Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN BRIEF
Open Access

Regulatory Divergence in the Stress Response of Tomato

Celine Caseys
Celine Caseys
Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Celine Caseys
  • For correspondence: celcaseys@ucdavis.edu

Published July 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00433

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2018 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Humans have domesticated crops for thousands of years by artificially selecting plants for numerous traits including morphology, lower toxicity, or higher yield. As a result, plant domestication often altered plant fitness and resistance to stress under controlled conditions (Meyer and Purugganan, 2013). Typically, in tomato, the fruit size was improved at the cost of plant stress sensitivity. Indeed, Solanum pennellii, a wild species relative to tomato, is more tolerant to both biotic and abiotic stresses than the domesticated tomato.

Plant development and resilience to environmental stresses strongly depend on the plants ability to regulate gene expression. Such regulation is achieved through the interaction of transcription factors (TFs) and cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in gene promoters and gene bodies. Divergence in gene regulation is generated mostly by sequence variation at the regulated genes, which creates new CREs or CRE variants that affect the TF binding potential (Wittkopp and Kalay, 2011). Theses sequence divergences in CREs are major players of phenotypic divergence and explain many domestication traits in crop species (Swinnen et al., 2016). The contribution of regulatory divergence to complex traits such as stress response remains mostly unknown.

Liu et al. (2018) make use of the 3 to 7 million years of genetic divergence between wild (S. pennellii) and domesticated (S. lycopersicum) tomato species to uncover the likely causes of wound response regulatory divergence. The study revealed that the response to artificial leaf wounding is massively different between the two tomato species: the speed and amplitude of the response vary, as well as the number of genes involved (see figure). S. pennellii has stronger constitutive defenses to start with in addition to faster response to wounding. S. pennellii reacts by massively downregulating genes including photosynthesis and metabolic pathways. On the other hand, S. lycopersicum induces a larger number of defense-related genes.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Differential gene expression in response to leaf wounding after 0.5 and 2 h in the domesticated S. lycopersicum (Sl) and wild S. pennellii (Sp) tomato. The gray arrows indicate divergent regulatory responses. FC, fold change. (Reprinted from Liu et al. [2018], Figure 1B.)

To understand the genetic basis of these different regulatory programs, Liu and coauthors explored variation in putative cis-regulatory elements (pCREs). The pCREs were identified by bioinformatics detection of enriched short DNA sequence motifs upstream of wound response genes. The authors found that the minority (24–52%) of pCREs are present in both tomato species, while the remaining pCREs are species specific. Although concerning a minority of pCREs, the sequence variations in the consistently enriched pCREs are largely predictive of the divergence in gene regulation as the authors noted a correlation between pCRE site conservation and conservation of the gene expression response.

Altogether, each tomato species evolved its own collection of pCREs that fine-tune gene expression within species, while further modifying the core group of pCREs shared between species and predictive of wound response regulatory divergence. These results suggest major divergence in wound response gene regulation over the millions years of evolution by natural and artificial selection. This study further confirms large-scale genome divergence analyses of these two species (Kamenetzky et al., 2010), while providing new insights into the evolution of regulatory elements with tomato domestication.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.18.00433

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kamenetzky, L.,
    2. Asís, R.,
    3. Bassi, S.,
    4. de Godoy, F.,
    5. Bermúdez, L.,
    6. Fernie, A.R.,
    7. Van Sluys, M.A.,
    8. Vrebalov, J.,
    9. Giovannoni, J.J.,
    10. Rossi, M.,
    11. Carrari, F.
    (2010). Genomic analysis of wild tomato introgressions determining metabolism- and yield-associated traits. Plant Physiol. 152: 1772–1786.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Liu, M.J.,
    2. Sugimoto, K.,
    3. Uygun, S.,
    4. Panchy, N.,
    5. Campbell, M.S.,
    6. Yandell, M.,
    7. Howe, G.A.,
    8. Shiu, S.H.
    (2018). Regulatory divergence in wound-responsive gene expression between domesticated and wild tomato. Plant Cell 30: 1145–1460.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Meyer, R.S.,
    2. Purugganan, M.D.
    (2013). Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14: 840–852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Swinnen, G.,
    2. Goossens, A.,
    3. Pauwels, L.
    (2016). Lessons from domestication: targeting cis-regulatory elements for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 21: 506–515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wittkopp, P.J.,
    2. Kalay, G.
    (2011). Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 59–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulatory Divergence in the Stress Response of Tomato
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Regulatory Divergence in the Stress Response of Tomato
Celine Caseys
The Plant Cell Jul 2018, 30 (7) 1380; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.18.00433

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Regulatory Divergence in the Stress Response of Tomato
Celine Caseys
The Plant Cell Jul 2018, 30 (7) 1380; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.18.00433
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 30 (7)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 30, Issue 7
Jul 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Ripe for the Picking: Finding the Gene Behind Variation in Strawberry Fruit Color
  • Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
  • Slice and Dice: DCL2 Mediates the Production of 22-Nucleotide siRNAs that Influence Trait Variation in Soybean
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire