Reconstruction of the structure of a sieve element-companion cell complex as found in in vivo confocal studies and after freeze substitution of whole plants. Sieve elements contain ER, mitochondria covered with clamp proteins, and electron-dense vesicles. While those structures are usually embedded in an amorphous ground matrix, SEOR1 filaments and sieve element plastids are always in direct contact with the sieve tube sap. A SEOR1 agglomeration is shown in front of a plate that does not fill the entire lumen of the sieve element. Companion cells contain all organelles typical for a plant cell, but only nucleus, vacuoles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria are shown. Blue lines indicate the location of a cross section for (A) to (C). C, chloroplast; Cl, clamp proteins; EV, electron-dense vesicles; GM, ground matrix; M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; P, plastid; SR, SEOR1 filaments; V, vacuole.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    In Vivo Flow and Injury Experiments.

    (A) and (B) Comparison of phloem flow velocities along a main root of the Arabidopsis wild type (A) and SEOR1 T-DNA insertion mutant (B). The entire root system is visible in MicroROCs after loading with CFDA, permitting flow measurements in individual tubes by FRAP. No significant difference was found between mutant and wild-type plants.

    (C) and (D) FRAP experiment on an individual tube. Three frames from Supplemental Movie 2 online (C). After bleaching of CFDA, the laser intensity was lowered and refilling of the tube was monitored at subsecond intervals. Regions of interest are marked along the tube (arrows and colors of arrows correspond to colors in graph), and fluorescence intensity is measured and graphed (D), giving a direct reading of flow velocity in the tube.

    (E) and (E1) to (E4) Four frames of Supplemental Movie 3 online, showing the slow movement (flow is right to left) of SEOR1-YFP filaments through a sieve plate (arrow). Movement does not stop even after 23 min.

    Bars = 5 mm in (A) and (B), 100 μm in (C), and 10 μm in (E).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    List of Parameters for Flow Calculations

    ParameterSymbol/ExpressionValue, Unit, Reference
    Sieve tube cross-section areaEmbedded Imagem2
    Effective sieve tube cross-section areaEmbedded Imagem2
    At SEOR1 agglomeration cross-section areaEmbedded Imagem2
    Effective sieve tube radiusae1.2 μm
    At SEOR1 filament radiusaf10 nm
    At SEOR1 agglomeration opening radiusao0.5 μm
    Average sieve pore radiusap156 nm
    Sieve tube radiusat1.5 μm
    Effective sieve tube diameterde2.4 μm
    At SEOR1 filament diameterdf20 nm
    At SEOR1 agglomeration opening diameterdo1 μm
    Sieve tube diameterdt3.0 μm
    Observed flow speedU100 μm s−1
    At SEOR1 filament separation distanceb6 nm
    Permeability of At SEOR1 agglomerationKm2
    Length of plantL15 cm
    At SEOR1 agglomeration lengthLp6 μm
    Sieve element lengthLt120 μm
    Sieve plate thicknessl450 nm
    Number of sieve elementsN1250
    Average number of sieve poresNp15
    Number of At SEOR1 agglomerationsM125
    Volume fluxQm3 s−1
    Hydraulic resistance of the phloem translocation pathwayRPa s m−3
    Viscosityη1.3 mPa s (Deeken et al., 2002; Hunt et al., 2009)
    Nondimensional permeability of At SEOR1 agglomerationEmbedded Image
    Volume fraction occupied by filaments inside agglomerationϕ0.45
    • Reference is given next to parameter value when not measured by the authors.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Parameters Relevant for the Calculation of the Pressure Drop Δp in Equation 1/(A1)

    de (μm)do (μm)Rlumen (Pa sm−3)NRlumen (Pa sm−3)Rplate (Pa s/m3)(N−1) × Rplate (Pa sm−3)Rplug (Pa s/m3)MRplug (Pa s/m3)R (Pa s/m3)Q (m3/s)Δp (MPa)
    3.01.0(*)7.8 × 10169.8 × 10191.5 × 10171.9 × 10203.5 × 10174.4 × 10193.3 × 10207.1 × 10−160.23
    3.00.507.8 × 10169.8 × 10191.5 × 10171.9 × 10205.2 × 10186.5 × 10209.4 × 10207.1 × 10−160.66
    3.00.237.8 × 10169.8 × 10191.5 × 10171.9 × 10207.5 × 10199.4 × 10219.7 × 10217.1 × 10−166.8
    3.0(†)7.8 × 10169.8 × 10191.5 × 10171.9 × 1020(†)(†)2.9 × 10207.1 × 10−160.20
    2.41.0(*)1.9 × 10172.4 × 10201.5 × 10171.9 × 10203.5 × 10174.4 × 10194.7 × 10204.5 × 10−160.21
    2.40.501.9 × 10172.4 × 10201.5 × 10171.9 × 10205.2 × 10186.5 × 10201.1 × 10214.5 × 10−160.49
    2.40.231.9 × 10172.4 × 10201.5 × 10171.9 × 10207.5 × 10199.4 × 10219.8 × 10214.5 × 10−164.4
    2.4(†)1.9 × 10172.4 × 10201.5 × 10171.9 × 1020(†)(†)4.3 × 10204.5 × 10−160.19
    • Calculated values of the lumen resistance Rlumen, plate resistance Rplate, agglomeration resistance Rplug, and total resistance R determined from Equations (A3), (A4), (A5), and (A2) (see Supplemental Appendix 1 and Supplemental References 1 online). The results are given for two values of the effective sieve tube diameter de and three values of the agglomeration opening diameter do. de = 3.0 μm corresponds to a completely empty sieve tube, and de = 2.4 μm corresponds to a sieve tube with only 65% of the area open to flow. Results marked with an asterisk indicate the measured value of do = 1 μm. Results marked with (†) indicate the case where no At SEOR1 agglomerations are present.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
    • Supplemental Movie Legends
    • Supplemental Movie
    • Supplemental Movie
    • Supplemental Movie
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phloem Ultrastructure and Pressure Flow: Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related Agglomerations Do Not Affect Translocation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Phloem Ultrastructure and Pressure Flow: Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related Agglomerations Do Not Affect Translocation
Daniel R. Froelich, Daniel L. Mullendore, Kåre H. Jensen, Tim J. Ross-Elliott, James A. Anstead, Gary A. Thompson, Hélène C. Pélissier, Michael Knoblauch
The Plant Cell Dec 2011, 23 (12) 4428-4445; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.093179

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Phloem Ultrastructure and Pressure Flow: Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related Agglomerations Do Not Affect Translocation
Daniel R. Froelich, Daniel L. Mullendore, Kåre H. Jensen, Tim J. Ross-Elliott, James A. Anstead, Gary A. Thompson, Hélène C. Pélissier, Michael Knoblauch
The Plant Cell Dec 2011, 23 (12) 4428-4445; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.093179
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 23 (12)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 23, Issue 12
Dec 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • SPIKE1 Activates the GTPase ROP6 to Guide the Polarized Growth of Infection Threads in Lotus japonicus
  • M-Type Thioredoxins Regulate the PGR5/PGRL1-Dependent Pathway by Forming a Disulfide-Linked Complex with PGRL1
  • Allelic Variation of MYB10 Is the Major Force Controlling Natural Variation in Skin and Flesh Color in Strawberry (Fragaria spp.) Fruit
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire