Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN BRIEF
Open Access

Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!

Gregory Bertoni
Gregory Bertoni
Science Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregory Bertoni

Published December 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.20.00881

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

It’s not just human relationships that may require a chaperone to prevent inappropriate interactions. Numerous proteins in organisms from Escherichia coli to us, especially hydrophobic membrane proteins, also require chaperones in aqueous environments to prevent inappropriate interactions such as aggregation or improper folding (Gruber and Horovitz, 2016).

Whereas most plasma membrane proteins in E. coli are inserted cotranslationally by ribosomes attached to the target membrane, thylakoid membrane proteins in the chloroplast are typically nucleus encoded, translated in the cytoplasm, and must be inserted into thylakoid membranes posttranslationally. After crossing the chloroplast outer and inner membranes, they must transit the aqueous stroma en route to the thylakoids, often requiring chaperones (Zhao and Liu, 2018). Also, for proper targeting, a particular thylakoid membrane protein may need to be either folded or unfolded.

Cpn60 is a chloroplast chaperone protein involved in folding of stromal proteins (Kim et al., 2013). It is part of a 700-kD protein complex that dissociates upon ATP addition, as is typical of chaperonin-substrate complexes. Using the thylakoid protein Plastidic type I signal peptidase 1 (Plsp1) as a model substrate for insertion into the thylakoid membrane, Laura Klasek and colleagues (Klasek et al., 2020) now ask: Does Cpn60 facilitate proper integration of Plsp1 into the thylakoid membrane and, if so, how? Because premature folding of Plsp1 in the stroma results in mistargeting in the thylakoid membrane (Endow et al., 2015), they tested whether integration was influenced by the ratio of Cpn60 to cpSecA1, the stromal motor of the cpSec1 translocon that inserts unfolded Plsp1 into the thylakoid membrane.

Plsp1 is also found in a 700-kD complex in the stroma, so the authors tested whether Plsp1 bound directly to Cpn60. In vitro pull-down assays showed that Plsp1 bound specifically to Cpn60 and pulled it down in stoichiometric amounts. Cpn60 also protected Plsp1 from proteinase K digestion. More detailed proteomic analysis showed that Plsp1 interacted with specific α and β isoforms of Cpn60, but not others, suggesting substrate specificity of the different isoforms.

After showing that Plsp1 physically interacts with Cpn60, the authors demonstrated that Cpn60 and cpSec1 interact with adjacent amino acid residues of Plsp1. Analysis of a series of deletion constructs revealed that specific β strands adjacent to the transmembrane domain were important for interaction with Cpn60 (see figure). Removal of these residues abolished integration.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Structure of Plsp1 Linear and Three-Dimensional Models of Plsp1.

Illustrations show regions of the transmembrane domain (TMD), the 10 β strands, and the C terminus deleted to analyze Plsp1-Cpn60 interaction.

(Adapted from Klasek et al. [2020], Figure 3A [top] and Figure S5 [bottom].)

Using radiolabeled Plsp1 translated in vitro and Cpn60α1 and β1 isolated from pea (Pisum sativum), they reconstituted the 700-kD complex, and, like the native complex, it disappeared upon treatment with ATP. Then, using an import-chase assay to introduce a pulse of Plsp1 into isolated chloroplasts, they found that the abundance of the 700-kD complex containing Cpn60 decreased as the amount of Plsp1 inserted into the membrane increased. Addition of denatured ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (a Cpn60 substrate) to a Cpn60-Plsp1 complex displaced Plsp1 from Cpn60, presumably making it more accessible to the cpSec1 translocon and restoring integration of Plsp1 into the thylakoid membrane by the cpSec1 pathway.

The authors conclude by presenting three plausible models to describe how Cpn60 “hands off” Plsp1 to the cpSecI translocon. They show how their data support the model in which Cpn60 binds and releases Plsp1 in cycles as Plsp1 transits the stroma en route to cpSec1 and its final destination in the thylakoid membrane. Cpn60 shields the hydrophobic membrane protein from potential aggregation in the aqueous stroma and, like a human chaperone, prevents unwanted and potentially detrimental interactions.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.20.00881

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Endow, J.K.,
    2. Singhal, R.,
    3. Fernandez, D.E.,
    4. Inoue, K.
    (2015). Chaperone-assisted post-translational transport of plastidic type I signal peptidase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 290: 28778–28791.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Gruber, R.,
    2. Horovitz, A.
    (2016). Allosteric mechanisms in chaperonin machines. Chem. Rev. 116: 6588–6606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kim, S.-R.,
    2. Yang, J.-I.,
    3. An, G.
    (2013). OsCpn60α1, encoding the plastid chaperonin 60α subunit, is essential for folding of rbcL. Mol. Cells 35: 402–409.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Klasek, L.,
    2. Inoue, K.,
    3. Theg, S.M.
    (2020). Chloroplast chaperonin-mediated targeting of a thylakoid membrane protein. Plant Cell 32: 3884–3901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Zhao, Q.,
    2. Liu, C.
    (2018). Chloroplast chaperonin: An intricate protein folding machine for photosynthesis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 4: 98.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
Gregory Bertoni
The Plant Cell Dec 2020, 32 (12) 3654-3655; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00881

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
Gregory Bertoni
The Plant Cell Dec 2020, 32 (12) 3654-3655; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00881
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 32 (12)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 32, Issue 12
Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Slice and Dice: DCL2 Mediates the Production of 22-Nucleotide siRNAs that Influence Trait Variation in Soybean
  • How to Eat One’s Feelings: Autophagy and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire