Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
Open Access

Os-GIGANTEA Confers Robust Diurnal Rhythms on the Global Transcriptome of Rice in the Field

Takeshi Izawa, Motohiro Mihara, Yuji Suzuki, Meenu Gupta, Hironori Itoh, Atsushi J. Nagano, Ritsuko Motoyama, Yuji Sawada, Masahiro Yano, Masami Yokota Hirai, Amane Makino, Yoshiaki Nagamura
Takeshi Izawa
aPhotosynthesis and Photobiology Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
bPlant Genomics Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tizawa@nias.affrc.go.jp
Motohiro Mihara
bPlant Genomics Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuji Suzuki
cGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori-Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981-8555, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meenu Gupta
aPhotosynthesis and Photobiology Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hironori Itoh
aPhotosynthesis and Photobiology Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi J. Nagano
aPhotosynthesis and Photobiology Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ritsuko Motoyama
dRice Genome Resource Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuji Sawada
eRIKEN Plant Science Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
fJapan Science and Technology Agency, CREST, 4-1-8 Hon-chou, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiro Yano
gQTL Genomics Research Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masami Yokota Hirai
eRIKEN Plant Science Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
fJapan Science and Technology Agency, CREST, 4-1-8 Hon-chou, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amane Makino
cGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Tsutsumidori-Amamiyamachi, Sendai 981-8555, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiaki Nagamura
dRice Genome Resource Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba 305-8602, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Published May 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083238

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2011 American Society of Plant Biologists

Abstract

The circadian clock controls physiological traits such as flowering time, photosynthesis, and growth in plants under laboratory conditions. Under natural field conditions, however, little is known about the significance of the circadian clock in plants. By time-course transcriptome analyses of rice (Oryza sativa) leaves, using a newly isolated rice circadian clock–related mutant carrying a null mutation in Os-GIGANTEA (Os-GI), we show here that Os-GI controlled 75% (false discovery rate = 0.05) of genes among 27,201 genes tested and was required for strong amplitudes and fine-tuning of the diurnal rhythm phases of global gene expression in the field. However, transcripts involved in primary metabolism were not greatly affected by osgi. Time-course metabolome analyses of leaves revealed no trends of change in primary metabolites in osgi plants, and net photosynthetic rates and grain yields were not affected. By contrast, some transcripts and metabolites in the phenylpropanoid metabolite pathway were consistently affected. Thus, net primary assimilation of rice was still robust in the face of such osgi mutation-related circadian clock defects in the field, unlike the case with defects caused by Arabidopsis thaliana toc1 and ztl mutations in the laboratory.

INTRODUCTION

Circadian clocks produce an endogenous rhythm of ~24 h under constant environmental conditions. Recent studies based on molecular genetics using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant have revealed that circadian clocks control various physiological traits such as flowering time, plant growth, leaf movement, and guard cell opening in the laboratory (McClung, 2008; Harmer, 2009). For instance, Arabidopsis circadian clocks confer phase-dependent expression of the key flowering regulator CONSTANS (CO) (Putterill et al., 1995; Imaizumi and Kay, 2006). The coincidence of CO gene expression with acute light signals in the evening under long-day (LD) conditions triggers the expression of the floral regulator FT (Corbesier et al., 2007), initiating the floral transition. A recent study of flowering time mutants of Arabidopsis in field environments demonstrated that CO and the circadian clock control flowering time in the field in this species (Wilczek et al., 2009). However, it is largely unknown how plant circadian clocks contribute to the control of various other physiological traits under natural field conditions, in which the environment can differ dramatically from that in the laboratory.

An extensive survey of circadian clock–related traits among Arabidopsis accessions collected from various climatic regions revealed broad ranges of natural variations in these traits (Michael et al., 2003), suggesting that natural variation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock may contribute to the adaptation of Arabidopsis to local growing areas (Michael et al., 2003). Although natural variation in flowering time genes involved in vernalization-responsive flowering pathways, such as FLC and FRI, is associated with variations in the local distribution of Arabidopsis accessions, no such associations have been found with natural variation in the genes involved in photoperiodic flowering pathways, such as CO (Shindo et al., 2005, 2006; Izawa, 2007). Therefore, natural variation in circadian clock traits found among Arabidopsis accessions (Michael et al., 2003) may be associated with traits other than flowering time phenotypes. Indeed, circadian clocks have long been believed to influence aspects of primary assimilation, such as photosynthesis, in plants (Harmer, 2009). For instance, it is well known that CAB genes encoding chlorophyll binding a/b proteins are regulated by circadian clocks in many plant species under constant environmental conditions (Millar and Kay, 1991; Millar et al., 1995; Sugiyama et al., 2001). In addition, under laboratory conditions, using circadian clock mutants of Arabidopsis and cyanobacteria with distinct free-running rhythms, circadian clocks have been shown to influence photosynthesis, growth, and fitness in adapting to artificial rhythms fitted to the free-running rhythms (Ouyang et al., 1998; Green et al., 2002; Dodd et al., 2005). Therefore, plant circadian clocks can influence aspects of primary assimilation under laboratory conditions, although more studies are needed to determine conclusively the biological significance of plant circadian clocks under natural field conditions.

In this work, we first identified a rice (Oryza sativa) circadian clock–related mutant by a suppressor mutant screening of late-flowering phenotypes against an early-flowering mutant line with a phytochrome deficiency (Izawa et al., 2000) and found that the phenotype was caused by mutations in GIGANTEA (Os-GI) (the sole rice ortholog of Arabidopsis GI) (Fowler et al., 1999; Park et al., 1999; Hayama et al., 2002). GI is a flowering time gene that is strongly involved in the Arabidopsis circadian clock system (Fowler et al., 1999; Park et al., 1999; Locke et al., 2005, 2006; Harmer, 2009). For instance, gi mutants flower very late under LD conditions, because GI is required for phase-dependent CO transcription through the interaction with FKF1, which leads to Cycling DNA binding with one finger (Cycling Dof [CDF]) degradation and consequent derepression of CO (Sawa et al., 2007; Fornara et al., 2009). In addition, it has been known that GI protein interacts with ZEITLUPE (ZTL) F-box protein to control the diurnal rhythm of TOC1 protein in regulation of the Arabidopsis circadian clock (Kim et al., 2007; Pokhilko et al., 2010).

Because our osgi mutants did not show extreme flowering time phenotypes in the field, we next performed an extensive time-course transcriptome analysis (>27,000 genes tested) and a widely targeted time-course metabolome analysis (>700 assigned chemicals tested) of rice leaves growing in the field (for the methodology of the widely targeted time-course metabolome analysis, see Sawada et al., 2009). We examined the physiological properties of photosynthesis-related traits and yield-related traits in the field to elucidate the genetic roles of Os-GI in the rice circadian clock under natural field conditions. The results demonstrated that the GI-dependent circadian clock confers orchestrated and finely tuned diurnal rhythms on the global transcriptome under natural day–night cycles in rice. Surprisingly, we also demonstrated that, under field conditions, aspects of the primary carbon assimilation of rice, including net photosynthesis, were robust despite the defect in circadian control of the transcriptome due to the osgi mutation, unlike the case under laboratory conditions with defects in Arabidopsis circadian clocks caused by toc1 and ztl mutations.

RESULTS

Identification of a Circadian Clock–Related Mutant in Rice

To elucidate the role of the circadian clock in flowering time control in rice, a short-day (SD) plant, we first screened suppressor mutants of an early-flowering rice mutant that is insensitive to photoperiod, termed photosensitivity5 (se5) (Izawa et al., 2000). The se5 mutant is phytochrome deficient and derepresses the expression of Heading date 3a (Hd3a), a rice ortholog of FT (Izawa et al., 2002; Kojima et al., 2002; Tamaki et al., 2007). We hoped to obtain some circadian clock–related mutants because we had previously found that the se5 mutant exhibits fairly normal circadian clock behavior (Izawa et al., 2002). The suppressor mutants that we obtained exhibited late-flowering phenotypes under both SD (10 h light/14 h dark) and LD (14.5 h light/9.5 h dark) conditions (flowering slightly earlier under LD than under SD) (Figure 1A) and repressed Hd3a gene expression, as opposed to the derepressed Hd3a expression in se5 mutants (see Supplemental Figure 1 online). Because GI (Fowler et al., 1999; Park et al., 1999) and CO (Putterill et al., 1995) lie upstream of FT in Arabidopsis, we examined the expression of Heading date1 (Hd1) (Yano et al., 2000) (a CO ortholog in rice) and Os-GI (Hayama et al., 2002). In the suppressor mutants, Hd1 expression was greater during the day and less at night than in the se5 mutants, and it had a flatter diurnal gene expression. GI expression was under the limit of detection by RT-PCR in some of these suppressor mutants (see Supplemental Figure 1 online).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flowering Time Phenotypes of a Rice Circadian Clock Mutant in the Laboratory.

(A) Flowering time phenotypes of suppressor mutants screened from se5 mutants. N8: wild-type cultivar for se5. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of plants tested. M1 to M5 suppressor lines were derived from different plants in a M2 population upon screening. Later, we identified M1 to M3 as having the same mutation in Os-GI and M4 to M5 as having another mutation. SD: 10 h light/14 h dark; LD: 14.5 h light/9.5 h dark.

(B) Flowering time phenotypes of progeny of a cross between se5 osgi-1 (M1) and NIL(hd1). NIL(hd1) was an hd1-deficient line with a Nipponbare (NIP) genetic background. N8 and NIP exhibited similar flowering time responses to given photoperiods. Progeny were plants of the F4 generation.

We then surveyed the genome sequences of Os-GI in the suppressor mutants and found one insertional mutation in three mutant lines (Mutant1 [M1], M2, and M3) and one deletion mutation in two mutant lines (M4 and M5) (see Supplemental Figure 2 online). Complementation testing (see Supplemental Figure 3 online) indicated that these mutations caused the suppressor phenotypes. We termed the mutant allele with the insertion osgi-1 and that with the deletion osgi-2. The expression data indicated that osgi-1 was a null allele of Os-GI. These suppressor mutations dramatically affected the circadian clock–related genes PRR1 (Murakami et al., 2003) and LHY (Izawa et al., 2002) under both SD and LD conditions (see Supplemental Figure 4 online). The PRR1 gene in the suppressor mutants was expressed ~10 times more strongly than in the se5 mutant and the wild type at all time points. The LHY gene in the suppressor mutants was expressed 100 times less strongly than in the se5 mutant and the wild type at 02:00 and 04:00, whereas the expression levels were similar during the daytime. These findings indicated that the circadian clocks in the suppressor mutants were severely impaired.

We then crossed the M2 mutant line (se5 osgi-1) with the hd1-deficient near-isogenic line NIL(hd1-Kas) (Yano et al., 2000), and we examined flowering time in the progeny (Figure 1B). The single osgi-1 mutation extended the time to flowering only under SD conditions. Under LD conditions the single hd1 mutation induced early flowering, but osgi-1 plants exhibited no phenotypic change, strongly suggesting that the roles of GI in floral regulation are distinct from those of Hd1 in rice. The flowering time phenotypes of the hd1 osgi-1 double mutants were intermediate between those of the hd1 and osgi-1 single mutants.

Flowering Time Phenotypes of osgi Mutants in the Field

In our studies, osgi mutants exhibited late flowering under SD conditions but no change under LD conditions (Figure 1B). We then asked whether Os-GI contributes to rice flowering time in the field, since we knew that, in typical rice cultivation in temperate areas of Asia, floral transition occurs under natural LD conditions (Izawa, 2007). We reared ~1000 F2 progeny of a cross between se5 osgi-1 and a cultivar (Kasalath) with a defective Hd1 allele and several other natural variations in flowering time genes, and we then examined their flowering times in the field. We also genotyped them at several loci (GI, Se5, and Hd1) and checked the associations between the genotypes and flowering time in this population (Figure 2; see Supplemental Figure 5 and Supplemental Data Set 1 online). Distinct associations of flowering time distribution with the genotypes of the Se5 locus (Figure 2C) and Hd1 locus (Figure 2B), but not with the Os-GI genotypes (Figure 2A), suggested that Os-GI does not influence flowering time much in our fields at Tsukuba, Japan. We further examined flowering time in Os-GI–related lines in a series of experiments with different transplanting dates (see Supplemental Figure 6 online). The osgi-1 mutation slightly advanced flowering, although only by a few days. Flowering time was delayed in osgi mutants with later transplanting dates, possibly reflecting SD promotion of flowering by Os-GI (Itoh et al., 2010).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Flowering Times of Rice osgi Mutants in the Field.

All plants were grown in paddy fields (2005; Tsukuba, Japan). Histograms of flowering time in the field. About 1000 F2 plants from a cross between se5 osgi and Kasalath (an aus rice subgroup cultivar with an hd1-deficient allele) were grown.

(A) Os-GI. All plants were Hd1/hd1 and Se5/se5. Red, osgi/osgi (N8 type); white, Osgi/osgi (hetero); blue, Osgi/Osgi (Kas type).

(B) Hd1. All plants were OsGI/osgi and Se5/se5. Red, Hd1/Hd1 (N8 type); white, Hd1/hd1 (hetero); blue, hd1/hd1 (Kas type).

(C) Se5. All plants were Hd1/hd1 and Osgi/osgi. Red, se5/se5 (N8 type); white, Se5/se5 (hetero); blue, Se5/Se5 (Kas type).

Transcriptome Analysis of osgi Mutants in the Field

The subtle effects of Os-GI on flowering time in the field (Figure 2; see Supplemental Figures 5 and 6 online) prompted us to examine the transcriptomes of rice using osgi-1 mutants growing in the field. At Tsukuba, we sampled two leaves of wild-type and osgi-1 plants for 1 d (24 h) at 2-h intervals (a total of 13 samplings) from 07:00 on August 12, 2008 to 07:00 on August 13, 2008, at each of four developmental stages (achieved by staggering transplanting dates at 1-week intervals), and we performed a series of microarray analyses with an Agilent 44K rice microarray chip. On the sampling date, environmental conditions, such as sunlight and temperature, were also monitored to determine whether the ambient environmental conditions on the sampling date were in the physiological range for rice growth (see Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 7 online). The photoperiods were estimated from the global solar radiation on each sampling date (see Supplemental Table 1 online) and are plotted as day–night bars in Supplemental Figures 8 to 10 online. In summary, 104 arrays were used, with two replicates at each of 13 time points and four developmental stages (2 × 13 × 4 = 104). On each array, the wild-type sample was labeled with Cy3 and the osgi sample was labeled with Cy5. (See Methods and Supplemental Data Set 2 online for assessment of the dye effect when using the rice 44K Agilent microarray.) We did not focus on the differences among developmental stages and instead averaged (or considered together) all eight microarray data sets (two replicates × four developmental stages) per time point to mask the developmental effects. The major conclusions (Figure 3) drawn from the rice diurnal transcriptome data in the field were obtained with these averaged data. For statistical comparison, an unpaired t test assuming equal variances was performed between the eight sets of processed data for the wild type and osgi per time point to judge the effect of Os-GI on the expression of each tested gene at each time point (see Supplemental Figure 11 and Supplemental Tables 2 and 3 online; also see below). We therefore considered that we had sufficient biological replicates to draw valid conclusions. We finally obtained 206 microarray data sets (Cy3-labeled for the wild type and Cy5-labeled for osgi-1). (We discarded one data set because of high variance.) All data are publicly available in the SALAD on ARRAYs viewer (Mihara et al., 2010) of our database (http://salad.dna.affrc.go.jp/salad/) and also have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE18685.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Field Transcriptome Analysis of osgi Mutant.

Hundreds of rice plants were grown in a paddy field (2008; Tsukuba, Japan). Leaf samples were harvested from several plants at 2-h intervals from 07:00 on August 12th to 07:00 on August 13th.

(A) to (C) Heat maps of pairwise Pearson’s coefficients for averaged processed data of 27,201 genes (Cy3- or Cy5-labeled). From high to low values, colors change in the order of green–orange–red. From left to right (and top to bottom), the orders of bins were from developmental stages 1 to 4 (each with a 1-week difference in transplanting dates) at each indicated time. Time point order was from 7:00 August 12th to 7:00 August 13th. WT, wild type.

(A) For 103 microarray data from the wild type (or Norin 8): 13 time points × 2 leaves × 4 stages.

(B) For 103 microarray data from osgi: 13 time points × 2 leaves × 4 stages. (For one sample taken at 19:00, stage 4 was removed because of abnormal variance.)

(C) Relationship between the wild type and osgi. Phases were shifted.

(D) and (E) Averaged coefficients of eight samples per time point were plotted, from data of (A) from the wild type (D) and from data of (B) from osgi (E). Lines are labeled with the corresponding time points.

With these data, we first checked circadian clock–related gene expression. (Note that the graphs are presented in log2 scales [see Supplemental Figures 8 to 10 online].) The dynamic ranges of data processed for Os-GI, -LHY, and -PRR1 in the wild type covered two, three, and two orders of magnitude, respectively (see Supplemental Figure 8 online) and were basically consistent with the quantitative RT-PCR results in se5 osgi-1 plants (see Supplemental Figures 1 and 4 online). At all time points, GI expression in osgi-1 plants was around one order of magnitude less than that in wild-type plants. This reduced level of GI gene expression could have been due to nonsense-mediated decay of mRNA caused by the insertional mutagenesis (see Supplemental Figure 2 online) because the order of amplitude and the rhythm pattern of GI expression did not differ between the wild-type and osgi-1 plants; the only difference was in the level of GI expression. Therefore, it is likely that the rhythmic transcriptional regulation of Os-GI works independently of GI function. Os-LHY expression was substantially reduced at all time points in osgi-1 plants (see Supplemental Figure 8 online); at some points (e.g., midnight), there was more than one order of magnitude difference from the value in wild-type plants, but a clear rhythm of Os-LHY expression remained in the osgi-1 plants. By contrast, Os-PRR1 was substantially upregulated in osgi-1 plants at many points (except at 15:00, 17:00, and 19:00), but its expression exhibited a relatively flat pattern with a reduced rhythm (see Supplemental Figure 8 online). These results indicated that the circadian clock was severely impaired in osgi-1 plants, even under the natural day–night conditions in the field. In rice, GI negatively regulates PRR1, although mathematical modeling in Arabidopsis suggests that At-GI activates the ortholog of Os-PRR1, At-TOC1 (Strayer et al., 2000), and it has been experimentally shown that this activation might occur through posttranslational regulation of TOC1 protein by GI and ZTL (Locke et al., 2005, 2006; Kim et al., 2007; Martin-Tryon et al., 2007; Pokhilko et al., 2010). The role of Os-GI in the rice circadian clock clearly differs from that of At-GI in Arabidopsis, since the effects of a gi single mutation on TOC1 transcription in Arabidopsis are not detectable and those on other circadian clock–related genes are subtle and unclear under diurnal conditions (Kim et al., 2007; Martin-Tryon et al., 2007). As with Os-PRR1, clearly damped rhythms of Os-PRR95 and Os-PRR59 diurnal expression were also observed in osgi-1 plants (Murakami et al., 2003), although the difference was greater from evening to dawn than that in Os-PRR1 (see Supplemental Figure 8 online). By contrast, there were no effects on rhythmic expression patterns of Os-PRR73 or Os-PRR37 (Murakami et al., 2003) (see Supplemental Figure 8 online), suggesting that Os-GI does not regulate these PRR genes (i.e., PRR73 and PRR37) in rice. If we assume that there is some evolutionary conservation between rice circadian clock–related genes and those associated with Arabidopsis circadian clocks, where the circadian clock consists of interlocked subloops, it is also possible that Os-GI is a member of a subloop in rice circadian clocks. If this is the case, because the amplitudes and expression patterns of the rhythmic transcription patterns of Os-LHY and Os-GI were not affected severely by the osgi-1 mutation, both Os-LHY and Os-GI may themselves function as interlocks. By contrast, Os-PRR1, -PRR59, and -PRR95 require Os-GI to maintain their strong rhythms and may be members of a subloop in which GI is a central member, whereas PRR73 and PRR37 may consist of other subloops independent of GI.

Consistently, expression of some other circadian clock–related genes, such as LHY-related genes (Os04g0583900 and Os02g0685200), LUX (Os01g0971800), and ELF3like (Os01g0566100), was affected by osgi-1 (see Supplemental Figure 9 online). Like PRR1, FKF1 (Os11g0547000) was upregulated in osgi plants, with a damped rhythm, but LKP2 (Os02g0150800) and ZTL (Os06g0694000) were not affected (see Supplemental Figure 9 online). Therefore, Os-FKF1 may function as a downstream gene in the Os-GI–dependent clock. Alternatively, it could be a member of the Os-GI–dependent subloop itself.

The major flowering time gene Hd1 was affected in the evening and at night by the single osgi-1 mutation; this was consistent with the RT-PCR data for se5 osgi-1 (see Supplemental Figures 1 and 10 online). Some CO-like and COL9-like genes were dramatically affected by osgi-1 (see Supplemental Figure 10 online), suggesting that the rhythmic expression of several output genes is regulated critically by Os-GI–dependent circadian clocks in rice.

To elucidate how these changes in circadian clock–related genes affect global gene expression in osgi mutants in the field, where strong environmental cues set the phases of circadian clocks, we next checked the effect of the osgi mutation on the entire rice transcriptome in field-grown plants. Among the 27,201 nonredundant tested genes, the expression of 57% (at false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.01) or 75% (FDR = 0.05) was significantly affected by osgi-1 under natural diurnal conditions (see Supplemental Figure 11 and Supplemental Tables 2 and 3 online). Here, significance was examined by t test among the eight log2-calibrated data sets from the processed data of the Agilent rice 44K array for each time point (see Supplemental Figure 11 online). Pearson’s coefficients of correlation between all possible pairs of the 27,201 nonredundant gene expression data among 206 microarrays were used to make heat maps (Figures 3A to 3C; see Supplemental Figure 12 online) to visualize the relationships of each set of rice transcriptome data. The averaged coefficients of the eight microarray data sets per time point were also plotted (Figures 3D and 3E). With these transcriptome data, orchestrated phase-dependent global changes in rice transcriptomes were clearly observed in wild-type plants (Figures 3A and 3D; see Supplemental Figure 12 online). However, only two major types of transcriptome profile, corresponding to “day” and “night”, were observed in osgi-1 plants (Figures 3B and 3E; see Supplemental Figure 12 online). The changes in the coefficients of correlation in a day were clearly greater in wild-type plants than in the osgi mutants, indicating a more drastic phase dependency and stronger amplitudes of the transcriptomes in wild-type plants than osgi-1 plants (Figures 3D and 3E).

We next used cosine curve regression models to estimate the peak phase corresponding to a 24-h period for all tested genes using nonlinear least-squares methods (see Supplemental Figures 13 and 14 online). For this cosine curve fitting, for which we used data averaged over eight microarray data sets, we adopted an original score, termed a fitting score, to select genes that were diurnally expressed in rice (see details of fitting scores in Methods). Our aim was to select genes with diurnal gene expression that was as global as possible; from the transcriptome data obtained from rice leaves, we selected >6000 genes that were diurnally expressed.

The peak phases of expression of these selected diurnally expressed genes were severely affected in the osgi-1 mutants; in osgi plants, we found two major gene groups with high expression amplitudes and either a morning or night peak, but in wild-type plants, the peak phases with high amplitudes were distributed more evenly (see Supplemental Figure 15 online). By contrast, gene groups with low amplitudes were evenly distributed in the osgi mutants, and no group of low-amplitude genes with a midday peak was clearly observed in the wild-type plants (see Supplemental Figure 15 online). In addition, some phases of each type of gene expression were delayed or advanced in the osgi plants compared with those in the wild type at all time points (see Supplemental Figures 16 and 17 online). For the majority of genes, the amplitudes of expression (corresponding to “b” in the regression models; see also Supplemental Figure 13 online) were reduced in the osgi plants (see Supplemental Figure 18 online). Fitting to the cosine curves also differed between wild-type and osgi plants; some genes showed better fitting in wild-type plants, whereas others fitted better in the osgi mutants. Basal expression (corresponding to “a”) did not change greatly (see Supplemental Figure 18 online). These findings indicated a close relationship between Os-GI and the transcriptome profile (i.e., the phase setting and amplitude of the transcriptome). These data clearly demonstrated that Os-GI confers fine phase-setting and strong amplitudes of orchestrated global diurnal rhythms on the transcriptomes of rice leaves in the field (Figure 3; see Supplemental Figures 12 and 15 to 18 online).

Physiological Phenotypes of osgi Mutants in the Field

We next examined the photosynthetic properties and diurnal changes in photosynthate pools under full sun (Figure 4; see Supplemental Table 4 online) because circadian clocks are believed to maintain photosynthetic performance and the resulting primary production. In Arabidopsis, artificial environments matched to a free-running period enhance photosynthesis in long and short circadian period mutants (Dodd et al., 2005). Our results clearly demonstrated that the contents of Suc and starch in the leaves were significantly increased at most time points in osgi-1 mutants (Figures 4F and 4G). Furthermore, leaf nitrogen content and light-saturated photosynthesis at different CO2 partial pressures were not affected in osgi-1 plants (Figures 4A and 4D). These findings implied that loss of proper phase setting and changes in the amplitude of transcriptome expression resulted in some increase in primary production in the leaves of osgi mutants of rice, although the physiological and biochemical functions of Os-GI protein are still largely unknown. Increased starch content is also reported in gi mutants in Arabidopsis (Eimert et al., 1995). A similar, but more extensive, analysis of metabolite profiling has been reported in Arabidopsis gi mutants (called starch excess3 mutants by the authors; Messerli et al., 2007). Chlorophyll content was significantly reduced in osgi plants (Figure 4E), but stomatal conductance was significantly increased, resulting in significantly increased intercellular CO2 partial pressures (Figures 4B and 4C) (Seneweera et al., 1995). However, these changes did not affect the photosynthetic rate (Figure 4A).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Photosynthesis, Primary Metabolism, and Yield-Related Traits in osgi.

(A) CO2 assimilation rates (A) at different [CO2] partial pressures. Measurements were made at an ambient CO2 pressure (pCa) of 39 Pa and intercellular CO2 pressures (pCi) of 20 and >60 Pa.

(B) Stomatal conductance (gs) measured at pCa = 39 Pa.

(C) Intercellular CO2 partial pressure (pCi) measured at pCa = 39 Pa.

(D) Leaf nitrogen (N) content.

(E) Leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content.

(F) Diurnal change in leaf starch content. WT, wild type.

(G) Diurnal change in leaf Suc content. Each datum is represented as the mean ± se from 4 to 5 independent experiments in (A) to (G).

(H) Panicle numbers per plant.

(I) Spikelet numbers per plant. Significant difference (asterisk) at P < 0.05.

(J) Averaged grain weights.

(K) Grain yields per plant.

(L) Averaged fertility.

(M) Fertility under atypical growing conditions with late transplanting dates. Numbers in parentheses indicate the transplanting dates. Significant difference is indicated as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

[See online article for color version of this figure.]

We then surveyed our microarray data for photosynthesis-related pathways and primary metabolic pathways (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figures 19 to 28 online). In the pathways regulating sink size, several starch synthesis–related genes were clearly upregulated in osgi plants (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figure 19 online). Consistently, the main starch degradation genes were downregulated, especially in the morning (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figure 20 online). These results indicate clearly that Os-GI can affect the main starch metabolic genes to control starch accumulation, although it is still possible that Os-GI can also affect enzymatic activity in starch metabolic pathways. In the other primary metabolism pathways and photosynthetic and mitochondrial electron transfer pathways, no critical changes in gene expression and no trends—even when there were changes in primary metabolite production—were observed (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figures 21 to 28 online). The orchestrated transcriptomal diurnal rhythms set by Os-GI are therefore not essential for high levels of photosynthetic efficiency in rice. (Note that the data presented in the graphs in Supplemental Figures 19 to 29 are those in which the ratio of osgi to the wild type [or the wild type to osgi] was >2 and the mRNA level in wild-type plants was higher than the background hybridization level.)

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Robustness of Gene Expression Related to Primary Assimilation to the osgi Mutation.

Using color gradients as described in the figure, average mRNA levels during the 24 h in the wild type and their ratios between the wild type (WT) and osgi are indicated as left and right boxes with different colors, respectively. From left to right columns, all gene expression related to starch synthesis, starch degradation, TCA cycle, Calvin cycle, Suc metabolism, oxidative reaction of pentose phosphate pathway (pentose phosphate) (in cytosol [Cyt] and chloroplast [Chl]), glycolysis I (Glyco I), and glycolysis II (Glyco II). Photochemical reaction and electron transfer in chloroplast (Chl) and mitochondrion (Mito) are summarized. Detailed data are also shown in Supplemental Figures 19 to 28 online. Less than one-tenth and >10 ratios (osgi/wild type) were not observed among these genes. Numbers in parentheses in a column indicate an enzyme in the pathway corresponding to those in Supplemental Figures 19 to 28 online.

In addition, panicle numbers and spikelet numbers were significantly increased in osgi-1 plants (Figures 4H and 4I), possibly because of outgrowth of axial meristems and increased panicle formation using the increased amounts of photosynthate. However, because osgi grains were significantly lighter than wild-type grains, grain yield was not affected in osgi-1 plants (Figures 4J and 4K). In contrast with the case with primary assimilation, expression of some key genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway (a secondary metabolite pathway controlled by circadian clocks; Harmer, 2009) was significantly upregulated in osgi plants (see Supplemental Figure 29 online). Furthermore, under atypical growing conditions with late transplanting dates in the field, fertility was significantly reduced in osgi plants, indicating some loss of seasonal adaptability (Figures 4L and 4M).

Metabolome Analysis of osgi Mutants in the Field

To further elucidate the physiological roles of Os-GI, we performed a widely targeted metabolome analysis (see Methods in Sawada et al., 2009) of rice leaves growing in the field. Among ~700 chemicals tested, we found significant changes in the production of 73 metabolites in osgi plants relative to the wild type (N8). (See our summary database of this metabolome analysis in Supplemental Data Sets 3 and 4 online.) In Supplemental Data Set 4 online, for the 73 metabolites we plotted the diurnal time-course changes in mass peak areas, as well as mean values, difference plots, and density plots. In these metabolome results, among metabolites in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, the production of malate, citrate, and 2-oxoglutarate was significantly decreased in osgi-1 plants, whereas aconitate and isocitrate production was significantly increased (Figure 6). Levels of succinate and fumarate were not significantly affected in osgi-1 leaves (Figure 6). In addition, we observed an increase in flavonoid production and a clear reduction in Phe production (see Supplemental Figure 30 online). The reduction of fertility in osgi plants under atypical growing conditions (Figures 4L and 4M) was consistent with this accumulation of flavonoids in osgi leaves (see Supplemental Figure 30 online) because some of these flavonoids are known to be stress inducible (Grace and Logan, 2000).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Summary of Changes in Levels of Primary Metabolites in osgi.

The analyses were performed based on the results of a widely targeted metabolome analysis (Sawada et al., 2009). Summarized data from Supplemental Data Sets 3 and 4 online for primary metabolites are presented. Colors of circles represent the fold changes (osgi/wild type) as indicated in the figure. Sizes of circles represent FDRs. FDR was calculated using the P values of a paired t test with 52 values (2 × 13 time points for both the wild type and osgi).

DISCUSSION

OsGI Confers Fine Phase Setting and a Strong Orchestrated Rhythm on the Global Transcriptome in the Field

In this work, we focused on the physiological roles of plant circadian clocks under natural field conditions. The traits of circadian clocks, including free-running rhythms, have long been examined under constant environmental conditions, ever since cab:luc screening of circadian clock mutants of Arabidopsis was successfully performed (Millar et al., 1995; McClung, 2008; Harmer, 2009). Assaying under constant light (LL) or constant dark (DD) is done mainly to be able to more clearly quantify the endgenous period of the traits and to elucidate the self-oscillation mechanisms, where free-running assays are simply to obtain better period estimates. However, the phenotypes observed under such constant environmental conditions do not necessarily reflect the biological roles of circadian clocks under natural day–night cycles of sunlight or diurnal artificial conditions in the laboratory. Because circadian clocks are believed to control target genes and, hence, related traits under natural diurnal conditions, we performed transcriptome analyses, targeted metabolome analyses, and physiological analyses of photosynthetic properties using osgi mutants of rice.

In Arabidopsis, GI is thought to be a circadian clock component gene (Fowler et al., 1999; Park et al., 1999; Locke et al., 2005, 2006; Kim et al., 2007; Pokhilko et al., 2010). Here, we demonstrated that Os-GI, which is transcriptionally regulated by diurnal light changes in the laboratory (Itoh et al., 2010), is required for strong amplitudes and fine-tuning of the diurnal rhythm phases of global transcriptome expression under natural day–night field conditions (Figure 3; see Supplemental Figures 15 to 18 online). It is generally believed that ambient environmental cues may control the entrainment of circadian clocks. Therefore, this concept, together with our results, suggests that entrained circadian clocks require the function of Os-GI to give rise to strong diurnal rhythms and fine phase-setting of global transcriptome expression. Considering the changes in circadian clock–related gene expression in the osgi mutants, it is possible that Os-GI participates in a subloop of circadian clocks in rice and uses ambient environmental signals to entrain the subloop clocks to produce the strong, finely tuned, and orchestrated rhythms in the transcriptomes of rice (see Supplemental Figures 15 to 17 online). Consistent with this idea, darkness longer than normal night dramatically reduces rhythmic gene expression of Os-GI in the laboratory (Itoh et al., 2010). On the other hand, even in the osgi mutants, there remained two distinct transcriptomal profiles (i.e., day and night; Figure 3), although the phase settings and amplitudes of rhythmic gene expression were severely impaired in these plants. Therefore, in osgi mutants, diurnal changes in environmental cues can cause only all-or-none-type responses in the transcriptome profiles, with no fine phase setting. Taken together, our results indicate that Os-GI confers fine phase setting and a strong orchestrated rhythm on the global transcriptome in the field.

Although light and ambient temperature are known to be zeitgebers in the laboratory, the diurnal changes in environmental cues responsible for entraining circadian clocks have not been identified experimentally under natural field conditions. For example, we do not know which signal (dawn or dusk) has the stronger effect on the entrainment of circadian clocks in the field. Extensive mathematical modeling to elucidate the relationships between various environmental cues and gene expression in our transcriptome data are now under investigation in our laboratory, with the aim of determining which environmental cues are the most effective in entraining circadian clocks or gating circadian clock–controlled genes in rice.

Associations between Transcriptome and Metabolome Data of osgi

One of the major actions of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis is thought to be the transcriptional regulation of downstream genes. Currently, a negative feedback transcriptional loop between CCA1/LHY and TOC1 (or other PRRs) is believed to be the core clock mechanism in Arabidopsis (Strayer et al., 2000; Alabadí et al., 2001). Here, because we obtained both transcriptome and annotated metabolome data from osgi leaves in rice under field conditions, we used the osgi-1 mutation to address the simple question of how changes in circadian clock–controlled gene expression in some metabolic pathways were associated with the levels of related metabolites under field conditions. In Arabidopsis, it is well known that the transcription of genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway is under the control of circadian clocks (Harmer, 2009). As expected from this knowledge, in our transcriptome data, expression of several genes of the phenylpropanoid pathway was significantly affected by the osgi-1 mutation under natural diurnal conditions in the field; the majority of these genes were upregulated (see Supplemental Figure 29 online). Because only the net effects of the osgi-1 mutation on the expression of paralogous genes imply some ability to change the production of related metabolites, we checked the expression of all paralogous gene members in the rice genome (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figures 19 to 29 online). Consistent with the transcriptome data on the phenylpropanoid pathway (see Supplemental Figure 29 online), we observed that the production of several metabolites in the phenylpropanoid pathway was significantly increased (see Supplemental Figure 30 and Supplemental Data Set 4 online). By contrast, the pool of Phe, a major chemical precursor in the phenylpropanoid pathway, was significantly decreased in our metabolome data. We found a similar association between a set of transcriptome data and the related metabolome data on starch metabolism (Figures 4F, 4G, and 6; see Supplemental Figures 19 and 20 online). These examples suggest that this transcriptional regulation primarily influences the amounts of the corresponding products in both the starch and the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathways in rice. Note that the possibility of posttranslational regulation of starch metabolic enzymes by circadian clocks was not excluded by our results. Some of these changes in the starch production pathway were consistent with those in previous reports (Zeeman et al., 2007; Fulton et al., 2008).

Recently, extensive work has been done on starch metabolism and circadian clocks in Arabidopsis (Fukushima et al., 2009; Graf et al., 2010). Graf et al. (2010) reported that starch degradation during the night, which is a determinant of growth in Arabidopsis, is partly under circadian control. This observation is consistent with our finding that some amylase (starch degradation enzyme) genes of rice were expressed at lower levels in the leaves of osgi mutants than in those of the wild type (see Supplemental Figure 20 online). Fukushima et al. (2009) reported that a triple PRR mutant of Arabidopsis, d975, showed considerably increased production of TCA cycle intermediates, whereas a CCA-overexpressing (CCA-ox) mutant showed less change in primary metabolism. Because the Arabidopsis circadian clock does not cycle in CCA-ox mutants (Wang and Tobin, 1998), we considered that the reduced effects of the transcripts on primary metabolism in osgi mutants were consistent with the CCA-ox phenotype. Because the d975 mutant shows dramatic changes in the diurnal expression of many genes under diurnal conditions in the laboratory (Nakamichi et al., 2009), the upregulation of TCA cycle member genes suggests that both light signaling and the circadian clock are impaired in d975 mutants.

In contrast with the above examples, transcript changes related to the production of other major primary metabolites revealed no clear associations with the changes in related metabolome data in rice (Figures 5 and 6; see Supplemental Figures 21 to 28 online). For example, production of malate, citrate, and 2-oxoglutarate in the TCA cycle was significantly decreased, whereas aconitate and isocitrate production was increased (Figure 6). These changes in primary metabolite production in the TCA cycle were not supported by our transcriptome data because the expression of most genes encoding TCA cycle enzymes was not critically changed in the osgi mutants (Figure 5; see Supplemental Figure 21 online). Furthermore, levels of succinate and fumarate in the TCA cycle were not significantly affected in osgi mutants (Figure 6). Considering the relatively normal growth of osgi plants in the field (Figure 4), it is likely that the TCA cycle itself was not impaired in the osgi mutants. The changes in the amounts of these primary metabolites might have been brought about indirectly as a result of changes in their pool sizes through related secondary metabolism. For example, levels of both Phe (a primary metabolism product) and related secondary metabolites were affected together (see Supplemental Figure 30 and Supplemental Data Set 4 online). These data strongly indicate that the expression of the majority of genes related to primary metabolites was robustly controlled by homeostasis at the transcriptional level. Therefore, in considering transcriptional regulation as a primary output of circadian clocks, we concluded that the osgi mutation did not alter primary productivity (Figures 4 to 6), even though in the transcriptome analysis the expression of 57% (FDR = 0.01) or 75% (FDR = 0.05) of genes was significantly affected by the osgi mutation under natural diurnal day–night conditions in the field (see Supplemental Figure 11 online). In addition, circadian clock–dependent modification of the activity of enzymes associated with primary metabolite production would explain the lack of association between transcriptomes and metabolomes, although such modifications are not yet considered as major outputs of plant circadian clocks.

Robustness of Primary Assimilation in osgi Mutation in the Field

The finding that the osgi mutation did not greatly affect the flowering time of rice in the field (Figure 2; see Supplemental Figures 5 and 6 online) raised the question of the physiological roles of the circadian clock in rice under natural day–night conditions. For instance, the ambient light intensity to which plants are subjected in the laboratory is generally weak (~50 to 200 μmol m–2 s–1). By contrast, in the field on a typical sunny day (for instance, in Tsukuba, Japan), the sunlight intensity to which plants are subjected is often up to 2000 μmol m–2 s–1. Therefore, we decided to examine osgi mutants under field conditions to elucidate the physiological roles of Os-GI in the plant circadian clock. Here, we clearly demonstrated that, even under natural day–night cycle conditions, Os-GI gave a clear, orchestrated diurnal phase dependency to rice global transcriptomes, producing marked differences in expression at different time points (Figure 3). Unexpectedly, the net photosynthesis rate was not affected by the global defect caused by the osgi mutation (Figures 4A to 4E), indicating the robustness of primary assimilation in the face of defects in the circadian clock. This conclusion was further supported by the field transcriptome data (Figure 5), the widely targeted time-course metabolome analysis (Figure 6), and the examination of yield related traits in the field (Figures 4H and 4I). These results strongly suggest that the genetic diversity of circadian clock–related traits contributes to the local adaptation of rice cultivars through traits other than those related to primary assimilation.

Physiological changes in flowering time control and some secondary metabolic pathways of stress response are likely candidate traits related to such local adaptations. For instance, osgi mutants become late flowering under SD conditions (Figure 1B), suggesting that there would be changes in flowering time if these mutants were grown in tropical areas. In the field, natural cues (daylight, temperature, and photoperiod) often fluctuate, sometimes leading to abiotic and biotic stresses on plants. Indeed, we showed that, under atypical growing conditions with late transplanting dates in the field, fertility was significantly reduced in osgi plants, indicating loss of seasonal adaptability (Figures 4L and 4M). The accumulation of phytoalexin-related flavonoids, such as 3-deoxyanthocyanidins in osgi leaves (see Supplemental Figure 30 online), could be a response to natural stress because some flavonoids are stress inducible (Grace and Logan, 2000).

Overall, as shown here, by using circadian clock functions, rice plants maintain strong amplitudes and fine-tuning of the diurnal rhythm phases of global transcriptomes, thus likely enabling them to better adapt to fluctuating environmental conditions in the field. However, photosynthesis- and growth-related primary assimilation in rice was robust in the face of a severe defect in the diurnally rhythmic transcriptomes under field conditions (Figures 4 and 5). It is likely that plant primary assimilation ability is firmly protected by some unidentified homeostatic feedback system. In Arabidopsis under dim light conditions in the laboratory, the circadian clock plays an important role in maintaining primary assimilation (Ouyang et al., 1998; Green et al., 2002; Dodd et al., 2005; Harmer, 2009). This suggests that plant researchers should be more keen to use ambient environmental conditions to investigate the biological roles of circadian clocks.

METHODS

Suppressor Mutant Screening

About 3000 se5 seeds were irradiated with a conventional dose of γ-rays (Institute of Radiation Breeding) and then germinated to give M1 plants. The M2 seeds obtained were bulk harvested into six groups. In total, 18,000 M2 plants were grown in a paddy field and screened for flowering phenotype. Eight individuals were isolated as suppressor mutants; five were analyzed in this work. M1, M2, and M3 plants were obtained from one group in the M2 population, and M4 and M5 plants were obtained from another group.

Genotyping of Flowering Time Loci

After transplantation of the rice (Oryza sativa) plants, part of a leaf from each of 1000 tested plants was sampled and used for DNA preparation. Fragment analysis using GeneMapper software (Genetic Analyzer ABI3130) was performed for genotyping. The primers strongly linked to target loci were RM5552F (5′-AGCCCAGAGGGAGTAACTTAACAACC-3′) and RM5552R (5′-GTTTCACACATCTTGATATGCTGGAAGC-3′) for Os-GI; RM6836F (5′-AGCGTGTTCAGAAATTAGGATACGG-3′) and RM6836R (5′-GTTTGATCTCGCCACGTAATTGTTGC-3′) for Hd1; and RM3628F (5′-AGCCCTAGACACACCCGTACC-3′) and RM3628R (5′-GTTTGCCAGATCAGAAATCATGC-3′) for Se5.

PCR fragments were postlabeled for detection.

Transcriptome Analysis

For microarray analysis, rice leaves were sampled in a paddy field every 2 h from 07:00 on August 12, 2008 to 07:00 on August 13, 2008. Ambient conditions on August 12th to the 13th (2008) are shown in Supplemental Figure 7 online. Photoperiods were estimated from the global solar radiation (see Supplemental Table 1 online); the corresponding day–night bars are shown in Supplemental Figures 8 to 10 online. Both wild-type and osgi plants flowered in the first week in September. RNA was prepared with an RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). A rice 44K Agilent microarray chip (Agilent Technologies) was used. RNA quality in all cases was analyzed using Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). RNA was labeled in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (the wild type with Cy3 and osgi with Cy5). Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cRNA probes (800 ng) were hybridized to a single chip. All microarray analyses were systematically performed by the same researcher (T. Izawa) and a technical assistant (R. Motoyama) in a series of experiments (four chips for one experiment). Redundancy of distinct probes for the same gene in the chip was considered to summarize the data into the expression of 27,201 distinct genes. If multiple probes existed, the averaged processed data were considered to represent expression of the corresponding gene.

Normalization and Correlation Analysis

For each set of microarray data, to reduce the indeterminate error among microarray experiments, we first normalized the obtained data using the qspline method, which was implemented in R and included in the Bioconductor package (http://www.r-project.org/; Workman et al., 2002). Normalized data were analyzed with Excel (for heat map display) and R software (for correlation coefficient calculation and two-dimensional histogram display).

t Test

The unpaired t test assuming equal variances was used for statistical comparison between the eight sets of processed data for wild-type and osgi plants at a time point. Both FDR = 0.01 and FDR = 0.05 were considered significant (see Supplemental Figure 11 and Supplemental Table 3 online). A total of 27,201 × 13 P values were used for this FDR calibration (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). When any significant difference at one time point or more among 13 time points was detected for a tested gene by this t test, we concluded that the gene was regulated by the Os-GI gene.

Fitting Methods

Normalized data were transformed to log2 values. We applied three curve-fitting models over microarray data for 13 time points using nonlinear least squares in R (http://www.r-project.org/) (see also Supplemental Figure 14 online):Embedded Imagewhere y represents the microarray data and t is the time, a, b, c, d, ∂1, ∂2, and ∂3 are estimate parameters, and ∂1 is the phase estimate for the entrained 24-h period.

Model Evaluation

We compared ∂1 and the peak points of the fitted model curves between Model 1 and the other two models. Theoretically, ∂1 should be identical among models because these models are based on Fourier transformation formulae. This was confirmed in our cases by nonlinear least squares (see Supplemental Figure 13 online).

Fitting Evaluation

Fitted model curves were evaluated using a fitting score, which was defined as residual standard error divided by amplitude [i.e., sqrt (Dev/n – 3)/b]. Here, Dev, n, and b indicate residual sum of squares, total number of time points, and amplitude, respectively. A low fitting index indicates good fit. The basic idea here is very simple. The residual sum of squares (or residual standard error) can be considered as noise in the experiments. Therefore, the ratio of noise against b (amplitude) can be used as a simple score to explain how a value is fitted to a cosine curve. We empirically set 0.6 as a threshold fitting score (see Supplemental Table 4 online). To justify this criterion, we present examples of best fits, borderline fits, and worst fits in Supplemental Figure 14 online. We also made histograms of the fitting scores (see Supplemental Figure 31 online); we found that they had peaks around the range of 0.3 to 0.4, with a gradual slope that reached nonrhythmic gene expression. Because we wanted to select genes with diurnal expression that was as global as possible, we considered that the threshold of 0.6 was a reasonable value because genes with scores of 0.3 to 0.4 score were typical diurnally expressed genes.

Dye Effect of Cy5/Cy3 Labeling

On each array in our transcriptome analyses, the wild-type sample was labeled with Cy3, and the osgi sample was labeled with Cy5. Therefore, we had to evaluate the dye effects using the same rice 44K Agilent array independently. First, we collected five sets of dye-swap microarray data that had been obtained previously with the same experimental protocol. See the details of samples in Supplemental Table 5 online. In this series of experiment, there were five sets of two treatments (leaf 0 min versus leaf 60 min after cutting, leaf 0 min versus leaf 30 min after cutting, root 0 min versus root 30 min after cutting, panicle 0 min versus panicle 30 min after cutting, embryo with abscisic acid [ABA] treatment versus embryo without ABA treatment), and each dye-swap pair used the same treatment (A or B in Supplemental Table 5 online) for both Cy3 and Cy5. The simple box plot of the 20 microarray data suggests the lack of overall dye effect in the rice 44K Agilent chip microarray experiments when we used log2 of the processed data provided by the Agilent protocol as an intensity of gene expression (see Supplemental Figure 32 online). To do a statistical test for a per-gene dye effect, we further adopted two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; without interaction) analysis for all the 27,201 genes simply using the R function, or aov. The two factors were in the two-way ANOVA model: Dye and Combo, where Dye has two levels (Cy3 and Cy5) and Combo has 10 levels (leaf 0 min – sample 1, leaf 30 min, leaf 0 min – sample 2, leaf 60 min, root 0 min, root 30 min, panicle 0 min, panicle 30 min, embryo with ABA, embryo with Moc). We included all data of obtained cy3 and cy5 intensity even if they are background levels. Therefore, each gene has 10 cy3 intensity data points and the corresponding 10 cy5 intensity data points. Obtained P values for the Dye effect (at the gene level) after two-way ANOVA were FDR corrected by another R function, or p.adjust (method = “fdr”). The minimum data of FDR-corrected P value among 27, 201 genes was 0.01062 (see Supplemental Data Set 2 online), which indicates that no gene among 27,201 genes exhibited any dye effects (FDR = 0.01). Otherwise, only nine genes among them exhibited some dye effects (FDR = 0.01) among 27,201 genes tested (see Supplemental Data Set 2 online). Furthermore, averaged log2 (cy3 intensity/cy5 intensity) ratios of the nine genes were within 0.5 and −0.5 (see Supplemental Figures 33 and 34 online). These possible dye effects do not affect any evaluations on all the conclusions from the field transcriptomes described in the text. Therefore, we are confident that we could assume there were no dye effects on our data in using our microarray protocols for the rice 44k Agilent array.

Plant Growth in the Field

Rice plants were grown in paddy fields at Tsukuba, Japan (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure 5 online, 2005; Supplemental Figure 6 online, 2007; Figures 3 and 4M, 2008; Figures 4H to 4L, 2009) or in Sendai, Japan (2009) (Figures 4A to 4G) in pots containing nutrient solution (Makino et al., 1988) by water culture in an environmentally controlled greenhouse maintained with day/night temperatures of 25/20°C and 60% relative humidity under natural sunlight (Figure 4). In the paddy fields, plants were transplanted at one plant per 20 × 20 cm (2005) or per 15 × 30 cm (2007, 2008, and 2009). Major transplanting dates were May 18, 2005 (Tsukuba), June 16, 2008 (Tsukuba), and April 1, 2009 (Sendai). For the microarray (Figure 3) and fertility (Figure 4M) data, plants were transplanted into paddy fields on June 1, 8, 15, and 22 (2008); these dates were later than those in typical cropping seasons in Tsukuba. For yield-related traits (Figures 4H to 4L), plants were transplanted on May 19, 2009. Heading dates were recorded every 2 or 3 d and considered as the flowering dates. For agronomic traits, the means ± sd were used from 10 (Figure 4H) or nine (Figure 4I) randomly selected independent plants at each stage. In total, 40 (Figure 4H) or 36 (Figure 4I) plants in the field were measured. Nine plants with about average panicle numbers were measured for grain weight (Figure 4J), grain yield (Figure 4K), and fertility (Figure 4L). For each transplanting date, nine plants were tested for fertility under atypical conditions (Figure 4M).

Photosynthesis and Carbohydrate Analyses

Gas-exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence were simultaneously measured on the uppermost fully expanded leaves with a portable open gas-exchange system (LI-6400; Li-Cor) equipped with a Mini-PAM photosynthesis yield analyzer (Walz) as described (Hirotsu et al., 2004). Measurements were made at a photosynthetic photon flux density of 1200 μmol m–2 s–1, a leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference of 1.0 to 1.2 kPa, a leaf temperature of 25°C, an ambient CO2 partial pressure of 39 Pa, and intercellular CO2 partial pressures of 20 Pa and >60 Pa. The gas exchange parameters were determined (Genty et al., 1989), and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and the level of thermal dissipation (i.e., the nonphotochemical quenching) were estimated (von Caemmerer and Farquhar, 1981). These measurements were recorded indoors from June 1st to June 3rd in 2009. Plants used for measurements were moved to the room in the morning, and measurements were completed by 16:00. Ambient light conditions on June 1 to 3, 2009 are shown in Supplemental Figure 7 online. After the measurements, leaf nitrogen and chlorophyll contents were measured (Makino et al., 1988). To determine the carbohydrate contents, the uppermost fully expanded leaves were collected, weighed, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen at different time points (at 4-h intervals) on a clear day (on June 9th) and then stored at –80°C until analysis. Ambient light conditions on June 9, 2009 are shown in Supplemental Figure 7 online. Suc and starch contents were measured with an F-Kit (R-Biopharm) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Metabolomic Analysis

Rice plants were grown in paddy fields at Tsukuba, Japan. The transplanting date was June 19, 2009. Leaves were sampled from the paddy field every 2 h from 07:00 on August 24, 2009 to 07:00 on August 25, 2009 and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Ambient environmental conditions on August 24th to the 25th in 2009 are shown in Supplemental Figure 7 online. A leaf was used as the sample for metabolomic analysis. All samples were derived from different plant individuals. Leaves were lyophilized and were crushed in a Mixer Mill (MM300; Retsch). Five milligrams (dry weight) of powdered tissue was used. Extraction with 1 mL of 80% aqueous methanol containing 0.1% formic acid, 33.6 nM lidocaine, and 1.72 μM 10-camphorsulfonic acid, and the subsequent sample preparation, were fully automated. Metabolite contents were quantified by means of widely targeted metabolomics (Sawada et al., 2009) with 545 sets of retention time (RT) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) conditions, which were optimized for quantification of ~700 compounds by tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry coupled with ultraperformance liquid chromatography (Waters). Some of the RT-MRM sets detected more than one metabolite [e.g., d-(−)-ribose and d-xylulose, which is indicated as 2i_d-(−)-ribose_d-xylulose in Supplemental Data Sets 3 and 4 online]. Details of the methods of sample preparation and metabolomic analysis have been given previously (Sawada et al., 2009). Statistical analyses of metabolome data were performed using R. The significance of difference between the wild type (N8) and mutant (osgi) was tested by a paired t test. FDRs were calculated from the P values of the paired t tests (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Differences in compound amounts between paired samples are represented in the difference plots (upper right of Supplemental Data Set 4 online). The estimated distributions of the compound amounts are shown in the density plots (bottom right of Supplemental Data Set 4 online).

Accession Numbers

Sequence data for Os-GI can be found in the GenBank database under accession number NM_001048755.1. Microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE18685.

Author Contributions

T.I. designed this work, organized collaborations, performed most of experiments, and wrote the manuscript. M.M. helped to analyze the transcriptome data and worked with our database. H.I. performed complementation tests and mutant sequencing. M.Y.H. and Y.S. performed the metabolome analysis. A.J.N. analyzed the metabolome data. Y.S. and A.M. performed assays of photosynthesis and primary metabolism products and analyzed primary production in the microarray data. R.M. and Y.N. helped in the microarray analysis. M.Y. helped to screen the suppressor mutants. M.G. helped with genotyping for the association analysis.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

  • Supplemental Figure 1. qRT-PCR Analysis of Time Course of Expression of Hd3a, Hd1, and Os-GI in se5 Suppressor Mutants.

  • Supplemental Figure 2. osgi Mutations Identified in This Work Are Shown Schematically.

  • Supplemental Figure 3. Complementation Test.

  • Supplemental Figure 4. qRT-PCR Analysis of Circadian Clock–Related Genes in se5 Suppressor Mutants.

  • Supplemental Figure 5. Histograms of Flowering Time in the Field.

  • Supplemental Figure 6. Shift-of-Transplanting-Date Experiments for Flowering Time in the Field.

  • Supplemental Figure 7. Diurnal Changes in Ambient Environmental Conditions for Some of the Experiments.

  • Supplemental Figure 8. Average Calibrated Data for Core Circadian Clock–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 9. Average Calibrated Data for Other Circadian Clock–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 10. Average Calibrated Data for CO-like and COL9-like Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 11. Histograms of Gene Numbers with the Time Points, at Which Expression Levels Were Changed Significantly by osgi-1.

  • Supplemental Figure 12. Heat Map of Pairwise Pearson’s Coefficients for Average Calibrated Data for Genes with Fitting Thresholds of <0.6.

  • Supplemental Figure 13. Mathematical Fittings for Cosine Curves.

  • Supplemental Figure 14. Examples of Regressed Waves to Average Calibrated Data of 27,201 Genes.

  • Supplemental Figure 15. Two-Dimensional Histograms for Peak Phases of the 24-h Period and Amplitudes of 13,338 Wild-Type Genes and 12,318 osgi Genes.

  • Supplemental Figure 16. Correlation Diagram of Peak Phases of a 24-h Period.

  • Supplemental Figure 17. Peak Phase Shifts for Each Time Point in osgi.

  • Supplemental Figure 18. Correlation Diagrams of a, b, and the Fitting Index between the Wild Type and osgi.

  • Supplemental Figure 19. Average Processed Data of Starch Synthesis–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 20. Average Processed Data of Starch Degradation–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 21. Average Processed Data of TCA Cycle–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 22. Average Processed Data of Calvin Cycle–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 23. Average Processed Data of Sucrose Metabolism-Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 24. Average Processed Data of Oxidative Reaction of Pentose Phosphate Pathway–Related Genes with a Process of Conversion of Fructose 6-Phosphate to Glucose 6-Phosphate in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 25. Average Processed Data of Glycolysis I–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 26. Average Processed Data of Glycolysis II–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 27. Average Processed Data of Photochemical Reaction–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 28. Average Processed Data of Mitochondrial Electron Transfer–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 29. Average Processed Data of Phenylpropanoid Pathway–Related Genes in Rice.

  • Supplemental Figure 30. Summary of Changes of Levels of Phenylpropanoid Metabolites in osgi.

  • Supplemental Figure 31. Histograms of the Fitting Score.

  • Supplemental Figure 32. Box Plot Log2 Processed Data of 10 Distinct Microarray Data for Dye Swap Evaluation.

  • Supplemental Figure 33. Box Plot of Log2 (cy3 Intensity/cy5 Intensity) of Nine Genes Selected by the Two-Way ANOVA (P Value [FDR] < 0.05).

  • Supplemental Figure 34. Box Plot of Log2 (Intensity) of Nine Genes Selected by the Two-Way ANOVA (P Value [FDR] < 0.05).

  • Supplemental Table 1. A Time Course of Global Solar Radiations at Dates of the Experiments.

  • Supplemental Table 2. Numbers of Genes Exhibiting Differences in Expression between Wild-Type and osgi Plants at Each Time Point.

  • Supplemental Table 3. Numbers of Genes Fitting to Cosine Curve with Different Fitting Index Thresholds.

  • Supplemental Table 4. Photosynthesis-Related Traits in Wild-Type and osgi Plants.

  • Supplemental Table 5. List of Additional Five Set of Dye-Swap Microarray Data in Rice 44K Agilent Arrays for the Dye Effect Evaluation.

  • Supplemental Data Set 1. List of Genotpyes and Flowering Time Summarized in Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure 5.

  • Supplemental Data Set 2. List of P Value (FDR) for Dye and P Value (FDR) for Combo Based on Two-Way ANOVA (without the Interaction Dye*Combo) Analysis for the Dye-Effect Evaluation Using Additional Five Set of Dye-Swap Microarray Data in Rice 44K Agilent Arrays.

  • Supplemental Data Set 3. Widely Targeted Metabolome Raw Data.

  • Supplemental Data Set 4. Summary of Widely Targeted Metabolome Analysis for 73 Metabolites with Altered Production in Field-Grown osgi Relative to the Wild Type (N8).

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Yazawa, S. Hirashima, and T. Komatsuzaki for taking care of the rice plants in the field, M. Nishimura (Institute of Radiation Breeding) for the γ-ray radiation treatments of rice seeds, M. Tomiyama for measuring the yield traits, and K. Kanno for technical assistance in quantification of starch and sugars. This work was supported by two grants from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics for Agricultural Innovation GPN0001 and RTR0004 to T.I. and RTR0002 to Y.N.).

Footnotes

  • The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Takeshi Izawa (tizawa{at}nias.affrc.go.jp).

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.111.083238

  • ↵[C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

  • ↵[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

  • ↵[W] Online version contains Web-only data.

  • Received January 15, 2011.
  • Revised April 22, 2011.
  • Accepted May 2, 2011.
  • Published May 13, 2011.

Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alabadí D.,
    2. Oyama T.,
    3. Yanovsky M.J.,
    4. Harmon F.G.,
    5. Más P.,
    6. Kay S.A.
    (2001). Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293: 880–883.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Benjamini Y.,
    2. Hochberg Y.
    (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57: 289–300.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Corbesier L.,
    2. Vincent C.,
    3. Jang S.,
    4. Fornara F.,
    5. Fan Q.,
    6. Searle I.,
    7. Giakountis A.,
    8. Farrona S.,
    9. Gissot L.,
    10. Turnbull C.,
    11. Coupland G.
    (2007). FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316: 1030–1033.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Dodd A.N.,
    2. Salathia N.,
    3. Hall A.,
    4. Kévei E.,
    5. Tóth R.,
    6. Nagy F.,
    7. Hibberd J.M.,
    8. Millar A.J.,
    9. Webb A.A.
    (2005). Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309: 630–633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Eimert K.,
    2. Wang S.M.,
    3. Lue W.I.,
    4. Chen J.
    (1995). Monogenic recessive mutations causing both late floral initiation and excess starch accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7: 1703–1712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Fornara F.,
    2. Panigrahi K.C.,
    3. Gissot L.,
    4. Sauerbrunn N.,
    5. Rühl M.,
    6. Jarillo J.A.,
    7. Coupland G.
    (2009). Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell 17: 75–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fowler S.,
    2. Lee K.,
    3. Onouchi H.,
    4. Samach A.,
    5. Richardson K.,
    6. Morris B.,
    7. Coupland G.,
    8. Putterill J.
    (1999). GIGANTEA: A circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J. 18: 4679–4688.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. ↵
    1. Fukushima A.,
    2. Kusano M.,
    3. Nakamichi N.,
    4. Kobayashi M.,
    5. Hayashi N.,
    6. Sakakibara H.,
    7. Mizuno T.,
    8. Saito K.
    (2009). Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 7251–7256.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Fulton D.C.,
    2. et al
    . (2008). Beta-AMYLASE4, a noncatalytic protein required for starch breakdown, acts upstream of three active beta-amylases in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell 20: 1040–1058.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Genty B.,
    2. Briantais J.M.,
    3. Baker N.R.
    (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990: 87–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Grace S.C.,
    2. Logan B.A.
    (2000). Energy dissipation and radical scavenging by the plant phenylpropanoid pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355: 1499–1510.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Graf A.,
    2. Schlereth A.,
    3. Stitt M.,
    4. Smith A.M.
    (2010). Circadian control of carbohydrate availability for growth in Arabidopsis plants at night. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 9458–9463.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Green R.M.,
    2. Tingay S.,
    3. Wang Z.Y.,
    4. Tobin E.M.
    (2002). Circadian rhythms confer a higher level of fitness to Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 129: 576–584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Harmer S.L.
    (2009). The circadian system in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60: 357–377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Hayama R.,
    2. Izawa T.,
    3. Shimamoto K.
    (2002). Isolation of rice genes possibly involved in the photoperiodic control of flowering by a fluorescent differential display method. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 494–504.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hirotsu N.,
    2. Makino A.,
    3. Ushio A.,
    4. Mae T.
    (2004). Changes in the thermal dissipation and the electron flow in the water-water cycle in rice grown under conditions of physiologically low temperature. Plant Cell Physiol. 45: 635–644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Imaizumi T.,
    2. Kay S.A.
    (2006). Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 11: 550–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Itoh H.,
    2. Nonoue Y.,
    3. Yano M.,
    4. Izawa T.
    (2010). A pair of floral regulators sets critical day length for Hd3a florigen expression in rice. Nat. Genet. 42: 635–638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Izawa T.
    (2007). Adaptation of flowering-time by natural and artificial selection in Arabidopsis and rice. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 3091–3097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Izawa T.,
    2. Oikawa T.,
    3. Sugiyama N.,
    4. Tanisaka T.,
    5. Yano M.,
    6. Shimamoto K.
    (2002). Phytochrome mediates the external light signal to repress FT orthologs in photoperiodic flowering of rice. Genes Dev. 16: 2006–2020.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Izawa T.,
    2. Oikawa T.,
    3. Tokutomi S.,
    4. Okuno K.,
    5. Shimamoto K.
    (2000). Phytochromes confer the photoperiodic control of flowering in rice (a short-day plant). Plant J. 22: 391–399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Kim W.Y.,
    2. Fujiwara S.,
    3. Suh S.S.,
    4. Kim J.,
    5. Kim Y.,
    6. Han L.,
    7. David K.,
    8. Putterill J.,
    9. Nam H.G.,
    10. Somers D.E.
    (2007). ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature 449: 356–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kojima S.,
    2. Takahashi Y.,
    3. Kobayashi Y.,
    4. Monna L.,
    5. Sasaki T.,
    6. Araki T.,
    7. Yano M.
    (2002). Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 1096–1105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Locke J.C.,
    2. Kozma-Bognár L.,
    3. Gould P.D.,
    4. Fehér B.,
    5. Kevei E.,
    6. Nagy F.,
    7. Turner M.S.,
    8. Hall A.,
    9. Millar A.J.
    (2006). Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi-oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2: 59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Locke J.C.,
    2. Southern M.M.,
    3. Kozma-Bognar L.,
    4. Hibberd V.,
    5. Brown P.E.,
    6. Turner M.S.,
    7. Millar A.J.
    (2005). Extension of a genetic network model by iterative experimentation and mathematical analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1: 0013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Makino A.,
    2. Mae T.,
    3. Ohira K.
    (1988). Difference between wheat and rice in the enzymic properties of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the relationship to photosynthetic gas exchange. Planta 174: 30–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Martin-Tryon E.L.,
    2. Kreps J.A.,
    3. Harmer S.L.
    (2007). GIGANTEA acts in blue light signaling and has biochemically separable roles in circadian clock and flowering time regulation. Plant Physiol. 143: 473–486.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. McClung C.R.
    (2008). Comes a time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11: 514–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Messerli G.,
    2. Partovi Nia V.,
    3. Trevisan M.,
    4. Kolbe A.,
    5. Schauer N.,
    6. Geigenberger P.,
    7. Chen J.,
    8. Davison A.C.,
    9. Fernie A.R.,
    10. Zeeman S.C.
    (2007). Rapid classification of phenotypic mutants of Arabidopsis via metabolite fingerprinting. Plant Physiol. 143: 1484–1492.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Michael T.P.,
    2. Salomé P.A.,
    3. Yu H.J.,
    4. Spencer T.R.,
    5. Sharp E.L.,
    6. McPeek M.A.,
    7. Alonso J.M.,
    8. Ecker J.R.,
    9. McClung C.R.
    (2003). Enhanced fitness conferred by naturally occurring variation in the circadian clock. Science 302: 1049–1053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Mihara M.,
    2. Itoh T.,
    3. Izawa T.
    (2010). SALAD database: A motif-based database of protein annotations for plant comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(Database issue): D835–D842.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Millar A.J.,
    2. Carré I.A.,
    3. Strayer C.A.,
    4. Chua N.H.,
    5. Kay S.A.
    (1995). Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by luciferase imaging. Science 267: 1161–1163.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Millar A.J.,
    2. Kay S.A.
    (1991). Circadian control of cab gene transcription and mRNA accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3: 541–550.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Murakami M.,
    2. Ashikari M.,
    3. Miura K.,
    4. Yamashino T.,
    5. Mizuno T.
    (2003). The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: Rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm. Plant Cell Physiol. 44: 1229–1236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Nakamichi N.,
    2. Kusano M.,
    3. Fukushima A.,
    4. Kita M.,
    5. Ito S.,
    6. Yamashino T.,
    7. Saito K.,
    8. Sakakibara H.,
    9. Mizuno T.
    (2009). Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 50: 447–462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Ouyang Y.,
    2. Andersson C.R.,
    3. Kondo T.,
    4. Golden S.S.,
    5. Johnson C.H.
    (1998). Resonating circadian clocks enhance fitness in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8660–8664.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Park D.H.,
    2. Somers D.E.,
    3. Kim Y.S.,
    4. Choy Y.H.,
    5. Lim H.K.,
    6. Soh M.S.,
    7. Kim H.J.,
    8. Kay S.A.,
    9. Nam H.G.
    (1999). Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285: 1579–1582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Pokhilko A.,
    2. Hodge S.K.,
    3. Stratford K.,
    4. Knox K.,
    5. Edwards K.D.,
    6. Thomson A.W.,
    7. Mizuno T.,
    8. Millar A.J.
    (2010). Data assimilation constrains new connections and components in a complex, eukaryotic circadian clock model. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6: 416.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Putterill J.,
    2. Robson F.,
    3. Lee K.,
    4. Simon R.,
    5. Coupland G.
    (1995). The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 80: 847–857.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Sawa M.,
    2. Nusinow D.A.,
    3. Kay S.A.,
    4. Imaizumi T.
    (2007). FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318: 261–265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Sawada Y.,
    2. Akiyama K.,
    3. Sakata A.,
    4. Kuwahara A.,
    5. Otsuki H.,
    6. Sakurai T.,
    7. Saito K.,
    8. Hirai M.Y.
    (2009). Widely targeted metabolomics based on large-scale MS/MS data for elucidating metabolite accumulation patterns in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 50: 37–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Seneweera S.P.,
    2. Basra A.S.,
    3. Barlow E.W.,
    4. Conroy J.P.
    (1995). Diurnal regulation of leaf blade elongation in rice by CO2 (is it related to sucrose-phosphate synthase activity?). Plant Physiol. 108: 1471–1477.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. ↵
    1. Shindo C.,
    2. Aranzana M.J.,
    3. Lister C.,
    4. Baxter C.,
    5. Nicholls C.,
    6. Nordborg M.,
    7. Dean C.
    (2005). Role of FRIGIDA and FLOWERING LOCUS C in determining variation in flowering time of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 138: 1163–1173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Shindo C.,
    2. Lister C.,
    3. Crevillen P.,
    4. Nordborg M.,
    5. Dean C.
    (2006). Variation in the epigenetic silencing of FLC contributes to natural variation in Arabidopsis vernalization response. Genes Dev. 20: 3079–3083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Strayer C.,
    2. Oyama T.,
    3. Schultz T.F.,
    4. Raman R.,
    5. Somers D.E.,
    6. Más P.,
    7. Panda S.,
    8. Kreps J.A.,
    9. Kay S.A.
    (2000). Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 289: 768–771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Sugiyama N.,
    2. Izawa T.,
    3. Oikawa T.,
    4. Shimamoto K.
    (2001). Light regulation of circadian clock-controlled gene expression in rice. Plant J. 26: 607–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Tamaki S.,
    2. Matsuo S.,
    3. Wong H.L.,
    4. Yokoi S.,
    5. Shimamoto K.
    (2007). Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316: 1033–1036.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. von Caemmerer S.,
    2. Farquhar G.D.
    (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchanges of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Wang Z.Y.,
    2. Tobin E.M.
    (1998). Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 93: 1207–1217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Wilczek A.M.,
    2. et al
    . (2009). Effects of genetic perturbation on seasonal life history plasticity. Science 323: 930–934.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Workman C.,
    2. Jensen L.J.,
    3. Jarmer H.,
    4. Berka R.,
    5. Gautier L.,
    6. Nielser H.B.,
    7. Saxild H.H.,
    8. Nielsen C.,
    9. Brunak S.,
    10. Knudsen S.
    (2002). A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol. 3: research0048.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Yano M.,
    2. Katayose Y.,
    3. Ashikari M.,
    4. Yamanouchi U.,
    5. Monna L.,
    6. Fuse T.,
    7. Baba T.,
    8. Yamamoto K.,
    9. Umehara Y.,
    10. Nagamura Y.,
    11. Sasaki T.
    (2000). Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12: 2473–2484.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Zeeman S.C.,
    2. Smith S.M.,
    3. Smith A.M.
    (2007). The diurnal metabolism of leaf starch. Biochem. J. 401: 13–28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Os-GIGANTEA Confers Robust Diurnal Rhythms on the Global Transcriptome of Rice in the Field
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Os-GIGANTEA Confers Robust Diurnal Rhythms on the Global Transcriptome of Rice in the Field
Takeshi Izawa, Motohiro Mihara, Yuji Suzuki, Meenu Gupta, Hironori Itoh, Atsushi J. Nagano, Ritsuko Motoyama, Yuji Sawada, Masahiro Yano, Masami Yokota Hirai, Amane Makino, Yoshiaki Nagamura
The Plant Cell May 2011, 23 (5) 1741-1755; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.083238

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Os-GIGANTEA Confers Robust Diurnal Rhythms on the Global Transcriptome of Rice in the Field
Takeshi Izawa, Motohiro Mihara, Yuji Suzuki, Meenu Gupta, Hironori Itoh, Atsushi J. Nagano, Ritsuko Motoyama, Yuji Sawada, Masahiro Yano, Masami Yokota Hirai, Amane Makino, Yoshiaki Nagamura
The Plant Cell May 2011, 23 (5) 1741-1755; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.083238
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell Online: 23 (5)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 23, Issue 5
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Ectopic Expression of the Transcriptional Regulator silky3 Causes Pleiotropic Meristem and Sex Determination Defects in Maize Inflorescences
  • SAUR17 and SAUR50 Differentially Regulate PP2C-D1 during Apical Hook Development and Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis
  • AUTOPHAGY-RELATED14 and Its Associated Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Complex Promote Autophagy in Arabidopsis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire