Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN BRIEF
Open Access

Follow That Protein: SNAP-Tagging Permits High-Resolution Protein Localization

P. William Hughes
P. William Hughes
Department of Ecology, Environment,and Plant SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. William Hughes

Published October 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.20.00682

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Protein analysis relies heavily on the production of “tagged” proteins (i.e., recombinant proteins that contain both a functional peptide sequence and a peptide or chemical label [the tag]). Common tags include fluorescent proteins (FPs), which make tagged proteins easier to detect, as well as those that bind preferentially to specific substrates, which facilitates protein purification. However, new chemical dye tags have been developed that offer notable advantages over FP tags, including smaller size, higher quantum yield and photostability, more specific timing of the initiation of fluorescence, and a greater variety of dyes that can be used. One of these new methods is SNAP-tagging, a method of protein labeling that involves covalently bonding a target protein to a “SNAP-tag,” a modified version of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase that can take a variety of dyes and fluorophores as substrates (Juillerat et al., 2003; Keppler et al., 2003). Despite the fact that SNAP-tagging has been used extensively to study endocytosis in human and animal systems (Thorn, 2017), this technique is not commonly used in studies of plant proteins, possibly because the synthetic dyes involved in SNAP-tagging may not effectively permeate plant cell walls.

In their article, Iwatate et al. (2020) attempt to establish that SNAP-tagging can be effectively used to study plant proteins in vivo. To demonstrate the usefulness of SNAP-tagging in plant systems, the authors performed five key tests. First, they determined whether plant cells were permeable to dyes of interest. This was assessed by examining the permeability of tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) BY-2 cells to an array of 32 different fluorescent dyes. The authors identified 23 dyes that were able to pass through the cell wall and enter the cell within 1 min at pH 5.8. Eight dyes did not enter the cytosol at all, and three dyes—Rhodamine Green, Rhodamine 123, and PREX710—accumulated only to a very slight degree. Three dyes used for SNAP-tagging in animal systems—Surface Alexa Fluor 488, SNAP-Cell TMR-Stars, and SNAP-Cell-647-SiR—were found to be able to permeate BY-2 cells either in their native forms or in benzylguanine-conjugated forms.

Second, the authors tested the self-labeling potential of these three SNAP-tagging dyes by transforming BY-2 cells with a construct encoding a SNAP-tagged α-Tubulin5 protein (pUBQ10:SNAP-TUA5) and determining whether cytoskeletal structures containing α-tubulin could be visualized after incubation with any of the three dyes. They observed specific, efficient labeling of microtubules for each dye, indicating that SNAP-tagging with these dyes is feasible. The authors also captured microtubule transitions in a short film, included in their Supplemental Data, which is visually captivating and may be of interest to readers.

The third set of experiments repeated the α-tubulin labeling experiment in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Using the same SNAP-TUA5 construct, they were again able to visualize cytoskeletal structures, including spindles and phragmoplasts, in Arabidopsis seedlings. They also examined whether SNAP-tagged proteins posed a toxicity risk by tracking the mitotic cell division in etiolated hypocotyl cells infiltrated with SNAP-tagged tubulin and those infiltrated with tubulin tagged with an FP, mCherry-TUA5. They found no significant difference in the time from nuclear envelope breakdown to phragmoplast initiation, suggesting that SNAP-tagged proteins do not contribute to cellular toxicity more than comparable FPs.

Fourth, the authors demonstrated one of the major advantages of SNAP-tagging as a method of protein visualization: the ability to use the specific spectral properties of different chemical dyes to permit in vivo multicolor imaging of subcellular structures (see figure). Finally, the authors attempted to perform SNAP-tagging of de novo PIN2, a specific auxin transporter regulating gravitropism, and to track where these proteins moved within the cell. By determining the fluorescence ratio of SNAP-tagged proteins to an FP-tagged cell membrane-impermeable probe (DRBG488), they were able to demonstrate that the SNAP-tagged protein permitted the effective monitoring of endocytosis, intracellular trafficking, and the delivery of newly synthesized protein to the cell plate and also permitted the direct visualization (via double tagging) of multiple pools of the same protein within a single cell.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

SNAP-Tagging Permits in Vivo Multicolor Imaging of Subcellular Organelles in Plant Cells.

Shown are root tip cells of Arabidopsis seedlings after coexpression of p35S:YFP-LTI6B, p35:H2B-RFP, and pUBQ10:SNAP-TUA5 and incubation in 500 nM SNAP-Cell-647-SiR for 30 min. Plasma membrane is shown in pink, nucleus in dark blue, and microtubules in teal. Bar = 5 μm.

(Adapted from Iwatate et al. [2020], Figure 3C.)

Taken together, these data suggest that the in vivo targeted labeling of proteins with small-molecule chemical dyes is possible in plant systems as it is in animal systems. Here, the authors demonstrate that SNAP-tagging can be effectively used for a variety of novel experiments, including multicolor labeling and the observation of cytoskeletal dynamics. This is a valuable achievement because chemical dye labeling offers more precise qualification and subcellular localization relative to covalent FP-based tagging.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.20.00682

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Iwatate, R.,
    2. Yoshinari, A.,
    3. Yagi, N.,
    4. Grzybowski, M.,
    5. Ogasawara, H.,
    6. Kamiya, M.,
    7. Komatsu, T.,
    8. Taki, M.,
    9. Yamaguschi, S.,
    10. Frommer, W.B.,
    11. Nakamura, M.
    (2020). Covalent self-labeling of tagged proteins with chemical fluorescent dyes in BY-2 cells and Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 32: 3081–3094.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Juillerat, A.,
    2. Gronemeyer, T.,
    3. Keppler, A.,
    4. Gendreizig, S.,
    5. Pick, H.,
    6. Vogel, H.,
    7. Johnsson, K.
    (2003). Directed evolution of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase for efficient labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Chem. Biol. 10: 313–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Keppler, A.,
    2. Gendreizig, S.,
    3. Gronemeyer, T.,
    4. Pick, H.,
    5. Vogel, H.,
    6. Johnsson, K.
    (2003). A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 21: 86–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Thorn, K.
    (2017). Genetically encoded fluorescent tags. Mol. Biol. Cell 28: 848–857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Follow That Protein: SNAP-Tagging Permits High-Resolution Protein Localization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Follow That Protein: SNAP-Tagging Permits High-Resolution Protein Localization
P. William Hughes
The Plant Cell Oct 2020, 32 (10) 3039-3040; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00682

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Follow That Protein: SNAP-Tagging Permits High-Resolution Protein Localization
P. William Hughes
The Plant Cell Oct 2020, 32 (10) 3039-3040; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00682
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 32 (10)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 32, Issue 10
Oct 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
  • Slice and Dice: DCL2 Mediates the Production of 22-Nucleotide siRNAs that Influence Trait Variation in Soybean
  • How to Eat One’s Feelings: Autophagy and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire