Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
In BriefIN BRIEF
Open Access

Zones of Defense? SA Receptors Have It Under Control

Hanna Hõrak
Hanna Hõrak
Institute of TechnologyUniversity of TartuTartu, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hanna Hõrak

Published December 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.20.00848

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

The constant evolutionary arms race with pathogens has equipped plants with a layered immune system. As the first line of defense, membrane-localized pattern recognition receptors perceive microbe-associated molecular patterns and activate pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). In parallel, R proteins—mainly nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors—perceive effectors secreted by pathogens to suppress plant defense responses, leading to the activation of effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Both PTI and ETI rely on the production of salicylic acid (SA), which also protects distal tissues from subsequent infections via systemic acquired resistance (SAR). N-hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP) appears to be the mobile signal that moves from locally infected to systemic tissues and activates SAR (Chen et al., 2018; Hartmann et al., 2018).

SA is perceived by two classes of receptors—NONEXPRESSER OF PR GENES 1 (NPR1) and NPR1-LIKE PROTEIN 3 and 4 (NPR3/NPR4)—which positively and negatively regulate transcription of SA-dependent genes via TGACG SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC BINDING PROTEIN (TGA) transcription factors, respectively (see figure). Binding of SA to NPR1 activates NPR1 and induces SA-dependent gene expression, whereas NPR3/NPR4 repress transcription in the absence of SA, and the repression is released upon binding of SA by NPR3/NPR4 (Ding et al., 2018). The npr4-4D dominant-negative mutant has constitutively suppressed SA responses (Ding et al., 2018). In this issue of The Plant Cell, Yanan Liu and Tongjun Sun and colleagues (Liu et al., 2020) systematically dissected the roles of the SA receptors in immunity with the help of the npr1-1 npr4-4D double mutant, in which the perception of SA by all three receptors (NPR1, NPR3, and NPR4) is blocked. They discovered that SA perception and signaling through both receptor types is required for PTI, ETI, biosynthesis of NHP, and activation of SAR, as well as regulation of SA catabolism.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Manifold Roles of SA Receptors in Immunity.

SA activates gene expression in parallel through the activation of NPR1 and the repression of NPR3 and NPR4, which all require TGA transcription factors, leading to local pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immune responses (PTI and ETI), production of NHP and SAR, and SA catabolism through hydroxylation and glycosylation. (Adapted from Liu et al. [2020], Figure 7.)

The authors found that while SAR and induction of NHP biosynthesis genes were compromised in npr1-1 and npr4-4D single mutants, they were completely abolished in the npr1-1 npr4-4D double mutant. Indeed, only trace amounts of NHP and its precursor pipecolic acid were detected in pathogen-challenged npr1-1 npr4-4D plants. Notably, the double mutant was unable to induce SAR. These results indicated that SA perception is critical for systemic resistance signaling, including NHP biosynthesis and NHP-induced immunity.

After establishing that both classes of SA receptor were required for systemic immune responses, the authors analyzed their role in PTI and ETI. They determined that both PTI and ETI responses and the induction of respective immune response marker genes were more severely compromised in npr1-1 npr4-4D plants than in the single mutants, suggesting that SA perception participates in PTI and ETI responses.

Interestingly, the authors observed that PTI, ETI, and SAR were all more severely impaired in npr1-1 npr4-4D than in the sid2-1 mutant, which is deficient in SA biosynthesis. These data suggest that the perception of SID2-independent basal SA levels by NPR1/3/4 makes an essential contribution to plant immune activation.

The authors also addressed the role of NPR1 and NPR3/4 in SA homeostasis and found that basal levels of conjugated forms such as hydroxylated SA and pathogen-induced glycosylated SA, but not free SA levels, were severely reduced in the npr1-1 npr4-4D double mutant. SA- and pathogen-triggered induction of genes involved in SA hydroxylation and glycosylation was abolished in npr1-1 npr4-4D, compared to a mere reduction of expression in the single mutants. Thus, the NPR1- and NPR3/4-dependent SA perception pathways may regulate SA catabolism in parallel.

The study by Liu et al. (2020) provides a thorough analysis of the contribution of SA signaling through NPR1 and NPR3/4 to local and systemic defense responses and indicates that most SA-triggered immune responses in plants require both types of SA receptors (see figure).

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.20.00848

  • ↵[OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chen, Y.-C.,
    2. Holmes, E.C.,
    3. Rajniak, J.,
    4. Kim, J.-G.,
    5. Tang, S.,
    6. Fischer, C.R.,
    7. Mudgett, M.B.,
    8. Sattely, E.S.
    (2018). N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid is a mobile metabolite that induces systemic disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115: E4920–E4929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ding, Y.,
    2. Sun, T.,
    3. Ao, K.,
    4. Peng, Y.,
    5. Zhang, Y.,
    6. Li, X.,
    7. Zhang, Y.
    (2018). Opposite roles of salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in transcriptional regulation of plant immunity. Cell 173: 1454–1467.e15.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Hartmann, M.,
    2. Zeier, T.,
    3. Bernsdorff, F.,
    4. Reichel-Deland, V.,
    5. Kim, D.,
    6. Hohmann, M.,
    7. Scholten, N.,
    8. Schuck, S.,
    9. Bräutigam, A.,
    10. Hölzel, T.,
    11. Ganter, C.,
    12. Zeier, J.
    (2018). Flavin monooxygenase-generated N-hydroxypipecolic acid is a critical element of plant systemic immunity. Cell 173: 456–469.e16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Liu, Y., et al.
    (2020). Diverse roles of the salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in plant immunity. Plant Cell 32: 4002–4016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Zones of Defense? SA Receptors Have It Under Control
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Zones of Defense? SA Receptors Have It Under Control
Hanna Hõrak
The Plant Cell Dec 2020, 32 (12) 3658-3659; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00848

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Zones of Defense? SA Receptors Have It Under Control
Hanna Hõrak
The Plant Cell Dec 2020, 32 (12) 3658-3659; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00848
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 32 (12)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 32, Issue 12
Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • Hold Me, Fold Me...or Not!
  • Slice and Dice: DCL2 Mediates the Production of 22-Nucleotide siRNAs that Influence Trait Variation in Soybean
  • How to Eat One’s Feelings: Autophagy and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate
Show more IN BRIEF

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire