Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • Info for
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians
    • Subscribers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN BRIEF
Open Access

Smashing Barriers in Biolistic Plant Transformation

Alex Harkess
Alex Harkess
Assistant Features Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex Harkess
  • For correspondence: aharkess@danforthcenter.org

Published February 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00051

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

A foundation of modern biotechnology is the ability to stably introduce foreign DNA into an organism. The two most widely used methods, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and biolistics, are both steeped in a rich history of creative exploration into the molecular unknown. Agrobacterium research accelerated in the early 1970s, particularly with the discovery of the large Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium that contained a region of T-DNA. Culturing plant calli in autoclaved jelly jars, and long before the advent of PCR, DNA gel blots were first used to show that T-DNA fragments could stably integrate into the nuclear genome (Chilton et al., 1980; Chilton, 2001). By contrast, the first manufactured biolistic “gene gun” was an actual gun: it shot a blank .22 caliber cartridge loaded with DNA-coated tungsten shards to integrate foreign DNA into the nuclear genome. While it has long been known that biolistic transformation violently integrates DNA in a largely random, unpredictable, and imprecise way, the cellular mechanisms of damage repair and successful integration remain complicated issues to disentangle.

Liu et al. (2019) address the question of biolistic damage and repair in a controlled fashion. They biolistically transform three constructs into maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa) calli: a linear 48-kb λ phage as well as two circular constructs. They then assess the impact of genomic disruption and repair of successful transgenics using short-read Illumina whole-genome resequencing, long-read PacBio sequencing, and long-range Bionano optical mapping. After screening and resequencing transformed callus for the presence of λ, they discover a multitude of different types and degrees of integration (see figure). Some of the transformants for both rice and maize contained one or just a few λ insertions, with no other evidence of genome-wide damage such as deletions or rearrangements. These low-copy insertions were sometimes accompanied by small chromosomal deletions around the λ insertion site. Oppositely, as shown in another rice transformant line λ-4, λ was present in high copy and shattered into an array containing small pieces of genomic DNA derived from other parts of the genome.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Models for Various Chromosome Breakages and Repair Outcomes following Biolistic Transformation.

(A) Introduced molecules (yellow) ligate to broken ends of chromosomes via NHEJ (non-homologous end joining).

(B) Chromothripsis, or chromosome shattering, results in many double stranded breaks across the chromosome.

(C) The breaking and joining of two separate chromosomes can occur through the BFB (breakage-fusion-bridge) cycle, resulting in stable genomic deletions.

(D) DNA damage can also be repaired through HDR (homology-directed repair), via recombination with an intact sister chromatid. (Reprinted from Liu et al. [2019] Figure 6.)

These findings opened up a major question: How exactly does a chromosome repair itself after a rather violent biolistic integration? Two known pathways are nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), where blunt-ended junctions fuse, and microhomology-mediated end joining, which uses small regions of aligned homology (longer than five nucleotides). Because both methods of repair lead to small deletions that flank the original break site, the authors computationally detected these events and found evidence for both types, but NHEJ and microhomology-mediated end joining could not explain every detected case of successful λ integration. There exists another major form of chromosomal repair, homology-directed repair (HDR), that can repair double-stranded DNA breaks using undamaged templates (such as sister chromatids) as guides. Indeed, rice line λ-4 and several other transformants showed evidence of HDR, where areas of the genome that had been damaged during transformation were seamlessly repaired.

Even more surprising, some cases of multiple simultaneous chromosome breakages may have created interchromosomal fusions, creating unstable dicentric chromosomes (with two centromeres) that segregate improperly to form trisomics. These unstable dicentric chromosomes can trigger the breakage-fusion-bridge cycle to create even more downstream structural variation, famously described by Barbara McClintock (McClintock, 1938). In other cases, chromosome impact sites appear to have “shattered” and reassembled with copy-number variations, rearrangements, and deletions in a phenomenon called chromothripsis.

What Liu et al. (2019) reiterate to us is that biolistic transformation creates a slew of diverse chromosome damage that, in turn, triggers a variety of DNA integration and repair mechanisms. With the advent of precision Cas9- and Cpf-based editing tools, classic Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods may remain superior over biolistic transformation if the goal is to minimize off-target genome damage.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.19.00051

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chilton, M.D.
    (2001). Agrobacterium. A memoir. Plant Physiol. 125: 9–14.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Chilton, M.D.,
    2. Saiki, R.K.,
    3. Yadav, N.,
    4. Gordon, M.P.,
    5. Quetier, F.
    (1980). T-DNA from Agrobacterium Ti plasmid is in the nuclear DNA fraction of crown gall tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4060–4064.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Liu, J.,
    2. Nannas, N.J.,
    3. Fu, F.-F.,
    4. Shi, J.,
    5. Aspinwall, B.,
    6. Parrott, W.A.,
    7. Dawe, R.K.
    (2019). Genome-scale sequence disruption following biolistic transformation in rice and maize. Plant Cell 31: 368–383.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. McClintock, B.
    (1938). The production of homozygous deficient tissues with mutant characteristics by means of the aberrant mitotic behavior of ring-shaped chromosomes. Genetics 23: 315–376.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Smashing Barriers in Biolistic Plant Transformation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
Citation Tools
Smashing Barriers in Biolistic Plant Transformation
Alex Harkess
The Plant Cell Feb 2019, 31 (2) 273-274; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00051

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Smashing Barriers in Biolistic Plant Transformation
Alex Harkess
The Plant Cell Feb 2019, 31 (2) 273-274; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00051
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 31 (2)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 31, Issue 2
Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Micro Manager: MicroRNA Dynamics Facilitate Correct Embryo Morphogenesis and Patterning
  • Mightier Than Muscle: A Near-Atomic View of Pollen Actin Filaments
  • Local Manufacturing: A Center for Photosystem Biogenesis
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2019 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire