Table 1.

The Effects of LHS, mom1, and ddm1 on the Transcriptional Activity of Repeats after 0, 2, and 7 d of Recovery

Transcriptional Fold Changesa
Wild-Type LHSbmom1ddm1
TargetORFR0R2R7MockLHS R0MockLHS R0
COPIA78Multiple+++++++++0+++0+++
GUS (L5)++++++++++++++++++
TSIMultiple+++++++++++++++++
IG/LINEAt5g27845+++++0+++++0+++
soloLTR++++0++++++0+++
MULE2At2g15800+++00++++++++++++
ATHILAMultiple+++0++++++++++
HPT (A-line)++00+n.d.+++n.d.
180-bpMultiple++00+++++++++
CYP40At2g15790+00++++
ATLANTYS2AAt3g60930+000++++
IS112AAt5g35490+++++
COPIA4IAt4g16870c0--+++
TA11At1g729200+0-00
GP2NLTRAt2g150400+0-00
  • R, recovery; ORF, open reading frame; n.d., not determined.

  • a qRT-PCR data: +++, >400; ++, 40 to 400; +, 4 to 40; 0, −2 to 4; -, −4 to −2; −, −8 to −4.

  • b Two different wild types (WT and WT2) were included to match the different mutants as closely as possible. Unless stated otherwise, expression of the target did not differ significantly, and they are shown together.

  • c −2 to 4 for WT2.