Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Plant Cell
  • Other Publications
    • Plant Physiology
    • The Plant Cell
    • Plant Direct
    • The Arabidopsis Book
    • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
    • ASPB
    • Plantae
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Plant Cell

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Preview Papers
  • About
    • Editorial Board and Staff
    • About the Journal
    • Terms & Privacy
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Contact Us
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow PlantCell on Twitter
  • Visit PlantCell on Facebook
  • Visit Plantae
CorrectionCorrection
You have accessRestricted Access

CORRECTION

Published June 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.20.00239

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Ho, W.W.H., Weigel, D. (2014). Structural Features Determining Flower-Promoting Activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell 26: 552–564.

During the assembly of Supplemental Figure 7 and Figure 8, six luciferase images of individual leaves were inadvertently duplicated. These images served to illustrate the strength of interactions between FT and TFL1 proteins and their mutant variants with GRF and TCP proteins, as measured qualitatively in split luciferase assays and in support of independent, quantitative yeast-two-hybrid experiments. The authors went back to the original photographs, and prepared a corrected version that contains the correct images for the six duplicated leaves. Figure 8 shows a subset of the leaves shown in Supplemental Figure 7; corrections for both figures are shown below.

The figures are referred to twice in the text:

“As expected, FT, TFL1, the TFL-1–like FT mutant Q140K as well as the FT mutant Q140D, which is predicted to have the same surface charge as native FT, all interacted similarly well with several 14-3-3/GRF proteins and with FD (Figures 7 and 8; Supplemental Figure 7).”

Figure 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8

(original). Bimolecular luciferase complementation assays.

Young but fully expanded 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves were strictly chosen for infiltration. Experiments were repeated twice. Complete set of assay results is shown in Supplemental Figure 7.

Note added in correction: Leaves surrounded by heavy lines and numbered in gray indicate images that were correctly assigned. Leaves surrounded by light lines and numbered in red indicate images that were duplicated and which are replaced in the corrected version.

Supplemental Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Supplemental Figure 7

(original). Bimolecular luciferase complementation assays.

Young but fully expanded 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves were strictly chosen for infiltration. Experiments were repeated twice. A selection of TCP interactions is shown in Figure 8.

Note added in correction: Leaves surrounded by heavy lines and numbered in gray indicate images that were correctly assigned. Leaves surrounded by light lines and numbered in red indicate images that were duplicated and which are replaced in the corrected version.

“The same trends were observed in qualitative assays using bimolecular luminescence complementation assays in N. benthamiana (Figure 8; Supplemental Figure 7).”

These descriptions of the experiments remain correct.

Versions of the original Supplemental Figure 7 and of the original Figure 8 in which the duplications are indicated are shown below. Leaves surrounded by heavy lines and numbered in gray indicate images that were correctly assigned. Leaves surrounded by light lines and numbered in red indicate images that were duplicated and which are replaced in the corrected versions of Supplemental Figure 7 and Figure 8.

Figure 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8

(corrected). Bimolecular luciferase complementation assays.

Young but fully expanded 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves were strictly chosen for infiltration. Experiments were repeated twice. Complete set of assay results is shown in Supplemental Figure 7.

Leaves surrounded by light lines and numbered in red indicate the images that were corrected compared to the original.

Supplemental Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Supplemental Figure 7

(corrected). Bimolecular luciferase complementation assays.

Young but fully expanded 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves were strictly chosen for infiltration. Experiments were repeated twice. A selection of TCP interactions is shown in Figure 8.

Leaves surrounded by light lines and numbered in red indicate the images that were corrected compared to the original.

All the original photographs from which the leaves of all experiments were extracted, including a table with a key to the images, are available at https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.h9w0vt4fh. The experiments affected by the duplication are highlighted in red in this table.

The authors apologize for these errors.

Note: This correction was reviewed by members of The Plant Cell editorial board. The authors are responsible for providing a complete listing and accurate explanations for all known errors or instances of inappropriate data handling or image manipulation associated with the original publication.

Footnotes

  • www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.20.00239

PreviousNext
Back to top

Table of Contents

Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Plant Cell.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CORRECTION
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Plant Cell
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Plant Cell web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CORRECTION
The Plant Cell Jun 2020, 32 (6) 2043-2047; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00239

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
CORRECTION
The Plant Cell Jun 2020, 32 (6) 2043-2047; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.20.00239
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

In this issue

The Plant Cell: 32 (6)
The Plant Cell
Vol. 32, Issue 6
Jun 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS

More in this TOC Section

  • CORRECTION
  • CORRECTION
  • CORRECTION
Show more CORRECTIONS

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Plant Cell Preview
  • Archive
  • Teaching Tools in Plant Biology
  • Plant Physiology
  • Plant Direct
  • Plantae
  • ASPB

For Authors

  • Instructions
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Editorial Board and Staff
  • Policies
  • Recognizing our Authors

For Reviewers

  • Instructions
  • Peer Review Reports
  • Journal Miles
  • Transfer of reviews to Plant Direct
  • Policies

Other Services

  • Permissions
  • Librarian resources
  • Advertise in our journals
  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Plant Biologists

Powered by HighWire