Table 1.

Complementation of wus-1 Mutant Flowers with Promoter Truncations and Internal Deletion Constructs

Whorl
ConstructSepalsPetalsStamensCarpelsn
HindBst4.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.3 ± 0.42.0 ± 020
FspBst4.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.6 ± 0.52.0 ± 020
ApaBst4.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.8 ± 0.42.0 ± 020
ScaBst4.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.9 ± 0.32.0 ± 020
Δ14.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.7 ± 0.52.0 ± 020
Δ24.0 ± 04.0 ± 04.5 ± 1.21.3 ± 0.820
Δ34.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.9 ± 0.42.0 ± 020
Δ44.0 ± 04.0 ± 05.9 ± 0.22.0 ± 018
Δ54.5 ± 1.04.4 ± 0.85.1 ± 1.30.1 ± 0.320
wus-1a3.7 ± 0.73.6 ± 0.90.9 ± 0.50.0 ± 053
Ler4.0 ± 04.0 ± 06.0 ± 0.32.0 ± 020
  • The average floral organ number and the sd in n flowers of the line that showed the best complementation are indicated.

  • a Data for wus-1 are taken from Laux et al. (1996).