Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
Research ArticleResearch Article
Open Access

The Maize MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY Homolog CELL NUMBER REGULATOR13/NARROW ODD DWARF Coordinates Organ Growth and Tissue Patterning

Marisa Rosa, María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez, Michael W. Lewis, João Pedro Fonseca, Wang Tian, Vicente Ramirez, Sheng Luan, Markus Pauly, Sarah Hake
Marisa Rosa
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marisa Rosa
María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez
Michael W. Lewis
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Pedro Fonseca
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wang Tian
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vicente Ramirez
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheng Luan
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Pauly
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Hake
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720Plant Gene Expression Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California 94710
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Hake
  • For correspondence: hake@berkeley.edu

Published March 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00878

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Abstract

Organogenesis occurs through cell division, expansion, and differentiation. How these cellular processes are coordinated remains elusive. The maize (Zea mays) leaf provides a robust system to study cellular differentiation due to its distinct tissues and cell types. The narrow odd dwarf (nod) mutant displays defects at both the cellular and tissue level that increase in severity throughout growth. nod mutant leaves have reduced size due to fewer and smaller cells compared with the wild type. The juvenile-to-adult transition is delayed, and proximal distal-patterning is abnormal in this mutant. Differentiation of specialized cells such as those forming stomata and trichomes is incomplete. Analysis of nod-1 sectors suggests that NOD plays a cell-autonomous function in the leaf. We cloned nod positionally and found that it encodes CELL NUMBER REGULATOR13 (CNR13), the maize MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY homolog. CNR13/NOD is localized to the membrane and is enriched in dividing tissues. Transcriptome analysis of nod mutants revealed overrepresentation of cell wall, hormone metabolism, and defense gene categories. We propose that NOD coordinates cell activity in response to intrinsic and extrinsic cues.

INTRODUCTION

Organogenesis results from the activities of cell division, expansion, and differentiation. How these processes are coordinated, and influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic cues, is not fully understood (Sablowski and Carnier Dornelas, 2014; Eichmann and Schäfer, 2015). Leaves provide a useful framework to investigate mechanisms that coordinate individual cell responses with growth and differentiation. Leaves initiate at the flanks of shoot apical meristems (SAMs) and are asymmetric relative to three axes of growth: adaxial-abaxial, medial-lateral, and proximal-distal (Lewis and Hake, 2016). Additionally, developing leaves have a predictable pattern of cell division along a proximal-distal developmental gradient. Maize (Zea mays) leaves are especially useful for studying patterning. These leaves are composed of a proximal sheath that grips the stem, a distal blade, and a junction region of the auricle and ligule. The auricle serves as a hinge, allowing the blade to tilt back, while the ligule acts as a gasket. Although the ligule itself is mostly derived from adaxial epidermis, vasculature coalesces at that region (Becraft et al., 1990) and abaxial layers become rigid (Sun et al., 2015). Thus, numerous levels of cell and tissue coordination are evident in order to form a mature maize leaf.

The CELL NUMBER REGULATOR (CNR) gene family was identified in maize through homology with a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) quantitative trait locus, fw2.2, which influences fruit size up to 30% (Guo et al., 2010; Frary et al., 2000). Similar to FW2.2, CNR1 and CNR2 expression levels have an inverse impact on cell number, although cell size remained unchanged. These are plant-specific, membrane-localized cysteine-rich proteins that carry a PLAC8 domain (named after a family of human placenta-specific proteins of unknown function) (Libault and Stacey, 2010). PLAC8-containing proteins were also identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. Overall, these proteins are membrane localized and may function in metal transport (Song et al., 2004, 2010; Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010). Among them are the MCAs (MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY), which are thought to be involved in Ca2+ uptake. MCAs have a conserved structure, with a PLAC8 domain in the C terminus and a mid-portion coiled-coil domain. The N terminus diverges from other PLAC8-containing proteins by having sequence homology to the regulatory region of various rice (Oryza sativa) protein kinases and a EF-hand-like motif known to interact with Ca2+ (Iida et al., 2013). In most eudicots, two MCA-coding genes are present, a likely result of separate duplication events, while monocots have only one of these genes (Kurusu et al., 2013).

The Arabidopsis MCA1 was identified by its ability to complement the low Ca2+ and related lethality phenotypes of mid1 (mating induced death1) yeast mutants upon mating induction (Iida et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1997; Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012c). Mid is a putative regulatory subunit of a high-affinity, low-capacity Ca2+ influx system that has Cch1 as the putative pore-forming subunit (Iida et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1997; Muller et al., 2001; Rigamonti et al., 2015). Interestingly, cch1 lethality was also partially complemented by MCA expression (Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012c). Experiments in various cell types showed that overexpression of MCAs leads to increased Ca2+ uptake under normal and membrane-distorting conditions (Nakano et al., 2011; Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2012c; Furuichi et al., 2012). Furthermore, as Mid is thought to have stretch-activated Ca2+ uptake functions and MCA1 is required for mechanoperception in roots, it was suggested that MCAs are stretch-activated Ca2+ channels (Nakagawa et al., 2007).

Here, we describe the narrow odd dwarf (nod) mutant, which has pleiotropic phenotypes that affect vegetative and reproductive development in maize. nod encodes CNR13, the maize homolog of MCA proteins. nod-1 has an overall reduction in size and organ patterning defects. These severe phenotypes derive from defects in cell division, expansion, and differentiation. Analysis of nod-1 mosaic plants suggested that CNR13/NOD has a cell-autonomous function. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that multiple genetic pathways contribute to the pleiotropy of the nod phenotype, including leaf patterning factors and gibberellin biosynthesis. Interestingly, nod mutants also appear to have a constitutive upregulation of pathogen response pathways. Therefore, we propose that CN13/NOD functions to coordinate growth and patterning in response to developmental (intrinsic) and environmental (extrinsic) cues.

RESULTS

nod Mutants Have Smaller Organs Due to Fewer and Smaller Cells

The recessive nod-1 mutant was discovered in an EMS F2 population, with mutagenized B73 pollen crossed onto A619 female flowers. Mutants were crossed into B73 four generations prior to phenotypic analysis. nod-1 plants have pleiotropic phenotypes in both vegetative and reproductive development (Figure 1). The mutants are notably smaller than the wild type as early as 2 weeks after sowing (Figure 1A). This size difference is exacerbated at maturity and clearly affects leaf dimensions, plant height, and stem diameter (Figures 1B to 1F and 1J). A loss of apical dominance adds to a striking change in plant architecture, giving mutant plants a dwarf, bushy appearance due to derepression of axillary bud growth (Figures 1C and 1J). The main shoot in nod-1 has extremely abridged internode elongation, fewer internodes (only 6% of wild-type stem height) and asymmetrical shape (Figures 1D and 1J). Leaves are reduced in length, width, and number (Figures 1F and 1J) and have irregular surfaces and chlorotic patches (Figure 1F). These phenotypes are obvious from the first leaves and become progressively more severe (Figure 1F; see below). nod-1 tassels are barren and necrotic (Figures 1G to 1H), although small, partially fertile ears are produced on the main shoot and tillers (Figure 1I).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

nod Mutants Have Pleiotropic Developmental Phenotypes.

(A) Two-week-old wild-type and nod-1 plants.

(B) Mature wild-type and nod-1 plants.

(C) Detail of nod-1 plant. (+), main shoot; (*), tillers; (X), ear. Arrow, ear in tiller. Bar = 4 cm.

(D) Wild-type and nod-1 mature stems. Bar = 4 cm.

(E) Cross section of mature wild-type and nod-1 stems. Bar = 1 cm.

(F) Wild-type leaf 8 and nod-1 leaves 8 to 14. Leaf 1 is the first produced by the plant. Bar = 4 cm.

(G) Wild-type male inflorescence. Bar = 2 cm.

(H) Detail of nod-1 male inflorescences. Bar = 1 mm.

(I) Wild-type and nod-1 unfertilized ears. Bar = 4 cm.

(J) Measurement of wild-type and nod-1 phenotypes.

Data represent mean ± sd. n = 10 plants. ****P ≤ 0.0001; unpaired two-sample Student’s t tests.

Leaf defects, increased tiller outgrowth, and abnormal tassel production suggested a SAM defect. Analysis of longitudinal sections revealed that 3-week-old nod-1 meristems are proportionally smaller than the wild type but have a normal shape (Figures 2A and 2B). Additionally, the meristem marker KNOTTED1 (KN1) localized to the SAM and was excluded from leaf primordia, similar to the wild type (Figure 2C), suggesting normal meristem identity. Sections of 5-week-old apices showed a transitioning SAM in both wild-type and nod-1 plants (Figure 2D). Later, the inflorescence meristem fails to initiate lateral primordia and differentiates (Figures 2E to 2G, arrows). Tassel elongation is reduced and few spikelet pairs are produced, sometimes appearing, instead, singly or in triplicate (Figures 2H to 2J). This suggests tassels initiate but don’t progress.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Analysis of nod-1 Shoot Apical and Inflorescence Meristems.

(A) Wild-type and nod-1 TBO-stained longitudinal sections of 3-week-old SAMs. Bar = 200 μm.

(B) SAM size (height and width) of 3-week-old wild-type and nod-1 plants. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 10 SAMs. ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001; unpaired two-sample Student’s t tests.

(C) KN1 immunolocalization of 3-week-old wild-type and nod-1 apices. Bar = 200 μm.

(D) Wild-type and nod-1 TBO stained longitudinal sections of 5-week-old apices. Bar = 500 μm.

(E) Scanning electron micrograph of wild-type and nod-1 developing male inflorescence. Bar = 1 mm.

(F) Detail of inflorescence meristem of developing tassels in (E). The wild type is shown from the side. nod-1 is shown from the side and from above. Bar = 500 μm.

(G) Wild-type and nod-1 longitudinal sections of developing male inflorescence. Bar = 500 μm.

(H) Scanning electron micrograph of nod-1 male inflorescence. Bar = 1 mm.

(I) Detail of inflorescence in (H). Bar = 500 μm.

(J) Detail of a spikelet triplicate present in a male inflorescence. Bar = 500 μm.

Arrow, differentiated inflorescence meristem; triangle, odd numbered spikelets.

We asked if the nod-1 size reduction was caused by a decrease in cell number due to cell proliferation defects or by reduced cell expansion. Mutant leaf cells looked smaller and in fewer layers than in the wild type (Supplemental Figures 1A to 1D). Mutant interstomatal epidermal cells in leaf 4 were uniformly smaller than the wild type in width, length, and thickness (82, 84 and 73% of the wild type) (Supplemental Figures 1E to 1G). The blade length of leaf 4 is 44% of the wild type (Figure 1J), while cell size is only reduced to 84%, suggesting a reduction in cell number as well. Furthermore, from the measurements, we extrapolated the average cell area and volume in nod-1 to be 70 and 50% of the wild type, respectively (Supplemental Figure 1H), which is not enough to explain the strong reduction in overall plant size. Therefore, nod-1 mutants are defective in both cell proliferation and expansion.

A second allele, nod-2, was identified in an EMS population in the A619 inbred background. This mutant failed to complement nod-1. Both alleles have similar phenotypes when compared in the same inbred background (Supplemental Figure 2). Interestingly, the severity of the nod mutant phenotypes varies with the genetic background (Supplemental Figure 2). We focused our analysis on B73, which produces the most severe phenotype, in hopes of discovering the connection between the many pleiotropic traits.

nod Mutants Have Proximal Distal Patterning Defects

In normal maize leaves, the proximal sheath and distal blade are separated by a clear border where the fringe-like ligule and hinge-forming auricle reside (Figure 3A). The preligule band is visible early in leaf primordia as a line of cells that divide transversely, longitudinally, and eventually, outward to initiate the ligule (Sylvester et al., 1990). nod-1 has a gradual disruption in proximal-distal leaf patterning; both auricle and ligule tissues are reduced in the first leaves produced but are absent in later leaves (Figures 3A to 3E; Supplemental Figures 3A and 3B). If produced, the ligule is restricted to leaf margins and is replaced at the midrib by a mass of unorganized cells forming outgrowths (Figure 3E, open arrow). Both phenotypes are obvious, even in young developing leaves (Supplemental Figure 3G). Divisions at the preligule also appear in a more vertical pattern in nod-1 than in the wild type (Supplemental Figure 3G). Additionally, the left and right halves of the mutant leaves are asymmetric and have abnormal cell proliferation at both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces (Figures 3F to 3H; Supplemental Figure 3C). The sheath is also abnormal in nod-1 (Supplemental Figures 3D to 3F), indicating that leaf-patterning defects are not restricted to the sheath-blade border. When grown in the greenhouse during winter, mutant seedlings accumulated high levels of pigment in the sheath (Figures 3B to 3D). This pigmentation was sometimes present in wild-type plants, although with less intensity.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

nod-1 Leaves Have Proximal-Distal Patterning Defects.

(A) to (D) Light photographs of wild-type and nod-1 leaves.

(A) Adaxial (left) and abaxial (right) sides of wild-type leaf 4.

(B) to (D) Adaxial (left) and side (right) view of nod-1 leaf 4 (B), 8 (C), and 12 (D). Bar = 5 mm.

(E) Scanning electron micrograph of adaxial blade-sheath border region in wild-type leaf 4 and nod-1 leaves 4, 8, and 12. Bar = 1 mm.

(F) to (H) Hand sections of wild-type (F) and nod-1 (G-H) blade-sheath borders. Leaf sections are oriented with the abaxial surface to the top. Bottom panel is a detail of boxed region in the top panel. Gray, cell wall autofluorescence; red, chlorophyll autofluorescence. Bar = 200 μm.

(F) Section through wild-type region a in (A).

(G) Section through nod-1 regions b (left panel), c (middle panel), and d (right panel) shown in (B).

(H) Section of nod-1 through region e in (D).

(I) and (J) Immunolocalization of LG1 in the wild type and nod-1. Longitudinal (I) and transverse sections (J). Bar = 200 μm.

Arrow, ligule; triangle, auricle; open arrow, unorganized outgrowths.

To further investigate the ligule patterning defects in nod-1, we performed immunolocalization using an antibody to the LIGULELESS1 (LG1) protein, which is required for developmental patterning of the blade-sheath boundary (Moreno et al., 1997). LG1 accumulates at the preligule region in leaf primordia (Lewis et al., 2014) and activates various leaf patterning genes (Johnston et al., 2014). Surprisingly, LG1 accumulation is normal in nod-1, even at the midrib (Figures 3I and 3J). Thus, the signal for ligule initiation and growth is present, but the cell divisions and differentiation downstream of ligule signaling are abnormal.

nod-1 Has Multiple Defects in Cell Differentiation

Given the increasing severity of nod-1 during development, we examined the phenotypes of juvenile and adult leaf blades. Normal juvenile leaves are small, have simple cell walls, and lack adult specialized cell types (e.g., hairs and bulliform cells) (Figures 4A and 4B) (Dudley and Poethig, 1993; Sylvester et al., 1990). In the wild type, the first four leaves are fully juvenile, five to seven have mixed identities, and the rest are adult. In nod-1 mutants, leaf 8 is still juvenile, as confirmed by purple TBO staining to indicate juvenile waxes (Dudley and Poethig, 1993), and it lacks hairs (Figure 4B). Leaf 10 and later exhibit adult traits, including the presence of hairs and cell wall crenulation (Sylvester et al., 1990), indicating that the juvenile-to-adult transition is delayed in nod-1.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

nod-1 Mutant Leaves Have Defects in Patterning of Cell Differentiation.

(A) Detail of wild-type and nod-1 mid-portions of leaf 4, 8, and 10 blades. a, distal leaf blade; b, proximal leaf blade. Bar = 1 cm.

(B) Cleared and TBO stained wild-type and nod-1 blades of leaf numbers 4, 8, and 10.

(C) to (E) Hand sections of wild-type and nod-1 mid-blade region on juvenile (C) and adult blades (D) and adult midrib (E). Leaf sections are oriented with the abaxial surface to the top. Right or bottom panel, close-up of boxed region. Bar = 1 mm.

(F) and (G) Scanning electron micrograph of adaxial (F) and abaxial (G) wild-type and nod-1 adult blades. a and b correspond to regions in (A). Right panel, close-up of boxed region. Bar = 500 μm.

Asterisk, rows of bulliform cells; arrow, macrohair; triangle, ectopic hairs; open arrow, regions of hypodermal sclerenchyma.

The patterning defects of nod-1 expand beyond the sheath-blade boundary. Patches of cells with high wall autofluorescence are present in the proximal blade and close to the midrib in nod-1 (Figures 4D and 4E), coinciding with a lack of chlorophyll (Figure 4A, region b). These regions are unorganized and composed of abnormal, small cells (Figures 4F and 4G, nod-1 b) that often proliferate, replacing normal epidermal, mesophyll (Figure 4D), and hypodermal sclerenchyma that top vascular bundles (Figures 4C to 4E, arrows). This change in cell identity can by visualized in transverse leaf sections by the lack of phloroglucinol staining (Supplemental Figures 4A and 4B, arrows). The staining pattern difference is also apparent in stem cross sections (Supplemental Figure 4C) and suggests a change in lignin content and/or composition.

Other obvious defects in cell differentiation involve hairs and stomates. The specialized cells at the base of macrohairs are reduced or missing in nod-1, and rows of ectopic and enlarged prickle hairs appear above the veins (Figure 4F, triangle) and, randomly, in the abaxial surface (Figure 4G). In monocots, stomata complexes, comprising two subsidiary cells flanking two guard cells, arise from a sequence of three cell divisions followed by cell differentiation (Facette and Smith, 2012). nod-1 blades have multiple types of abnormal stomata (Supplemental Figures 1D and 5A, triangle). The presence of stomata with altered cell number (divisions) and abnormal shape (differentiation) (Supplemental Figure 5B) indicates defects in all patterning steps. The severity increases close to the midrib, in the proximal blade region, and in the abaxial surface (Supplemental Figure 5B), recapitulating other cell organization and patterning defects (Figure 4). Stomata density is also reduced in nod-1 mutant leaves (Supplemental Figure 5C).

Taken together, these data suggest that NOD is required for normal cell division, expansion, and differentiation. The failure of these basic cellular processes in the mutant leads to pleiotropic consequences that affect multiple aspects of plant development in maize.

NOD Is a MCA Protein

We mapped nod-1 to an interval of 244 kb containing four gene models, with 50 recombinants detected among 700 individuals. After sequencing, we found a change of C to T in one of the four predicted genes, GRMZM2G027821. This mutation was localized in the second exon of the gene and caused a conversion from a glutamine (Q) to a stop codon (Figure 5A). The second allele, nod-2, has a missense mutation of C to T that converted a highly conserved proline (P) to a leucine (L) (Supplemental Figure 6A). A long (T01) and a short (T02) transcript are produced from this locus (Figure 5A), but nod_T02 levels are much lower than nod1_T01 levels (Figure 5B). The levels of both transcripts are reduced to approximately one-third of the wild type in nod-1 and are unchanged in nod-2 (Figure 5B). To study protein abundance, we raised an antibody against NOD and used it for protein gel blot analysis. The antibody detected a specific 48-kD protein in shoot apices, consistent with the prediction of a 421-amino acid protein produced by nod_T01 (Figure 5C). The corresponding band was absent in nod-1 and reduced in nod-2. No other bands corresponding to a putative shorter protein were detected in nod-1, suggesting that it is a protein null allele (Figure 5D). No band corresponding to nod_T02 was observed in the analyzed samples.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

NOD Is a MCA Family Protein.

(A) Structure of the nod gene. Two transcripts (T01 and T02) are produced. nod-1 and nod-2 mark the location the mutations. Gray boxes, exons; lines, introns; clear boxes, untranslated regions. P01 and P02, primer pairs used for T01 and T02.

(B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of nod T01 and T02 in vegetative shoot apices. Results shown are relative to the gapdh gene. Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3 shoots. ***P ≤ 0.001; **P ≤ 0.01; unpaired two-sample Student’s t tests.

(C) Protein gel blot analysis of NOD protein levels in wild-type and nod mutant vegetative shoot apices. TUB, TUBULIN used as a control.

(D) Structure of MCA proteins showing predicted domains. Black bars, potential transmembrane segments (TM).

(E) Transient expression of nod in wild tobacco cells. Expression of NOD:YFP and NOD (negative control) driven by the constitutive 35 promoter. Bright-field and YFP channel images of the same region are presented. Bar = 200 μm.

(F) Cell viability of MID1 and mid1 mutant yeast with or without treatment with the α-factor (α). Cells were not transformed (N.T.) or transformed with MID1, NOD, and NOD-2 (mutant version encoded by nod-2). Data represent mean ± sd. n = 3 (10,000 cells each). ***P ≤ 0.001; ****P ≤ 0.0001; χ2 test.

nod encodes the maize MCA protein, a PLAC8-containing protein previously annotated as CNR13 (Guo et al., 2010). NOD maintains the key features of other MCAs, including putative transmembrane regions in both N- and C-terminal regions, and a coil-coiled structural domain (Figure 5D; Supplemental Figure 6A). Previous work with Arabidopsis and rice MCA proteins indicated the presence of an EF-hand-like motif, a region often found in rice kinases named ARPK in the N-terminal half of the proteins, and a STYcK region (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2015), which appear conserved in NOD (Supplemental Figure 6A). Analysis by RNA-seq indicated that nod is expressed throughout maize plants, with higher levels in developing organs (Supplemental Figure 6C) (Stelpflug et al., 2016). To analyze protein subcellular localization, we expressed Pro35S:NOD:YFP constructs transiently in wild tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana). YFP signal was apparent at the plasma membrane of epidermal cells (Figure 5E), confirming previous MCA localization data (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012c). We used the NOD antibody to study protein localization in sections of wild-type and nod-1 shoot apices but were unable to identify any signal.

Given the ability of MCA to partially complement mid1 yeast mutants and increase Ca2+ uptake (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012c), we investigated whether NOD is able to rescue the lethality of the Ca2+-deficient mid1 yeast mutants upon treatment with the α-factor. Three hours after treatment, the lethality of mid1 increased to 31%, an effect completely rescued by transformation with MID1 (Figure 5F). Expression of NOD partially rescued the mid1 phenotype (18% lethality), whereas the protein encoded by nod-2 (NOD-2) provided no rescue. Previous work has explored the possibility that MCAs form plasma membrane-localized mechanosensing Ca2+ channels. Although Furuichi et al. (2012) reported some channel activity, we were unable to confirm their findings in experiments with Xenopus laevis oocytes under our experimental conditions (Supplemental Figure 6D). Taken together, our results show that the mid1-complementing activity of MCAs is conserved in NOD, but obtaining a complete understanding of the molecular activity of NOD requires further study.

NOD Functions Cell Autonomously

We performed a mosaic analysis (Becraft et al., 1990; Foster et al., 2004) to determine the autonomy of the nod-1 phenotype and to further characterize the function of NOD. Cell-autonomous gene products only affect the phenotype of the cells where they are expressed, while non-cell-autonomous gene products are able to rescue adjacent mutant cells (Candela and Hake, 2008). nod-1 was marked with the linked albino mutant marker viviparous5 (vp5) (Becraft et al., 2002) (see Methods). The mixed genetic background (B73/Hi17) produced milder mutant phenotypes then B73, but nod-1 phenotypes were clearly expressed in homozygous vp5 seedlings (Figures 6A and 6B). X-ray-induced loss of the top of chromosome 1 (Figure 6C) created albino (nod-1/− vp5/− hemizygous) sectors on normal (heterozygous) green leaves (Figures 6D to 6F).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

NOD Functions Cell Autonomously in the Leaf Blade.

(A) Wild-type and nod-1 F2 plants following crosses of vp5/+ to nod-1/+.

(B) Sheath-blade phenotype of a nod-1 plant in the same population. Arrow, ligule.

(C) Genetic design for production of nod-1 mosaics in which random chromosome breaks that are proximal to Vp5+ create nod-1 mutant sectors marked by the linked vp5 albino allele.

(D) Composition of analyzed sectors. nod-1/− vp5/− are hemizygous for both genes; nod-1/+ vp5/+ are heterozygous for both genes.

(E) Sheath-blade region of leaf containing nod-1 vp5/− sector. Arrow, smaller and interrupted ligule.

(F) Sector in blade region.

(G) TBO stained cross section through sector in (F). Bar = 200 µm.

(H) and (I) Scanning electron micrograph of adaxial (H) and abaxial (I) region corresponding to (G). Bar = 200 µm.

(J) to (M) TBO stained cross section through blades of different genotypes. Bar = 200 µm.

(N) Detail of adaxial and abaxial regions of (H) and (I). Bar = 50 µm.

(O) Width of cells in regions 1 to 7 of (G) to (I). Regions 1 and 7 are green, fully wild-type regions, 2 and 6 have wild-type (green) and mutant (albino) layers, 3 and 5 are the first fully albino regions at the border, and 4 is fully albino. Data represent distribution of values. n = 3 leaf regions (more than 10 cells each). *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001, unpaired two-sample Student’s t tests.

(P) Example of another mutant sector. The composition is the same as in (D) but inverted horizontally. Bar = 200 µm.

The sector depicted in Figure 6 extends along the entire length of the leaf, occupies 3% of the leaf blade width, and is white in all cell layers. It is flanked by narrow pale-green regions, in which only the L1 and L2 layers are albino (Figure 6D). The mutant sector interrupted and reduced the size of the ligule (Figure 6E, arrow) and displayed multiple nod-1 phenotypes, including smaller vascular bundles, irregular leaf surface, and ectopic hairs (Figures 6G to 6J). Those phenotypes are absent in the green tissue of mosaic leaves or in vp5/− sectors of nod-1/+ plants (Figures 6J to 6M). Additional nod-1 defects seen in the sector include abnormal stomata development, misshapen cells, and reduced cell width (Figure 6N). The cell width was reduced in all nod-1 albino tissues and even at the borders, when only the abaxial L1 and L2 are mutant (Figure 6O), suggesting that the presence of wild-type internal mesophyll cells is not enough to recover the mutant phenotype. The same phenotypes were observed in other sectors with similar composition (Figure 6P). While we cannot exclude the possibility that NOD may influence the phenotype of directly adjacent cells through a short-distance signal, at the tissue level, wild-type cells are not able to rescue mutant traits, suggesting a cell-autonomous function for NOD.

nod-1 Changes Transcription of Multiple Pathways

To address the pleiotropic effects of nod mutants, we performed expression profiling by RNA-seq using 3-week-old plants (Supplemental Figures 7A to 7C and Supplemental Data Set 1). Using a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05, 9533 of a total of 25,038 genes were deemed differentially expressed (DE) between the wild type and nod-1 (Supplemental Data Set 2). To focus on the most significant genes, we used a stringent criterion of FDR < 0.01 and fold change > 2, which led to 4137 DE genes. Of those, 3028 and 1109 were up- and downregulated, respectively. The nod transcript levels are reduced to approximately one-third of the wild type, consistent with the RT-qPCR analysis (Figure 5B; Supplemental Data Set 2).

To investigate proximal-distal leaf patterning, we analyzed the overlap of nod-1 DE and genes enriched at different regions of the leaf primordia (blade, sheath, and ligule) (Johnston et al., 2014). Overrepresentation of all categories is found in both up- and downregulated nod-1 genes (Supplemental Data Set 3), indicating a global misregulation of leaf patterning factors. A significant overlap is also found between nod-1 and genes both up- and downregulated in lg1 (Johnston et al., 2014). As the expression of lg1 remains unchanged (Figures 3I and 3J; Supplemental Data Set 2), the data support the idea that LG1 signal fails to transmit correctly in nod-1. KNOX genes (such as kn1) and their targets have a proposed role in proximal-distal leaf patterning (Bolduc et al., 2012a; Johnston et al., 2014). Comparison of nod-1 DE genes with those changed in kn1 mutants or bound by KN1 (Bolduc et al., 2012b) shows a statistically significant enrichment, particularly in the nod-1 downregulated group. These changes in gene expression are likely related to the proximal-distal patterning defects observed in nod-1 mutants.

To identify additional cellular pathways or processes changed in nod-1, we tested the enrichment of MapMan categories (Thimm et al., 2004). We found several overrepresented (P < 0.01) functional categories that correlated well with the nod-1 phenotype (Figure 7A). The expression of SBP transcription factors, which function in vegetative phase change in maize (Chuck et al., 2007; Wu and Poethig, 2006), is reduced in nod-1, confirming the phenotypic analysis (Figure 4B). Accordingly, gl1, a marker of juvenility, is strongly overexpressed in this mutant (Supplemental Data Set 2). To determine how much of the overall transcriptional changes could be a result of this delay in phase transition, we compared the nod-1 data set with juvenile or adult-specific genes in developing leaves (Beydler et al., 2016). As expected, juvenile and adult-specific genes were overrepresented in nod-1 up- and downregulated groups, respectively (Supplemental Data Set 3). These changes could explain only ∼5% (215 of 4137 genes) of nod1 DE, indicating that the extended juvenility is not the major factor behind nod-1 global differential expression.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

MapMan Functional Categories Enriched in nod-1 DE Gene Data Set.

(A) Enrichment of functional categories. u and d, upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively.

(B) Enrichment of gene families.

(C) H2O2 accumulation in wild-type and nod-1 leaves stained in brown. Bar = 0.5 cm.

(D) Superoxide accumulation in wild-type and nod-1 leaves stained in blue. Bar = 0.5 cm.

Genes involved in the gibberellin (GA) pathway, which are known to regulate growth (Claeys et al., 2014), were overrepresented as downregulated in nod-1 (Figure 7A). A defect in the GA pathway is conserved in a rice MCA mutant, pad (Liu et al., 2015). To test if GA deficiency is causal to the nod-1 phenotypes, we applied exogenous GA3 to 2-week-old plants. The treatment rescued the GA biosynthesis-deficient mutant d1 (Chen et al., 2014) but not the GA insensitive D9 mutant (Lawit et al., 2010). In nod-1, GA3 application caused a small increase in stem height, but failed to rescue the other pleiotropic phenotypes (Supplemental Figures 7E and 7F). This finding suggests that GA deficiency is not a major factor in establishment of nod-1 phenotypes. The reduction in expression of cell cycle genes is expected in a mutant with reduced cell proliferation. Indeed, cell cycle-regulated genes (Avramova et al., 2015) were downregulated in nod-1, although some only mildly (1.5-fold change). Interestingly, the expression of tangled1, a gene required for the proper establishment of the division plane during cell division (Walker et al., 2007), was also reduced. This could explain the abnormal cell shapes observed in nod-1.

The MapMan category stress response was highly enriched among nod-1 upregulated transcripts. Included in this broad category are “touch and wounding” and “biotic stress.” Indeed, multiple transcriptional changes in nod-1 could be explained by a constitutive upregulation of the pathogen response (Figures 7A and 7B). Among those are the upregulation of genes encoding various receptor-like kinases, secondary metabolites (e.g., flavonoids), and multiple transcription factors (e.g., WRKYs) (Verma et al., 2016). Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid are only mildly overrepresented (P < 0.05) in upregulated and downregulated nod-1 genes, respectively. nod-1 also recapitulates changes in carbon metabolism-related genes known to occur during biotic stress responses (Huot et al., 2014), with a downregulation of starch biosynthesis and upregulation of invertase genes (Supplemental Figure 7G). Conversely, starch levels are reduced in mutant plants (Supplemental Figure 7H). Various gene families associated with the oxidative burst are overrepresented in nod-1, including peroxidases, glutaredoxin, and glutathione S-transferases (Figure 7B), although we did not observe hypersensitive response lesions. Staining for hydrogen peroxide and superoxide confirmed the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in nod-1 leaves (Figures 7C and 7D), a known response to stress.

As cell wall-related genes are also overrepresented in nod-1 (Figure 7B) and Arabidopsis MCA1 was shown to be involved in the cell wall stress response pathway (Wormit et al., 2012; Denness et al., 2011), we investigated the composition of wild-type and nod-1 cell walls. The levels of hemicellulosic-based arabinose are increased in nod-1, while hemicellulosic xylan and cellulose levels are unchanged (Supplemental Figure 4E). Both transcription and cell wall sugar composition are consistent with a stress response (Le Gall et al., 2015; Tenhaken, 2015). The exception is the reduction in lignin content observed by phloroglucinol staining in leaf and stem tissues (Supplemental Figures 4A to 4D) and correlated with the downregulation of the phenylpropanoid category (Figure 7B). A significant but only minor reduction in both lignin content and composition (Supplemental Figure 4F) indicates that overall lignification is not altered in the nod-1 mutant and that the changes in staining are likely due to cell differentiation defects (Figure 4).

In summary, the transcriptome analysis confirmed changes in the juvenile-to-adult transition and patterning pathways in the nod-1 mutant. Additionally, we detected the enrichment of hormone metabolism, cell wall, and stress categories. Surprisingly, nod has transcriptional changes consistent with the upregulation of pathogen defenses.

DISCUSSION

We identified and characterized the maize nod mutant, which shows pleiotropic defects in growth and cell differentiation. NOD (previously known as CNR13) is the maize homolog of MCA1 and MCA2 (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010). Like MCA homologs, NOD localized to the plasma membrane when transiently expressed in wild tobacco. MCA deficiency causes a reduction in overall organ size in Arabidopsis (Yamanaka et al., 2010), rice (Liu et al., 2015; Kurusu et al., 2012a), and maize (this study). Hence, MCA appears to be not only conserved in sequence, but also, at least partially, in function. Nevertheless, severe organ patterning defects have only been reported in nod mutants.

MCAs were shown to complement the mating-induced, low calcium uptake and lethality phenotypes of components of the Cch1/Mid1 high-affinity Ca2+ influx system. The mechanosensing phenotype of Arabidopsis mca1 and positive effects on Ca2+ levels upon overexpression in various cell types have led to the hypothesis that MCAs form membrane-localized stretch-activated Ca2+ channels (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2012c; Furuichi et al., 2012). Like other studied MCAs (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Yamanaka et al., 2010; Kurusu et al., 2012c), NOD was able to partially complement the lethality phenotype of the mid1 yeast mutant upon treatment with the mating hormone, further indicating functional conservation. However, we did not observe Ca2+ channel activity when expressing NOD in X. laevis oocytes using the patch clamp technique under the conditions tested. It is possible that MCAs form membrane Ca2+ pores dependent on the presence of additional proteins and/or that this activity relies on loading under different conditions for oligomerization (Nakano et al., 2011). Although current data point to a role connected with Ca2+ uptake, an indirect effect of MCAs by activating/regulating endogenous Ca2+ channel systems cannot be excluded (Figure 8). Future work should address the effects of NOD on calcium uptake in planta. Additionally, identification of NOD protein interactors might elucidate function and possible Ca2+ uptake-related mechanisms.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Model of NOD Function.

We hypothesize that NOD (yellow) localizes to the plasma membrane (PM), transducing positional and environmental information during patterning and growth of maize organs. That information might be transmitted through Ca2+, with NOD either regulating Ca2+ channels (blue; 1) or dimerizing and forming a channel itself (2), as suggested in Arabidopsis (Nakagawa et al., 2007; Nakano et al., 2011). The information transduced by NOD regulates growth, patterning, and immunity through an unknown mechanism.

nod mutants are impaired in cell number (proliferation), cell size (expansion), and cell differentiation. Smaller cells were also reported in the rice MCA mutant pad (Liu et al., 2015). Studies in tomato and maize indicated that other PLAC8-containing proteins act as cell number regulators, but with inverse correlation between size and expression levels and no effect on cell growth (Guo et al., 2010; Cong and Tanksley, 2006). MCA expression in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells is cell cycle regulated, and RNAi MCA rice cultured cells had low proliferation under low calcium conditions (Kurusu et al., 2012a, 2012c). While it is possible that NOD plays a role in regulating the cell cycle, it must have additional functions in cell differentiation and tissue organization, as exemplified by the stomata and ligule defects.

nod-1 mutants have several hallmarks of pathogen-induced immune responses, including accumulation of ROS, overexpression of various classes of pathogenesis-related genes, reduction in plant size, and suppression of cell division (Eichmann and Schäfer, 2015). Abnormal leaf morphologies have been observed previously in autoimmune genotypes (Du et al., 2009), and mutants in immunity-involved MAP kinases have stomata patterning defects in Arabidopsis (Khan et al., 2013), much like nod-1. In addition, the expressivity of nod in different inbreds is reminiscent of hybrid necrosis (Bomblies and Weigel, 2007; Todesco et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). Ca2+ signals are known to regulate immune responses in plants, both positively and negatively (Verma et al., 2016; Du et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2014), which could connect a putative NOD function in Ca2+ uptake or signaling to misregulation of defense pathways. However, developmental defects resulting from autoimmune responses are minimally understood in dicots and monocots, with no leaf patterning defects reported for maize autoimmune genotypes (Hu et al., 1996; Olukolu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015). The question remains whether nod-1 is an autoimmune mutant with defects, for example, in R gene regulation, or if those transcriptional changes are a secondary effect of its complex phenotype (Figure 8).

Arabidopsis MCA1 has a proposed role in monitoring cell wall integrity (Hamann et al., 2009; Denness et al., 2011). Interestingly, cell wall synthesis inhibition triggers pathogen response pathways and inhibits cell division and expansion (Hamann, 2015). Disturbance of the cell cycle is also known to trigger pathogen responses (Bao et al., 2013). Cell wall synthesis CSDL mutants, warty and slender leaf, have overlapping phenotypes with nod-1, including reduced organ size, defects in cell division, and abnormal stomata differentiation (Hunter et al., 2012; Yoshikawa et al., 2013). Given that the cell wall composition of mature nod-1 tissues was nearly unchanged, it is unlikely that NOD contributes to cell wall synthesis, while a role in cell wall signaling cannot be excluded.

A growing body of literature suggests that plant shape is determined at the supracellular level and not solely determined by individual cells. For example, leaf shape is normal in mutants with altered cell division patterns, such as tangled or warty (Smith et al., 2001; Reynolds et al., 1998). In maize, leaf shape is uniform through development but undergoes an enormous increase in size, from 10 to 150 cm in later leaves. This massive growth must be integrated with information required to produce a leaf that is asymmetric relative to three axes of growth. nod-1 plants have reduced organ growth and abnormal cell shapes, as seen in both tangled and warty, but additionally fail to produce organs with the correct axial information. Interestingly, the function of NOD in proximal-distal leaf patterning is not restricted to establishing a border between sheath and blade or elaborating ligule and auricle, as seen in other liguleless mutants, such as lg2 or Lgn (Moon et al., 2013; Harper and Freeling, 1996). Instead, at the ligule, NOD is involved in the perception of patterning signals, downstream of LG1, and translating them into specific decisions in cell fate. Our mosaic analysis is consistent with a role for NOD in decoding the patterning and differentiation information in developing tissues. The defect is mostly postmeristematic, as shown by the correct KN1 localization and function and by the observation that a tassel that initiated normally failed when patterning and growth initiated. Thus, NOD may be required to maintain tissue patterning, coordinating the actions at a cellular level with that of the organ as a whole. This function may explain why early (smaller) leaves have milder defects.

As organogenesis is influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic cues, it is possible that NOD is also required to integrate environmental information into the developmental program (Figure 8). Abnormal signaling or perception of external cues leads to both a developmental and pathogen response. The analysis of nod-1 in inbred backgrounds that permit more normal architecture (Supplemental Figure 2), but still have patterning and cellular defects, will elucidate the connection of NOD to pathogen responses. Understanding the connection between development, immunity, and cell wall integrity will lead to an understanding of NOD function, and, in a broader sense, of all MCA proteins.

METHODS

Mapping, Plant Materials, and Phenotypic Analysis

The maize (Zea mays) nod-1 mutant was identified in an F2 family (04HI-A619xB73-GN156) following EMS mutagenesis of B73 pollen crossed onto A619 ears. Mutants were crossed to A619 and then sib-crossed to generate families that segregated 50% nod-1/A619 and 50% nod-1/nod-1. 50 recombinants were found using 700 individuals, limiting the region to four genes located between 11,945 and 12,125 kb on the short end of chromosome 1. nod-1 mutants were introgressed into B73 at least four times before analysis. Wild type refers to normal siblings of the same family. All phenotypes were scored in the greenhouse. Blade length of the leaf above the top ear was measured along the midrib, from ligule to tip, and width was measured at the midpoint of the length. Stem height was measured from the soil to the insertion point of the tassel. Analysis was performed on 10 individual plants for each genotype.

Histology and Immunolocalization

For analysis of SAMs, 3-week-old shoots were dissected and fixed in FAA with vacuum infiltration, dehydrated in an ethanol series, treated with Histo-Clear, and embedded in Paraplast plus. After sectioning as described before (Jackson, 1991), the slides where dewaxed in Histo-Clear and rehydrated. The slides were stained in 0.05% TBO or used for immunolocalization. Immunolocalization was performed as previously described (Jackson, 1991), using KN1 (Bolduc and Hake, 2009) and LG1 (Lewis et al., 2014) antibodies, both at 1:500 dilution. Slides were photographed with a Leica bright-field microscope (DM 4000 B). For measurement of SAM, 10 longitudinal TBO-stained sections of individual shoots were used and the size determined in ImageJ with the “measure” tool.

Whole-mount leaf preparations (each with ∼1 cm2 of area) were cleared according to Chuck et al. (1996), stained with 0.05% TBO, and observed with bright-field microscopy. Hand sections of leaves were mounted in water and observed under UV using a 365-nm excitation filter and a 420-nm long pass emission filter or stained with 0.05% TBO and observed with light microscopy. Fluorescent pictures were analyzed in image J where the blue and green channels were pseudocolored to gray. The size of interstomatal epidermal cells of leaf 4 was determined using the ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012) “measure” tool. To determine width and length, we used pictures of whole mount cleared leaf pieces stained in TBO. Two hundred cells of two leaves from different plants were measured per genotype. The thickness was determined in pictures of hand sections and 40 cells from three leaves of different plants were measured. Quantification of stomata abnormalities was conducted in Image J with the “Cell Counter” tool, using pictures of whole-mount preparations of leaf 12. Two hundred stomata from each of three to six leaves from different plants per data point were analyzed. Stomata density was measured in six regions of individual leaves.

Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described before (Thompson et al., 2014). Blades of adult, mature leaves were stained to detect hydrogen peroxide or superoxide ROS (Kumar et al., 2014). Three to five blades were analyzed per genotype. Replicas of the surface of developing leaves were obtained as described before (Moon et al., 2013) and then mounted for scanning electron microscopy.

Fresh-cut sections of leaf blade or stem were stained with Wiesner’s solution (2% [w/v] phloroglucinol in ethanol:50% HCl [v/v] in water [95:5, v/v]) and immediately observed and photographed using a bright-field microscope.

Antibody Creation and Protein Gel Blot Analysis

The NOD antibody was created as described before (Chuck et al., 2010). The cDNA sequence excluding the first putative transmembrane was amplified with primers NOD01-F and NOD01-R and cloned into pENTR and then into pDEST15 or pDEST17 according to manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). All primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1. NOD proteins were produced in Escherichia coli, purified using a N-terminal His-tag, and used for immunization of guinea pigs (Cocalico Biologicals). The serum was affinity purified against an N-terminal GTS-tagged NOD fusion protein.

Transcript and Protein Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from shoot apices with leaf primordia tissues using the PureLink Micro-to-Midi Total RNA Purification System (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg of RNA, oligo dT(20), and SSIII RT reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, on three independent replicates, each corresponding to five apices. qPCR was performed for each cDNA replicate, and all samples were run in duplicate. PCRs were performed using GoTaq DNA Polymerase (Promega) and labeled with EvaGreen dye (Biotium), under the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and a final melt curve stage from 60 to 95°C. Primers used to amplify NOD are P01-F and P01-R. Data were normalized using ZmGAPDH as the reference gene. The CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) was used. Gene expression was normalized by subtracting the CT value of the control gene from the CT value of the gene of interest. Average expression ratios were obtained from the equation 2–∆∆CT, where ∆∆CT represents ∆CT (gene of interest in stage evaluated) – ∆CT (gene of interest at control stage), according to the protocol reported by Czechowski et al. (2004).

The TMHMM (CBS of DTU, Technical University of Denmark; www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM), SMART (University of Heidelberg; smart.embl-heidelberg.de), and InterProScan (EMBL-EBI; www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/iprscan) bioinformatics tools were used to analyze protein sequences and identify conserved motifs.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Alignments were done with protein-coding sequences by the neighbor-joining method using ClustalW (2.1). The alignment in Supplemental Figure 6 was built with Boxshade. The phylogenetic tree was produced with Mega7 using bootstrap analysis with 1000 replications. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as the evolutionary distances used. The aligned sequences used to construct the phylogenetic tree are shown in Supplemental File 1.

NOD Immunodetection

Standard SDS-PAGE (12% acrylamide gel) was performed with protein extracts of 100 mg of ground tissue from maize shoot apices using 200 μL of 1× SDS loading buffer. Semidry transfer, blocking, and incubation with 1:2000 affinity-purified guinea pig polyclonal antibody anti-NOD was performed. NOD protein was detected using chemiluminescence with 1:3000 anti-GP secondary HRP-coupled antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After NOD detection, membranes were stripped and tubulin was detected as a loading control by incubation with 1:25,000 monoclonal anti-TUB. Detection was done using 1:10,000 secondary HRP-coupled antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Transient Expression in Wild Tobacco

The full-length NOD coding sequence was amplified from cDNA with primers NOD02-F and NOD01-R, cloned into pENTR and then into pEarley101 (Earley et al., 2006) using the Gateway method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The construct was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Transient transformation of wild tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) was performed as described (Bolduc and Hake, 2009). This experiment was repeated three times.

Yeast Lethality Assay

All strains were derived from haploid W303a. mid1 mutants were generated by replacing the MID1 open reading frame with the Kan resistance gene from pKanMX4 and transformed using standard yeast transformation techniques. Primers used were MID1-KanMX-fw and MID1-KanMX-rv. MID1, NOD, and NOD-2 expression strains were derived from a set of yeast single integration vectors containing selectable markers and targeting sequences for the LEU2 locus. Expression vectors were amplified by PCR and transformed using standard yeast transformation techniques. MID1 sequence was amplified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic DNA, using primers scMID1-fwd and scMID1-rev, and inserted into XhoI/BamHI-digested pMC02. NOD and NOD-2 were amplified from maize cDNA using primers zmNOD-fwd and zmNOD-rev. Amplification primers used were LEU-fw and Leu-rv. The cells were grown in YPD at 30°C.

Prior to the experiment, the cells were grown and maintained in exponential phase for ∼24 h in SD-Ca100 (Iida et al., 1994) and then diluted to an optical density (OD600) of 0.02. After 2 h, the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in SD-Ca (Iida et al., 1994) with and without α-Factor mating pheromone (Zymo Research; 20 µM). After 3 h of treatment at 30°C, the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 1× TE and LIVE/DEAD FungaLight. The Yeast Viability protocol was performed as suggested by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes).

For the flow cytometry analysis, fluorescence measurements were performed on an LSRII analyzer (BD Biosciences). A blue (488 nm) laser was used to excite S9, and a green (561 nm) laser was used to excite PI. Emission was detected using a 530/30-nm band-pass filter for S9 (Chroma) and a 610/20 band-pass filter for PI (Chroma). Ten thousand cells were collected for each measurement. Flow cytometry data were analyzed in MATLAB (Mathworks).

Oocyte Experiments

The nod, nod-2 (mutant), AtCIPK23, AtCBL1, and AtAKT1 cDNA was subcloned into pGEMHE. The capped RNA (cRNA) was synthesized from 1 µg of linearized plasmid DNA template using an mMessage mMachine in vitro transcription kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The cRNA quality was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. The concentration was determined by A260/A280 and adjusted to a final concentration of 0.5 µg/µL. A total 11.5 ng of each tested cRNA was injected into each oocyte. Injected oocytes were incubated in ND96 at 18°C for 2 d prior to electrophysiological analysis. Oocytes were voltage clamped using a TEV 200 amplifier (Dagan) and monitored by computer through a Digidata 1550 A/D converter and pCLAMP 10.2 software (Axon Instruments). The pipette solution contained 3 M KCl. The isotonic perfusion buffer contains 40 mM KCl, 2 mM EGTA, and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 adjusted with KOH, 220 mOsmol/L adjusted with d-mannitol. The hypoosmotic solution contains 40 mM KCl, 2 mM EGTA, and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 adjusted with KOH, 110 mOsmol/L adjusted with d-mannitol. The membrane voltage was stepped to potentials starting at +40 to −140mV for 0.8 s with 20-mV decrements and the holding potential was 0 mV. This experiments was performed six times.

Genetic Mosaic Analysis

The vp5 cell-autonomous mutant (Robichaud et al., 1979; Becraft et al., 2002) was used as a recessive marker in the mosaic analysis. The vp5 segregating population, in a Hi27 background, was provided by the Maize Coop Stock Center (Urbana, IL; stock 103D). vp5 is located on the top arm of chromosome 1, 5.6 Mb proximal to nod. We crossed vp5/+ to nod-1/+, recovered two F1 individuals segregating both mutations and propagated them to F3. We scored a total of 23 F3 families for linked mutant alleles. Four families were positively identified and used in the analysis. Irradiation treatments were performed on seeds imbibed for 3 d on wet filter paper at 25°C. An x-ray tube (CXR-105 x-ray tube; Comet Technologies) was powered at 62 kV, 9 mA, with the x-ray window positioned 108 mm from the center of the sample plate. The applied dose was determined with a radiation measurement system (Accu-Dose MNL/2086; Radcal) using a high-dose-rate ion chamber (10X6-0.18; Radcal). An exposure time of 2 min produced a mean target dose of 10 Gy, with a maximum of 15 Gy at the center and minimum of 5.8 Gy at the edge of the plate. After irradiation, the germinated seedlings were transplanted and field grown at Gill Tract (Albany, CA) until maturity and then analyzed.

RNA Sequencing Analysis

Ten shoots of each genotype were dissected (Supplemental Figures 7A and 7B) and used for RNA extraction. Triplicate pools of 10 shoot apices each were harvested from normal siblings and nod-1 mutants. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. mRNA was purified from 3 µg of total RNA using Dynabeads oligo(dT) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by two successive purifications. mRNA was used for library construction using the ScriptSeq v2 RNaseq system (Epicentre). Addition of bar-coded adapters enabled multiplexed sequencing. The size distribution of the libraries was verified on a high sensitivity Bioanalyzer chip.

Sequenced reads were aligned to the maize genome (B73 Refgen V3) using TopHat2 (Kim et al., 2013). HTseq (Anders and Huber, 2010) was used to obtain the raw read values for each gene. Genes with count number lower than 10 were excluded from the analysis. The Bioconductor edgeR package was used to identify differentially expressed genes (Robinson et al., 2010), using the Benjamin and Hochberg method for determining the FDR. Functional analysis of DE genes was done using MapMan gene annotation (Thimm et al., 2004), and enrichment of categories was determined with the binomial test using a P value < 0.01, only in categories with more than five DE genes.

Exogenous Application of GA3

Wild-type, nod-1, d1, and D9 greenhouse-grown seedlings were treated with a 100 μM GA3 aqueous solution containing 0.1% Tween 20. Mock solution with no GA3 was used as a control. The treatment was started 12 d after sowing by adding 100 μL of each solution to the inner whorls of seedlings. Applications were done three times a week with measurements every other day. Ten wild-type or nod-1 seedlings were used for each experimental data point. Three d1 and D9 were used as controls. Stem length was measured from the base of the stem to the last emerged ligule.

Cell Wall Composition and Starch Analysis

Two-week-old plant tissue was freeze-dried and homogenized to a fine powder using a mixer mill (MM400; Retsch Technology) at 30 Hz for 2 min. One milligram of destarched cell wall extracts per assay was used for the determination of cellulose content, total lignin content, and monolignol composition (Foster et al., 2010a, 2010b). For the determination of matrix polysaccharide composition, 1 mg of destarched AIR was hydrolyzed in 2 M TFA for 90 min at 121°C. A Shimadzu Prominence HPLC system equipped with a refractive index detector was used to measure glucose, xylose, and arabinose in the hydrolysate. Samples were separated with a Phenomenex RezexTM RFQ-Fast Acid H+ (8%) ion exchange column (100 × 7.8 mm) and a Bio-Rad Cation H guard column (30 × 4.6 mm) with 5 mM sulfuric acid as the mobile phase and a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 at 55°C for 5 min.

Statistical Analysis

Unpaired Student’s t tests were used to determine significance between populations. Graphs throughout the article show the mean value and error bars the sd.

Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative or GenBank/EMBL databases; all accession numbers for genes mentioned in this study are given in Supplemental Data Set 2.

Supplemental Data

  • Supplemental Figure 1. nod-1 cells are smaller than the wild type.

  • Supplemental Figure 2. Severity of nod mutant phenotypes varies with genetic background.

  • Supplemental Figure 3. nod-1 has proximal-distal patterning defects.
    Supplemental Figure 4. Cell wall analysis of nod-1 leaves.
    Supplemental Figure 5. nod-1 has defects in stomata development.

  • Supplemental Figure 6. Phylogenetic analysis of nod.

  • Supplemental Figure 7. Comparison of differential gene expression between nod-1 and the wild type.

  • Supplemental Table 1. List of primers used in this study.

  • Supplemental Data Set 1. Alignment statistics.

  • Supplemental Data Set 2. List of genes in the RNA-seq data set.

  • Supplemental Data Set 3. Overlap of nod-1 DE genes and primordial leaf (Johnston et al., 2014), KN1 (Bolduc et al., 2012b), and juvenile/adult (Beydler et al., 2016) data sets.

  • Supplemental File 1. Alignment data used for phylogenetic analysis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Devi Santhosh and Jessica Rodriquez for mapping, Gillian Xu for technical assistance, Jake Brunkard for discussions about autoimmunity, all Hake lab members for comments and criticisms, De Wood and Tina Williams for the USDA-ARS microscope facility, Lia Poasi and her greenhouse staff for expert care of the plants, and Eric Jackson at the USDA-ARS facility for seed irradiation. The work was supported by NSF IOS-1238202 to S.H., UC-MEXUS CONACYT to M.J.A.-J., Marie Curie PIOF-GA-2013-623553 to V.R., and the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Grant DE-SC001240 to M.P.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

M.R. and S.H. designed this work. M.J.A.-J. performed qRT-PCR, protein gel blot analysis, hormone treatments, and RNA-seq library preparation. M.W.L. made the NOD antibody. J.P.F. performed yeast experiments. W.T. performed oocyte experiments. V.R. performed the cell wall and starch analysis. M.R. carried out all other experiments. M.R., M.J.A.-J., S.L., M.P., and S.H. analyzed the data. M.R. and S.H. wrote the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.16.00878

  • The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Sarah Hake (hake{at}berkeley.edu).

  • ↵1 Current address: Institute for Plant Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Heinrich-Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

Glossary

SAM
shoot apical meristem
FDR
false discovery rate
DE
differentially expressed
GA
gibberellin
ROS
reactive oxygen species
  • Received November 28, 2016.
  • Revised February 13, 2017.
  • Accepted February 27, 2017.
  • Published March 2, 2017.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Anders, S.,
    2. Huber, W.
    (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11: R106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Avramova, V.
    2. AbdElgawad, H.,
    3. Zhang, Z.,
    4. Fotschki, B.,
    5. Casadevall, R.,
    6. Vergauwen, L.,
    7. Knapen, D.,
    8. Taleisnik, E.,
    9. Guisez, Y.,
    10. Asard, H.,
    11. Beemster, G.T.S.
    (2015). Drought induces distinct growth response, protection and recovery mechanisms in the maize leaf growth zone. Plant Physiol. 169: 1382–1396.
  3. ↵
    1. Bao, Z.,
    2. Yang, H.,
    3. Hua, J.
    (2013). Perturbation of cell cycle regulation triggers plant immune response via activation of disease resistance genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 2407–2412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Becraft, P.W.,
    2. Bongard-Pierce, D.K.,
    3. Sylvester, A.W.,
    4. Poethig, R.S.,
    5. Freeling, M.
    (1990). The liguleless-1 gene acts tissue specifically in maize leaf development. Dev. Biol. 141: 220–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Becraft, P.W.,
    2. Li, K.,
    3. Dey, N.,
    4. Asuncion-Crabb, Y.
    (2002). The maize dek1 gene functions in embryonic pattern formation and cell fate specification. Development 129: 5217–5225.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beydler, B.D.,
    2. Osadchuk, K.,
    3. Cheng, C.-L.,
    4. Manak, J.R.,
    5. Irish, E.E.
    (2016). The juvenile phase of maize sees upregulation of stress-response genes and is extended by exogenous JA. Plant Physiol. 171: 2648–2658.
  7. ↵
    1. Bolduc, N.,
    2. Hake, S.
    (2009). The maize transcription factor KNOTTED1 directly regulates the gibberellin catabolism gene ga2ox1. Plant Cell 21: 1647–1658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Bolduc, N.,
    2. O’Connor, D.,
    3. Moon, J.,
    4. Lewis, M.,
    5. Hake, S.
    (2012a). How to pattern a leaf. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 77: 47–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bolduc, N.,
    2. Yilmaz, A.,
    3. Mejia-Guerra, M.K.,
    4. Morohashi, K.,
    5. O’Connor, D.,
    6. Grotewold, E.,
    7. Hake, S.
    (2012b). Unraveling the KNOTTED1 regulatory network in maize meristems. Genes Dev. 26: 1685–1690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bomblies, K.,
    2. Weigel, D.
    (2007). Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 382–393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Candela, H.,
    2. Hake, S.
    (2008). The art and design of genetic screens: maize. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9: 192–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chen, Y.,
    2. Hou, M.,
    3. Liu, L.,
    4. Wu, S.,
    5. Shen, Y.,
    6. Ishiyama, K.,
    7. Kobayashi, M.,
    8. McCarty, D.R.,
    9. Tan, B.-C.
    (2014). The maize DWARF1 encodes a gibberellin 3-oxidase and is dual localized to the nucleus and cytosol. Plant Physiol. 166: 2028–2039.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Chuck, G.,
    2. Lincoln, C.,
    3. Hake, S.
    (1996). KNAT1 induces lobed leaves with ectopic meristems when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 8: 1277–1289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Chuck, G.,
    2. Cigan, A.M.,
    3. Saeteurn, K.,
    4. Hake, S.
    (2007). The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat. Genet. 39: 544–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chuck, G.,
    2. Whipple, C.,
    3. Jackson, D.,
    4. Hake, S.
    (2010). The maize SBP-box transcription factor encoded by tasselsheath4 regulates bract development and the establishment of meristem boundaries. Development 137: 1243–1250.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Claeys, H.,
    2. De Bodt, S.,
    3. Inzé, D.
    (2014). Gibberellins and DELLAs: central nodes in growth regulatory networks. Trends Plant Sci. 19: 231–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Cong, B.,
    2. Tanksley, S.D.
    (2006). FW2.2 and cell cycle control in developing tomato fruit: a possible example of gene co-option in the evolution of a novel organ. Plant Mol. Biol. 62: 867–880.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Czechowski, T.,
    2. Bari, R.P.,
    3. Stitt, M.,
    4. Scheible, W.-R.,
    5. Udvardi, M.K.
    (2004). Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes. Plant J. 38: 366–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Denness, L.,
    2. McKenna, J.F.,
    3. Segonzac, C.,
    4. Wormit, A.,
    5. Madhou, P.,
    6. Bennett, M.,
    7. Mansfield, J.,
    8. Zipfel, C.,
    9. Hamann, T.
    (2011). Cell wall damage-induced lignin biosynthesis is regulated by a reactive oxygen species- and jasmonic acid-dependent process in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156: 1364–1374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Du, L.,
    2. Ali, G.S.,
    3. Simons, K.A.,
    4. Hou, J.,
    5. Yang, T.,
    6. Reddy, A.S.N.,
    7. Poovaiah, B.W.
    (2009). Ca2+/calmodulin regulates salicylic-acid-mediated plant immunity. Nature 457: 1154–1158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Dudley, M.,
    2. Poethig, R.S.
    (1993). The heterochronic Teopod1 and Teopod2 mutations of maize are expressed non-cell-autonomously. Genetics 133: 389–399.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Earley, K.W.,
    2. Haag, J.R.,
    3. Pontes, O.,
    4. Opper, K.,
    5. Juehne, T.,
    6. Song, K.,
    7. Pikaard, C.S.
    (2006). Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 45: 616–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Eichmann, R.,
    2. Schäfer, P.
    (2015). Growth versus immunity--a redirection of the cell cycle? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 26: 106–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Facette, M.R.,
    2. Smith, L.G.
    (2012). Division polarity in developing stomata. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15: 585–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Fischer, M.,
    2. Schnell, N.,
    3. Chattaway, J.,
    4. Davies, P.,
    5. Dixon, G.,
    6. Sanders, D.
    (1997). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCH1 gene is involved in calcium influx and mating. FEBS Lett. 419: 259–262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Foster, C.E.,
    2. Martin, T.M.,
    3. Pauly, M.
    (2010a). Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) part I: lignin. J. Vis. Exp. pii: 1745.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Foster, C.E.,
    2. Martin, T.M.,
    3. Pauly, M.
    (2010b). Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) part II: carbohydrates. J. Vis. Exp. pii: 1837.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Foster, T.,
    2. Hay, A.,
    3. Johnston, R.,
    4. Hake, S.
    (2004). The establishment of axial patterning in the maize leaf. Development 131: 3921–3929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Frary, A.,
    2. Nesbitt, T.C.,
    3. Grandillo, S.,
    4. Knaap, E.,
    5. Cong, B.,
    6. Liu, J.,
    7. Meller, J.,
    8. Elber, R.,
    9. Alpert, K.B.,
    10. Tanksley, S.D.
    (2000). fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Furuichi, T.,
    2. Iida, H.,
    3. Sokabe, M.,
    4. Tatsumi, H.
    (2012). Expression of Arabidopsis MCA1 enhanced mechanosensitive channel activity in the Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membrane. Plant Signal. Behav. 7: 1022–1026.
  31. ↵
    1. Guo, M.,
    2. Rupe, M.A.,
    3. Dieter, J.A.,
    4. Zou, J.,
    5. Spielbauer, D.,
    6. Duncan, K.E.,
    7. Howard, R.J.,
    8. Hou, Z.,
    9. Simmons, C.R.
    (2010). Cell Number Regulator1 affects plant and organ size in maize: implications for crop yield enhancement and heterosis. Plant Cell 22: 1057–1073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Hamann, T.
    (2015). The plant cell wall integrity maintenance mechanism--a case study of a cell wall plasma membrane signaling network. Phytochemistry 112: 100–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Hamann, T.,
    2. Bennett, M.,
    3. Mansfield, J.,
    4. Somerville, C.
    (2009). Identification of cell-wall stress as a hexose-dependent and osmosensitive regulator of plant responses. Plant J. 57: 1015–1026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Harper, L.,
    2. Freeling, M.
    (1996). Interactions of liguleless1 and liguleless2 function during ligule induction in maize. Genetics 144: 1871–1882.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Hu, G.,
    2. Richter, T.E.,
    3. Hulbert, S.H.,
    4. Pryor, T.
    (1996). Disease lesion mimicry caused by mutations in the rust resistance gene rp1. Plant Cell 8: 1367–1376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Hunter, C.T.,
    2. Kirienko, D.H.,
    3. Sylvester, A.W.,
    4. Peter, G.F.,
    5. McCarty, D.R.,
    6. Koch, K.E.
    (2012). Cellulose Synthase-Like D1 is integral to normal cell division, expansion, and leaf development in maize. Plant Physiol. 158: 708–724.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Huot, B.,
    2. Yao, J.,
    3. Montgomery, B.L.,
    4. He, S.Y.
    (2014). Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol. Plant 7: 1267–1287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Iida, H.,
    2. Furuichi, T.,
    3. Nakano, M.,
    4. Toyota, M.,
    5. Sokabe, M.,
    6. Tatsumi, H.
    (2013). New candidates for mechano-sensitive channels potentially involved in gravity sensing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. (Stuttg.) 16 (suppl. 1): 39–42.
  39. ↵
    1. Iida, H.,
    2. Nakamura, H.,
    3. Ono, T.,
    4. Okumura, M.S.,
    5. Anraku, Y.
    (1994). MID1, a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding a plasma membrane protein, is required for Ca2+ influx and mating. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 8259–8271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Jackson, D.P.
    (1991). In situ hybridization in plants. In Molecular Plant Pathology: A Practical Approach, D.J. Bowles, S.J. Gurr, M. McPherson, eds (Oxford, UK: Oxford University), pp. 163–174.
  41. ↵
    1. Johnston, R.,
    2. Wang, M.,
    3. Sun, Q.,
    4. Sylvester, A.W.,
    5. Hake, S.,
    6. Scanlon, M.J.
    (2014). Transcriptomic analyses indicate that maize ligule development recapitulates gene expression patterns that occur during lateral organ initiation. Plant Cell 26: 4718–4732.
  42. ↵
    1. Khan, M.,
    2. Rozhon, W.,
    3. Bigeard, J.,
    4. Pflieger, D.,
    5. Husar, S.,
    6. Pitzschke, A.,
    7. Teige, M.,
    8. Jonak, C.,
    9. Hirt, H.,
    10. Poppenberger, B.
    (2013). Brassinosteroid-regulated GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases phosphorylate mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases, which control stomata development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 7519–7527.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Kim, D.,
    2. Pertea, G.,
    3. Trapnell, C.,
    4. Pimentel, H.,
    5. Kelley, R.,
    6. Salzberg, S.L.
    (2013). TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14: R36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Kumar, D.,
    2. Yusuf, M.,
    3. Singh, P.,
    4. Sardar, M.,
    5. Sarin, N.
    (2014). Histochemical detection of superoxide and H2O2 accumulation in Brassica juncea seedlings. Bio Protoc. 4: e1108.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Kurusu, T., et al
    . (2012a). Plasma membrane protein OsMCA1 is involved in regulation of hypo-osmotic shock-induced Ca2+ influx and modulates generation of reactive oxygen species in cultured rice cells. BMC Plant Biol. 12: 11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Kurusu, T.,
    2. Iida, H.,
    3. Kuchitsu, K.
    (2012b). Roles of a putative mechanosensitive plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channel OsMCA1 in generation of reactive oxygen species and hypo-osmotic signaling in rice. Plant Signal. Behav. 7: 796–798.
  47. ↵
    1. Kurusu, T.,
    2. Kuchitsu, K.,
    3. Nakano, M.,
    4. Nakayama, Y.,
    5. Iida, H.
    (2013). Plant mechanosensing and Ca2+ transport. Trends Plant Sci. 18: 227–233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Kurusu, T.,
    2. Yamanaka, T.,
    3. Nakano, M.,
    4. Takiguchi, A.,
    5. Ogasawara, Y.,
    6. Hayashi, T.,
    7. Iida, K.,
    8. Hanamata, S.,
    9. Shinozaki, K.,
    10. Iida, H.,
    11. Kuchitsu, K.
    (2012c). Involvement of the putative Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive channels, NtMCA1 and NtMCA2, in Ca2+ uptake, Ca2+-dependent cell proliferation and mechanical stress-induced gene expression in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells. J. Plant Res. 125: 555–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Lawit, S.J.,
    2. Wych, H.M.,
    3. Xu, D.,
    4. Kundu, S.,
    5. Tomes, D.T.
    (2010). Maize DELLA proteins dwarf plant8 and dwarf plant9 as modulators of plant development. Plant Cell Physiol. 51: 1854–1868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Le Gall, H.,
    2. Philippe, F.,
    3. Domon, J.-M.,
    4. Gillet, F.,
    5. Pelloux, J.,
    6. Rayon, C.
    (2015). Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 4: 112–166.
  51. ↵
    1. Lewis, M.W.,
    2. Hake, S.
    (2016). Keep on growing: building and patterning leaves in the grasses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 29: 80–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Lewis, M.W.,
    2. Bolduc, N.,
    3. Hake, K.,
    4. Htike, Y.,
    5. Hay, A.,
    6. Candela, H.,
    7. Hake, S.
    (2014). Gene regulatory interactions at lateral organ boundaries in maize. Development 141: 4590–4597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Libault, M.,
    2. Stacey, G.
    (2010). Evolution of FW2.2-like (FWL) and PLAC8 genes in eukaryotes. Plant Signal. Behav. 5: 1226–1228.
  54. ↵
    1. Liu, Z.,
    2. Cheng, Q.,
    3. Sun, Y.,
    4. Dai, H.,
    5. Song, G.,
    6. Guo, Z.,
    7. Qu, X.,
    8. Jiang, D.,
    9. Liu, C.,
    10. Wang, W.,
    11. Yang, D.
    (2015). A SNP in OsMCA1 responding for a plant architecture defect by deactivation of bioactive GA in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 87: 17–30.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Moon, J.,
    2. Candela, H.,
    3. Hake, S.
    (2013). The Liguleless narrow mutation affects proximal-distal signaling and leaf growth. Development 140: 405–412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Moreno, M.A.,
    2. Harper, L.C.,
    3. Krueger, R.W.,
    4. Dellaporta, S.L.,
    5. Freeling, M.
    (1997). liguleless1 encodes a nuclear-localized protein required for induction of ligules and auricles during maize leaf organogenesis. Genes Dev. 11: 616–628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Muller, E.M.,
    2. Locke, E.G.,
    3. Cunningham, K.W.
    (2001). Differential regulation of two Ca(2+) influx systems by pheromone signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159: 1527–1538.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Nakagawa, Y., et al
    . (2007). Arabidopsis plasma membrane protein crucial for Ca2+ influx and touch sensing in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 3639–3644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Nakano, M.,
    2. Iida, K.,
    3. Nyunoya, H.,
    4. Iida, H.
    (2011). Determination of structural regions important for Ca2+ uptake activity in Arabidopsis MCA1 and MCA2 expressed in yeast. Plant Cell Physiol. 52: 1915–1930.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Olukolu, B.A., et al
    . (2013). A connected set of genes associated with programmed cell death implicated in controlling the hypersensitive response in maize. Genetics 193: 609–620.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Reynolds, J.O.,
    2. Eisses, J.F.,
    3. Sylvester, A.W.
    (1998). Balancing division and expansion during maize leaf morphogenesis: analysis of the mutant, warty-1. Development 125: 259–268.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  62. ↵
    1. Rigamonti, M.,
    2. Groppi, S.,
    3. Belotti, F.,
    4. Ambrosini, R.,
    5. Filippi, G.,
    6. Martegani, E.,
    7. Tisi, R.
    (2015). Hypotonic stress-induced calcium signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves TRP-like transporters on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell Calcium 57: 57–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Robichaud, C.S.,
    2. Wong, J.,
    3. Sussex, I.M.
    (1979). Control of in vitro growth of viviparous embryo mutants of maize by abscisic acid. Genesis 1: 325–330.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Robinson, M.D.,
    2. McCarthy, D.J.,
    3. Smyth, G.K.
    (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Sablowski, R.,
    2. Carnier Dornelas, M.
    (2014). Interplay between cell growth and cell cycle in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 65: 2703–2714.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Schneider, C.A.,
    2. Rasband, W.S.,
    3. Eliceiri, K.W.
    (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9: 671–675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Smith, L.G.,
    2. Gerttula, S.M.,
    3. Han, S.,
    4. Levy, J.
    (2001). Tangled1: a microtubule binding protein required for the spatial control of cytokinesis in maize. J. Cell Biol. 152: 231–236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Song, W.-Y.,
    2. Choi, K.S.,
    3. Kim, D.-Y.,
    4. Geisler, M.,
    5. Park, J.,
    6. Vincenzetti, V.,
    7. Schellenberg, M.,
    8. Kim, S.H.,
    9. Lim, Y.P.,
    10. Noh, E.W.,
    11. Lee, Y.,
    12. Martinoia, E.
    (2010). Arabidopsis PCR2 is a zinc exporter involved in both zinc extrusion and long-distance zinc transport. Plant Cell 22: 2237–2252.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Song, W.-Y.,
    2. Martinoia, E.,
    3. Lee, J.,
    4. Kim, D.,
    5. Kim, D.-Y.,
    6. Vogt, E.,
    7. Shim, D.,
    8. Choi, K.S.,
    9. Hwang, I.,
    10. Lee, Y.
    (2004). A novel family of cys-rich membrane proteins mediates cadmium resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 135: 1027–1039.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Stelpflug, S.C.,
    2. Sekhon, R.S.,
    3. Vaillancourt, B.,
    4. Hirsch, C.N.,
    5. Buell, C.R.,
    6. de Leon, N.,
    7. Kaeppler, S.M.
    (2016). An expanded maize gene expression atlas based on RNA sequencing and its use to explore root development. Plant Genome 9: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.04.0025.
  71. ↵
    1. Sun, S.,
    2. Chen, D.,
    3. Li, X.,
    4. Qiao, S.,
    5. Shi, C.,
    6. Li, C.,
    7. Shen, H.,
    8. Wang, X.
    (2015). Brassinosteroid signaling regulates leaf erectness in Oryza sativa via the control of a specific U-type cyclin and cell proliferation. Dev. Cell 34: 220–228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Sylvester, A.W.,
    2. Cande, W.Z.,
    3. Freeling, M.
    (1990). Division and differentiation during normal and liguleless-1 maize leaf development. Development 110: 985–1000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Tenhaken, R.
    (2015). Cell wall remodeling under abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 5: 771.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Thimm, O.,
    2. Bläsing, O.,
    3. Gibon, Y.,
    4. Nagel, A.,
    5. Meyer, S.,
    6. Krüger, P.,
    7. Selbig, J.,
    8. Müller, L.A.,
    9. Rhee, S.Y.,
    10. Stitt, M.
    (2004). MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37: 914–939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Thompson, B.E.,
    2. Basham, C.,
    3. Hammond, R.,
    4. Ding, Q.,
    5. Kakrana, A.,
    6. Lee, T.-F.,
    7. Simon, S.A.,
    8. Meeley, R.,
    9. Meyers, B.C.,
    10. Hake, S.
    (2014). The dicer-like1 homolog fuzzy tassel is required for the regulation of meristem determinacy in the inflorescence and vegetative growth in maize. Plant Cell 26: 4702–4717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Todesco, M.,
    2. Kim, S.-T.,
    3. Chae, E.,
    4. Bomblies, K.,
    5. Zaidem, M.,
    6. Smith, L.M.,
    7. Weigel, D.,
    8. Laitinen, R.A.E.
    (2014). Activation of the Arabidopsis thaliana immune system by combinations of common ACD6 alleles. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Verma, V.,
    2. Ravindran, P.,
    3. Kumar, P.P.
    (2016). Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 16: 86.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Walker, K.L.,
    2. Müller, S.,
    3. Moss, D.,
    4. Ehrhardt, D.W.,
    5. Smith, L.G.
    (2007). Arabidopsis TANGLED identifies the division plane throughout mitosis and cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 17: 1827–1836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Wang, G.-F.,
    2. Ji, J.,
    3. El-Kasmi, F.,
    4. Dangl, J.L.,
    5. Johal, G.,
    6. Balint-Kurti, P.J.
    (2015). Molecular and functional analyses of a maize autoactive NB-LRR protein identify precise structural requirements for activity. PLoS Pathog. 11: e1004674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Wormit, A.,
    2. Butt, S.M.,
    3. Chairam, I.,
    4. McKenna, J.F.,
    5. Nunes-Nesi, A.,
    6. Kjaer, L.,
    7. O’Donnelly, K.,
    8. Fernie, A.R.,
    9. Woscholski, R.,
    10. Barter, M.C.L.,
    11. Hamann, T.
    (2012). Osmosensitive changes of carbohydrate metabolism in response to cellulose biosynthesis inhibition. Plant Physiol. 159: 105–117.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Wu, G.,
    2. Poethig, R.S.
    (2006). Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 133: 3539–3547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Yamanaka, T.,
    2. Nakagawa, Y.,
    3. Mori, K.,
    4. Nakano, M.,
    5. Imamura, T.,
    6. Kataoka, H.,
    7. Terashima, A.,
    8. Iida, K.,
    9. Kojima, I.,
    10. Katagiri, T.,
    11. Shinozaki, K.,
    12. Iida, H.
    (2010). MCA1 and MCA2 that mediate Ca2+ uptake have distinct and overlapping roles in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152: 1284–1296.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Yoshikawa, T.,
    2. Eiguchi, M.,
    3. Hibara, K.,
    4. Ito, J.,
    5. Nagato, Y.
    (2013). Rice slender leaf 1 gene encodes cellulose synthase-like D4 and is specifically expressed in M-phase cells to regulate cell proliferation. J. Exp. Bot. 64: 2049–2061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Zhang, L.,
    2. Du, L.,
    3. Shen, C.,
    4. Yang, Y.,
    5. Poovaiah, B.W.
    (2014). Regulation of plant immunity through ubiquitin-mediated modulation of Ca2+-calmodulin-AtSR1/CAMTA3 signaling. Plant J. 78: 269–281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Maize MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY Homolog CELL NUMBER REGULATOR13/NARROW ODD DWARF Coordinates Organ Growth and Tissue Patterning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
Citation Tools
The Maize MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY Homolog CELL NUMBER REGULATOR13/NARROW ODD DWARF Coordinates Organ Growth and Tissue Patterning
Marisa Rosa, María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez, Michael W. Lewis, João Pedro Fonseca, Wang Tian, Vicente Ramirez, Sheng Luan, Markus Pauly, Sarah Hake
The Plant Cell Mar 2017, 29 (3) 474-490; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00878

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Maize MID-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY Homolog CELL NUMBER REGULATOR13/NARROW ODD DWARF Coordinates Organ Growth and Tissue Patterning
Marisa Rosa, María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez, Michael W. Lewis, João Pedro Fonseca, Wang Tian, Vicente Ramirez, Sheng Luan, Markus Pauly, Sarah Hake
The Plant Cell Mar 2017, 29 (3) 474-490; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00878
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • METHODS
    • Acknowledgments
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 29 (3)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 29, Issue 3
Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • ORANGE Represses Chloroplast Biogenesis in Etiolated Arabidopsis Cotyledons via Interaction with TCP14
  • Secretion of Phospholipase Dδ Functions as a Regulatory Mechanism in Plant Innate Immunity
  • Genetic Analyses of the Arabidopsis ATG1 Kinase Complex Reveal Both Kinase-Dependent and Independent Autophagic Routes during Fixed-Carbon Starvation
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2019 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire