Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
LetterLetter to the Editor
Open Access

Reply: The BIF Domain Is Structurally and Functionally Distinct from Other Types of ACT-Like Domains

Fang Chang, Jie Cui, Linbo Wang, Hong Ma
Fang Chang
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering and Institute of Biodiversity Sciences, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Cui
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering and Institute of Biodiversity Sciences, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linbo Wang
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering and Institute of Biodiversity Sciences, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Ma
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering and Institute of Biodiversity Sciences, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaCenter for Evolutionary Biology, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hong Ma
  • For correspondence: hxm16@psu.edu

Published August 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00547

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

We welcome the discussion on the BIF/ACT-like domain in plant bHLH proteins and hope this will help to clarify their functions and structures distinct from those of other types of ACT-like proteins. The bHLH proteins are found in major eukaryotic groups and play important roles in many plant developmental processes and environmental responses (Feller et al., 2006; Pires and Dolan, 2010). The model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has 159 bHLH members; in particular, DYSFUNCTIONAL TAPETUM1 (DYT1) is an early regulator of normal tapetum and pollen development (Zhang et al., 2006; Feng et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2015).

DYT1 expression and function are precisely regulated by a set of interactions: On one hand, protein products of DYT1 downstream genes bHLH010/089/091 interact and form a feed-forward loop with DYT1 to control the proper expression of shared downstream anther genes (Zhu et al., 2015); on the other hand, bHLH010/bHLH089/bHLH091 facilitates the stage-dependent nuclear-specific localization of DYT1 in a positive feedback regulatory loop enhancing DYT1 function (Cui et al., 2016).

In addition to the bHLH domain, DYT1 and its homologs share a second domain close to its C terminus with a predicted secondary structure of ββαββα (α for an α helix and β for a β strand) (Figure 1). This C-terminal domain of DYT1 is required for the interaction with and the nuclear localization by bHLH010/bHLH089/bHLH091, and transcriptional activation activity and in vivo function of DYT1 (Cui et al., 2016); this domain in DYT1 and homologs was named the BIF domain for bHLH protein interaction and function and also found in over one-third of Arabidopsis bHLH proteins (Cui et al., 2016).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The Location and Position (with P Value) of DYT1 Orthologs: Conserved Motifs in the DYT1 Sequence.

(A) A schematic diagram representing the α-helices (magenta box) and β-sheets (green arrows) in DYT1.

(B) A block diagram showing the eight best nonoverlapping tiling of motifs from the analysis of the DYT1 amino acid sequences and those of 54 DYT1 orthologs; the conserved motifs (M1∼M8) are indicated as boxes with different colors. The length of each motif is relative to the length of DYT1 sequence, and the height of each box provides an indication of the significance of the match.

(C) The location and amino acid sequences of each motif. Position P value (the probability of a single random subsequence of the length of the motif scoring at least as well as the observed match) is indicated above each motif. The secondary structure of DYT1 was predicted on the website https://www.predictprotein.org, and the motif analysis was performed using MEME software (Bailey and Elkan, 1994).

Previously, a domain with similar predicted ββαββα structure was found in the maize (Zea mays) bHLH transcription factor R and some additional maize and Arabidopsis proteins and was referred to as an ACT-like domain (Feller et al., 2006) or ACT domain (Kong et al., 2012). However, there are substantial functional and structural differences (see below) between the C-terminal BIF/ACT-like domain of plant bHLH proteins (Feller et al., 2006; Kong et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2016) and the original ACT domain and previously reported ACT-like domain in other proteins (Chipman and Shaanan, 2001; Siltberg-Liberles and Martinez, 2009; Lang et al., 2014).

The ACT domain and previously reported ACT-like domains are found in functionally diverse proteins. The ACT domain, which was named after the three founding members aspartate kinase, chorismate mutase, and TyrA (prephenate dehydrogenase), is found in a variety of enzymes involved in amino acid and purine metabolism and is known to bind amino acids in negative feedback regulation of such enzymes (Schuller et al., 1995; Aravind and Koonin, 1999; Grant et al., 1999; Chipman and Shaanan, 2001; Grant et al., 2001). The ACT domain was thought to have evolved independently from the catalytic domain of amino acid metabolic enzymes (Hsieh and Goodman, 2002). The ACT domain is found in Arabidopsis amino acid metabolic enzymes such as aspartate kinase, 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, and acetohydroxyacid synthase regulatory subunit, with suggested regulatory functions (Chipman and Shaanan, 2001; Lee and Duggleby, 2001; Hsieh and Goodman, 2002; Mas-Droux et al., 2006). In addition, the ACT domain is present in ACT domain repeat (ACR) proteins in plants, with multiple members in both Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa), including the OsACR7 and OsACR9, which likely act as the glutamine signal sensors (Hsieh and Goodman, 2002; Hayakawa et al., 2006; Liu, 2006; Kudo et al., 2008; Sung et al., 2011; Takabayashi et al., 2016)). The ACT and ACT-like domains in the regulatory domains of Escherichia coli threonine deaminase have similar βαββαβ secondary structures (Schuller et al., 1995; Aravind and Koonin, 1999; Chipman and Shaanan, 2001; Lang et al., 2014). Another domain was considered to be an ACT-like domain because of a predicted βαββαβ secondary structure similar to that of ACT-proteins, but it was named RAM, for regulation of amino acid metabolism (Ettema et al., 2002).

By contrast, the BIF/ACT-like domains in plant bHLH proteins are predicted to share a ββαββα structure, which differs from the βαββαβ structure in the position of four out of six motifs (Feller et al., 2006; Kong et al., 2012; Cui et al., 2016). At the sequence level, there are very low levels of amino acid sequence identities, with only 4.6% between the ACT domain of 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase and the ACT-like domain of threonine deaminase, and only 6.6% between the ACT domain and the ACT-like RAM domain; these percentages are not statistically different from that between two random sequences. The levels of amino acid sequence identities between the ACT-like domains in plant bHLH proteins and the ACT domains are also very low, such that the DYT1 and R proteins are not found in the Pfam database as having an ACT-like domain.

In short, the “ACT-like domain” is a general term for various domains that show similar structural similarities to the ACT domain, whereas the “BIF domain” is a more specific term referring to those in DYT1 and other plant bHLH proteins with distinct function in dimerization and nuclear localization of interacting proteins and the ββαββα topology. We consider the domain in plant bHLH proteins sufficiently different from others to warrant a distinct name.

Acknowledgments

The BIF domain-related work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (2012CB910503) and the National Science Foundation of China (31130006 and 31070274).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

F.C. and J.C. drafted an early version of the manuscript. F.C. prepared a new version of the manuscript with sequence analyses by L.W. H.M. discussed the manuscript with other authors and revised the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.17.00547

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

  • Received July 10, 2017.
  • Revised June 10, 2017.
  • Accepted July 26, 2017.
  • Published July 26, 2017.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aravind, L.,
    2. Koonin, E.V.
    (1999). Gleaning non-trivial structural, functional and evolutionary information about proteins by iterative database searches. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 1023–1040.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bailey, T.L.,
    2. Elkan, C.
    (1994). Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. University of California San Diego Technical Report CS94–351.
  3. ↵
    1. Chipman, D.M.,
    2. Shaanan, B.
    (2001). The ACT domain family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 694–700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cui, J.,
    2. You, C.,
    3. Zhu, E.,
    4. Huang, Q.,
    5. Ma, H.,
    6. Chang, F.
    (2016). Feedback regulation of DYT1 by interactions with downstream bHLH factors promotes DYT1 nuclear localization and anther development. Plant Cell 28: 1078–1093.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Ettema, T.J.G.,
    2. Brinkman, A.B.,
    3. Tani, T.H.,
    4. Rafferty, J.B.,
    5. Van Der Oost, J.
    (2002). A novel ligand-binding domain involved in regulation of amino acid metabolism in prokaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 37464–37468.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Feller, A.,
    2. Hernandez, J.M.,
    3. Grotewold, E.
    (2006). An ACT-like domain participates in the dimerization of several plant basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 28964–28974.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Feng, B.,
    2. Lu, D.,
    3. Ma, X.,
    4. Peng, Y.,
    5. Sun, Y.,
    6. Ning, G.,
    7. Ma, H.
    (2012). Regulation of the Arabidopsis anther transcriptome by DYT1 for pollen development. Plant J. 72: 612–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Grant, G.A.,
    2. Hu, Z.,
    3. Xu, X.L.
    (2001). Specific interactions at the regulatory domain-substrate binding domain interface influence the cooperativity of inhibition and effector binding in Escherichia coli D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 1078–1083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Grant, G.A.,
    2. Kim, S.J.,
    3. Xu, X.L.,
    4. Hu, Z.
    (1999). The contribution of adjacent subunits to the active sites of D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 5357–5361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Hayakawa, T.,
    2. Kudo, T.,
    3. Ito, T.,
    4. Takahashi, N.,
    5. Yamaya, T.
    (2006). ACT domain repeat protein 7, ACR7, interacts with a chaperone HSP18.0-CII in rice nuclei. Plant Cell Physiol. 47: 891–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hsieh, M.H.,
    2. Goodman, H.M.
    (2002). Molecular characterization of a novel gene family encoding ACT domain repeat proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130: 1797–1806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Kong, Q.,
    2. Pattanaik, S.,
    3. Feller, A.,
    4. Werkman, J.R.,
    5. Chai, C.,
    6. Wang, Y.,
    7. Grotewold, E.,
    8. Yuan, L.
    (2012). Regulatory switch enforced by basic helix-loop-helix and ACT-domain mediated dimerizations of the maize transcription factor R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: E2091–E2097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kudo, T.,
    2. Kawai, A.,
    3. Yamaya, T.,
    4. Hayakawa, T.
    (2008). Cellular distribution of ACT domain repeat protein 9, a nuclear localizing protein, in rice (Oryza sativa). Physiol. Plant. 133: 167–179.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lang, E.J.,
    2. Cross, P.J.,
    3. Mittelstädt, G.,
    4. Jameson, G.B.,
    5. Parker, E.J.
    (2014). Allosteric ACTion: the varied ACT domains regulating enzymes of amino-acid metabolism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 29: 102–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lee, Y.T.,
    2. Duggleby, R.G.
    (2001). Identification of the regulatory subunit of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase and reconstitution with its catalytic subunit. Biochemistry 40: 6836–6844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Liu, Q.
    (2006). Computational identification and systematic analysis of the ACR gene family in Oryza sativa. J. Plant Physiol. 163: 445–451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Mas-Droux, C.,
    2. Curien, G.,
    3. Robert-Genthon, M.,
    4. Laurencin, M.,
    5. Ferrer, J.L.,
    6. Dumas, R.
    (2006). A novel organization of ACT domains in allosteric enzymes revealed by the crystal structure of Arabidopsis aspartate kinase. Plant Cell 18: 1681–1692.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Pires, N.,
    2. Dolan, L.
    (2010). Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 862–874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Schuller, D.J.,
    2. Grant, G.A.,
    3. Banaszak, L.J.
    (1995). The allosteric ligand site in the Vmax-type cooperative enzyme phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 69–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Siltberg-Liberles, J.,
    2. Martinez, A.
    (2009). Searching distant homologs of the regulatory ACT domain in phenylalanine hydroxylase. Amino Acids 36: 235–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Sung, T.Y.,
    2. Chung, T.Y.,
    3. Hsu, C.P.,
    4. Hsieh, M.H.
    (2011). The ACR11 encodes a novel type of chloroplastic ACT domain repeat protein that is coordinately expressed with GLN2 in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 11: 118.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Takabayashi, A.,
    2. Niwata, A.,
    3. Tanaka, A.
    (2016). Direct interaction with ACR11 is necessary for post-transcriptional control of GLU1-encoded ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase in leaves. Sci. Rep. 6: 29668.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Zhang, W.,
    2. Sun, Y.,
    3. Timofejeva, L.,
    4. Chen, C.,
    5. Grossniklaus, U.,
    6. Ma, H.
    (2006). Regulation of Arabidopsis tapetum development and function by DYSFUNCTIONAL TAPETUM1 (DYT1) encoding a putative bHLH transcription factor. Development 133: 3085–3095.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Zhu, E.,
    2. You, C.,
    3. Wang, S.,
    4. Cui, J.,
    5. Niu, B.,
    6. Wang, Y.,
    7. Qi, J.,
    8. Ma, H.,
    9. Chang, F.
    (2015). The DYT1-interacting proteins bHLH010, bHLH089 and bHLH091 are redundantly required for Arabidopsis anther development and transcriptome. Plant J. 83: 976–990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply: The BIF Domain Is Structurally and Functionally Distinct from Other Types of ACT-Like Domains
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
Citation Tools
Reply: The BIF Domain Is Structurally and Functionally Distinct from Other Types of ACT-Like Domains
Fang Chang, Jie Cui, Linbo Wang, Hong Ma
The Plant Cell Aug 2017, 29 (8) 1803-1805; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00547

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Reply: The BIF Domain Is Structurally and Functionally Distinct from Other Types of ACT-Like Domains
Fang Chang, Jie Cui, Linbo Wang, Hong Ma
The Plant Cell Aug 2017, 29 (8) 1803-1805; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00547
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 29 (8)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 29, Issue 8
Aug 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • ERULUS Is a Plasma Membrane-Localized Receptor-Like Kinase That Specifies Root Hair Growth by Maintaining Tip-Focused Cytoplasmic Calcium Oscillations
  • Correction of Persistent Errors in Arabidopsis Reference Mitochondrial Genomes
  • The BIF Domain in Plant bHLH Proteins Is an ACT-Like Domain
Show more LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2019 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire